Archive for March, 2017

Foundation stopped giving to ‘alt-right’ movement leader in 2015 … – The Augusta Chronicle

The Augusta-based Community Foundation for the Central Savannah River Area severed ties with an organization tied to a white nationalist in 2015 after discovering the groups mission and purpose, the nonprofits President and CEO Shell K. Berry said in a statement.

The Los Angeles Times reported this week that the foundation was the largest single donor to the National Policy Institute after white nationalist Richard Spencer provided the groups recent tax returns to the newspaper.

Established in 1995, the Foundation is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization that administers over 200 funds of several different types, such as scholarship funds to memorialize a loved one and designated funds for specific organizations such as churches, or specific causes.

The foundation sent a grand total of $25,000 over three years to the National Policy Institute, which has become well-known among the alt-right, a phrase Spencer popularized, and hosted a November event where attendees were shown on video raising their right arms in a Nazi salute as Spencer spoke of America as a white country designed for ourselves and our posterity.

The groups Augusta ties date to at least 2006, when Augusta real estate investor Louis R. Andrews, who died in 2011, registered the National Policy Institute, Inc., at his Washington Road address with the Georgia Secretary of State. Funding to the organization were made at the direction of a single individual and other foundation money did not go Spencers group, Berry said. She would not name the donor.

Berry said the foundations involvement with the directed funds to the National Policy Institute ended with the final donation of $10,169 the foundation reported on its 2015 tax return, according to Berrys statement.

That year, management became aware that one of its funds was recommending grants in support of the National Policy Institute, she said.

Upon discovery of the mission and purpose of the NPI, Foundation management took immediate action to disassociate with NPI and as of July 2015, this donor-advised fund no longer exists at the Community Foundation for the CSRA, Berry said.

Independent of that one donor, any individual, organization or corporation that contributed to the (Foundation) can be assured that no additional monies given to the (Foundation) were granted to the (National Policy Institute), she said Tuesday when questioned about the donation.

The Foundation went on that year (2015) to modify policies to prevent any grantmaking that is inconsistent with our organization, she said.

As a public charity, the Foundation is required to report much of its giving, but allows donors to remain confidential and create anonymous funds, according to its web site. The LA Times article names the Masters Tournament as one of the foundations donors.

The Augusta Chronicle reported in December a Foundation endowment created by the tournament and Augusta National Golf Club was worth almost $15 million and had funded $7.5 million in in grants over the last 20 years.

Other local organizations that have established Foundation funds through which they award grants include Women In Philanthropy of the CSRA and the Border Bash Foundation, according to prior Chronicle reports.

The Foundations 2015 tax return shows millions in charitable contributions through its unrestricted grants fund, which allows not-for-profit organizations to compete for grants, and through its donor-advised funds, which allow donors to specify where the funds go, and through other types of funds.

The years more than 100 recipients ranged from Americas Warrior Partnership, which received $2.9 million in donor-advised fund grants to groups such as Augusta Locally Grown, Boys and Girls Club of the CSRA, Savannah Riverkeeper and the Salvation Army, which received unrestricted grants fund grants.

Reach Susan McCord at (706) 823-3215 or susan.mccord@augustachronicle.com.

Originally posted here:
Foundation stopped giving to 'alt-right' movement leader in 2015 ... - The Augusta Chronicle

Insider the Alt-Right/All-Russia Nexus – TPM (blog)

rW."}) S.,%JWv0rLdB9]w8Gw'[kD%OWGL{><7a6 ;dYTXIR>wj&YEi:3m0fah4pcumx/k~metosGY T8H^<3 xlpfPCZ9/H_s'p3 =o8 lIi3dA:Nn;VZm6;8[jvnR|'s,OKM,qZ=u+ng)>SuqD? xMOc.BF@=h/oJ87%Q<1G U^(;O(IO[{/S{iwx7& kuK3V&A8@a}+OJT ?4ooyD66`>>lxa>}4e Y}M/<>vF|yqezMx[_>i

< qF8!d4~%! 6._4ndYmz=HO/Ma u+s!'dM`$GEG[$&2%N"#tsJON#WF{4z LEw}a>hI~ ( !SW'|BBf&'W"wvZ+6IFuHFWD<_Hq`-A>~IG?}$"*knK?Z: T+ Zg<0I+U;7|p~pKRpUO >oIQ@{a`z.+,4BMl,97n"wE3y>(k:56ww=n6[Y,&qrE{,h6w VH@W=jAovw{5}cW}w /HFo?|}8;_/%?A=^B_CY%.@t'#FG 4G~N7>r?ED9"QHEgN6S~ZeSv1k/0GW?C14D;k\{nkgF>R]TVH3j`EsKEe5&y-oLU_ W^@ZWmCNbGsvnq ei7|O;0|qnO:K1G-IW)OD+:tmcE"{h; Gu{6?yt'^f $8~U!MkDe=-@XIh'3/cpB_dG,1TC3Nty1,a?,$9Xjeaia|V7TiX$Xn:[nWI '_<'$:;KN[/`nO=4{K~ogNK/5F7.xJX) F#%h`5-$.NGur"jt[5Am0Zg9A{8,?'[I3?X/s/T##vHIheqBs$W*>X@i:}Nozf4wkk[>OZw ]' :Ft) wDKYG [O~,KN8G0`;$kOzNx ;'v2amoo^Vp=/2w_I9&7[GrR4d$6O/ghu!x)wd$wZE{]dy]]>;$nDDxPrm^s[} fffn|7G]vc$A?n3bS; 9~3b>:@2A$?KT8zlR?AtW)/='dw|SILw6th3* :bQ]Z'z.jqk68,*_l gYI] wep_"]"L1TXon~}]kg K[[WK +,o.oseU&xa3Aj yjzs]8]0rA$77]'M%DeK5 wclwX{|SLMh?cNLzW_@u ~Vmy7}9^%_+<$a7r5@O2H|kp.*Z,t>beXp bN_[/"/HH>[yrnEkKbn`DajeY =T3rhCED_iI C@P/T#^"ltB&w* ADR(iL3">h4![nOG}4Ad`:*(M)]zLC7NFT#$TOXD$xN1,un>/WCy+UjDdD01,6l7w j b%F=Df$WEdxsei9k:L btIy AGU."NaS^Cil!$THs &PTd%jR]t B^!Y7$C(13#Ka_ uFi`D6d?jKH znRHH|fq&pB^LW>B[y!Gz`b%5ZGLWC~/43Q,$K0O*R k:wU~-GI'sa~rk'I^$ !z|F%s0)U$:f%T2'N(q%&l,)w"<$+Y_8t, 0[W*BcMqE4#'US=-QtpJ3&4CtpYv8j(K&H;R>m62t9n,Q/7aBf4Hqh0HW79D!=T0/~|z~p?:^2 EiHa<|z?~ I,-'On;IW}I&zG*,7%p7~ K$)TPA3MS}}V$Kp)7pDkxEq7l0'!"#_%M:,H$r{'o !zoT=3H Tu< 3,o_t@+?.l3>LIP@>Wf&s|&on(' HOKwQQL~J-)+<0X%9d^I0c]qzmV{kw[wnjb4LvGxFPVRh(m'ZrW} OaC&us<_hu;+S,a1{O?r'm_^S[FIdfJruT$-1ti=uHF8NxH!??/4:twVS$:g!%{m-G^1](H=JmmdF`4x]a0>u$AxoyI|Vj/0f_ >+$"'05?>@yg.9P7H=4,9 pHXb$~ Z$2-C},cCkMn*GO87P"{&d2bR$d!(c8cD+U 7|vV1dZ#tZX}{,bjb@4 tuaQ.Ug%2v:lu>04Gis]E!}K%!I *-c@K^\{vv'X F_$-xM8z]_tvHjuvUvv]g{{[nolo5jnzMmnu]>Wa> 7s97r*(7w''GOW5]|WOOnA<1n!;gn5&vw%js"@.qKJ]"U~WxLuz>`XM4ILE;o_Iv]{aNT9}xH?a?Wy7_V$p+n3{5 oi$A?Iz ec|Rokos;nZk:g0n? v,I]<1Lvnv=;[~u;~iz-:WnV5EIQ^8nu;r]Ouz[)Nz-uU^Ddly[xMUtJoy^n]{jm:+yjX3ojx~u][L-U]E$45 %C!8F81%cA;e[^h668!5Kdk0Klnyc2d C.7,ELe59f T46WQo,]n?X:/KYeEX$,M8:q5Gr?ND)mpr4:"?vvqmw+}y&+=nufk0{W;tK'/*7i|jlnr?}r J[9Xa)f= @0#&K$t,*31pyv{okw%r;-28ZW(*>NFJHE1@` 2A!0XG#>9Ai0+R[r1 |Vps4J ^CP6#^=YX`MOpM!VJCKbE)'nyhJ!:,<8Q=(}VB'N Je pl#o=Jq0Rj,VbC=[Si+gB0IZ[{^lMp#I${^ej?iOIV2mC79P XZQRkA2Gb=OJYdx8:^`;5'ZkV.PmlJ+{*BZ[5c~7Ix T$TIH$*g(.*NqBpfQ/av3F:2jyo0p9/! @TvGtgz788`s*^GeH%!mXM*oLCZ$e64haXAiQfrN?P+JQ"/d`i+3CFtme=C}jt@qpi//^O46I~ ,AxUpP|E?,&Z@6G:s-TMgcHK =6DIa++T9Gh3Wg6c6Nk`*T @ngB !5BTX@W/MbxTAY^c+j2.ih!4NU TC!SSmM]Pk7:ns>PNdemvnmVDl %+Fpnt^K.fmPi @GcD^ gash ulsM+ipKj`F}1^R k+i46q*Iz=MI[+TMSb_:7-_[`%aS94]5}ZOr^"Z/U:f./ k!I:Dz'-YACBfpty8Cb,~z`"Ol_e{IW>#=pp ZBLf33(D06ip=>MZ Y!)sA%FKRc $W()`]J>A|mN<]IW LmwtK|^"=IW|rP%jV[l>GPH@ $Sc &?G[o,~,#U@z&,*byVP8r'fU Mlyp! :2p#EG xtc7i,a|p! uemq |$4*-;UR ':S@xC:-Kd!FGtpt8eT(jwlu(!p>a3zhl.wP?0:drd!Xl.ED>PFajgBM8M.EV< P7A(PtF>UL1oD&Z{G buWPJW%8FY*I(G>ez_p.SlF9uS)4):Nc( AM.cik)I[lXMNTuHumM:JB%>R>LmD1r) U9Wf>fztiuu~,HZ)"N^6;0EX,(71o1D^=].#n:+94+E1rm1A`9`2yW A3jv9@9IeGj a~3pZbb8<'p9X}S"!ElFqKiRn6kH2'-D8wZnwO<8e7 {lk?WWWow?^c3Z+hGdz*1NIWXerW*4 |c!z. DsxJdbI+!GRqc(B[Q/(p [)9:-^uAhDsO?9>>dk5W6:PIEFx;se/d$Uv,S?VY!Xq3cD^GFhW)Hjm(V#E=uI:Uh8B[sq;loA?98'95'zYF,Hw~(#:*[3 rhr1>?PvL#(set"kg:pU&u;#K<,prL _j# ,}tfl}44J9#I]ZG@bTY?,JEDmA1@1p{jm(IA/ oHAH*rBX"R_@,/USCj>+8}4Gh.]YPFt oND"q|$gxb?H[S)Bq![r*T h[+$Snj9o/?nu{g"9#.Z7 AT| ToX'Uvp(}Jhy1Zj:R;a t9oGWY:qg9+U{EfeT9imnZc,R]]9yX}du2hLL|3Jp8fD7,AEOWS$b|_qW~YX|*Oy-9IX"FAZ|3iE@1IJ4H'@B) c|B2t&&u*Y3y&[HR:"<;Y]bq*0ef` >qx1BC0 5k=AG]<(T`*5X qetX#7RXi~ r&6a7L?0zzH.`O/+pWXOQ;4qis;Fu/XUMR"[.4"R.$eu}u42` Uw z{VZ lcl%#u=.WeI? bFt iFMVce_~J8`|^"@`d[Av'?f8isa/da+/;Aug8yOgBc:Dzwg6|?3:i^om$ /~FlJhI:U;F$P(=b~/?=} ?3)!=2u8E"NfsaK^IxoD&h^]:E_}LD;e8Els`69N>_W$pd{rpu:LVYC8sQWZ/2AO_W)^' 9mSd;U"s&/#u98On=VOJX B%034P2%F3Ccy"ZOD$kGTSpz6mDfZ <%2%qjdNqq>^^I]GGo'iV'W"-/tBE 2c`QLJ4[V`Z03+V)k`7^8T`Byd3~g+&i&Vw!jIe' H%Km~$jyZRQ5I*z*jQ. z'Ri&KyC$|COTJEVZ&&zs0aK(szL{&4u(m UBfts5TU%`uJxdupcce=Q7@ ,(${ Xa=1WFpsTC[_?+g}%(jzb~]}8AmR%nY&v(Z'T^$E2Vlg:AQDcm"p+[.)'I7t]9d;L!gG^>]/FpQoF)b9DCGL(zmZI~oHlrTv3'z0n6LCnTibA6,yr)D(JKNy$PMZ(][H ?A5ued4|I'|Ft4@c:YBK~*JFs5~7N!:dp>o^Y@&#Tsj'PBv{# =F,^p$RB>Nqt!Hzt4!-tXi oe'"t *u@!^Q s07I2Qj@V"b'SE/t_ FG V]LC4j(y8hL0WJC#0pQ@VRi&L9Ssx6sf.i]Z>Huj,TZFvPw|<-_sjQSgu!GlxH#`:~eB5%(LV>6scQ_a@hIM!358+J}-{0R08nl9,-@c^!X%ry8|xCi+jcw_`>6Uc-{M4fO3@)t~Kti1sqPX%*] q)9T PxRHcMk.YaTt%|E=]G=Rku 3eK=N*"G4q*0xp8V]{"&TET+ 4&y vhr9yZJ#T4-`)&50U0e Qh}_CIpQ`ZXNIFwcjf=E}/:!+u>lTD{KPcetGtgnq0nwgICMI2[*3>."e>BO=MCBr;7uRlnhmX 'y&,j)I:0]L<^V4y(I4dn}k4J=`_iR'iMJ524g"k|Ghk o*l7IfR>,%[I/2& eqlIe' *O(eEMtQ$+(flYp *,$x?UNTLvcDA IK%yKghpz%t q_'pLRzE8".xMPGV.+=DBj)YBmcdEXr~>bQ$71|VC!=~.$!#;,a_,lL`=.A}Q0fLf (|DU|egQVW+jLc"&( hawBt3nzR]2 ,c @ es"snp$`0Q xA4I31Z2;pEs `nU3Ug,H=}QtN+Fv7l0sZN-[ JhuM@`%Z`Gb}urUqu&cboxVW6P{B'P0#r4blER^:"SkZbu%hVag"-@YHAQ`;kfFm5A=~Q{N[!1g|JTo`W<$&R#.e": SMG}Fz|J2 f==>yA8gK2d VxWCc"D J@!T<+$(az/lhAH=qWn6T,LdD(?[XqV5g AiUAfoaITnwN[B&NmKmYB'WgVnkg8%r< n{3'.lX7*B9D#cV*gcd6L>_Frz!igXic+L{#}W.mnHrIuk#|L/(el:3tQ(C@b|+ /vuy}Q hJ)nj b@7]1&iaCDsFa>esu.447IC#x.>zyY9UX'vOI=bRkJPnfnABaOHV5[RK6r2q(F Z5F w;5aC_gp+alq=Fdgql.UDGhrQzQ3[AAQFCBpp@|$D12- W>t28k; &cDhEp?T,_ xRpB5(@va&4 47~4>},}Z~6:GPN6l6M4uo}|t="<d=PYqe"Fts8tl%D/q{Jn%z ,w&sE](a]9%"TT N!*{9& hBcIGf&;FbQ+CKv]J-Iq2mrhlqNb6tY"8KV)( [N8s%r.Y T4 _4eO-Zdn&Ms/`N%Xsrr/:,p#:'{^$J<[J [/n`.teeJ}fe2#B;)Z'XtEu^@##m$U^M1EeRMTYkQB~xq%zVrpaN!~]6fNh.o&=f{(aqr@]@=R!.?i4pw4&)gLI,eBP?[[Sxr8`k4 s_}=Q=m^~G!,~LcT L$P ,' *903& [mK3({JG->N(Zt$7{!#eMWWA$}e%-L$:c:4~}V9gf%g@&(3p,bcx#Z"_Gn1d{o8 ~ HyOG75A&*9}")*!qzl{|2&LIMZ2 )g_}4+$dM8gp=HLvWbUCXU]3&|J0TfO$xK*l%ZCWRcCiI)#:l|_#!`yVI)JgdR13bVT,!ik/5H(6=SERc|C?RD&09&rHHH0!DxCO7iGmOa :MO5"yjF$N{uKC2p4:K;|g;Nr J%+)P!|}/rzE#iO/5HU: {@K D!xH+x8!7 *i4^SxC<|M;t);. (I5]cv[E1jnsVtvk^sntVq0ql,W: 3{% n](RK|]zNZCn56 _wN6zNvZ.nV?]mJ1PA4 Xm$iA#h5@xkg5e$tM^ipYpl<3m3X;c_:?hk2LB ^p'C Q&4&f6OF op?|{4;gRQJ H*M5rq+?[LCQu>i/aPWcmh?^-~]GdzPZE :<~2?o?d7z8$xPA@sP}t5_@|ApCe8#IiX/h1cUZ+gX7ltx C>/5WJn5ycFrLMV_IaA4v< g_x:"{_[:U*/ige*;i2*rNPzllMMhZ%# O$F=N4zu

Continued here:
Insider the Alt-Right/All-Russia Nexus - TPM (blog)

Curator Nato Thompson shines a light on art and the culture wars in ‘Culture as Weapon’ – Los Angeles Times

We live in an era in which image memes are lobbed as political salvos. In which security is theater and defining who controls the narrative in a world of facts and alternative facts is the daily bread of the hot-take class. In which words are bombs, delivered in 140-character installments in the new culture war a phrase that can and has referred to all manner of cultural conflicts: The face-off between elite versus populists, urban versus rural, Hollywood versus the heartland.

Culture is a weapon a pretty effective one at that. And its a topic that New York-based curator Nato Thompson takes on in his latest book, Culture as Weapon: The Art of Influence in Everyday Life, which explores the ways in which the tools of culture are deployed to do everything from sell iPhones to wage war.

As far as timing goes, the books landing during the early days of the Trump administration couldnt have been more impeccable. Culture as Weapon provides a broad overview on how individuals, corporations and governments employ design, storytelling, imagery and art to stir emotion and mold sentiment. The prominence of the Internet and social media, naturally, makes this all the more profound and far-reaching than in the past.

Thompsons book kicks off with an extensive historical primer. Over the course of the 20th century, the fields of public relations and advertising have created visually resonant cultural icons such as the Marlboro Man to move merchandise. Thompson shows how political figures have employed those same techniques to sway elections and stoke fear. For example: the 1988 presidential campaign ad for George H.W. Bush about Willie Horton, the Massachusetts convict who raped a woman while on furlough an ad that ignited anxiety about crime (and African American men) and likely cost Michael Dukakis the election.

Thompson also provides a backgrounder on how visual symbols have been historically wielded socially and politically. The Nazis, for example, were famously meticulous about their aesthetics. Adolf Hitler himself devoted great care and attention to the design and look of the Nazi flag.

The Nazis loved culture, notes Thompson. They used culture. They distributed culture. Cinema, music, flags, banners, book burnings, rallies, and holidays were all deployed in a phantasmagoria of stark blood red, swastikas, and blinding white.

Interestingly, political groups, such as the Nazis, have also been perfectly happy to co-opt the symbols of those they impugn. Hitlers propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, decried so-called degenerate art anything Modernist or made by Jews even as he put that art on view in an extraordinarily well-attended touring exhibition titled, naturally, Degenerate Art.

A similar phenomenon occurred during the U.S. culture wars of the 1980s and 90s, when Congress attacked some of the artists funded by the National Endowment for the Arts. The NEA hubbub, writes Thompson, was an opportunity to condemn luridness and bask in it in equal measure. An artists own work weaponized against him. (The Trump administrations proposed budget cuts are part of a long-running conservative animosity toward the NEA.)

The look back is interesting, and in the process Thompson delivers priceless instances of cultural manipulation, such as when the American Tobacco Co. used the trappings of womens liberation to encourage women to smoke in the late 1920s.

But far more vital are the chapters that the author devotes to the recent past and the present to the ways in which big business and government have liberally borrowed from culture for their purposes. (These are topics he comes at from the left, with a healthy skepticism of capitalism and its habit of turning everything into sellable merch.)

Thompson examines how art and architecture have been used as an implement of urban development, via so-called starchitectural development projects and family-friendly public art installations such as Cows on Parade. The commodification of bohemia, as he calls it, has led to art being viewed as an engine rather than the cultural mirror of a nation. The NEAs motto, for example, has gone from Because a great nation deserves great art to Art works a model that would no longer be focused on excellence based on taste, writes Thompson, but rather on the way that culture could make things happen.

This, interestingly, has led to an increasing mistrust toward the idea of culture itself. Los Angeles certainly offers a vivid case in point: The anti-gentrification efforts in Boyle Heights have specifically targeted art galleries (though, curiously, Thompson doesnt mention them).

Culture as Weapon covers myriad other topics: How the U.S. military employed cultural anthropologists during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, how staged social relationships are as intriguing to artists as they are to corporations, and how culture informs our everyday retail experiences. (The maze-like layout of Ikea is inspired, in part, by the disorienting ramps of Frank Lloyd Wrights Guggenheim Museum in New York.)

In taking on so much disparate material, Culture as Weapon can feel scattered and often delves into topics that the reader is likely already familiar with. (Do we really need another overview that covers the improbable rise of the personal computer from Steve Jobs garage to our back pocket?)

Instead Thompson is at his most effective when he is dissecting what it is about culture that makes it such a potent social tool.

Art, in its appeal to emotion, can override rationality, he notes. Fear, he writes, motivates faster than hope and appeals to emotion do not rely on the truth.

How the rational brain might counter the barrage of cultural string-pulling that we experience on a daily basis, and how the world of culture might save itself from becoming a mere tool, Thompson doesnt say. But Culture as Weapon provides a compelling manual for determining how the manipulation begins.

::

Culture as Weapon: The Art of Influence in Everyday Life

by Nato Thompson

Melville House: 288 pp., $27

Sign up for our weekly Essential Arts & Culture newsletter

carolina.miranda@latimes.com

@cmonstah

Read this article:
Curator Nato Thompson shines a light on art and the culture wars in 'Culture as Weapon' - Los Angeles Times

Controversy Over Trump Aide Gorka Sparks A Wikipedia Editors War – Forward

On the morning of March 19, as a controversy grew over senior presidential aide Sebastian Gorka, an unidentified individual amended the Wikipedia page of a previously obscure far-right Hungarian organization called the Vitzi Rend, or Order of Vitz.

The Forward, in an exclusive published on-line just three days earlier, had identified the group as one that the State Department listed as having been under the direction of the Nazi Government of Germany during World War II; it also quoted leaders of one of the Vitzi Rends modern-day factions naming Gorka as one of their sworn lifelong members. (Gorka was quoted denying it by the website Tablet but did not repeat that denial in a subsequent formal statement he issued addressing the Forwards story via the White House Press Office.)

The new paragraph in Wikipedia said that according to Columbia University Professor Istvn Dek, there were Jewish members of the Vitzi Rend. But when the Forward contacted Dek, a prominent scholar of Hungary in the 20th century, he stated emphatically that he never said this. In fact, he said, Hungarian Jews were effectively barred from membership in the organization.

I have never heard of a Jew or, more importantly, of a Christian of purely Jewish origin, who had the right to sign his name with v for vitz, he wrote in an email, referring to the honorific the group confers only on members.

Today, he added, the Vitzi Rend is obviously a rightist organization, whose members, especially in the US, adore the exoticism of their archaic sounding ranks. But he added, All in all, in my opinion, the Vitzi Rend was not, and still is most likely not a full-fledged fascist organizationIt surely contains a few neo-Nazis. I doubt that any Jewish convert had made its way into the Order.

Wikipedia entries can be edited by anyone. As the editing history and discussion boards of the Vitzi Rend and Sebastian Gorka pages show, they can also quickly become targets of an information war, with multiple individuals constantly trying to amend the page to their likingincluding with false information.

Wikipedia designates this phenomenon as edit warring. According to the website, edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to win a content dispute.

Over the past weeks, since an initial article on the news website Lobelog first sparked interest in Gorkas relationship to the Vitzi Rend, the Wikipedia entries for both Sebastian Gorka and Vitzi Rend have been edited countless times. Users have pages-long discussions and arguments over the reliability of sources and accuracy of Wikipedia wording, with editors often accusing one another of personal motives for changing the entries.

I understand the edit war going on is not productive but how does one stop someone from unfairly trying to defame a Subject on Wikipedia, especially in light of the contentious elections? [asked] one user in the discussion page regarding the Sebastian Gorka Wikipedia entry.

Another editor complains of the Gorka Wikipedia entry: two editors persist in removing material thats reliably sourced and accurately described.

One editor posted, in an exasperated tone, on March 19 regarding the Vitzi Rends Wikipedia page: Last sane edit: Id like to suggest reversion back to the last edit before the 2016 U.S. election. []The reason for this is the controversy surrounding a suspected member of the group.

But sites like Wikipedia are not alone in struggling to present accurate information to readers online.

Just a few days before the anonymous Wikipedia editor added historically inaccurate statements to the Vitzi Rends Wikipedia page, the Jerusalem Post published an opinion piece by Bruce Abramson and Jeff Ballabon accusing the Forward of failing in its story on Gorka to note that the order had Jewish members. Among these, claimed the authors, was a friend of the Gorka family whose valuables the Gorkas hid from the Nazis.

All leading historians of this era agree that Jewish Hungarians were in effect barred from membership in the organization, which was founded on the principle of Hungarian racial superiority.

I do not know about a single Jewish member of the Vitzi Rend, founded and presided by Regent Horthy, Professor Lszl Karsai, a historian at the University of Szeged in Hungary, wrote the Forward. Karsai reference was to Admiral Miklos Horthy, Hungarys ruler from 1920 to 1944 and founder of the modern Vitz order.

Karsai, who is also director of the Holocaust Center of the Hungarian Jewish Museum and Archives and head of the Yad Vashem Research Group in Hungary, added that one informant, a Holocaust survivor told him some 20 years ago, that one or two members, converted Jews, were allowed to join this organization. Out of approximately 29,000 members, this is not too much,

Another Hungarian historian of this period, Rbert Kerepeszki of the University of Debrecen, presented his research findings in 2014 and concluded that the Vitzi Rend was radically rightist, ultra-Nationalist as well as anti-Semitic, never admitting Jews to their ranks.

Historian Szilrd Ttrai, of Etvs Lornd University in Budapest, points out in his study of the organizations that the leadership of the Vitzi Rend used administrative means to ensure that Jews that would not be qualified to join. Members who wished to marry, for example, were required to ask the Vitzi Rend for permission, and by the late 1930s had to provide the birth certificates and baptism records of the prospective wifes grandparents. A Vitzi Rend member could therefore not marry the granddaughter of Jews, let alone a woman who was Jewish herself.

The false attribution of incorrect historical facts to Dek is not to the only significant inaccuracy in the Vitzi Rend page. The Wikipedia entry claims that members of the organization received confiscated Jewish-owned properties after the German occupation of Hungary, when in fact the Vitzi Rend received Jewish land as early as 1939, under the Horthy regimes anti-Jewish laws. This inaccuracy unlike the incorrect information regarding Jewish members appears to have been part of the entry prior to the controversy surrounding Gorka.

Journalists are required by the ethics of their profession to fact-check and reach out to multiple sources to ensure that information is as accurate as possible. Opinion writers, and contributors to information-aggregating sites like Wikipedia, are often not held to that standard.

There is no historical evidence of Jews ever being allowed to become full-fledged members of the Vitzi Rend.

Contact Lili Bayer at feedback@forward.com or follow her on Twitter, @liliebayer

Originally posted here:
Controversy Over Trump Aide Gorka Sparks A Wikipedia Editors War - Forward

Hater Vandalizes Nikki Haley’s Wikipedia Page – Israellycool (blog)

This is what you are currently greeted with when you go to the Wikipedia page for Nikki Haley, the current US Ambassador to the UN (click on image to enlarge):

Haleys new career as Donald Trumps Permanent Representative to the UN was mired in controversy following a strong display of her subservience to Israeli interests at the UN in early March, 2017. Stridency of Haleys (hyperbolic) reaction to a report titled Israeli Practices Toward the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid by the UN agency Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), has taken many independent UN observers and analysts by surprise[21].

The report, authored by a beacon of the international movement against the murder and oppression of Palestinians by Israel, Richard Falk, and Virginia Tilley (Professor of Political Science at Southern Illinois University-Carbondale) hardly deserved such condemnation. Haleys vigorous demands for the immediate withdrawal of the report and her personal abuse of Richard Falk [22]suggested that Haley was attempting to outdo her neocon sycophant predecessors on the job such as Madeleine Albright, Richard Holbrooke and Samantha Power.

Disturbingly for the future of the term of new UN Secretary General Antoni Guterres, he duly withdrew the report citing procedural issues [23]. The role of his spokesman Stphane Dujarric (a Georgian and alumni of the Georgetown University with strong US connections) has been the subject much discussion among UN insiders with long experience with Israeli maneuvers at the UN.

Haleys claimed Indo-American background [24] has come under scrutiny following this performance.

It looks like a Wiki user by the name of Angel Muse is responsible for this online vandalism, prompted by Nikki Haleys wonderful job in her new role so far, calling out the UN for its biastowards Israel.

Unfortunately, this is the world of the World Wide Web. The haters are in abundance, and spend much time and energy harassing, bullying, lying, and vandalizing all motivated by an unhinged hatred of Israel and the Jewish people.

(Hat tip: Michael)

Update: It seems an Israel supporter has deleted the changes.

Support more stories like this.

Original post:
Hater Vandalizes Nikki Haley's Wikipedia Page - Israellycool (blog)