Archive for June, 2017

Jeremy Corbyn’s surprise success tapped into an anti-elite sentiment, but he’s no Donald Trump – Washington Post

Jeremy Corbyn seems to have pulled off the impossible. Britain's prime minister, Theresa May, called an early election just seven weeks ago, and at the time, Corbyn was seen as having no chance at getting even a half-respectable result. His left-wing Labour Party lagged as much as 20 points behind May's right-wing Conservatives.Even members of his own party warned ofa historic defeat.

And yet, asBritons voted Thursday, it became evident that something had changed. Corbyn had clear momentum. In the end, he was able to not onlyquash May's dreams of bolstering her slim majority in Parliament but to gain Labour seats. The Conservatives have now been forced into an unstable minority government with help fromNorthern Irish unionists to pass legislation. While May is staying in office for now, in the medium term, her chances of remaining at 10 Downing Street look dim.

Whenconsidering Corbyn's polling numbers over the past few weeks, it's tempting for Americans to look at another recent electoral upset by an underdog closer to home: Donald Trump.

Thecomparison is appropriate in some ways. Both politicians have tapped into anger at the status quo, a feeling that can be observed around much of the world.

Jeremy Corbyn represented a challenge to the government, saidBen Page, chief executive of the polling firm Ipsos MORI, adding that Labour's platform spoke to an anti-elite anxiety as widespread in Britain aselsewhere. One unnamed Corbyn aide even told Politicothis year that the Labour leader planned to copy media strategies from the Trumpplaybook.

But big differences in the political landscape, not to mention the candidates themselves, limit such comparisons. Corbyn's electoral success can also be read as a backlash to Britain's rightward swing in recent years, including last summer's vote to leave the European Union. He has some anti-establishment rhetoric, yes, but that rhetoric and the support it attracts are distinct from the ethos of Brexit or Trump.

As politicians, Corbyn and Trumpdo share some similarities. Both are roughly the same age but entered mainstream politics only recently. They grew their support through social media and rallies, while facing ridicule from the political elite and media outlets. At certain points, they have sharedsome views on international affairs, criticizing foreign intervention and the logic of NATO. And both Corbyn and Trump stand accused of making unrealistic promises on the campaign trail but ultimatelyperformed better than expected against more established female politicians (though both Corbyn's Labour and Trump received fewer votes than their rivals).

The contrasts in the two men's backgrounds far outweigh the similarities, however. Corbyn is an old-school British leftist who cut his teeth in the antinuclear protests of the 1980s. Trump is a real estate developerturned reality television star who made his political career by suggesting that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya. While Corbyn was riding his bike to work in Parliament, Trump was flying between resorts in a personally branded private jet.

These different backgrounds are reflected in their ideologies. The British politician has a dogmatic view of social democratic policies and has spent decades in that ideological world. Trump's political views seem to be malleable: A former Democrat, he is now a Republican who enjoys the support of the far-right fringe. Though Corbynwas once a leftist Euroskeptic, he campaigned for Britain to remain in the European Union last year. Meanwhile, Trump dubbed himself Mr. Brexit and formed a personal bond with Nigel Farage, the former leader of the anti-Europe, right-wing U.K. Independence Party.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/video/world/conservatives-lose-majority-in-british-parliament-calls-for-may-to-resign/2017/06/09/e0352cd2-4cdd-11e7-987c-42ab5745db2e_video.html

There is little possibility of warm personal ties developing between Corbyn and Trump. While May has been keen to present herself as one of the U.S. president's key allies, the Labour leader has criticized Trump frequently.Donald Trump should not be coming to the U.K., he said in February.

But the frustration with political norms that helped Trump in the United States is certainlyevident in Britain, too.Page pointed to the Ipsos Global Trends survey, which compares the attitudes of select countries, including Britain and the United States, on politics and social changes. The survey found last year that more than three-quarters of Brits and Americans believedthat the economy was rigged to favor the rich and powerful. Aslightly lower percentage thought the government does not prioritize their concerns and the concerns of those like them.

British exit polls don't collect the same complicated data that their U.S. peers do, so a full postmortem on how this anti-elite sentiment may have helped Corbyn isn't available yet. But there are some hints in pre-election polls.Chris Curtis, a political researcher with YouGov, notedthat in the final poll conducted this week, 58 percent of Labour supporters suggested that health care was the most important issue facing Britain, compared with 27 percent of Conservative supporters. May was widely accused of being out of touch after telling a nurse that her lack of pay raises was because there was no magic money tree.

Inclear contrast to Trump, who received support from significant numbers of older voters, under Corbyn Labour is believed to have found more younger supporters in part because of dramatic promises such asCorbyn's pledge to abolish tuition fees at British universities. Registered-voter turnout is reported to have risen to 69 percent for this election. We believe it will have rose proportionally among the young, said Page, adding that most of these young voters are likely to have gone to Corbyn.

Whereonce polls missed right-wing voters, now they ran the risk of missing younger left-leaning voters, Page said. Many of these voters were frustrated by the past seven years of Conservative rule. Britain was once politically divided by its class system, he added, but now we are a country divided by generations. Another factor was that after years of political fragmentation, Britain appears to be returning to a two-party system meaning a distinctly left-wing Labour may be regaining some voters who began supporting the more centrist Liberal Democrats a little over a decade ago.

The biggest similarity between Corbyn and Trump may not have been their campaigns or their support, but their opponents. In the United States,some analysts criticized Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton for running a lackluster and arrogant campaign against her underestimated, upstart rival.In Britain, much of Corbyn's success is being attributed to May's failures.

People went into this election with a very strong impression of Theresa May, Curtis said, then she ran a campaign that really went against her chief strengths. Instead ofoffering an impression of strong and stable leadership, Mayappeared weak and wobbly on the campaign trail. That failure may havehelped the initially unpopular Corbyn with the fastest and most incredible shift we've seen since YouGov started polling, Curtis said.

More on WorldViews

After last years Brexit vote, younger Britons look to turn the tide

View original post here:
Jeremy Corbyn's surprise success tapped into an anti-elite sentiment, but he's no Donald Trump - Washington Post

DUP Wikipedia page locked to stop people pointing out the party doesn’t believe in dinosaurs – Metro


Metro
DUP Wikipedia page locked to stop people pointing out the party doesn't believe in dinosaurs
Metro
The DUP's Wikipedia page has been locked down after people edited it to point out that the party doesn't believe in dinosaurs. Theresa May just announced that she is forming a minority government supported by the Democratic Unionist Party, an extremely ...

and more »

More:
DUP Wikipedia page locked to stop people pointing out the party doesn't believe in dinosaurs - Metro

I-Team: Crime scene investigator shows up in middle of night, 36 hours after crime – fox8.com

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

CLEVELAND-- The FOX 8 I TEAM is digging into why a Cleveland crime scene investigator got to a home break-in at 1:30 a.m., 36 hours after a call to police.

It happened this week near W 140th and Lorain.

At midday Wednesday, Michael Jedd found someone had broken into the house he shares with his wife. They called again and again, and a report shows a patrol officer finally took a report the next day.

But, no one came to collect evidence until 36 hours had passed, and it was the middle of the night.

Jedd said, "That's just ridiculous. I mean, come on. You gotta have better sense than that. Don't send a fingerprint guy at my house at 1:30 in the morning when I'm asleep, gotta wake up the next day for work."

A card left by police says someone came by to gather evidence at 1:30 in the morning. No one was home. But the bedroom is just a few feet away from the front door. The Jedds say they were home and never heard knocking.

Councilman Brian Kazy said, "Not only are these residents victims of a crime, but it almost seems like they're becoming victims again through the SIU (scientific investigation) unit."

Kazy introduced us to a man who said someone broke into his home, and he had to wait 5 days for Clevelands CSI. And the Cleveland Police union has said repeatedly staffing in the crime scene investigation area is frequently a problem.

In Michael Jedds case, Cleveland Police refused to provide someone to speak to the I TEAM on camera. But the chiefs office sent an email saying a patrol car was sent out the day of the crime although not for 8 hours. That officer found no one around when he got there. As for the visit by the crime scene unit at 1:30 AM, the chiefs office said in a statement, Unless notified of special circumstances, SIU responds at first availability.

Jedd says, "Figure something out where all calls are met in a reasonable amount of time no matter what priority they are.

The city has said it is hiring more officers with a new tax increase. Councilman Kazy says its time to look at staffing with both patrol and evidence gathering.

41.499320 -81.694361

More:
I-Team: Crime scene investigator shows up in middle of night, 36 hours after crime - fox8.com

All We Need Is Love … and Deportations – Ann Coulter – Townhall – Townhall

|

Posted: Jun 08, 2017 10:46 AM

In Britain, as in the U.S., when an Islamic terrorist is said to be "known to law enforcement," the translation is: "He is being actively ignored by law enforcement."

After the latest terrorist attack in Britain -- at least as of this writing -- Prime Minister Theresa May bravely announced, "Enough is enough!"

What is the point of these macho proclamations after every terrorist attack? Nothing will be done to stop the next attack. Political correctness prohibits us from doing anything that might stop it.

Poland doesn't admit Muslims: It has no terrorism. Japan doesn't admit Muslims: It has no terrorism. The United Kingdom and the United States used to have very few Muslims: They used to have almost no terrorism. (One notable exception was chosen as the National Freedom Hero in this year's Puerto Rican parade in New York!)

Notwithstanding the lovely Muslim shopkeeper who wouldn't hurt a fly, everyone knows that with every tranche of peace-loving Muslims we bring in, we're also getting some number of stone-cold killers.

Former Prime Minister Tony Blair dumped millions of Third World Muslims on Britain to force "multiculturalism" on the country. Now Britons are living with the result. Since the 9/11 attack, every U.S. president has done the same. President Bush admitted Muslim immigrants at a faster pace after 9/11 than we had been doing before 9/11.

Whatever the 9/11 attackers intended to accomplish, I bet they didn't expect that.

Now we can't get rid of them. Under the rules of political correctness, Western countries are prohibited from even pausing our breakneck importation of Muslims, much less sending the recent arrivals home.

In defense of the poor saps responding to every terrorist attack with flowers, candles and hashtags, they have no ability to do anything else. Western leaders are in full possession of the tools to end Islamic terrorism in their own countries, just as their forebears once ended Nazi Stormtroopers.

Unable to summon the backbone to defeat the current enemy, the West is stuck constantly reliving that glorious time when they whipped the Nazis. In almost every Western country -- except the one with an increasingly beleaguered First Amendment -- it's against the law to deny the Holocaust.

Are we really worried about a resurgence of Nazism? Isn't Islamic terrorism a little higher on our "immediate problems" list? How about making it illegal to make statements in support of ISIS, al-Qaida, female genital mutilation, Sharia law or any act of terrorism?

The country with a First Amendment can't do that -- the most that amendment allows us to do is ban conservative speakers from every college campus in the nation.

But if our elected representatives really cared about stopping the next terrorist attack, instead of merely "watching" those on the "watch" list, they'd deport them.

To this day, we have a whole office at the Department of Justice dedicated to finding and deporting Nazis even without proof they personally committed crimes against Jews. But we can't manage to deport hearty young Muslims who post love notes to ISIS on their Facebook pages.

If the Clinton administration had merely enforced laws on the books against an Afghani immigrant, Mir Seddique Mateen, and excluded him based on his arm-length list of terrorist affiliations, his son, Omar, wouldn't have been around to slaughter 49 people at an Orlando nightclub last year.

If Secretary of State John Kerry, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson or anyone else in our vaunted immigration vetting system had done his job, Pakistani Tashfeen Malik never would have been admitted to this country to commit mass murder in San Bernardino a year after she arrived. Before being warmly welcomed by the U.S., Malik's social media posts were bristling with hatred of America and enthusiasm for jihad.

We're already paying a battery of FBI agents to follow every Muslim refugee around the country. When they find out that one of them lists his hobby as "jihad," we need them to stop watching and start deporting.

Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, the rest of the useless GOP -- and obviously every Democrat -- have the blood of the next terrorist attack on their hands if they don't make crystal clear that admiring remarks about Islamic terrorism is a deportable act.

But they won't do it. That's "not who we are," as Ryan famously said.

True, most Muslims are peaceful. Guess what? Most Nazis were peaceful! We didn't knock ourselves out to admit as many of them as we could, screening out only the Nazis convicted of mass murder.

Before we were even formally involved in World War II, the FBI was all over the German American Bund. No one worried about upsetting our German neighbors. (Perhaps because they knew these were Germans and wouldn't start bombing things and shooting people.)

But today, our official position is: Let's choose love so as not to scare our Muslim neighbors. Isn't that precisely what we want to do? Facing an immobile government, two British men -- by which I mean British men -- were sentenced to PRISON for putting bacon on a mosque in Bristol last year. One died in prison just after Christmas, an ancient religious holiday recently replaced by Ramadan.

If we can't look askance at Muslims without committing a hate crime, can't we at least stop admitting ever more "refugees," some percentage of whom are going to be terrorists and 100 percent of whom will consume massive amounts of government resources?

No, that's "not who we are."

Until any Western leader is willing to reduce the number of Muslims in our midst, could they spare us the big talk? "We surrender" would at least have the virtue of honesty.

Read the original post:
All We Need Is Love ... and Deportations - Ann Coulter - Townhall - Townhall

2 Black Teachers Arrested For Not Only … – Tommy Sotomayor

Ann Marie Shelvin and Tracy Gallow

The 11-year-old girl was relentlessly bullied. And the culprit, police say, were her teachers.

One of them told the girl to go kill herself and threatened to fail other students if they didnt fight the girl, police said. And when that teacher was removed from the classroom, a second teacher allegedly kept up the abuse.The two Louisiana teachers, Ann Marie Shelvin and Tracy Gallow, now face criminal charges.

St. Landry Parish Sheriff Bobby Guidroz said he learned of the accusations back in February after the girls mother filed a complaint. The mother returned to the sheriffs office in April to say the abuse was continuing.

Deputies said Shelvin, a teacher at Washington Elementary, threatened to fail three of her students if they didnt fight the girl. She also allegedly told the bullied girl to go and kill herself.

In a police report obtained by CNN, a student involved in the incident told deputies that Shelvin forced her to start a fight that resulted in several students sent to the principals office.

The student said she was told if she didnt fight the girl, Shelvin would refuse to help her with her class work just like she refuses to help the 11-year-old, the report said.The student told deputies she was scared shed be treated like the bullied girl if she didnt comply.

Shelvin was eventually removed from the school and Gallow, a former teachers aide, took over her class. The girls mother told police that Gallow retaliated against the girl for reporting Shelvin to the principal.

School surveillance cameras caught Gallow pushing the girl onto the school bleachers on two occasions, the sheriffs office said. When questioned by police, Gallow admitted pushing the student because she felt the girl was too upset to go start her testing.

A school board official, Anthony Stanberry told CNN affiliate KLFY is disturbed by the news and is promising swift action.

As a St. Landry Parish school board member, St. Landry Parish is not going to tolerate it, Anthony Stanberry, an official, told KLFY. Whatever actions needs to be taken care of to handle the situation is what we plan to do.

The school district said it is investigating the allegations.

We want to assure the school community that we take these allegations very seriously and we are doing everything to protect the health, safety and welfare of our students, St. Landry Parish School Board supervisor of personnel Matthew Scroggins said.

Sheriff Guidroz says the mother did the right thing by reporting the bullying to the school board.

Students should not have to attend school and be bullied especially by teachers that are there for their education, guidance and safety, he said. The teachers are charged with malfeasance in office, intimidation and interference in school operations.

Go here to read the rest:
2 Black Teachers Arrested For Not Only ... - Tommy Sotomayor