Archive for February, 2017

Hiring Eric Holder to defend people here illegally is deplorable – The San Luis Obispo Tribune


The San Luis Obispo Tribune
Hiring Eric Holder to defend people here illegally is deplorable
The San Luis Obispo Tribune
This July 26, 2016 file photo former Attorney General Eric Holder speaks during the second day of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. Vowing to protect California's values and constitutional guarantees, the state Legislature has ...

See more here:
Hiring Eric Holder to defend people here illegally is deplorable - The San Luis Obispo Tribune

Where Is the Fight in Eric Holder? – Fox and Hounds Daily

Connecting California Columnist and Editor, Zcalo Public Square, Fellow at the Center for Social Cohesion at Arizona State University and co-author of California Crackup: How Reform Broke the Golden State and How We Can Fix It (UC Press, 2010)

The state legislature did the right thing in hiring an outside lawyer who knows Washington as it prepares for a multi-front battle against our unhinged new president and his administration.

But did they pick the right lawyer?

Thats the question Sacramento should be asking about former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. The lawyer has a sterling reputation as a thoughtful person and administrator. But looking over his career, theres little evidence that hes much of a fighter.

Holders time as attorney general was distinguished by the fights he wouldnt take on. In particular, he repeatedly declined to go after banks and bankers who not only caused the great recession, but also were engaged in money laundering or other fraud. Whistleblowers in the financial industry have frequently said there was little appetite in Holders Justice Department to pursue wrongdoers. And the fact that Wells Fargo and its executive never went to jail for its systemic fraud borders on the criminal in itself.

Holder also refused to take the risk of prosecuting the torture or other abuses from the Bush administration. And his department did very little on public official corruption. Holders earlier tenure as a deputy a.g. during the Clinton administration and his previous career as a prosecutor follows a similar pattern.

Holder is now 65, and California is hardly his only case. Hes been talking more about a high-profile effort to push for redistricting reform in other states.

One could make the case that Holders decisions not to fight have reflected strategic or political prudence. But California and its legislature need a brawler, someone who can take the fight to Washington, and slay powerful, even venal adversaries.

And where is the fight in Eric Holder?

Go here to see the original:
Where Is the Fight in Eric Holder? - Fox and Hounds Daily

Entropy and Authority – Being Libertarian

Most people have agency. They live in their bubbles, their local municipalities, their facebook shitposting groups, their families. With the emotions and information they absorb in each, from their diapers to their diplomas and onward, they choose pathsthey make decisions. With the number of people rounding 7 billion and the number of possible bubbles rounding even more, its roundly impossible to intellectualize all of it. In fact, it is impossible to intellectualize most of the major parts and sub-parts of it. Even if we squint to try and better understand the behaviors of just our own bubbles, the equations dont exactly pop out.

To humans for whom curiosity and a sense of control are central, this all poses a very big problem. There are now, as its been for a while, too many branches of paths and possibilities to have anything that can meaningfully be called control. Theres too much entropy in society, too much oil on the grip of intellectual comfort.

You dont know if therell soon be a terror attack on your nation-bubbles soil, but its within some realm of possibility that merits concern. You dont know if a self-driving car might wonk out and kill someone, you dont have the resources to analyze the statistics or the software yourself, but you know that faulty systems with the capacity to kill warrant concern. You dont know if youll become ill, if your insurance company will be ethical, if youll have a doctor available, if your doctor will be capable but all of this is cause for concern. The behavior of the millions of people in the organizations whose decisions decide your capacity to commute, known as the fossil fuel industry, are both so sporadic and so impactful that youve probably felt their weight.

Theres too much information, and if you dont have a team of data scientists and access to the databanks of the NSA, JPMorgan, and Merck Pharmaceuticals like Palantir, there really is no control, and within few constraints, anything can happen. And people have a tendency to reduce anything can happen to the worst can happen and act accordingly.

How can this mass upset at entropy be resolved? How can they increase the constraints, at least in their own bubbles? With authority. Authority, whether physical, social, coercive, or economic, imposes agency onto entropy. Agency is sympathetic, agency is familiar. Even if its someone elses, so long as its not obviously opposed to yours, agency is the familiar friend who tames the wild beast of entropy with the sword and shield of authority.

But as you might see, entropy is largely liberty. Its peoples ability to take their unique circumstances, their knowledge and their instincts, and go with it where they please. Its their ability to communicate it to others through whisper or megaphone. Their ability to go on and bond with those others, as friends, colleagues, partners in adventure, or Grindr-bros. Their capacity to mobilize their assets, their land, their cars, their books and notebooks, their microscopes and fishing lures, as their circumstances call for it. And to trade those assets and relationships as they see fit.

These degrees of freedom lead any number of people to generate an enormous number of bubbles and spawn an even greater number of paths for the world to take. Some of those paths are hazard, most uncertain, and few utopian. And because entropy, the collective manifest of liberty, is without agency, its propaganda falls flat of any notions of collective workers paradise or great aryan nationhood.

Thankfully, there are many who find themselves just asif not morewary of authority, of the imposition of others agency, as they are of entropy. And even moreso, there are many, like myself, who see appreciate the necessity of entropy as clearly as the familiarity of agency.

Some, sadly, simply wear the cloak of liberty but retain a hatred of entropy, and develop some pathologies and ideologies. They identify themselves as lovers of liberty and warriors against authority, and end up attacking entropy: they convolute, and to themselves and the world claim liberty is actually a carefully orchestrated plan by a malicious shadow authority, and call for an authority which is more familiar than the supposed shadow authority to take its place. In reality, theyre fighting entropy and calling for authority with the caveat of decoration.

Liberty, to me and many others, is the way to maintain liberty. No amount of conceptual hoop-jumping and redefinition can obfuscate that. That entropy is a necessary consequence of liberty is an important understand that, although uncertain, if accepted, solidifies the notion that for us liberty is more important than fear of probability.

* Ronald Cohen is an organizational sociology student and researcher.

The main BeingLibertarian.com account, used for editorials and guest author submissions. The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions. Contact the Editor at editor@beinglibertarian.email

Like Loading...

Link:
Entropy and Authority - Being Libertarian

Supreme Court choice Neil Gorsuch draws Democrat opposition – BBC News


VICE News
Supreme Court choice Neil Gorsuch draws Democrat opposition
BBC News
Leading Democrats have come out in staunch opposition to Donald Trump's nomination of Neil Gorsuch for the vacant position on the Supreme Court. The court has the final say on such divisive issues such as abortion, gun control and gay rights. If ...
Senate Democrat admits fight against Gorsuch is just politicsNew York Post
Democrats face a choice: resist Trump or face the rage of "The Resistance"VICE News
Gorsuch Pick For Top Court Fulfills Trump Campaign Pledge, Confirms Democrats' FearsNPR
Huffington Post -Washington Post -CNN -Politico
all 3,606 news articles »

See the original post here:
Supreme Court choice Neil Gorsuch draws Democrat opposition - BBC News

Coming out as conservative: Why a College Democrat left the party – Washington Post

By Michael J. Hout By Michael J. Hout February 1 at 10:47 AM

Michael J. Hout, 22, is a junior majoring in history, English and political science at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. During the 2016 presidential campaign he participated in many Democratic activities as a leader in the College Democrats. But he recently quit the party. Here he explains his thinking.

By Michael J. Hout

Its generally accepted that many college campuses are bastions of liberal ideology. Theres a common perception perhaps even a correct one that this leads to a certain degree of indoctrination into the world of left-leaning politics. But my experience has been just the opposite.

As someone who has spent his life moving between Massachusetts and Georgia, Ive had exposure to Republican and Democratic politics in two states that could hardly be further apart in this regard. Coming to college in Massachusetts after being engaged in Georgia Democratic politics, I expected to be well within my comfort zone in and out of the classroom. That was not to be the case.

The more I studied and partook in various political efforts, the more conservative I felt compared to my classmates. The cold shoulder that I experienced from many progressive contemporaries, due to my more moderate leanings, fueled in me a desire to explore more conservative thought.

I came to the realization that between my own long-held convictions, already reasonably conservative, and the disturbing trends I was noticing among my peers and in the party at large namely their dramatic lurch to the left, and the increasing focus on identity politics over substance that I was not fighting for a party that welcomed my beliefs in its increasingly shrinking tent.

When I arrived at the decision to leave the Democratic Party, however, I was no longer on the correct side of campus culture. I went from being a high-ranking College Democrat to someone who must obviously be racist and misogynist and bigoted. For what other reason could I possibly have to entertain conservatism?

This decision perhaps the most difficult of my life to this early point was made over the course of a year or more of introspection, combing through perspectives of all sides in American political discourse. It was only as the sun set on the Obama presidency that I made the announcement I never anticipated that I would be leaving the Democratic Party to become an independent, and later, perhaps even a Republican. To some this may seem opportunistic, but I did not take this decision lightly.

My feeling of isolation originated not with the discovery of my conservative sympathies, but rather with my inherent, moderate ones. It was not enough to lead Democratic organizations, to sit on the National Council of the College Democrats of America, to help found new chapters at Amherst College and the entire state of New Hampshire, for that matter as the national chartering director of that organization.

No, what mattered was not loyalty to party, I found. What mattered was absolute devotion to the religion of dogmatic leftism. Many moderate Democrats just as easily could have been moderate Republicans. But these Democrats were rarely given the same opportunities or chances to succeed as their peers who were further to the left democratic socialists or social justice warriors. Now many of those same moderates are expressing to me a desire to leave the party as well.

Heres what I tell them: First, the Democratic Party needs moderates, so if you can stomach it, stick with the party and fight to move the conversation away from extremism and towards the center. America needs two sane options, so long as were in a two-party republic, with neither drifting so far away from the center that no compromise may ever be brokered.

Second, putting it plainly, you do not want to be a conservative on todays college campus. You will likely be ostracized to some extent, assuming your institution of higher learning is the norm. You will almost certainly lose friends, face bullying and need to develop thick skin. Ive experienced this, and I only came out as an Independent. Others Ive spoken to have horror stories worse than mine, attacked by fellow students, treated poorly by professors and administrators, accused publicly of racism, misogyny or unintelligence. And we have all received threats at one point or another. All things considered, perhaps I had it pretty good as a moderate Democrat. But my personal convictions prevented me from continuing to reside in the party that it has become, let alone the one that is to come.

This of course is a great irony. The so-called party of inclusivity, that values tolerance above all else, is extremely intolerant and wildly exclusive to ways of thinking that violate its delicate myopia. I contend that diversity of opinion both within and without parties is healthy and integral to our system. We must not only accept it, but demand it. Thus, we must be more accepting of conservative students, and the debate that they allow us to have, just as we must accept liberal students for the same reason. No one side should be able monopolize culture and community the way the left has been able to do on campuses. I ask my more progressive counterparts to be more accepting of students to their right, who likely have very legitimate reasons for feeling the way they do. Win with ideas, not intimidation. Be open to debate, and drop the baseless insults intended to stifle it.

At the end of the day, it was my view that not only was I more conservative than liberal in a contemporary sense (although I do identify as a classical liberal), but that I could do far more good towards repairing the Democratic Party from the outside than I could from within. Perhaps that will come in the form of aiding Republican campaigns. Perhaps that will come in the form of continuing to call out abuses in the Democratic Party and its affiliates through the media. I am not sure what the future has in store for me, but I know as long as my concern for this nation and those vying to run it persists, I will continue to speak out.

I will continue these discussions on a bipartisan blog I co-founded, with friends from a variety of backgrounds, called The American Moderate, as well as through a network of affiliated, bipartisan campus organizations we will be launching. Here, you will find a staunch commitment to free speech, diversity of opinion and a rational approach to politics and discourse. If you would like to join us, I encourage you to reach out. There is much work to do to begin to make our campuses more inclusive for all, conservatives included.

Read more:

At deep-blue Yale, students shocked to be facing Trump presidency

Yale professor: My students arent snowflakes, and they dont melt

On campus, Trump loses young Republicans but gains a flock

Continued here:
Coming out as conservative: Why a College Democrat left the party - Washington Post