Archive for February, 2017

Wanted: One Republican With Integrity, to Defeat Betsy DeVos – New York Times


New York Times
Wanted: One Republican With Integrity, to Defeat Betsy DeVos
New York Times
The vote to confirm Ms. DeVos is expected as soon as Monday, and the Republican senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine now say they'll vote against her, citing hundreds of calls they've received from furious voters. The result ...
Two Republican senators say they will vote against DeVos for education secretaryWashington Post
Will the Senate Block Betsy DeVos?The Atlantic
How Alaskan Activists Got a Key Republican Senator to Oppose Betsy DeVosThe Nation.
The Hill -Yahoo News -New York Magazine
all 648 news articles »

Read the rest here:
Wanted: One Republican With Integrity, to Defeat Betsy DeVos - New York Times

I’m a Republican, and I’m joining the protests – Crosscut

Credit: Alex Garland

On Saturday morning over coffee I read a summary of Donald Trumps executive order regarding refugees and immigrants. Then I read the order itself. And then I read it again.

And then I went online and my wife and I became members of the American Civil Liberties Union. Sunday night, for the first time in our lives, we became protestors, along with thousands of other Americans, joining a rally in Seattles Westlake Park.

Why would a lifelong Republican, who generally chafes at such activity, do such things? I feel guilty saying this, because millions of our neighbors are feeling real fear as a result of Trumps words and deeds, but I did it because of what I see happening in my party.

Trump is in the process of turning the party of Reagan, who championed growth, free trade and active American leadership in the world, into the party of protectionism and isolationism. And now, with his immigration ban, he is turning the party of Lincoln into the modern-day anti-immigrant Know Nothing Party.

A bit of context: In the fall of 2015, after the terrorist attacks in Paris, many Republicans including me said we should stop admitting refugees from ISIS dominated areas, mainly Syria and Iraq, until the FBI could adequately vet them and guarantee that they werent a threat.

But many Trump supporters want to go much farther and permanently ban Muslims from entering the U.S. and with his executive order, Trumphas taken Step 1 toward doing just that.

First, his order temporarily bans all refugees, not just those from ISIS dominated areas. Second, he temporarily bans Muslims from seven countries, and initiates a process to add more countries to that list. Third, and most importantly, he directs his administration to develop a permanent new screening procedure for all immigrants, not just refugees.

And this is the policy intent that will drive that new procedure:

In order to protect Americans, the United States must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward it and its founding principles. The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law.

This language sounds benign until you consider that many of Trumps alt-right supporters believe that Islam itself is a violent ideology, and that all Muslims want to place Islam and Sharia law over American law.

I have heard and read this over and over again from conservatives. Trump himself has said as much.

This is nonsense, of course. A generation ago religious bigots made the same sorts of claims about my faith, Roman Catholicism. And yet many of Trumps supporters seem to be standing behind him. I have even encountered people who want to deport the Muslims who are already here.

Where does my party stand on the issue? During the campaign, virtually every Republican leader said they opposed Trumps proposal for a Muslim ban. Some now have offered tepid opposition to the executive order, but so far no one in the GOP is talking about doing anything to really stop this new policy.

In a brilliant article in The Atlantic, Eliot Cohen, an expert on the Middle East who served as a counselor for the State Department under George W. Bush and now directs the Strategic Studies Program at the School of International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, describes precisely what life is like now for those of us who have spent our careers toiling in the conservative movement. It is, Cohen says, a defining moment:

For the community of conservative thinkers and experts, and more importantly, conservative politicians, this is a testing time. Either you stand up for your principles and for what you know is decent behavior, or you go down, if not now, then years from now, as a coward or opportunist. Your reputation will never recover, nor should it. The biggest split will be between those who draw a line and the power-sick, whose longing to have access to power, or influence it, or indeed to wield it themselves, causes them to fatally compromise their values. For many more it will be a split between those obsessed with anxiety, hatred, and resentment, and those who can hear Lincolns call to the better angels of our nature, whose America is not replete with carnage, but a city on a hill.

Trump made his views crystal clear during the campaign. Since the election, many people, especially Republicans, have tried to pacify themselves by hoping that he didnt mean what he said, and wont do what he promised to do. Well, its time to wake up and face reality: He meant every word of it, and it is anathema to everything the modern Reaganite GOP has stood for.

The GOP fought hard for NAFTA and the Trans Pacific Partnership. Trump has killed the TPP and has begun the process to kill NAFTA.

Trump continues to flirt with the idea of lifting the sanctions against Russia and developing a partnership with Putins fascist regime.

And now he is on his way to instating the Muslim ban he promised during the campaign, which is a violation of the spirit, if not the letter of the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

On issue after issue, Donald Trump is governing as Donald Trump. All of us, but especially Republicans, need to answer the question: What are you going to do about it?

Read the rest here:
I'm a Republican, and I'm joining the protests - Crosscut

Republicans Struggle to Gut Obamacare – Newsweek

Republicans in the U.S. Congress struggled on Thursday with their efforts to dismantle the Obamacare healthcare law, with conservatives urging haste while some lawmakers said the task was turning out to be more of a repair job than a repeal.

Two influential conservatives in the House of Representatives, worried that the process of scrapping Obamacare was getting bogged down, said the repeal measure that the Republican-majority Congress passed last year should be taken up quickly.

But in the Senate, a key Republican, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, counseled patience. Alexander, who is chairman of the Senate health committee, said changes to the healthcare law would be made in "chunks" and would be better labeled a "repair."

Try Newsweek for only $1.25 per week

"It's more accurate to talk about repairing it ... we're repairing the damage Obamacare has done," Alexander said outside the Senate.

Protesters support the Affordable Care Act, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, December 20, 2016. Lisa Lake/Getty

"We're not repealing all of Obamacare, it's not technically possible to do that (now) in the procedures that we have in the Senate, and secondly, there are some parts of it we want to keep," he said.

President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans campaigned on a promise to dismantle Obamacare, which they consider federal government overreach. They have been working on fulfilling that pledge as an early product of Republican control of both the White House and Congress.

But while both chambers voted last month to start the process of scrapping the law, they missed a target date of Jan. 27 to start drafting legislation to do so. At a congressional retreat last week, Republican leaders told lawmakers they hoped Congress would finish the Obamacare repeal by March or April.

Representative Mark Meadows, chairman of the conservative Freedom Caucus, and Representative Jim Jordan, the caucus' former chairman, urged the party leadership on Thursday to quickly enact an Obamacare repeal measure.

"That's what the American people expect us to do and they expect us to do it quickly," they said.

Former President Barack Obama, a Democrat, signed the Affordable Care Act in 2010 and it has long been opposed by Republicans. He vetoed the repeal passed by Congress last year.

Three of the biggest national insurers have also stepped up pressure on the lawmakers to act. Aetna Inc, Anthem Incand Cigna Corpthis week urged changes in Obamacare individual plan regulations in the next few weeks, in time for them to decide if they will sell the products in 2018.

They want stricter oversight of eligibility and enrollment periods, as well as other changes. Without them, these insurers say they may pull out of the Obamacare exchanges next year, which would lead to less competition and higher premium rates. Rates for 2017 rose an average of 25 percent.

Democrats were enjoying the Republican turmoil. They have long accused Republicans of rushing to gut the Affordable Care Act, without having a replacement plan ready. The law has enabled up to 20 million previously uninsured Americans to obtain health coverage.

"They (Republicans) havent come up with the so-called repairs," the Senate's No. 2 Democrat, Dick Durbin of Illinois, said in a hallway. "What a departure (for the Republicans), from 'let's repeal it and walk away from it and America will be a better place.'"

Continued here:
Republicans Struggle to Gut Obamacare - Newsweek

California shellackin’: Trump lost ground in Republican-leaning cities around state – Sacramento Bee


Sacramento Bee
California shellackin': Trump lost ground in Republican-leaning cities around state
Sacramento Bee
President Donald Trump has suggested that fraud caused him to lose California by almost 4.3 million votes, a major component of the Republican's 2.8 million vote loss nationwide. He has pledged to launch a major investigation of voting procedures.

The rest is here:
California shellackin': Trump lost ground in Republican-leaning cities around state - Sacramento Bee

Americans Are Putting Up a Good Fight Against Trump’s Assaultsfor Now – Slate Magazine

Acting attorney general Sally Yates was fired, and Steve Bannon seems to be pulling the strings. Whither democracy?

Photo illustration by Slate. Images by Pete Marovich/Getty Images and Saul Loeb - Pool/Getty Images

When faced with a choice between a candidate with no vision and a candidate with a nasty vision, many voters will embrace the nasty vision. Even in times of peace and prosperity, perfectly decent human beings are willing to vote for candidates promising extraordinarily cruel policies. When a candidate who promises to inflict extraordinary cruelty on the despised and the abject wins high office, he will (surprise, surprise) use his new-won powers to inflict cruelty on the abject and the despised.

Yascha Mounk, a lecturer on government at Harvard University and a fellow in the political reform program at New America, isthe author ofStranger in My Own Country.

The last 12 months hold out many lessons such as these. But in the last days, Ive been thinking of another, more abstract takeaway. Before the election, most people I knew were saying that a Trump presidency would be extremely dangerousbut that this wasnt something to worry about since he could never get elected. After the election, a lot of those same people started to say that Trump was a nasty manbut that this wasnt something to worry about because our institutions would stop him before he could possibly do lasting damage.

What explains their change of heart? A rather trivial, but very dangerous, failing: the deep desire to believe that the world we live inwhich for most of us has been mostly decent for most of our livescould not possibly turn quite so dark quite so quickly.

And yet, it is increasingly difficult to shake the feeling that we are now descending into darkness. In less than two weeks, Trump has delivered one of the most divisive inaugurals in the history of the country and spread blatant lies from the Oval Office. He has ordered the construction of a border wall and threatened Mexico with punitive tariffs. He has barred permanent residents from entering the country and banned refugees.

I could go on. But any attempt at comprehensiveness would be tedious as well as futile: There is simply too much chaos and mean-spiritedness. The party in power, meanwhile, seems determined to stand idly by. So far, Republicans in Congress have proved shockingly willing to rubber-stamp Trumps policies and Cabinet picks. His more extreme actions have led to cautious grumbling. But when the time to vote on his agenda came, moderate Republicans have once again lacked the courage of their convictions.

So we seemingly have every reason to despairand yet I have actually found myself to be quite hopeful over the last days. The Womens March turned into the biggest political rally in U.S. history, and the executive order on immigration inspired spontaneous protests at airports all over this great nation. Courts stayed large parts of the executive order on immigration andthough their current numbers limit their ability to hamstring Trumps agendaDemocrats are putting up a dogged fight in Congress. Several high-ranking officials have publicly defied or criticized orders they found unconscionable and hundreds of bureaucrats are secretly leaking their broken hearts out.

Since Trump got elected, one of my great fears has been that most American citizens might cling to a false sense of security, brought on by decades of prosperity and stability, while the president slowly and surely subverts our democracy. But between Trumps spectacular assault on democratic norms and the furious response it has already unleashed, I no longer worry about a quiet death. The American republic wont go down without putting up a hell of a fight.

But will itwill wewin? There is no easy answer because there is no clear precedent. Countries that have as deep-rooted a democratic history or as active a civil society as the United States simply havent been in such dangerous territory before. As Francis Fukuyama explains:

Because our current predicament is unprecedented, the most eminent political scientists at work today strongly disagree on what comes next. Is Daron Acemoglu right to worry that the institutions of modern democracy were never designed to withstand a strongman like Donald Trumpand are now headed toward pliancy? Or is Fukuyama right to respond that the Constitution sets up so many robust veto points that many institutional checks on power will continue to operate in a Trump presidency?

Nobody can say for sure. But what has become clear over the last weeks is that the natural experiment both Acemoglu and Fukuyama invoke is more extreme than we might have suspected a few short weeks ago. The authoritarian tendencies of Trumps presidency are even more blatant than most pessimists had warned. But the opposition has also proven more powerful and determined than many optimists had dared to hope. While I remain unsure about the ultimate outcome, I am increasingly convinced thatto misquote Steve Bannona major war is brewing between the administration and the institutions it would undermine.

Top Comment

Our government is being taken from us before our very eyes by a slow coup. More...

It is still too early to tell the genre of the head-spinning movie in which we have been cast as bit players. It certainly isnt the farce some originally mistook it for. But do we find ourselves in a live-action thriller or a horror movie? And are we hurtling towards a heroic finish or a gory demise? I dont know. But after the past days, Im more confident than ever that unprecedented turmoil awaits us along the wayand that is why Ive been both deeply scared and increasingly energized.

I believe that the worst politics can inflict tends to weigh more heavily than the best it can achieve. For anybody who understands what it means when political tensions destroy the lives of ordinary people, turmoil is not something to be welcomed. But when the alternative is a certain descent into the abyss of authoritarian darkness, it may be the best we can hope for.

View original post here:
Americans Are Putting Up a Good Fight Against Trump's Assaultsfor Now - Slate Magazine