Archive for February, 2017

Jorge Ramos: Illegal Immigrants Come ‘To Help Us’ | LifeZette – LifeZette

Mexican-born American journalist Jorge Ramos claimed that illegal immigrants come to the U.S. because they want to benefit our lives during an interview Friday evening with Chris Wallace on Fox News The OReilly Factor.

Wallace, who was filling in for host Bill OReilly, pressed Ramos about his support for blanket amnesty for the millions of illegal immigrants residing in the U.S. Ramos, a Univision anchor, took issue with President Donald Trumps strict stance of clamping down on illegal immigration, as well as the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials recent deportation of hundreds of mostly criminal aliens. Because a small numberof the deportees werent criminal aliens, Ramos balked at the mass deportation.

They are coming here, again, not because they want to go to Disneyland or because they want to kill Americans. They are here to benefit our lives.

They are here because of us, Ramos told Wallace. They are coming here, again, not because they want to go to Disneyland or because they want to kill Americans. They are here to benefit our lives. I mean, theyre here to millions of Americans benefit from their work.

Ramos bizarre defense of immigrants desires to enter and reside in the U.S. illegally seemed to attribute an unrealistic sense of altruism to their decision-making process.

The reason they are here, Chris, is because of us. So we have to be responsible for that, Ramos claimed. It is not simply that they come here and they just wanted to come here and make money. Yeah, I mean, they want to do that. They want to better their lives. But also they are here to help us. So we are partly responsible for that and I think we are partly responsible for finding a solution.

When Wallace pressed Ramos about the criminality of theillegal aliens being prioritized for deportation, Ramos insisted that he did not condone violent criminal aliens. Nevertheless, the Univision anchor attempted to justify some of non-violent criminal actions illegal aliens take part in once theyve entered the country.Although he admitted that it is a crime when illegal aliens get a false social security card, papers, or drivers license that allow them to receive government benefits, Ramos seemed to try to justify such behavior.

Lets not be naive Many of them use fake IDs. Many of them use fake drivers licenses. Why? Because they are working for us, Ramos insisted. They come here because they want to work. They harvest the food that we eat. They build our homes. And they dont want to get in trouble with the police.

Ramos continued his unusual defense of illegal entry into the U.S. by attempting to pin part of the blame on the 45th president.

"The problem, Chris, is that President Trump is criminalizing the immigrants in this country," Ramos insisted.

Ramos' defense came the same day that Trump reinforced his commitment to cracking down on illegal immigration during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

"You see what's happening at the border. All of a sudden for the first time, we're getting gang members out. We're getting drug lords out. We're getting really bad dudes out of this country, and at a rate that nobody's ever seen before," Trump said. "We are getting bad people out of this country. Whether it's drugs or murder, we are getting bad people out and I said it from Day One. Basically, all I've done is keep my promise."

View original post here:
Jorge Ramos: Illegal Immigrants Come 'To Help Us' | LifeZette - LifeZette

What is so difficult about handling illegal immigration? – Jacksonville Daily News

Eddie C. Quinn - Jacksonville

To the editor:

Gravy Train term used to refer to a situation in which someone can make a lot of money for very little effort.

E-Verify is an internet-based system that allows employers to determine whether a job applicant is entitled to work in the United States.

The blame for illegal aliens coming into, and remaining within, this country rests more with our own government than it does with the illegal aliens. Can you really blame illegal aliens for wanting to get on the government gravy train? The liberal government has been handing out so-called free benefits for decades. Hopefully, that will soon change. There is more incentive for the illegal alien to come to and remain within this country, than for illegal aliens to go back to, or remain within, their own country.

For decades, Congress has had, and continues to have, a problem figuring out how to end the mass illegal alien situation. To me, and many others, it is not only simple, but logical: Remove all the incentives for individuals to enter or remain within this country illegally! Reward those who abide by our laws, punish those that dont!

Why do the vast majority of illegal aliens come to this country? Jobs and government handouts. Remove these two incentives and illegal aliens will have less incentive to come to or remain within this country. Fewer illegal aliens would mean fewer government employees to distribute handouts, lower taxes and Border Patrol and ICE agents could focus on those intent upon doing this country and its citizens harm: terrorists, drug dealers and other criminal elements.

How to reduce illegal aliens? First, hold all employers (individuals and companies) legally and fiscally responsible for ensuring that prospective employees are legally eligible to work in this country before they hire the individual. The government developed E-Verify to assist employers in this process. If a prospective employer fails to make adequate job eligibility verification efforts, punish the employer and deport the illegal alien as both are breaking the law.

Second, the various levels of government provide numerous benefits to illegal aliens: shelter, food, clothing, medical care, education, disposable income and a host of other benefits. Where is it written that we should take better care of illegal aliens than our own citizens? Nowhere! Why are illegal aliens entitled to benefits often not even available to our own citizens particularly veterans? Answer: Leftists see illegal aliens as potential Democrat Party voters.

Conservatives see illegal aliens for what many of them are: an increased tax burden and job destroyer. Our various government entities should immediately terminate all benefits for illegal aliens. Without these benefits provided by our welfare state, illegal aliens would be far less inclined to illegally enter or remain within this country.

The upside for those legally in this country: lower taxes and the billions of dollars that are dispensed to support illegal aliens could then be shifted to help our own needy citizens.

Charity should begin at home. If there is a surplus, then spread outwards!

View post:
What is so difficult about handling illegal immigration? - Jacksonville Daily News

What the federal clampdown on illegal immigration means for Idaho … – Idaho Statesman

What the federal clampdown on illegal immigration means for Idaho ...
Idaho Statesman
The Treasure Valley's four largest law enforcement agencies say nothing really changes for them under President Donald J. Trump's new order that federal ...

and more »

Here is the original post:
What the federal clampdown on illegal immigration means for Idaho ... - Idaho Statesman

Immigration attorneys may be a good starting point for illegal immigrants – News-Press Now

On the campaign trail and during his first month in office, President Donald Trump has made it clear he will crack down on illegal immigration.

Last Tuesday, the Department of Homeland Security released documents explaining that it will no longer exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement.

The crackdown is causing an increase in concerns for local immigrants, according to a St. Joseph attorney, Lance Davis.

Davis said since Trump took office, the amount of calls he gets about immigration has nearly doubled. But many of those callers believe in common misconceptions.

Theres a lot of fear, with the Trump administration coming in, that we are gonna do these sort of Gestapo round-ups like in World War II and that is not the case, Davis said.

Instead, he said contact between illegal immigrants and police is usually initiated through a person being arrested for violating another crime.

As part of their booking process, they (police) try to ascertain where the person is from, their birthplace. And if they have documentation that can verify that then theres no problem, Davis said.

He explained that if police cannot verify a persons legal status; thats when their consulate or ICE would get involved.

He said the number of immigration-related calls are increasing all over the state.

There are not many attorneys that do this kind of work and of course the obvious problem is a language barrier that you run into, he said.

Those who are worried about getting deported, may be hesitant to seek help, fearing that could lead to their exposure, but Davis said he recommends reaching out to an attorney.

Were a confidential relationship so going to see an attorney is a great thing to do to start with, said Davis.

Davis said the best thing undocumented immigrants can do is abide by the laws while working towards becoming legal citizens.

If you can show you are a law abiding citizen and you are attempting to live the American life, by the rules, that cant hurt. And those are the things the immigration authorities are always asking us, said Davis.

See the original post here:
Immigration attorneys may be a good starting point for illegal immigrants - News-Press Now

Mike Pence, your friendly neighborhood ‘theocrat’ – ThinkProgress

When then-governor Mike Pence bounded onto the stage at the Republican National Convention in 2016, it took him less than two minutes to mention the introduction he prefers.

Im a Christian, a conservative, and a Republicanin that order, Pence said, smiling out at the roaring crowd.

The line played well, but it was hardly spontaneous. Pence has led with that same quip numerous times throughout his career, including previous appearances at conservative gatherings such as CPAC.

Most political analysts argue it was precisely this kind of vocal dedication to religious conservatism that nudged Trump to select Pence as his vice presidential nominee. The contrast, they say, is intentional: The odd couple pairing allows a pious Pence to balance a turbulent Trump, with the vice presidents relative courteousness reassuring anxious evangelicals that the halls of power are in godly hands.

Eventually, a narrative emerged: Even if Trumps already numerous scandals manage to somehow push him out of the White House, conservatives and even liberals could take solace in the potential of a more responsibleor at least less dramaticPresident Pence.

But history suggests otherwise. Like Trump, Pence has also backed policies that sparked rancorous protests in his home state of Indianapolices birthed from his ostensibly kinder, gentler, more Christian approach to politics. And while Pence undeniably differs from the president in several key ways, the precise meaning of his favorite introduction is far more complicated than he suggests.

In fact, the deeper you dig into his faith-fueled history, the harder it becomes to spot the substantive differences between Pences prayerful politics and Trumps brash brand of populism.

Fellow conservatives have lionized Pence as both a crusader for white evangelical Christian values and a defender of right-wing politics, but the former governors origins barely resemble that of a modern culture warrior.

For starters, Pence wasnt raised by a conservative evangelical family, but by two Irish-Catholic parents in Central Indiana, where his father ran a chain of gas stations. His heritage is deeply tied to the white Irish-Catholic immigrant experience: his namesake and grandfather, Richard Michael Cawley, emigrated from Ireland to the United States in 1923. And like most Irish Catholics of the time, both of his parents were Democrats, and all six children reportedly idolized President John F. Kennedy (Pence even had a closet full of banners and pictures of the Democratic president, according to his mother).

It was left-wing politics, not traditional conservatism, that framed his early political consciousness. He served as youth Democratic Party coordinator for his county as a teenager in 1976, and backed Democrat Jimmy Carter for president four years later.

Even then, faith was paramount.

[Carter] was a good Christian, Pence would later explain, noting that he wasnt yet a fan of Reagan, Carters opponent. Beyond that, there was a sense of, Why would you elect a movie star?

But while Carter was a Southern Baptist, Pences initial conception of Christianity was rooted primarily in his passion for Roman Catholicism. In addition to attending mass several times a week, he served as an altar boy at his local parish, attended parochial schools, and even considered a becoming a priest.

Our life revolved around the church, Gregory Pence, one of Mr. Pences two older brothers, told the New York Times.

Despite his Catholic roots, Pence underwent something of a dual conversion after he left home for Hanover College.

The first was religious: he became friends with several evangelical Christian students, whose Protestant faith he came to admire. I began to meet young men and women who talked about having a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, and while I cherish my Catholic upbringing and the foundation that it poured in my faith, that had not been a part of my experience, Pence said in a 2010 interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network.

A short time later, in 1978, Pence took his first major step away from Catholicism by engaging in a classic evangelical ritehe was saved.

Standing at a Christian music festival in Asbury, KentuckyI gave my life to Jesus Christ and thats changed everything, he said.

As powerful as the moment was, the departure from the faith that raised him wasnt immediate. Pence continued to align himself with Catholicism even after graduation, when he worked as a Catholic youth minister, and even applied to Catholic University in Washington, D.C. for graduate school. As late as 1994, he still used the unusual religious identityevangelical Catholicto help make sense of the tension between his old faith and his new spiritual experiences.

Pences other conversion was political, and far more rapid. He abandoned any lingering affinity for liberalism while in school, and launched his first campaign for Congress in 1988as a Republican. He lost, just as he would the second time he ran 1990, but retained a passion for politics, and eventually landed a gig as head of the Indiana Policy Review Foundation. The small organization is one of roughly 50 state-level conservative think tanks within the Koch brothers-funded State Policy Network. Conservative in scope, the Foundation lists among its goals to exalt the truths of the Declaration of Independence, especially as they apply to the interrelated freedoms of religion, property and speech.

These principles became guideposts for Pence, whose time at the Foundation proved formative. A detailed account of his conservative evolution can be found within the pages of the Indiana Policy Review, a seasonal publication of the Foundation filled with snarky and sometimes firebrand diatribeswith Pence at the top of the masthead.

Some were attributed to Pence himself, offering hints of an anti-media stance not altogether dissimilar from that of Donald Trump. In an essay entitled What if they held a convention and nobody came, Pence describes the 1996 Republican National Convention with phrases that drip with palpable disgust for the institutional party. He laments the conventions television ratings were dismal, a result he blamed partly on the GOPs failure to represent the personalities or principles of interest to its base constituency, the modern Reagan coalition.

But he saved his harshest criticisms for the media.

How many Republicans would depend on the likes of ABC, CBS, and NBC to tell them about their party? Pence writes, referring to the media as liberals.

Other pieces were credited to the entire Foundation instead of a single writer, but still show hints of culture-warrior politics Pence would later trumpet. An article published in 1993 targeted the Wall Street Journal for attending a job fair targeted towards gay journalists, bemoaning the so-called Pink Newsroom. The piece referred to homosexuality as a pathological condition and discouraged gay journalists from keeping their orientation a secret, lest their sexuality taint their reporting with bias.

The more extreme of the gay movement consider themselves members of a sexual determined political party, it read.

These and other pieces didnt explicitly list religion as a framing principle, but Pences political formation occurred around the same time he and his family began attending Grace Evangelical Church in Indianapolis, a Protestant megachurch affiliated with the Evangelical Free Church of America. As other journalists have noted, shifting political winds may have expedited Pences exit from Catholic pews: the mid-1990s were a time when conservative Catholics and evangelicals formed an alliance to combat, among other things, marriage equality for LGBT people.

To this day, Pence is the only one of his six siblings who no longer claims to be a Roman Catholic.

Meanwhile, Pence eventually left the Foundation to create his own conservative talk radio show (the Mike Pence Show) to give his ideas a broader audience. He continued to write for the Review, but his main medium became the airwaves, where he fashioned a program he described as Rush Limbaugh on decaf.

In was in his studio that Pence became more vocal about his proclivity for fusing faith and politics. In one episode, Pence railed against Kelly Flinn, Americas first female B-52 pilot who was discharged for disobeying an order to end an affair and later lying about it under oath.

I, for one, believe that the seventh commandment [forbidding adultery], contained in the Ten Commandments, is still a big deal, he said. The promises that we make to our spouses and to our children, the promises that we make in churches and in synagogues, in marriage ceremoniesits the most important promise youll ever make. And holding people accountable to those promisesto me, what could possibly be a bigger deal?

Pence closed with a shot at then-President Bill Clinton, taking a cue from a caller to knock the Commander-in-Chief for accusations of extramarital affairs.

Pence left his career in radio to reenter electoral politics in 1999, and was elected to the House of Representatives in 2000. In addition to upholding general conservative positions, he wasted little time in bringing his faith-fueled political agenda to the House floor.

Speaking with an inflection many evangelicals would recognize in their pulpits, Pence advocated in 2002 for changing science textbooks to describe evolution as merely one theory among many, and suggested including intelligent designa school of thought similar to Christian Creationismalongside the work of Charles Darwin.

The truth is [evolution] always was a theory, he said. And now that weve recognized evolution as a theory, I would simply and humbly ask: can we teach it as such? And can was also consider teaching other theoriesLike the theory that was believed in by every signer of the Declaration of Independence? The Bible tells us that God created man in his own image, male and female he created themand I believe that.

Some bright day in the future, through science and perhaps through faith, we will find the truth from whence we come, he concluded.

Pence also cited his Christianity during efforts to derail LGBTQ rights efforts throughout his time in Congress. In 2006, he described being gay as a choice, dismissing the pro-LGBTQ decisions of activist courts and purporting that denying same-sex couples the right to marry is Gods idea.

Several millennia ago the words were written that a man should leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife and the two shall become one flesh, he said, referencing the biblical books of Genesis and Mark. It was not our idea; it was Gods idea.

Pence developed a habit of citing faithor, alternatively, religious freedomwhile opposing LGBTQ rights legislation. In addition to endorsing gay conversion therapy and besmirching the repeal of Dont Ask, Dont Tell as social experimentation, he decried and voting against LGBTQ workplace nondiscrimination polices, saying it wages war on freedom and religion in the workplace.

He was similarly faith-forward about his foreign policy: My support for Israel stems largely from my personal faith, he said in 2002. In the Bible, God promises Abraham, Those who bless you I will bless, and those who curse you I will curse.

Eventually, some writers stopped using words like Republican or conservative to describe Pence, opting for another moniker instead: theocrat.

Pence reportedly talked less about his faith when he left the halls of Congress to run for governor in 2012, presumably to appeal to a broader audience. One Indiana reporter accused him of hiding his faith under a bushel, a biblical reference. While religion remained the cornerstone of his public persona, it became a more platitudinous form of public spirituality.

I would say that my Christian faith and my relationship with (my wife) Karen are the two most dominant influences in my life today, Pence told the IndyStar during the campaign.

Yet Pences conservative religious sensibilities continued to shine through in his policy agenda. In addition to backing a number of conservative laws in the state, Indianas Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (RFRA) bill thrust Pence and his understanding of religion and politics into the national spotlight. Supporters of the bill openly admitted it was designed to allow religious businesses to discriminate against LGBTQ people, but defended it as necessary to protect religious libertya concept whose definition has long been the subject of heated debate.

The bill was opposed by a broad coalition of businesses, civil rights advocates, athletes, and, ironically, several religious groupsincluding entire Christian denominations. But Pence, who developed his problematic understanding of religious liberty years before, signed the bill anyway.

This bill is not about discrimination, he said at the time, and if I thought it legalized discrimination in any way in Indiana, I would have vetoed itFor more than twenty years, the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act has never undermined our nations anti-discrimination laws, and it will not in Indiana.

It was only after opposition groups such Apple and NASCAR doubled down on their threat to boycott the state that Pence and his allies agreed to a fix for the bill that significantly watered down its ability to hurt LGBTQ people.

The whole RFRA spectacle, complete with colorful protests, damaged Pences standing in the Hoosier State and put his reelection prospects in doubt. When Donald Trump called on him to be his running mate, the political advantages were obvious.

Less clear was how Pences traditional, conservative Christianity would gel with Trump, a twice-divorced man infamously inept at reciting scripture and basic evangelical principles, much less articulating complicated theological ideas. And in addition to Trumps unusual misunderstanding of religious liberty, even Pence was appalled when The Donald first proposed his Muslim ban in December 2015, tweeting, Calls to ban Muslims from entering the U.S. are offensive and unconstitutional.

Yet for all the time Pence spent building up credibilityor at least name recognitionamong the Religious Right, he has been decidedly less vocal about his faith since he was tapped by Trump.

Once he entered Trumps orbit, for instance, the supposed crusader for religious freedom inexplicably abandoned his opposition to the Muslim ban. He has done nothing to prevent the administration from enacting it.

Instead, Pence has forged a new role as a loyal translator of the presidents policies, coating them in a religious veneer for so-called values voters. When the annual anti-abortion March for Life rolled through Washington, it was Pence who addressed the overwhelmingly religious crowd, telling them life is winning again in America. And when the Trump administration finally condemned anti-Semitism after four waves of bomb threats in February, it was Pencenot Trumpwho visited a desecrated Jewish cemetery in St. Louis to deliver a speech and help with clean-up efforts.

And despite valid criticisms of theological inconsistency on Pences part, his spiritual messaging tactics appear to be working. White evangelicals continue to embrace Trump in large numbers, and they remain the only major religious group in the country whose support for Trumps Muslim ban has increased since last year.

Whats more, many evangelicals uncomfortable with Trump say they take comfort in the counsel of Pence, who they see as one of their own. In a recent roundtable discussion on CNN, a voter from Ohio noted that as a Christian, he is seeing hope in Trumps administration for restoring values he believes in. When asked what Trump has done to instill that hope, he didnt mention Trump himselfhe talked about Pence.

[Trump] has already got a vice president who definitely stands firm in my beliefvery firm, he said. I believe in him. Hes a very conservative man, and I think hell be good for everybody.

Pence would likely agree. But his role of vice-president-as-cheerleader has already begun to obscure the personal brand of religiosity he once wore on his sleeve.

When he took the stage at this years CPAC, less than a year after his appearance at the RNC convention, Pence was quick to note that it was his 9th time addressing the conservative conference. But he did not pivot back to his signature canned one-liner about being a Christian first. Instead, he regaled the crowd with the benefits of Trumps agenda, repeating no fewer than six different versions of Trumps campaign slogan, Make America Great Again.

He did offer a spiritual framework as he closedbut only in ways that bolstered the presidents rhetoric. Pence recalled Inauguration Day, when he opened the Bible he used while swearing in as vice president. He said it was bookmarked to the same passage he regularly quoted while campaigning on behalf of Trump.

In the days aheadwe would do well to remember those ancient words, that if his people, who are called by his name, will humble themselves and pray, hell do like hes always done, youll hear from him, and hell heal this land, he said, slightly misquoting 2 Chronicles 7:14.

The Pence of the past may have said more, or brought God talk in sooner. But the Pence of the present seems to have a new order of identitiesone that begins with preaching Trumps gospel.

But then, maybe part of him always was.

This article is part of an ongoing series on the faith of presidential candidates and, now, the members of the new Trump administration. You can find the other articles in the series here.

Read the original here:
Mike Pence, your friendly neighborhood 'theocrat' - ThinkProgress