Archive for March, 2017

Another 180 Nigerians expected home from Libya tomorrow – BusinessDay (satire) (press release) (registration) (blog)

Dabiri-Erewa disclosed this when she received the Federal Commissioner, National Commission for Refugees, Migrants and Internally Displaced Persons Commission, Alhaja Sadiya Farouk in Abuja on Friday.This set will be the third batch of Nigerians to return from Libya to the country in one month.

One hundred and sixty one Nigerians returned from Libya on Feb.14 and another set of 171 returned on Feb. 16.

The presidential aide said the Federal Government was expecting more migrants back in the country and attributed the development to the current happenings around the world.

She said her office would therefore be working with the commission to sensitise Nigerians on the need to avoid irregular migration.

Your visit is timely because we expect more migrants back home.

In fact, 180 Nigerians are expected back from Libya on Tuesday.

With what is going on around the world, it is going to be worse. We will work with your commission to continue to sensitise Nigerians on the need for them to know that some places are not just worth it, she said.

In her remarks, Farouk commended Dabiri-Erewa for her efforts toward ensuring that Nigerians in diaspora were treated with dignity.

She condemned the xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in South Africa and pledged her commissions commitment to a sustained advocacy to end such unwarranted attacks.

The federal commissioner promised to work with Dabiri-Erewa to educate Nigerians on the dangers of irregular migration.

She said: These programmes will better inform Nigerians on their options, so they can make informed decision and develop realistic expectations when traveling outside the country.

It is important to note that the issue of sensitisation is an offshoot of the National Migration Dialogue.

The dialogue highlighted the need to establish a migration desk in all states and local governments which will provide sensitisation from the grassroots level in order to curb the root causes of irregular migration.

According to her, the commission has also developed return, re-admission and reintegration programme which provides referrals to settlement services for returnees.

Farouk said the commission had also developed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), for the conduct of returnees, readmission and reintegration of Nigerians as part of efforts to further cater for returnees.

What is obtainable is an adhoc approach which is not sustainable.

The SOP when operationalised, will ensure that the returning Nigerian migrants are adequately reintegrated into the society.

The SOP has been validated by the relevant stakeholders but yet to be institutionalised. We therefore seek your partnership to ensure the operationalisation, she said

Here is the original post:
Another 180 Nigerians expected home from Libya tomorrow - BusinessDay (satire) (press release) (registration) (blog)

What is Russia’s thinking on Libya? – Al-Monitor

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (R) meets with Libyan Prime Minister Fayez al-Sarraj in Moscow, March 2, 2017(photo byREUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin)

Author:Vasily Kuznetsov Posted March 5, 2017

The head of Libyas United Nations-backed government, Fayez al-Sarraj, undertook an official visit to Moscow to meet with top Russian diplomats and officials March 2-3. Russia has been stepping up efforts in Libya, which seems baffling outside the wide regional context. There is a popular opinion that Russian foreign policy, including planning in the Middle East, may sometimes be tactically impeccable but lacks strategic thinking. Some believe that unpredictability has been a hallmark of the Kremlin's foreign policy.

Russias revived interest in the Middle East goes back to Vladimir Putins second presidential term (2004-2008), and for a long while the authorities have focused on economic development and the need for most diversified economic ties. Their attitude has been typified by blunt pragmatism.

The well-known discordin 2011 between Dmitry Medvedev, who was then president, and Putin, who was then prime minister,over UN Security CouncilResolution 1973 on Libya may also be illustrative of Russia's pragmatic stance. Russia then abstained from the vote in the Security Council, thus avoiding the image of being the dictator's benefactor and of being engaged in the conflict. At the same time, Putin called the Western policy "a new crusade" while referring to US damage inflicted on Iraq, which was consistent with the assessments that pervaded Russian society.

Neither the Kremlin reshuffle nor the Arab Spring drove Russia to refrain from its reserved pragmatism. Even the 2012-13 rule in Egypt of Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization declared extremist in Russia, did not stand in the way of stronger bilateral ties, even at the top level.

Following the notorious events in Ukraine, which led to a further escalation of tensions with the West, politics and security began to prevail over the economy for Moscow. Still, it failed to devise any clear foreign policy strategy except its own pivot to the East.Even the start of the military operation in Syria in September 2015 did not clarify whether Moscow aspires to replace the United States as a new Middle East hegemon or just uses the region in its contest with Washington. It was a head-scratcher.

The missing strategy seems to be a conscious choice of the ruling political elite rather than a sign of its confusion. Postmodernity is characterized by the absence of a reliable strategy. The United States and Europe's numerous failures in the Middle East testify to the fact, while the ill-fated, futileand disastrous Libyan venture in 2011 is its graphic illustration.

Therefore, the abolition of strategic objectives requires a new analysis of the values and principles of world politics and Russia's place in the world.

Since the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, the Russian political establishment has strongly distrusted the West, as the latter has been manipulating human values to its advantage. The mistrust along with the elite's idiosyncrasy to any ideology thatwas bred in the late Soviet era has conjured up an image of a profoundly cynical capitalist world.

However, the ensuing confrontation with the West, whose leaders turned their back on Russia, and the need to identify Russia as an alternative project rather than part of the West have led to deliberations over world politics premisedon Russian historical experience. Theapproach of these deliberations seems to be based on seven principles: Security prevails over development;only stability can provide both security and development as revolutions are always destructive;stability is based on strong state institutions;institutions cannot be imposed from outside, socio-political engineering is inefficient;only a strong sovereign state can deliver security and development;unilateral steps on the world stage are destructive; andinternational law is the only means of creating a sustainable world order.

Looked at in this light, Russia is largely pursuing national security interests in the Middle East. Meanwhile, the events in 2015-17 showed that steps driven by the need to ensure security could produce new interests, with a new stable regional system of international relations being the major one.

This allows for an understanding of both the causes of Russias stepped-up efforts to deal with Libya and Moscows approaches to settling the countrys conflict.

Even though Russias existential interests are not at stake in Libya, one can emphasize four contexts providing rationales for its moves.

First, the list includes Moscows general line aimed at stabilizing the region. Not only does the policy contribute to Russias security, but it also throws into sharp relief its effective and attractive methods.

Second, add to the mixture Russian-Egyptian relations, which requirespecific measures totransform mutual affinity into a solid alliance, with Egypts regional position being strengthened. A weak Egypt, Moscow argues, will further destabilize the Middle East, as historical, geographical and demographic forces have predetermined the countrys key role. Assisting Egypt in handling Libya constitutes a means of bolstering Cairos regime.

Third, the agenda encompasses Russias Mediterranean policy and the countrys ties with European Unionmember states. According to aninformed source, Europe has but once given signals to the Kremlin that the refugee-affected countries are seeking Russias active involvement in Libyas affairs, which in the long run could improve relations between Moscow and Brussels.

At the same time, a friendly or loyal regime in Libya could emerge as part of the Russia-dominated axis of Damascus, Cairo and Tripoli.

Fourth, economic interests of Russian businesses striving to gain a foothold in new markets must also be considered.

All these factors may account for Moscows interest in Libya rather than its marked bias in favor of Gen.Khalifa Hifter. Given the particular episodes in the commanders biography, which should instill mistrust among Russias policymakers, their sympathetic attitude towardHifter is especially awkward.

Yury Barmin, an analyst ofRussias foreign policy in the Middle East,suggests the Kremlin perceives Hifter as a new Col. Moammar Gadhafi. Although Barmin may have a point, the two leaders and the surrounding contexts are strikingly different. Gadhafi hasnever had to forcibly unite the country, with his political system originally resting upon the then most popular ideology in the Arab world. Gadhafi, along with his young supporters, articulated the interests of the most modernized groups of generally traditional society. (Now it is much more modernized.)This does not play into Hifters hands.

Nevertheless, the Libyan marshal may have been chosen as an ally by Cairo rather than Moscow. In this view, it is the dialogue with the former that represents the latters paramount interest. Hifters and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisis ideological affinity, which concentrates on confronting the Muslim Brotherhood, makes them even more attractive to Moscow.

Finally, the Kremlins willingness to act as appropriate, thus refusing to impose its own will, gives another explanation for its focus on Hifter. Indeed, the marshal has objectively proved to be Libyas most powerful figure. Amid the chaos, his personified power makes him more appealing, with individual groups being unreliable and weak. Fierce opposition to Hifter and prioritizing the Government of National Accord mean standing in the way of natural processes and fueling the ongoing war. It is the Wests ideologically driven policies and its reluctance to recognize the imperfect world thatcause Moscows considerable irritation.

However, this does not imply that Russia intends to ignore other Libyan actors. Amid the lack of developed institutions and overmilitarized society, the establishment of a resilient system entails a necessary broad consensus. Given the Syrian experience and Moscows general approaches, one can assume that as a mediator in Libya, the Kremlin will follow a regional track of the conflict resolution involving Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria as the key players.

Read More: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/03/russia-libya-sarraj-foreign-policy-putin-hifter.html

Visit link:
What is Russia's thinking on Libya? - Al-Monitor

Local church replaces vandalized "Black Lives Matter" sign in show of unity – Press of Atlantic City

GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP Members of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation placed a new Black Lives Matter sign outside their church after taking down an old one that was defaced several times.

The members of the predominately white congregation said it was important to replace the sign because the term Black Lives Matter is a way to help build bridges and end the racial divide across the country.

We live in a community of diverse people and we need to recognize that we stand for everyone being included at the table, said the Rev. John Marsh, interim minister at the church. Faith communities live by symbols. This sign is meant to be a religious symbol of inclusion and welcome.

The church installed a Black Lives Matter sign in 2015 but took it down after it was vandalized several times.

Now, the church has put up the new sign and has prepared several more just in case this one has to come down. It also installed security cameras to try and catch anyone who attempts to vandalize the new sign.

Local civil-rights activists who spoke at the church commended its members for standing with the black community.

The Rev. William Williams, pastor at Asbury United Methodist Church in Atlantic City, told the congregation during a prayer service the goal is to build bridges and have a conversation.

He also spoke of educating children about black history and the meaning behind the Black Lives Matter movement in school more than just during the month of February.

Atlantic City Councilman Kaleem Shabazz told the congregation the sign is a bigger deal than most people realize.

This is a tremendous, symbolic gesture of unity, he said. Its more than a sign. Its a symbol of the commitment that this church has to justice and equality. And that is something that is important.

Shabazz said he applauds their courage for putting up the sign.

You can believe that other people will take a cue from you, he said. They may not have the courage to put up a sign, but its going to move them closer to being united.

Visit link:
Local church replaces vandalized "Black Lives Matter" sign in show of unity - Press of Atlantic City

Black Lives Matter Organizers Call For Resignations Of Several Memphis Officials – Local Memphis

Related Headlines

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (localmemphis.com) - Black Lives Matter Memphis is calling for the resignation of several city officials. They claim the local government is creating a hostile environment for people of color. They are also upset about the recent security list at city hall.

Organizers of BLM Memphis have created their own black list, and it includes the names of several officials they want removed from office.

"Here at Black Lives Matter Memphis we have a black list. We asking Amy Weirich resign, Richard Dosier resign, Jennifer Nichols resign, Tom Henderson, Deborah Ferguson resign, Chris Craft resign and James Lamey, says Steven Bradley, Spokesman for Black Lives Matter Memphis.

More than a dozen members stood in front of 201 Poplar Friday demanding to see change in their local government.

We can go on and on and on to deal with these injustices and Ms. Amy Weirichs lack of judgement, lack of facts, and takes into accountability that black lives matter, says Bradley.

Members are also upset about the Memphis City Hall A list and they are demanding for it to be removed.

"It shouldn't have never happened. Mayor Strickland denies the fact that it happened on his campaign. Once he saw the list he should have knocked it out of the way. "

The list initially included Darrius Stewart's mother Mary Stewart, but she was taken off during the revision.

A friend of her family spoke candidly at Friday's presser about her sons death at the hands of a then Memphis police officer, and how the family has still not received any justice.

"Amy Weirich refused to bring charges through a so-called sicken grand jury, says Jennifer Cain. It took you over 120 days to review the TBI port and all of a sudden you come back with a no indictment? I'm not understanding it.

She has 20 days to give her resignation and that is the anniversary of Darrius Stewart, says Bradley.

Darrius Stewart's birthday is in 20 days and the family is still grieving. We reached out to Amy Weirich's office. Her spokesperson, Vince Higgins, says they had no idea about Fridays rally until media started contacting them, and they have no comment.

Black Lives Matter Protest outside 201 Poplar http://www.localmemphis.com/news/local-news/black-lives-matter-organizers-call-for-resignations-of-several-memphis-officials/666310983

Black Live Matters Protest Part 2 http://www.localmemphis.com/news/local-news/black-lives-matter-organizers-call-for-resignations-of-several-memphis-officials/666310983

View original post here:
Black Lives Matter Organizers Call For Resignations Of Several Memphis Officials - Local Memphis

Judge Grants LA Police Commissioner a Restraining Order Against Black Lives Matter Activist – L.A. Weekly

Protester Trevor Gerard at a Black Lives Matter encampment in front of Los Angeles City Hall last summer

Sam Slovick

A judge on Wednesday granted a restraining order to the president of the Los Angeles Police Commission, protecting him against a prominent member of Black Lives Matter L.A. alleged to have engaged in a pattern of stalkingand violent threats.

The city sought the order protecting commission president Matt Johnsonfrom activist Trevor Gerard,identified in court proceedings by his given name of Trevor Ferguson, who is accused of stalking Johnson at his home in Sherman Oaks and at the entertainment law firm where he works in Century City.

Nana Gyamfi, the attorney representing Gerard, said the decision set a troubling precedent, signaling the start of a gradual impingement on the free-speech rights of activists.

For two hours all seats were occupied in the small courtroom, with an audience thatincluded supporters for Gerard and a pair of LAPD officers in suits, who apparently were there providing security for Johnson.

Arguments from the two sides hinged on whether Gerards conduct during two protest demonstrations targeting Johnson at his private residence, and the law firm where he works, constituted legally protected speech or threats intended to frighten the commissioner or his family.

Were dealing with a very thin line here, and the question is was it overstepped, said Superior Court Judge Carol Boas Goodwin.The line, the judge said, was one delineating a protester's rights versus fear directed at the commissioner.

To be granted the restraining order, the city had to show Gerard made threats against Johnson combined with actions that could have reasonably caused the commission president to fear for his safety what is known as cumulative effect.

The court heard testimony from Johnson and from attorney Paul Shapiro, a partner at the entertainment law firm where Johnson works, who testified he encountered Gerard in the law office after the activist rode the elevator up from a protest in the lobby.

Johnson told the court that Gerard frequently attends commission meetings and speaks during the public comment time, making negative comments about the police department and about Johnsons oversight of the department. He will often use derogatory and foul language relating to me, Johnson said."Many times, when I look out into the audience and catch his eye, he will mouth comments," which Johnson alleges have included physical threats.

At prompting from the judge, Johnson enumerated the alleged physical threats as Ill fucking kill you, Ill whip your ass and bitch-ass houseboy.

The judge at one point had the police commission president mouth the alleged threatening words to her on the bench. She said she wasn't able to read his lips.Maybe you should ask him to mouth them, Johnson replied, indicating to Gerard.

The commission is charged with overseeing the LAPD, setting policy and determining whether police use of force was justified. Its meetings are held at LAPD headquarters and upward of 15 officers in uniform attend. Johnson never ordered police to remove Gerard from the room, he said, because it would have caused an undue disruption and delayed commission business.

A fellow L.A. police commissioner,Cynthia McClain-Hill,was subpoenaed in the case and submitted written testimony that she never saw Gerard mouth threats at Johnson.Gerard likewise denied issuing threats of any kind, and said his comments were political speech critical of the commission, which he referred to in court as arubber-stamp body for extreme violence in the community.

Judge Boas Goodwin reviewed transcripts of Gerard's comments at meetings, introduced as evidence byJohnson's lawyer,deputy city attorneyHugo Rossitter. These includeda reference to Johnsons children deemed gratuitous in the court filing for the restraining order. The judge didn't agree, saying that given proper context the statements were understandable as political commentary.

One statement of Gerard's came from the Nov. 1 board meeting: Matt Johnson has four children, one of whom I understand is a boy, he said. God forbid, Matt Johnson, that you ever have to suffer at the hands of men like [LAPD Police Chief] Charlie Beck. ... God forbid you have to sit in this audience and suffer because your boy was just another nigger in the crosshairs.

Judge Boas Goodwin said that the statement doesnt appear to be a threat. He was making a point regarding violence and how black men are dealt with.

In a separate statement, Gerard concluded his comments to the board by stating, When 4 million people realize how fucked up yall are, yall will not be able to stop that tide. And thats coming. And its coming for all of you.

The judge dismissed the relevance of the statement to a restraining order: "It doesnt say coming for you, it says coming for all of you," she said.

Los Angeles Police Commissioner Matthew M. Johnson

CBS Los Angeles

Of greater concern to the judge, however, was the testimony of Paul Shapiro, a co-managing partner at the entertainment law firm where Johnson works.

Shapiro told of the morning of Dec. 17 when a group of about 20 protestersentered the lobby of the office tower where the firm is located.Shapiro described an encounter with Gerard alone on a restricted floor of the office. Gerard, he says, was walking around the floor, carrying a protest flier and asking, "Where is Matt Johnson?"

Johnson was not present at the time.

[Gerard] was emphatic about the fact that we would not remain protected in this building on the floor reserved for members of the firm," Shapiro said, "explaining that my affiliation to Mr. Johnson and the law firm did not absolve me from complicity.

Shapiro says he was "terrified" and was able to convince Gerard to leave, accompanying him on an elevator ride down to the lobby, where the large deployment of LAPD officers restored a "tremendous sense of calm." Eventually,the protesters agreed to remove the demonstration to the sidewalk. No arrests were made.

In an interview with L.A. Weekly after the hearing, Gerard said Shapiro"perjured" himself on the witness stand in his account of that morning.

Nevertheless, the judge told Gerard he was trespassing that day and that his actions inside the law firm were not free speech but rather an act of intimidation, in my view. She asked Gerard if it occurred to him at the time he went up in the elevator that he might be crossing a line."I dont know how to answer that," he said. "It was a protest.

Gyandi argued that protesters around the country go to private homes to demonstrate, and that the president of the police commission is a logical target for those struggling for greater police accountability in L.A.

The protesters had gone to the office to confront Johnson in part over claims he restricts public comment at meetings and on occasion ordered speakers physically removed from the room by police.

The court also heard from Hamid Khan, a community activist who was present at the demonstration in the lobby. Khan said thatthe decision to single out Johnson for protest was political, not personal, and thatthere were other activists attempting to go up in the elevators, in addition to Gerard.

It was a collective decision by people who go to police commission meetings, Khan said of the decision to protest inside the law firm.

At a separate demonstration the following day, on Dec. 18, protesters targeted Johnson's private residence. Agroup of about 14 approached the gated house on the sidewalk. Gerard says the main purpose of the action was to hand out fliers against Johnson (the flier, admitted as evidence at the hearing, accuses the police commissioner of complicity with state-sanctioned murder).

As many as 25 plainclothes LAPD officers met the protesters in front of Johnson's home, Gerard said in court. He says he was arrested and taken into custody after joking with an officer that he was going to ring the doorbell to Johnsons home. He did not end up setting foot on the property, and was later released without charge. Johnson was not on the property at the time, but his wife and four children were at home.

Judge Boas Goodwin ruled that Gerards participation in the two protests at Johnsons place of work and his private home, in combination with the public reference made to Johnsons children were grounds for granting the restraining order.

The order calls for Gerard to avoid Johnson's home and the law firm where he works, as well as his children's school. It does not prevent Gerard from attendingpublic meetings of the commission, and he may still make public comments.

Johnson made a statement to reporters after the hearing. "The First Amendment is a pillar of our democracy. The right to protest has led to true gains for people that look like me and Mr. Ferguson, and thats something I deeply respect. But there is a line. And that line for me is when you threaten the safety of my family."

Gyamfi said she plans to appeal the judge's decision.

Matt Johnson showed today he is actually a houseboy, Gyamfi told reporters. It is ridiculous that he used a process that people use to protect themselves from actual violence be it domestic violence or violence at the hands of people who intend to do harm to protect himself from what amounts to embarrassment and humiliation.

Gerard said, Whats being talked about is what is acceptable protest. And I dont believe the judge is in any position to make that call.

Continue reading here:
Judge Grants LA Police Commissioner a Restraining Order Against Black Lives Matter Activist - L.A. Weekly