Archive for March, 2017

A curious timeline of trademarks granted to Donald Trump by an increasingly helpful China – Quartz


Quartz
A curious timeline of trademarks granted to Donald Trump by an increasingly helpful China
Quartz
US president Donald J. Trump's swelling trademark portfolio in China hasonce againraised eyebrows over potential conflicts of interest, after the Chinese government granted him pre-approval to 35 new marks in recent weeks. At the heart of the ...

and more »

Continue reading here:
A curious timeline of trademarks granted to Donald Trump by an increasingly helpful China - Quartz

MacroSolve: Donald Trump Jr.’s favorite patent enforcer – Ars Technica

Enlarge / Donald Trump's sons, Donald Trump Jr. (L) and Eric Trump, walk in Trump Tower on November 14, 2016 in New York City. They will be in charge of the Trump Organization's myriad businesses while Donald Trump is president.

Getty Images

Before President Donald Trump took the oath of office in January, he handed offmanagement of the Trump Organization's business interests to his two eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. The family-owned company has been in variouslines of business over the yearsmost famously, there are hotels, casinos, andgolf resorts, some owned and others licensed. Ties, steaks, and a controversial seminar business have also borne the Trump name.

But DonaldTrump Jr. has also been involved with one particular business withrealimplications for the technology sector: patent enforcement. Beginning in 2011, Trump Jr. worked forand owned part ofa company called MacroSolve. While MacroSolve had supported itself selling software for more than a decade, by 2011 its focus had shifted to patent lawsuits as the company'smain source of profit.

MacroSolve's actions soon made it part ofa longstanding debate in the tech industry over"patent trolls," companies that do little or no business other than filing patent lawsuits. ButMacroSolve management never accepted the idea that the company was a "troll," and it said so in interviews.

"If you enforce your rights, you're a troll," MacroSolve CEO Jim McGill saidin a 2014 interview with Ars Technica. "If you don't, big companies will walk all over you."

Whatever youcall it, MacroSolve's brand of patent enforcement had initial successits lawsuitsearned the company close to$5 million. When thelitigation campaign eventually collapsed in 2014, MacroSolve was absorbed by a defense contractor called Drone Aviation Holding Corporation. That organization has its own close ties to the Trump presidency, and there's no tellingwhether, or if, Drone Aviation will try to enforce old MacroSolve patents or its own patents.

President Trump's views on patents and patent reform stillaren't clear, but family members have strongly influenced his policy views in other areas so farand there's a bit more clarity as to whereTrump Jr. stands on this topic. Afterbrowsing through MacroSolve's litigation history, reading every MacroSolve 10-K, and looking through every news clip and press release that mentionedthe words "MacroSolve" and "Trump"via the Nexis database, a pro-patent vantage point emerges. Ontop of all that, public statements from Trump Jr. himself revealsomestrongly held personal views on patent policy that emerged duringhis work for MacroSolve.

MacroSolve was originally known as Anyware Mobile Solutions, an Oklahoma company founded in 1997 by David Payne. The plan was to create applications for PDAs and cellphones, according to a Tulsa Worldstory on MacroSolve's "rise and fall."In 2008, the company went public, hoping to profit by helping businesses embrace the era of the smartphone.

It didn't work out. Between 2008 and 2010, sales plunged from $2.7 million to $638,000. But MacroSolve got one last, great chanceUS Patent No.7,822,816, issued in October 2010. At the time, MacroSolve's chairman said the patent could make the company into a billion-dollar business. The patent describes a "remote computing device" that sends out a questionnaire to a user, gets answers, and makes those answers available on the Web. Thus, in MacroSolve's view, it applies to anyone using questionnaireson a mobile app.

In early 2011, MacroSolve embraced patent litigation as a means of making money. The company went in big: overthe course of a year, MacroSolve filed dozens of lawsuits against 59 different companies, all filed in the patent-friendly Eastern District of Texas.Patent trolling had hit a peak, and it was easier than ever to squeeze money from companies afraid of litigating in East Texas. Discovery rules in that district were tough on defendants, and judges rarely decided cases on summary judgment, making patent litigation hugely expensive.After just a few months of filing lawsuits, MacroSolve reaped more than $1 million in settlementsmuch more than its struggling software business was worth.

Perhaps fearingblowback from its aggressive litigation campaign, MacroSolve's board decided to make someone else the company's public face. That's when it turned to Donald Trump Jr., who was hired on as the new spokesman in September 2011. Trump Jr. strucka deal to do two years of PR work, and he received at least $45,000 and 5,000,000 shares of MacroSolve stock as an initial payment, according to company financial reports.

In interviews and comments made at the time, Trump Jr., then executive vice president of the Trump Organization, described MacroSolve as a "pioneer" that he was excited to partner with. He called mobile apps "digital real estate." He said the Trump Organization would be integrating MacroSolve technology into its businesses.

"Just as in physical real estate, digital real estate is location, location, location," Trump Jr. said in a statement after he was hired in 2011."Having a company's brand and logo on the screen of mobile devices is a valuable place to be for a company looking to drive revenues and productivity."

In an interview with Oklahoma City'sJournal-Record, Trump Jr. said that he would be "opening his Rolodex" to help MacroSolve expand beyond Oklahoma. The company's patent was set tobe a big part of that effort. MacroSolve owned "a landmark patent with stability and very high growth potential as one of the few publicly traded companies in the industry," the new spokespersontold the newspaper.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Trump Jr. immediately took on a public role in pushing the newly patent-focused company.In November 2011, heintroduced MacroSolve CEO Steve Signoff to investors at the New York City Small Cap Conference.

"On our show Celebrity Apprentice, it really only takes one single factor to set an apprentice apart from another," Trump Jr. told the crowd. "It isnt their popularity, their appearance, their famous or infamous name... Its their edge."

For businesses, that "edge" is a good"mobility solution," said Trump Jr. "That is why it was so important for me and Trump-branded businesses to find a mobility-solutions company with that edge in the digital world. That's MacroSolve."

MacroSolve had "that hunter's nose," a proven record in mobile, and "their patent portfolio puts them years ahead in innovation," he added.

If the company's patent was innovative, that innovation wasn't translating into sales of products or services. Thecompany'ssales plummeted through the end of 2011, but MacroSolve executives told investors to hang onthe Trump "edge" was just around the corner.

"These third quarter revenues do not yet reflect the significant and strategic business development agreements we've put in place in Q2 and Q3 with Donald Trump Jr. and The Richards Group, both of which we expect will yield us major national accounts and sales that will create a very positive impact," MacroSolve CEOSteve Signoff told investors in December 2011, explaining away dismal financial results.

Sales of the company's products kept slowing as MacroSolve's docket of East Texas cases grew. It filed 10 more lawsuits in December 2011, puttingglobal travel companies on notice that their apps infringed the '816 patent. Four airlines got suedSouthwest, United, Continental, and American. So, too, did Priceline, Hotels.com, Travelocity, Hertz, and Avis.

Inearly 2012, MacroSolve filedlawsuits against a new batch of corporate defendants, including Facebook, Walmart, Yelp, Geico, Marriott, AOL, and Inter-Continental Hotels. It also sued Newegg, a retailer whose top brass had spoken out against patent trolls. Lawyers at Newegg and Geicowould ultimately bring together a coalition of companiesto fight MacroSolve's patent.

See the article here:
MacroSolve: Donald Trump Jr.'s favorite patent enforcer - Ars Technica

What would Mark Twain think of Donald Trump? – The San Luis Obispo Tribune


The San Luis Obispo Tribune
What would Mark Twain think of Donald Trump?
The San Luis Obispo Tribune
Thanks to the criticisms they've leveled in articles, interviews, tweets and letters to the editor, we know that many contemporary authors, from Philip Roth to J.K. Rowling, have a dim view of Donald J. Trump. But what would leading writers of the past ...

Go here to read the rest:
What would Mark Twain think of Donald Trump? - The San Luis Obispo Tribune

Things Donald Trump said about Angela Merkel and vice versa – Deutsche Welle

When German and American political leaders strongly disagree about a crucial issue in public it normally sounds something like this.

"This country under my leadership is not available for adventure," German Chancellor Gerhard Schrder said at a campaign event of his Social Democratic Party in the summer of 2002. He was of course referring to the potential US invasion of Iraq which ultimately began under President George W. Bush in 2003. Schroeder's public rebuke is said to not only have seriously irked Bush, but also to have damaged their personal relationship beyond repair.

Read: Trump and Merkel to talks NATO, Ukraine and climate change

"I am not convinced, German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer famously told US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at the Munich Security Conference in February 2003, one month before the American invasion of Iraq would begin.

Fischer openly rebuking the case for war made by Rumsfeld in front of a slew of global luminaries was highly unusual in the context of the traditionally close and at least publicly harmonious relationship between leaders of both countries.

Libya, Cuba and Germany

"I believe Libya, Cuba and Germany are ones that have indicated they won't help in any respect," Pentagon chief Rumsfeld, also not once to mince words, said about Germanyin February 2003, incensing Berlin by likening the country's stance vis-a-vis the Iraq invasion to that of two nations traditionally hostile towards the US.

After his first travel ban was slapped down by several courts, Trump issued a revised order banning travel from six Muslim-majority countries. This time, Trump dropped Iraq from a list that included seven blacklisted countries first time around. The new order temporarily suspended the entire US refugee program, but exempted those with visas and who had already been formally accepted as refugees.

From February and into March, President Trump further advanced his political objectives through a combination of executive orders, memoranda, memos, and the signing of bills into law. He also used his executive authority to undo guidelines issued under the Obama administration.

In February, Trump signed 11 new executive orders (broad ranging directives that help the executive branch manage federal government operations) and issued one memorandum (a more direct executive action aimed at a specific agency) targeting the Department of Labor. The US President also signed five bills sent to his Oval Office desk by Congress, which will now become law.

President Trump's first February executive order established "core principles" for regulating the financial system and requires the Treasury Department to review and report on key provisions of the Dodd-Frank financial reform act. Republicans had criticized the act, which was implemented in the aftermath of the Great Recession, for strangling financial flexibility and inhibiting economic growth.

Through a series of three executive orders, Trump followed up on his campaign promise to crack down on what he had described as rampant crime in the US. He ordered Attorney General Jeff Sessions to create a Task Force on Crime Reduction and Public Safety and heralded stronger combating of transnational crime. Trump also called for new federal crime criteria to prevent violence against police.

On February 9, Trump signed Executive Order 13775 reversing changes to the Justice Department's line of succession that President Obama had made mere days before leaving office. Trump had already side-stepped Obama's order when he removed and replaced acting Attorney General Sally Yates after she had refused to defend Trump's travel ban.

Executive Order 13777, signed February 24, builds off of his previous January 30 order prioritizing massive deregulation across the federal government. The February order introduces Regulatory Reform Officers into federal agencies and creates reform task forces. Together, these bodies will advise on the "repeal, replacement or modification" of regulations perceived as prohibitive or ineffective.

Trump began undoing environmental protections on two fronts. Firstly, he issued an executive order directing the Environmental Protection Agency to review a rule that empowers the federal government to protect waterways. Though unlikely to have immediate effects, the order could eventually weaken the 1972 Clean Water Act. Trump also signed a bill invalidating an Obama-era stream protection rule.

Surronded in the Oval Office by leaders from historically black educational institutions, Trump signed Executive Order 13779 in order to "promote excellence and innovation" at HBCUs. Primary goals including increasing private-sector participation in the institutions, broadly improving HBCUs capabilities, improving the relationships between HBCUs and the federal government.

In a two-page letter to US public schoos, the Trump administration revoked a controversial Obama-era federal directive allowing transgender students to use the bathroom of their choosing. The White House jusitified the action through a pending court case, despite the guidelines already being on hold. The letter did not lay out new guidelines, meaning states can choose their policies.

On February 28 Trump signed a measure to block an Obama-era regulation that would have prevented about 75,000 people with mental disorders from purchasing firearms. In an effort to curb gun violence, the Obama administration asked the Social Security Administration to disclose information about people with certain mental illnesses to the gun background system.

In the third week of February the Department of Homeland Security released Trump's plans to aggressively enforce deportation policies regardless of the severity of an immigrant's criminal history. The guidelines kicked off a nationwide crackdown on undocumented immigrants.

Trump signed two bills promoting women in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). One required NASA to encourage young women to study STEM fields and pursue careers that will help advance science and space exploration. The second required the National Science Foundation to encourage its entrepreneurial programs to recruit and support women to work in the commercial world.

Author: Cristina Burack

Against that historical backdrop the number and ferocity of Donald Trump's unprovoked verbal attacks during the presidential campaign against Chancellor Merkel were truly unprecedented.

"I always thought Merkel was, like, this great leader," he said in an interview in October 2015 about her decision to allow more than a million refugees into the country. "What she's done in Germany is insane," he added and predicted: "They're going to have riots in Germany."

Ruining Germany

Two months later, after Time magazine made Merkel its person of the year Trump took to Twitter to declare, that the outlet picked the person "who is ruining Germany".

In March 2016, referring to the Cologne New Year's Eve assaultson hundreds of women, Trump during a rally in Iowa again predicted unrest in Germany and lashed out against Merkel. "The German people are going to riot. The German people are going to end up overthrowing this woman [Angela Merkel]. I don't know what the hell she is thinking."

In June last year during remarks about Brexit, Trump mused about Germans emigrating: "These are people that were very proud Germans that were beyond belief, they thought the greatest that there ever was and now they're talking about leaving Germany."

But then in September 2016 after having repeatedly savaged Merkel for months, Trump suddenly heaped praise on the Chancellor, albeit with some key qualifiers.

A Merkel person

"Well, I think Merkel is a really great world leader," he said in an interview. "But I was very disappointed that, when she, this move with the whole thing on immigration, I think it's a big problem and really, you know, to look at what she's done in the last year and a half.I was always a Merkel person.I thought really fantastic. But I think she made a very tragic mistake a year and a half ago."

Unlike, some of her cabinet members, Merkel kept her cool and did not directly counter Trump's criticism during the presidential election campaign.

Instead, Merkel waited until after his election to deliver a message to the new president.

Chancellor Merkel had a noteworthy congratulatory message for President-elect Trump

Public lecture

In a remarkable statement from the chancellery congratulating him on his victory she went on to offer Trump close cooperation based on shared values which she then explicitly listed one by one: "democracy, freedom, the respect for the law and the dignity of human beings, independent of their origin, skin color, religion, gender, sexual orientation or political position".

While this may seem tame in comparison to Trump's attacks on her, for a German Chancellor to not just offer cooperation under specified terms to a US president, but to do it in way that could be perceived as lecturing him on Western values, was as stark a rebuke of an incoming US president as could be expected of Merkel or any German chancellor.

No screaming

And Merkel did not stop there,but since also came out strongly against President Trump's travel ban against several predominantly Muslim nations. "The necessary and decisive battle against terrorism does not in any way justify putting groups of certain people under general suspicion, in this case people of Muslim belief or of a certain origin,"she said in January in Berlin.

Keeping theirprior rhetorical struggle in mind, it seems fair to describe the first Trump-Merkel meeting as potentially loaded. It also makes clear why an experienced US foreign policy analyst was only half-joking when he recently commented that he considered italready a success if Trump behaved himself and the get-together ended without screaming.

Link:
Things Donald Trump said about Angela Merkel and vice versa - Deutsche Welle

Alt-Right Jane Austen – Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription)

By Nicole M. Wright March 12, 2017

Chronicle Review illustration, original image from The Granger Collection

Why was Milo Yiannopoulos, right-wing provocateur, quoting Jane Austen? A policeman had denied me entry to the latest stop of the notorious "Dangerous Faggot" campus tour, at the University of Colorado in Boulder, so I perched nearby with my laptop to live-stream it. Yiannopoulos, then still a darling of Breitbart News, held forth.

So far, I was bored; Yiannopouloss shtick about humorless lesbians and sensitive liberals was not warmed-over so much as exhumed from William F. Buckleys Dumpster, plopped in the microwave, and zapped to mush. I was tempted to pack up and head home. Now, though, he had my attention. In a speech celebrating Trumps election victory and a new dawn for right-wing nationalism, selections from The Fountainhead or Mein Kampf would not have been out of place, but a shout-out to a powerful female author hailed by some as a "feminist icon"? Perhaps Yiannopoulos had glanced at the title of Austens most famous novel and assumed that Pride and Prejudice was a justification of white pride and prejudice against ethnic minorities.

Over dinner with colleagues the next day, I joked that, as a specialist in the history of the novel, I thought that the most offensive part of the speech was the Cambridge dropouts incorrect categorization of a Regency novelist as a Victorian (Austen died in 1817; the Victorian era began two decades later, in 1837). The mistake was not surprising, for Yiannopoulos idled away two years ignoring his English-literature coursework: "I didnt show up to supervisions, didnt submit any essays and spent most of my time shagging and drinking instead of reading medieval literature," he bragged in 2015.

Yet I continued to reflect on why the appearance of Jane Austen in an "alt-right" speech seemed so incongruous. I searched for a transcript. To my surprise, invocations of Austen popped up in many alt-right online venues. Venturing into the mire, I found that there are several variations of alt-right Jane Austen: 1) symbol of sexual purity; 2) standard-bearer of a vanished white traditional culture; and 3) exception that proves the rule of female inferiority.

Some right-wing writers use Austen as shorthand for defiance of the sexual revolution. Andrew Anglin, a white-supremacist blogger for The Daily Stormer, inserted Austen into a paean to the pop star Taylor Swift, whom he approvingly called "a secret Nazi." As quoted in the Vice Media feminist channel Broadly, Anglin contrasted Swift with the singer Miley Cyrus and upheld her as an exemplar of Aryan virtue in a recording industry debased by multiculturalism. "Its incredible really that shes surrounded by these filthy, perverted Jews, and yet she remains capable of exuding 1950s purity, femininity, and innocence," said Anglin. "She is the anti-Miley. While Miley is out having gang-bangs with colored gentlemen, she is at home with her cat reading Jane Austen." Here Austens fiction serves as an escape portal from todays Babylonian sexual excess to a vaguely delineated (1800s through 1950s) mythical era when women were wholesome and chaste. Anglin must not have read so far into Austens novels to encounter her sexually adventurous characters Lydia Bennet and Maria Bertram.

This view of Austen as an avatar of a superior bygone era is linked not only with fantasies of female retreat from the sexual whirl, but also with calls for white separatism. On the popular blog of the alt-right publisher Counter-Currents, the world of Austens novels is extolled as a prototype for the "racial dictatorship" of tomorrow. One commenter wrote, "If, after the ethnostate is created, we revert back to an Austen-like world, we males ought to endure severe sacrifices as well. If traditional marriage la P&P [Pride and Prejudice] is going to be imposed, again, in an ethnostate, we must behave like gentlemen."

Yet if shared heritage is the key to incentivizing gentlemanly comportment, why are there so many cads in Austens world? Also, Austens protagonists express little of the populist boosterism and preoccupation with ethnic heritage that foster an ethnostate. Fervent patriotism is invoked sardonically rather than earnestly proclaimed: Upon his first visit to his fathers estate in the small town of Highbury, Frank Churchill archly states that he will prove that he "belong[s] to the place" and is a "true citizen." Emma playfully replies, "I do admire your patriotism," and Churchill parries by saying that Emma has witnessed "the very moment of this burst of my amor patriae."

Other alt-right partisans pay backhanded compliments by emphasizing Austens singularity as a celebrated female novelist. In a post that debuted in 2012 on Alternative Right and has since been lauded as an alt-right "classic," the "manosphere" blogger Matt Forney mentioned Austen as an outlier from the norm of female mediocrity: "Virtually all great leaders, thinkers and artists were men. Aristotle, Galileo, Michaelangelo [sic], Napoleon: all men. Not to say that all women are incapable of artistic, scientific or military talent; every so often, we get a Marie Curie, a Jane Austen or a Joan of Arc." Here the alt-right finds common ground with the literary gatekeeper Harold Bloom; in his best seller The Western Canon (1994), Austen is one of four women on a list of 26 most influential authors. According to this formulation, Austen is not a trailblazer for the female authors who followed in her wake, but rather a rebuke to women who have not reached her level of achievement.

There is a reason that alt-right adherents claim Austen for themselves, and it isnt because their Dear Leader, who has not read a book in years (according to his own biographer), is a closet Janeite. By comparing their movement not to the nightmare Germany of Hitler and Goebbels, but instead to the cozy England of Austen a much-beloved author with a centuries-long fandom and an unebbing academic following the alt-right normalizes itself in the eyes of ordinary people. It also subtly panders to the nostalgia of the Brexiters, with their vision of a better, bygone Britain. Such references nudge readers who happen upon alt-right sites to think that perhaps white supremacists arent so different from mainstream folks.

But these men are distorting Austens work; her novels are hardly blueprints for an "ethnostate." Instead, they serve as antidotes against the strategies used by the alt-right movement. After all, Austens heroines come to distrust men who beguile others through charismatic bluster and expedient lying (Exhibit A: Willoughby). Indeed, Austen inoculates her readers against trusting the autocrats cheered by the alt-right: her female characters come to regret taking up with coarse men (such as Rushworth in Mansfield Park) who are propped up by inherited wealth that initially dazzles those around them, but which cannot compensate for astonishing ignorance, flouting of decorum, and lack of empathy. Marianne and Maria learn those life lessons the hard way, but they do learn in the end, and they eventually abandon the duplicitous grifters and foolish scions. May it be so with us, and may we never see a day with alt-right "post-truths" universally acknowledged.

Nicole M. Wright is an assistant professor of English at the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Go here to read the rest:
Alt-Right Jane Austen - Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription)