Archive for June, 2017

House Democrat From California Seeks Support to Impeach Trump – New York Times


New York Times
House Democrat From California Seeks Support to Impeach Trump
New York Times
WASHINGTON Representative Brad Sherman, Democrat of California, circulated a proposed article of impeachment on Monday, the first step in a long-shot attempt to oust President Trump. Mr. Sherman's proposed resolution cites the president's decision ...
A House Democrat echoes Watergate in calling for Trump's impeachmentWashington Post
Democrat to bring impeachment to a voteVICE News
Second House Democrat introduces article of impeachment against TrumpWashington Examiner
Roll Call -Raw Story -Yahoo News UK
all 96 news articles »

See more here:
House Democrat From California Seeks Support to Impeach Trump - New York Times

Illinois Democrat introduces ‘Covfefe Act’ to preserve Trump’s social media posts – Washington Examiner

Rep. Mike Quigley has introduced the "COVFEFE Act" to amend the Presidential Records Act so that President Trump's social media posts are preserved after he leaves the White House.

The bill name stands for Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically for Engagement, or COVFEFE.

"In order to maintain public trust in government, elected officials must answer for what they do and say; this includes 140-character tweets," Quigley, D-Ill., said in a statement. "President Trump's frequent, unfiltered use of his personal Twitter account as a means of official communication is unprecedented. If the president is going to take to social media to make sudden public policy proclamations, we must ensure that these statements are documented and preserved for future reference. Tweets are powerful, and the president must be held accountable for every post."

Quigley's act clarifies that Trump's personal Twitter account should be archived in the same manner as the official @POTUS account. Quigley's legislation would also ensure that deleted tweets are kept.

It was from Trump's personal account that the president coined the term, "covfefe," an apparent misspelling of "coverage" in a tweet he used to complain about the press.

View post:
Illinois Democrat introduces 'Covfefe Act' to preserve Trump's social media posts - Washington Examiner

Robert Mueller Stocks Staff with Democrat Donors – LifeZette

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich sparked a mini-meltdown in the media Monday with a tweet challenging the fairness of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Gingrich, who alsoappeared on The Laura Ingraham Show, pointed to the early hires special counsel Robert Mueller has made.

Republicans are delusional if they think the special counsel is going to be fair, he tweeted. Look who he is hiring.check fec [sic] reports. Time to rethink.

He's not wrong about the donations. Four top lawyers hired by Mueller have contributed tens of thousands of dollars over the years to the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates, including former President Barack Obama and President Donald Trump's 2016 opponent, Hillary Clinton.

One of the hires, Jeannie Rhee, also worked as a lawyer for the Clinton Foundation and helped persuade a federal judge to block a conservative activist's attempts to force Bill and Hillary Clinton to answer questions under oath about operations of the family-run charity.

Campaign-finance reports show that Rhee gave Clinton the maximum contributions of $2,700 in 2015 and again last year to support her presidential campaign. She also donated $2,300 to Obama in 2008 and $2,500 in 2011. While still at the Justice Department, she gave $250 to the Democratic National Committee Services Corp.

Rhee also has contributed to a trio of Democratic senators: Mark Udall of New Mexico, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.

James Quarles, who worked on the Watergate investigation as a young prosecutor, has an even longer history of supporting Democratic politicians. He gave $1,300 to Obama in 2007 and $2,300 in 2008. He also gave $2,700 to Clinton last year.

He has supported a numberof other Democratic candidates, including Van Hollen, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), former Rep. John Spratt (D-S.C.), former Vice President Al Gore, 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry, former Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), and Colorado congressional candidate Gail Schwartz.

In addition, Quarles gave money to former Sen. John Walsh (D-Mont.) and three current Democratic senators Ron Wyden of Oregon, Ed Markey of Massachusetts, and Robert Menendez of New Jersey. He chipped in $300 to the DNC Services Corp. $300 in 2012.

Quarles did donate toa couple of GOP politicians $250 to then-Sen. George Allen (R-Va.) in 2006 and $2,500 to Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) in 2015.

Andrew Weissmann, a former Justice Department lawyer who now is at Jenner & Block, contributed $2,300 to Obama in 2008 and $2,000 to the DNC Services Corp. in 2006. Weissmann served as chief of the Justice Department's criminal fraud section and worked on the Enron fraud case.

A fourth lawyer on Mueller's staff, Michael Dreeben, donated $1,000 to Clinton 2006 and $250 to Obama in both 2007 and 2008. He was deputy solicitor general and has appeared many times before the Supreme Court.

Media pundits generally dismissed concerns over the Democratic Party ties of the staff Mueller is building. Several Trump critics noted that Gingrich previously had tweeted that Mueller was a "superb choice to be special counsel" and that his reputation was "impeccable for honesty and integrity."

Journalist Paul Vale, who has written for the Huffington Post and The Times of London, tweeted, "Boiled cabbage Gingrich lays out the White House plan to discredit career lawman Mueller all in the service of his babbling paymaster."

CNN anchor John King on Monday asked the network's chief congressional correspondent, Manu Raju, if it should be a concern.

"No, because Bob Mueller is the one who's in charge of this investigation and will ultimately decide how to proceed, and there is some oversight over him by [Deputy Attorney General] Rod Rosenstein, even though there is a special counsel," he said.

See the rest here:
Robert Mueller Stocks Staff with Democrat Donors - LifeZette

Top Democrat Joins Push Against Trump’s Saudi Arms Deal – HuffPost

WASHINGTON Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), the highest-ranking Democrat in the Senate, will vote to block President Donald Trumps plan to ship over $500 million of precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia, his office told HuffPost Monday.

Schumers decision makes him the most powerful supporter of a resolution of disapproval from Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Al Franken (D-Minn.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) that isdesigned to show U.S. condemnation for the Saudis controversial role in a bloody civil war in Yemen.

I will support Senator Murphys resolution of disapproval.The human rights and humanitarian concerns have been well documented and are important, Schumer said Monday. Of equal concern to me is that the Saudi government continues to aid and abet terrorism via its relationship with [a hard-line school of Islam known as] Wahhabism and the funding of schools that spread extremist propaganda throughout the world.

Schumers announcement is the clearest sign yet that senators may successfully push back on the sale, after afailed attemptto block a U.S.-Saudi tank sale last fall. Schumer did notsupportthat effort by Murphy and his partners. (In an email to HuffPost, an aide said that previous deal did not cover weapons to be used in Yemen.)

Two other top Democrats who opposed last years motion are also on board this year: Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), the ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the ranking member on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The Obama administration initially approved the Saudi weapons transfer, but then put it on hold. Last month, Trump lifted the hold as part of a planned $110 billion package for Saudi Arabia. While the Trump administration can green-light such a shipment, senators also have an opportunity to vote to disapprove of it. If they do so, the deal would likely be delayed as the House considers whether to vote as well. Trump could eventually have to use his presidential veto to ensure the sale goes through.

General Democratic unity against the sale now seems likely. Its a win-win: a way for legislators to show opposition to Trump, who has pulled the Saudis close, and to burnish their humanitarian credentials.

The key for activists trying to pressure Saudi Arabia will now be convincing more red-state Democrats, like Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), and Iran hawk Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) to join the cause. They also hope to win over some Republicans who have been willing to take stances on human rights issues, like Sens. Todd Young (R-Ind.) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.)

Senators are expected to vote Tuesday afternoon on the resolution to disapprove of the sale, a congressional aide told HuffPost.Activists say even gaining one more vote than they did on last years motion would be a win because it would send a powerful signal to the Saudis.The U.S. relationship with the country rarely faces serious official criticism.

The resolution comes as the Saudis continue to fight in Yemen, where they and allies in a U.S.-backed coalition, including the United Arab Emirates, are responsible for thousands of civilian deaths and a worsening cholera outbreak.

All the while, the Saudis, the U.A.E. and others are isolating Qatar, a U.S. partner nation that hosts the biggest American base in the region. Tuesdays vote would give the Senate a rare chance to weigh in on the actions of the U.S.-dependent kingdom.

The rest is here:
Top Democrat Joins Push Against Trump's Saudi Arms Deal - HuffPost

KING: Every Democrat in America should support Medicare for All – New York Daily News

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Updated: Monday, June 12, 2017, 2:05 PM

In a recent poll from the health insurance industry, only 8% of Americans actually want the United States Senate to pass the terrible Trumpcare bill, also known as the Affordable Health Care Act, that the House passed a few weeks ago.

That's about as bad as it gets not just for a health care poll, but for anything. Have you ever seen a movie on Rotten Tomatoes with a score of 8%? Hell, even the new Baywatch movie has a 20% on Rotten Tomatoes. In fact, there's not a major movie out in theaters right now with a Rotten Tomatoes score of less than 10%. Nobody likes Trumpcare. Tens of millions of everyday people will lose their health insurance, rates will skyrocket for America's seniors, and pre-existing conditions will become a problem again.

Republicans, so hell-bent on destroying Obamacare for the past eight years, never really bothered to do the hard work of coming up with a better plan that lowers costs and insures more people. They've got nothing. In fact, what they are proposing is worse than nothing.

So it's great that Democrats are blasting it every chance they get, but constantly criticizing it isn't enough. We have a health care crisis in America. Everyday people are struggling to afford good coverage, and premiums and co-pays are kicking our butts. That's why smart, compassionate local Democrats across the country aren't just blasting Trumpcare, they are proposing Medicare for All.

Trump brings 'victims' of Obamacare to talk to Senate Republicans

With a groundswell of grassroots support from unions like National Nurses United, the California State Senate has passed a Medicare for All bill that is now awaiting a signature from Gov. Jerry Brown. An astounding 70% of Californians, including 53% of Republicans there, support the bill. Other polls show 60% of all Americans now support health care coverage for all Americans. That's what this country wants not Trumpcare.

Every single Democrat in the country would be smart to divert at least half of their energy away from blasting Trumpcare to fighting for Medicare for All. If it becomes law in California, that will change the game for the entire country. For the third year in a row, a similar Medicare for All bill has passed the New York State Assembly. Nevada is getting closer to its own plan to open up Medicare for All there.

Many wealthy developed nations in the world have universal health care with 100% enrollment. We can have that. We should have that. And don't believe the lie about how we can't afford universal health care no nation in the world spends more money on health care and prescription drugs than we do right now. The United States spends nearly 20% of its entire GDP on health care also the highest rate in the developed world.

Now is the time to propose bold solutions. Donald Trump and every single conservative who supports him should be roundly criticized, but Americans need hope. Americans don't just need a villain to fight against, they need a cause to fight for and Medicare for All can and should be a principled part of that fight.

New York's Obamacare insurers call for 16% rate increase

More than 110 Democrats in the House are currently co-sponsoring a Medicare for All bill created by Congressman John Conyers. That's the most ever to support Medicare for All in the House, and represents a majority of 193 members of the House Democratic Caucus, but it begs the question what about the other Democrats in the House who aren't yet on record as supporting Medicare for All? What are they waiting on? And what about the Democrats in the Senate?

I'd like to see how much money the Democrats who are holding out their support for Medicare for All are receiving from the health insurance and prescription drug industries and lobbies. The reform is about as popular as it gets among rank and file Democrats so the lack of support from some elected officials is puzzling at best.

As Trump's approval ratings continue to tank and the country unites around our desire to see him leave office, we must use this rare moment in time where people are deeply hungry for systemic change to make our fight not just about personalities, but about policies. Medicare for All is the biggest, boldest, best idea we've got right now. Rallying behind it just makes sense.

See more here:
KING: Every Democrat in America should support Medicare for All - New York Daily News