Archive for February, 2017

2nd Amendment Groups Frustrated with Proposed DFL Firearm Legislation – Alpha News MN

St. Paul, MN Second Amendment advocacy organizations in Minnesota are responding to three firearm bills introduced by the DFL in the Minnesota State Legislature.

During a Thursday press conference DFL lawmakers unveiled three pieces of firearm legislation, fostering concern in several of Minnesotas Second Amendment supporters.

Senator Jeff Hayden (DFL Minneapolis), who lost his younger sister, Taylor, to gun violence last year while she was in Atlanta, introduced the Taylor Hayden Gun Violence Protection Act which would dedicate $200,000 in taxpayer dollars every year to be given to anti-gun groups like Everytown and Protect MN.

Hayden presented alongside law enforcement officers, anti-gun advocates, and his fellow DFL lawmakers, who introduced two additional pieces of anti-gun legislation. One bill would allow Minnesotans to obtain a court order to withhold guns from mentally unstable family members. The other bill would require background checks for Minnesotans who buy or receive guns from another private citizen. Both bills were introduced in previous legislative sessions.

We were sorry to hear of the loss that Senator Haydens family has suffered with the tragic murder of his sister last year. However, what was proposed last week is more of the same tired old gun control strategies of the past brought out from the same groups, with the same messaging, and the same falsehoods said Bryan Strawser, Chairman of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, explaining, Voters across the state rejected their message of gun control soundly in November. Gun control groups spent almost a million dollars in out-of-state funding to win seats in the Minnesota legislature, and succeeded in only two races. Instead, voters sent the strongest pro-Second Amendment majority in recent history to Saint Paul.

Strawser is correct in his assessment of Minnesotans electing a very pro-Second Amendment majority. As Alpha News previously reported, Republicans in the State Legislature introduced bills in January to address permitless-carry and stand-your-ground legislation.

The Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance wrote a Facebook post rejecting the three pieces of DFL gun legislation, stating, The new one (bill) will force the STATE, using your money, to fund anti-gun advocacy groups. These will need to be blocked.

Subscribe to Alpha News as we continue to track this legislation.

comments

Read the original here:
2nd Amendment Groups Frustrated with Proposed DFL Firearm Legislation - Alpha News MN

House Dems warn of ‘terribly alarming’ Republican gun bills – The Hill

House Democrats are pushing back against GOP attempts to loosen the nations gun laws.

Republican proposals to allow law-abiding gun owners to carry their firearms out of state and allow hunters to use sound suppressors are terribly alarming, Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) said Tuesday at a press conference.

Democrats are rallying to defeat these efforts on Capitol Hill. The legislation is almost certain to pass in the House, but they might stand a chance in the Senate, where Democrats can block a vote on the bills.

Now you have a pro-NRA president in Donald TrumpDonald TrumpPavlich: GOP gets green light on cuts Moulitsas: Owning Trumps failures Overnight Healthcare: GOP looks for ObamaCare path as right lashes out MORE, and sales are way down, profits are way down, Beyer added. They need a way to build back their profits. How do you do it? You create a brand new revenue stream to sell silencers, you make sure you can carry a concealed weapon everywhere. This is all about building up gun profitability.

This comes one day after Sen. John CornynJohn CornynOvernight Cybersecurity: Trump's intel pick faces Senate | House panel to mark up cyber standards bill DNI confirmation offers preview of surveillance debate Schumer: Trump speech 'less important' that past presidents' addresses MORE (R-Texas) introduced the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, which allows people who are legally permitted to own a gun in one state to carry that firearm in another state.

Proponents say it will allow law-abiding gun owners to travel across state lines with their firearms without being arrested. But critics point out that gun owners from states with weaker laws could pose a risk to people in other states.

Thompson called the bill an effort to dumb down the process for getting a concealed carry permit.

Republicans are also backing the Hearing Protection Act, which would allow gun owners to use sound suppressors to reduce the noise of their firearms. Proponents say it will protect the hearing of hunters, but critics argue these devices are paramount to silencers and could be exploited by criminals.

Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn.) called it a gift to the gun lobby.

This is not an attack on the Second Amendment of the United States, said Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.). Thats bull.

Thompson, the chairman of the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, also raised concerns about the Republican effort to roll back an Obama-era regulation that blocked certain disability recipients who are mentally ill from owning guns.

It was very said to learn that the first thing the new Republican majority did when they got here was make it easier for people who are mentally ill to have firearms, Thompson said.

Read the original here:
House Dems warn of 'terribly alarming' Republican gun bills - The Hill

MIGRANT CRISIS: Hungary risks EU’s wrath as it starts building ANOTHER border fence – Express.co.uk

GETTY

Prime Minister Viktor Orban's right-wing government considers migration to be one of the largest threats to the status quo in the EU.

But officials in Brussels and some other EU centres are distressed by some of his go-it-alone policies.

A European Parliament committee, for example, was due on Monday to discuss the state of fundamental rights in Hungary.

Mr Orban was also a rare EU leader to endorse US President Donald Trump, who is seeking to built a wall along the US-Mexico border.

The European Commission should not stand by while Hungary makes a mockery of the right to seek asylum.

Benjamin Ward

A barbed-wire fence is already in place, erected in 2015, when Hungary was part of the main overland route for hundreds of thousands of migrants and refugees, many fleeing the war in Syria.

It effectively blocked the route to Germany, where many were heading, but Hungary has said a second fence would make the barrier more effective and hold back migrants while processing their asylum requests.

Although the pressure on the border is far from the peak of the 2015 crisis, border patrols still prevent hundreds of illegal border crossings per day and escort back dozens of migrants who manage to break through, the government says.

GETTY

Poles for the second fence are already standing near the border station Kelebia, and construction materials have also been shipped to the border elsewhere.

Mr Orban's chief of staff, Janos Lazar, last week said the government had earmarked 110million for the fence and containment camps to hold migrants.

He said the second border fence, which will extend only to the Hungary-Serbia border for now, would be built as soon as the weather permitted and would be standing by the end of spring.

Getty Images

1 of 53

A Migrant is helped to wash tear gas from his eyes after clashes with Hungarian police at the Horgos border

GETTY

Rights groups Hungarian Helsinki Committee and Human Rights Watch on Friday sent a complaint to EU Migration Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos about current practices and proposed legal changes.

Human Rights Watch deputy director Benjamin Ward said: The European Commission should not stand by while Hungary makes a mockery of the right to seek asylum.

"Using transit zones as detention centres and forcing asylum seekers who are already inside Hungary back to the Serbian side of the razor-wire fence is abusive, pointless, and cruel."

GETTY

The Hungarian government's practice of allowing only 10 people in per day also creates a dangerous bottleneck along the Hungary-Serbia border in sometimes inhumane conditions, the rights groups added.

The government rejected that in an emailed reply to Reuters.

A statement said: Human Rights Watch... again tries to denigrate those serving at the border.

"Hungary was among the first to honour the EU's rules, protects the Schengen borders, stops, registers and separates refugees from economic migrants."

Originally posted here:
MIGRANT CRISIS: Hungary risks EU's wrath as it starts building ANOTHER border fence - Express.co.uk

Tancredo: Illegal Immigration Props Up Mexico’s Dysfunctional State – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Mexico is not happy that President Trump appears to be serious about building a border wall and halting the cross-border human traffic. The improvements in border security promised in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as a trade-off for the general amnesty never happened, and illegal border crossings have trended upwards again after a brief decline connected to the 2008-10 recession. Apprehensions of illegal border jumpers on the southwest border have increased every year but one since 2010, and increased 23 percent from 2015 to 2016.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Because of the relative ease of crossing the border and Mexicos liberal definition of Mexican citizenship, we have the situation recently described by author Ann Coulter, who discovered that persons of Mexican origin now residing in the United States legal and illegal are equal in number to over 25 percent of the 130 million population of Mexico.

The Pew Hispanic Center says there were 33.7 million Americans of Mexican descent in the United States in 2012, and that figure is based in part on the official Census figure of 11.3 million illegal aliens, over 60 percent of whom are from Mexico. If you believe as I do that the illegal alien population of the U.S. is over 25 million, not 11.3 million, then the percentage of Mexican nationals now residing in the U.S. persons recognized as Mexican citizens under the Mexican Constitution is considerably above 25 percent.

Few Americans are aware that in 2005, in recognition of the growing importance of remittances to the Mexican economy and thus the growing importance of maintaining a close connection with the millions of Mexicans who have moved north, the Mexican constitution was amended to bestow voting rights in presidential elections for Mexicans living abroad. In 2012, over eleven million Mexicans living in the United States voted in the Mexican presidential election.

Let me put this in stark economic terms: Mexicos national income grows in direct proportion to the size of the illegal Mexican population inside the United States. Does that help explain the Mexican fixation on U.S. politics? Mexicos most profitable export to the U.S. is not oil or avocados or automobile parts, it is people.

Mexicans living and working in theU.S. send home over $20 billion annually in cash remittances more than Mexico earns in foreign currency from tourism or any export commodity.

In 1979, Mexico received only $177,000 (U.S. Dollars) in remittances; in 2016 it was $26.1 BILLION over 90 percent of it from persons living in the United States. (See here for a GAO report on remittances to Mexico from the U.S. and here for the World Bank reports for total remittances received by Mexico.)

You dont believe government data? Even the Clinton News Network confirms it: this recent CNN report says Mexico relies more on remittance income than the sale of oil or tourism.

To guarantee those remittance dollars keep flowing north to south, Mexico must keep exporting its citizens south to north. Does anyone think Mexico will give up that lucrative income graciously?Do you think Mexican politicians will welcome an interruption of either of those two flows either people going north or dollars coming south?

As a Congressman, back in 2001, I visited Mexico along with two of my colleagues and met with several high government officials in the Mexican capital. One of those officials was Juan Hernandez, a dual citizen with a home in Texas, who at that time was the head of a cabinet department. That department had the name,Ministry for Mexicans Living Abroad, but it has since been reorganized and given a lower public profile as the Institute for Mexicans Abroad, a government-funded division of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

I asked Seor Hernandez, what exactly do you do here? He was quite candid and informative and not the least bit apologetic. Hernandezs job was to direct and coordinate a large collection of enterprises of transport and educational activities aimed at assisting and encouraging Mexicans in physically moving north across Mexico and entering the United States.

I was struck by both the grandiosity and bravura of that official Mexican government operationdirected by a cabinet official. Somewhat shocked by his candid admissions, I asked Hernandez, hey, arent you embarrassed by violating the sovereignty of a neighboring country? His reply was delivered calmly and with a smile. I remember his words clearly: Really, congressman, we dont have two countries here, its just a region.

I also asked Hernandez, why does the Mexican government work so hard to maintain contact with Mexicans even after they become naturalized citizens of the United States? He told me, its because they tend to stop sending money home after they assimilate. Assimilation, he believed, was a problem: if Mexicans stopped being Mexicans first, and Americans second, that is very bad for Mexico.

Juan Hernandez, as I said, is a dual citizen of Mexico and the United States, and he has been very involved in U.S. politics. In 2008, working from his Texas home, he was named as presidential candidate John McCains chief of Outreach to Hispanic Americans.

You can makeofthat connection with John McCain what you will; maybe the guy just needed a job. But as for myself, I would worry if my candidate were endorsed by the Juan Hernandez characters of the world, and I am delighted that Seor Juan Hernandez is apoplectic over the plans announced by President Trump.

What lies ahead for U.S.-Mexican relations? Your guess is as good as mine, but if Trump persists in his plans, Mexican bluster and outrage will be replaced by a more pragmatic accommodation. The border will continue to be a point of conflict, but Mexico may come to realize that the end of the remittance cornucopia was inevitable.

Mexico can grow its own economy and create millions of jobs for its people by abandoning its socialist dogmas and state-owned enterprises. If that happens, someday soon Mexican politicians will see the bitter medicine administered by Trump as a blessing in disguise.

Polls of newly-arrived Mexicans who entered our country illegally reveal that the large majority of them do not intend to stay forever. Typically, uponarrival, they plan to get a job, send money home, and then return home to Mexico and enjoy a better life than what they left.

Mexicans naturally retain a love of thecountryof their birthand that love of country is certainly not a bad thing if you think of it as your true home. If ten million Mexicans now in the United States became optimistic about Mexicos future and returned home to fight corruption, build a better educational system and a stronger economy, that, too, would not be a bad thing.

Read more here:
Tancredo: Illegal Immigration Props Up Mexico's Dysfunctional State - Breitbart News

Veterans Group Blasts Sen. Warren for Support of Undocumented … – Fox News Insider

Members of the group Veterans Assisting Veterans joined "Fox & Friends" Monday to discuss their opposition to the immigration policies of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and other lawmakers.

The Massachusetts-based group is demanding that the interests of veterans are placed before those of undocumented immigrants.

Trump Tweets That He Will Be Skipping White House Correspondents' Dinner

Watters Asks PA College Students About 'White Privilege' Pin Campaign

"There's hundreds of veterans dying every day. ... Why don't we address those problems first, and then we'll worry about other people coming into our country," said Dennis Moschella, the group's president.

The group would like to see the veterans be supported first, since they are the ones providing the lawmakers the opportunity to speak on these immigration issues by serving their country.

The group's spokesman John MacDonald said Veterans Assisting Veterans is by no means anti-immigration and in fact salutes the countless immigrants who have fought for America.

"Elizabeth Warren and people like her seem to have a very hard time understanding the difference between legal and illegal. ... It seems to be the fact that she's more interested in creating political theater than she is in helping Americans," MacDonald said.

Watch the full interview above. Plus, be sure to catch Judge Jeanine Pirro's powerful opening statement on police officers protecting undocumented immigrants in so-called sanctuary cities.

Witches Cast Mass Spell with Hopes of Removing Trump from Office

Bernie Sanders Trolls Trump on Twitter with Inauguration Crowd-Size Photo

See the original post:
Veterans Group Blasts Sen. Warren for Support of Undocumented ... - Fox News Insider