Archive for March, 2017

Senate Democrat Who Claimed Hard Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion: Uh, Never Mind – Townhall

Liberal Delaware Sen. Chris Coons caused a stir last week when he indicated during a televised interview that yet-undisclosed transcripts of recorded phone conversations conclusively prove that elements of the Trump campaign explicitly colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential election. Yet widely-circulated"bombshell" reports from the New York Times and CNN in recent weeks quoted sources who had no choice but to underline that there is no evidence of such coordination, and that the alleged contacts between Trump allies and Russian officials were not even necessarily unusual in nature. Therefore, it's understandable why thisstatement from Coons -- a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee --touched off a fresh, feverish round of breathless speculation and rumors.Here's the clip, via MSNBC:

MITCHELL: Do such transcripts exist? Is that what youre saying?

COONS: I have not seen them. I believe they exist.

As the internet is so fond of saying, "whoa, if true." Alas, here isCoons' walk-back under questioning from Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace. It turns out thatreckless and sloppy pronouncements from powerful politicians isn't a partisan phenomenon (skip ahead to the 1:50 mark):

<="" p="">

Well, he most certainly did not make that point clear. On Russia, the Left keepsoverreaching and making themselveslook foolish and hysterical when it's revealed thatthey can't back up their conspiratorial bravado. Speaking of conspiracies, read thisErick Erickson post piecing together a timeline of media reports on the Russia story, and how they've corresponded with major moments in Donald Trump's campaign and presidency. Is this the stuff of tin foil hats, or might there be something to it? Ericksonisn't the only conservative (nor the only Trump-skeptical conservative, I should also note) who israising red flags about this suspicious timing. As you contemplate that question, please recallthis reporting about Obama loyalists allegedly helping to choreograph the dissemination of information that led to the resignation of a prominent Iran Deal critic within the Trump administration. And before you go,watch former White House spokesmanJosh Earnestduck a question about whether Obama forces might be behind some of the national security leaks that have consumed much of Trump's early term. Hmm:

Read more here:
Senate Democrat Who Claimed Hard Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion: Uh, Never Mind - Townhall

Warren turns fundraising powerhouse for Democrats – Lowell Sun

No Published Caption

Sun staff photos can be ordered by visiting our SmugMug site.

BOSTON (AP) -- At the core of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren's appeal is a critique of an economic system she says is rigged against the little guy.

Helping fuel that message is a voracious fundraising machine that has turned the Massachusetts Democrat into a powerhouse in her party as she looks ahead to a 2018 re-election campaign and what supporters hope is a 2020 presidential bid.

Warren started 2017 with $4.8 million in her campaign account, the biggest piggybank of any Senate Democrat facing voters next year, according to an Associated Press review of campaign finance records.

That's also $1 million more than any Democratic member of the Senate except for Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, of New York, with $10.7 million. Schumer won re-election last year.

Warren is also ahead of eight of the nine Senate Republicans running for re-election next year. Republican Sen. Bob Corker, of Tennessee, ended 2016 with $5.9 million. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, trailed Warren with $3.8 million. Sanders also had $5.5 million in his presidential campaign account.

Key to Warren's fundraising muscle is a wide base of supporters. Warren raked in donations from virtually every state in the past two years. Nearly all her contributions came from individual supporters, with just $34,000 from political action committees and other groups.

Even in states where President Donald Trump beat Democrat Hillary Clinton by double digit margins, Warren found tiny pockets of support.

In Kentucky, the former Harvard University law professor pulled in $5,200. In Alabama, she collected $3,200. And in Tennessee, she raised $9,600 -- all states where the vote exceeded 60 percent for Trump.

The totals count only contributions above $200 during the election cycle. Just 36 percent of the $5.8 million Warren raised in 2015 and 2016 crossed that threshold.

The low average donation means Warren can return to those supporters again and again before they hit the maximum of $2,700 per election cycle.

Warren also raised about $1.2 million for her PAC for a Level Playing Field during the past two years. She donated $390,000 of that to Democratic candidates and committees.

Warren's success at cultivating small donors will be crucial to the Democratic Party's White House hopes in 2020 whether Warren runs or not, according to Peter Ubertaccio, director of the Martin Institute for Law & Society at Stonehill College.

"Her people have really figured out the secret sauce," Ubertaccio said. "Anyone who wants to be the Democratic nominee in 2020 is going to have to spend a lot of time cultivating Elizabeth Warren's supporters and donors, and ultimately her."

Warren is also adept at targeted fundraising appeals.

After Senate Republicans rebuked her for reading from a letter by Coretta Scott King during last months' debate on the nomination of Jeff Sessions for attorney general, Warren sent an email to outraged backers.

The liberal group MoveOn.org said it quickly raised more than $250,000 for Warren.

Warren also started selling "Nevertheless, She Persisted" T-shirts, echoing Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell who said, "She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted," before silencing Warren.

Contributions to Warren also spiked in the final three months of last year, when she took in $1 million, a period that included Trump's election.

Warren may also be hoping to discourage GOP challengers.

State Rep. Geoff Diehl, one of a handful of Massachusetts Republicans considering a Senate run, said Warren's cash isn't an obstacle.

"When you do the work and represent the interests of the people in the state, you can overcome whatever financial difference there may be," said Diehl, who served as the Trump campaign's Massachusetts co-chairman.

Warren has also become a fertile campaign tool for Republicans, much like the late Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy, whose seat Warren now holds.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee has already released a series of paid digital ads linking 10 Senate Democrats up for re-election next year to Warren, highlighting how often they've voted with her.

Link:
Warren turns fundraising powerhouse for Democrats - Lowell Sun

Gay conversion therapy advocates heartened by Pence, Republican electoral victories – ABC News

Advocates of long-discredited gay conversion therapy programs say they are heartened by the election of Donald Trump and are counting on Vice President Mike Pence and congressional Republicans to help fight off efforts to make such programs illegal.

I certainly hope that this administration will pull back from some of the aggressive activism that the Obama administration engaged in, said Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, a powerful conservative lobbying group in Washington that is active in supporting sexual reorientation efforts.

President Obama's Surgeon General Vivek Murthy publicly stated that conversion therapy is not sound medical practice and that such programs are harmful and are not appropriate therapeutic practices.

Conversion therapy has been outlawed for licensed mental health providers in California, Oregon, New Jersey, Vermont, Illinois and the District of Colombia, according to the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBT advocacy group.

The Family Research Council and Sprigg have helped to fight legislative proposals in 20 other states that would make gay conversion therapy illegal.

They certainly should not be outlawed. They certainly should not be prohibited by law, Sprigg said in an interview to be broadcast this Friday on the ABC News program 20/20 in an investigation of gay conversion therapy programs.

As a Christian, I believe that the Bible teaches that to choose to engage in homosexual conduct is a sin, he said, adding that he believes therapy can cause people to make different choices.

The 20/20 report includes revelations of two programs that conducted conversion therapy in Alabama, including one in which Christian pastors overseeing dozens of teens were convicted of child abuse amid stark allegations of beatings administered to teens who resisted efforts to change their sexual orientation.

The camps practicing conversion therapy uncovered by the 20/20 investigation were not operating as licensed mental health facilities and are therefore not covered by laws prohibiting the practice.

At the Republican National Convention last year, delegates voted for a party platform that appeared to tacitly endorse the right of parents to send their teens to conversion programs, supporting the right of parents to determine the proper medical treatment and therapy for their minor children.

The party position mirrors the position of the Family Research Council, which considers sexual reorientation therapy mental health care.

If someone is experiencing something mentally, like same-sex attractions, that is causing distress, then thats a mental health issue, Sprigg said.

He said that there is no place for physical abuse in therapy programs.

The kind of therapy that we support is ordinary talk therapy like anyone would have for any type of psychological issue, he said.

Sprigg said that his groups does not believe that same-sex attractions are a choice but that he also does not believe that experiencing same-sex attractions is a normal and natural variant of human sexuality.

He added that he believes Pence will be helpful in any battle with what he called the gay lobby.

As a candidate for Congress in the 1990s, Pences campaign website included a statement that fueled belief that he was in support of conversion therapies for gay youths.

Resources should be directed toward those institutions which provide assistance to those seeking to change their sexual behavior, the website said, under a header reading, The Pence agenda.

While ABC News has not received a comment from Pence, despite repeated requests, a spokesman for Pence told The New York Times in November that Pence was calling for federal funds to be directed to groups that promoted safe sexual practices and that it was patently false that he supported or advocated conversion therapy.

The Family Research Council is optimistic Republicans will back its position.

I see it as unlikely that any sort of legislative federal legislative attack upon sexual reorientation therapy will ... go anywhere," Sprigg said.

The practice however has long been discredited by respected medical and mental health institutions.

In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its diagnostic manual, the fields definitive book of mental disorders.

In 1975 the American Psychological Association said, Homosexuality per se implies no impairment in judgment, stability, reliability or general social and vocational capabilities; further, the American Psychological Association urges all mental health professionals to take the lead in removing the stigma of mental illness that has long been associated with homosexual orientations.

And in 1993 the American Academy of Pediatrics denounced conversion therapy, saying, "Therapy directed at specifically changing sexual orientation is contraindicated, since it can provoke guilt and anxiety while having little or no potential for achieving changes in orientation.

Despite these unequivocal positions from the foremost U.S. mental health organizations, the 20/20 investigation found a cottage industry of so-called conversion camps operating across the country.

To learn more, and hear the harrowing story of how two gay youths escaped such camps, tune in to 20/20 on Friday at 10 p.m. Eastern time.

ABC News Randy Kreider, Cho Park, Alex Hosenball and Paul Blake contributed to this story.

Original post:
Gay conversion therapy advocates heartened by Pence, Republican electoral victories - ABC News

Republican Randy Boyd Announces Bid for Governor – Nashville Scene

Former ECD commissioner is the second Republican to get in what looks to be a competitive primary

Photo: Randy Boyd for GovernorKnoxville businessman Randy Boyd, the former state Commissioner of Economic and Community Development, is running for governor.

Boyd announced his candidacy in a press release Monday morning, making him the second Republican candidate to enter what is likely to be a competitive primary. State Sen. Mark Green announced his candidacy in January and state House Speaker Beth Harwell and U.S. Rep. Diane Black are thought to be seriously considering runs as well.

There is not a better time to live and work in Tennessee, but not everyone is sharing in that success. So my campaign will be about expanding opportunities for every Tennessee family and community, Boyd says in his announcement. The opportunity for a better education the opportunity for better jobs and a better opportunity for everyone, regardless of where you live, whether youre from rural Tennessee, the inner city, or somewhere in between. Thats how Ive tried to serve in the past, and that is my vision for an even greater, more successful Tennessee.

Boyd touts the fact that he is "not a professional politician." His campaign, though, will be run by veteran Republican operative and former Tennessee Republican Party chairman Chip Saltsman.

On the Democratic side, former Nashville Mayor Karl Dean has announced his candidacy and state House Minority Leader Craig Fitzhugh is expected to do so.

View post:
Republican Randy Boyd Announces Bid for Governor - Nashville Scene

DEAR KEVIN: Time to consider a different Republican? – The Bakersfield Californian

Dear Kevin: Lately you have been refusing to meet with constituents, mostly because you know you wont like what you hear. The Californian even offered to set up a controlled, invitation-only meeting with a small group (about 30) of mostly friendlies. And you declined that.

And yet, you were more than happy to be interviewed by 23ABC News where you didnt have to face constituents and where you largely dismissed the recent, growing protests as a ploy of the Democratic Party, claiming protesters were mostly people bused in from outside your district. How convenient. (And by the way, David Valadao followed you on that interview and offered the same excuse.)

As the many recent editorials and letters in The Californian have pointed out, your priorities seem to be your own political fortunes first followed closely by the interests of the Republican Party, with your constituents and the American public a distant third. These priorities also are obvious based on your voting record updates, published in The Californian. I realize that yours is a Republican safe district, but in 2018 it may be time for us to consider a different Republican.

Read more:
DEAR KEVIN: Time to consider a different Republican? - The Bakersfield Californian