Archive for May, 2014

SEO Client Retention Tips: 7 Mistakes Ive Made That You Shouldnt by @mchuckgreen

During the past three years I have managed SEO projects for small and mid-sized businesses. My failures have taught me many valuable lessons. I am the perfectperson to explain mistakes to avoid, because Im pretty sure I have made them all.

If you manage SEO projects, this post is for you. Theseare the most crucial SEO mistakes you should avoid making. Follow my advice, and you willlikelysee your retention rates improve.

I am not talking about a situation where a month passes and you are worried because you havefailed to achieve SERP domination. Normally, thats impossible.

Business owners want to feel good about the investment that theyve made right from the start, and the best way for you to ensure that is to start working as soon as they pay, and keep them updated on that work via emails or phone calls.

Here are some specific ways to start slow that I have been guilty of:

In 2014, you wont be very effective for a client without getting their input and feedback regarding content, goals, other marketing efforts, etc. Staying in close contact with your client from the beginning should occur naturally.

Countless times made the mistake of having an SEO Ego and thinking I dont need to listen to the client, they need to listen to ME!. Needless to say, this is not a productive mindset.

Yes, I do have more knowledge about SEO than the client, but you know what I have not a clue about? Their business.

It is critical that you not only ask your client the right questions, but also actively listen to their responses, particularly during the initial stages of the project.

The client will be able to tell if youre SEO ego is showing, and that harms your ability to establish trust.

View post:
SEO Client Retention Tips: 7 Mistakes Ive Made That You Shouldnt by @mchuckgreen

UNfree Press: As UN Censorship Alliance Prez Makes Claims, UNTV Shows FUNCA Skepticism – Video


UNfree Press: As UN Censorship Alliance Prez Makes Claims, UNTV Shows FUNCA Skepticism
UN #39;s Charade of World Press Freedom Day Had Bid to Censor Opposition By Matthew Russell Lee UNITED NATIONS, May 9 -- At the UN, the head of the UN Correspond...

By: InnerCity Press

Follow this link:
UNfree Press: As UN Censorship Alliance Prez Makes Claims, UNTV Shows FUNCA Skepticism - Video

ARE YOU SICK OF BEING CENSORSHIP – Video


ARE YOU SICK OF BEING CENSORSHIP
Published on May 14, 2014 By: tatoott1009 Raise Sea Levels Higher MSM Pushes Doomsday http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/05/13... World War III Has Begun In Ukraine http://www.tatoott1009.com/2014/0...

By: Spiritwolf Ofthewild

Continued here:
ARE YOU SICK OF BEING CENSORSHIP - Video

Rape Culture is a Panic Where Paranoia, Censorship, and False Accusations Flourish

Living Sexual Assault Larry Contratti

Christina Hoff Sommers is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a TIME contributor, and author of several books, including The War Against Boys. She hosts a weekly video blog The Factual Feminist

On January 27, 2010, University of North Dakota officials charged undergraduate Caleb Warner with sexually assaulting a fellow student. He insisted the encounter was consensual, but was found guilty by a campus tribunal and thereupon expelled and banned from campus.

A few months later, Warner received surprising news. The local police had determined not only that Warner was innocent, but that the alleged victim had deliberately falsified her charges. She was charged with lying to police for filing a false report, and fled the state.

Cases like Warners are proliferating. Here is a partial list of young men who have recently filed lawsuits against their schools for what appear to be gross mistreatment in campus sexual assault tribunals: Drew SterrettUniversity of Michigan, John DoeSwarthmore, Anthony VillarPhiladelphia University, Peter YuVassar, Andre HenryDelaware State, Dez WellsXavier, and Zackary HuntDenison. Presumed guilty is the new legal principle where sex is concerned.

Sexual assault on campus is a genuine problembut the new rape culture crusade is turning ugly. The list of falsely accused young men subject to kangaroo court justice is growing apace. Students at Boston University demanded that a Robin Thicke concert be cancelled: His hit song Blurred Lines is supposedly a rape anthem. (It includes the words, I know you want it.) Professors at Oberlin, University of California, Santa Barbara, and Rutgers have been urged to place trigger warnings on class syllabi that include books like the Great Gatsbytoo much misogynist violence. This movement is turning our campuses into hostile environments for free expression and due process. And so far, university officials, political leaders, and the White House are siding with the mob.

It appears that we are in the throes of one of those panics where paranoia, censorship, and false accusations flourishand otherwise sensible people abandon their critical facilities. We are not facing anything as extreme as the Salem Witch Trials or the McCarthy inquisitions. But todays rape culture movement bears some striking similarities to a panic that gripped daycare centers in the 1980s.

In August 1983, an anguished mother reported to the police that her 2-year old son had been horrifically abused in the McMartin preschool in Manhattan Beach, California. She described a network of underground tunnels where school staff had sodomized her child and forced him to watch animal sacrifices. The mother was mentally disturbed and her story had no basis in reality. But the news media seized on the story, and paranoia about Satanic Cults became a national epidemic. Parents were already on edge: advocacy groups, politicians, and the media had warned that nearly 50,000 children were being abducted by strangers, and 4,000 of them murdered, every year. As news of the McMartin barbarity spread, daycare personnel in schools across the nation found themselves implicated in the crime of satanic-ritual child abuse. A national network of abuse-therapists promptly materialized. Through the use of intimidating interviewing techniques, they egged on children to remember terrible abuses in their daycare.

The abuse therapists were joined by an influential group of conspiracy-minded feminists, including Gloria Steinem and Catharine MacKinnon. When a few civil libertarian feministsCarol Tavris, Wendy Kaminer, Ellen Willis, and Debbie Nathantried to blow the whistle on the witch-hunt, they were vilified by the conspiracy caucus as backlashers, child abuse apologists, and obedient daddies girls of male editors.

From the start of the scare in 1983 until its ending in the mid-1990s, untold numbers of children were subject to manipulative therapies and hundreds of innocent adults faced charges of ritual child abuse. Several of the accused would spend years in prison for crimes that never happened. A recent Slate article called it one of the most damaging moral panics in Americas history, which only began to abate when skeptical journalists got round to checking facts and asking questions. A 1985 story in the Los Angeles Times informed readers that, according to FBI reports, the number of child kidnappings by strangers in 1984 was 67, not 50,000

More:
Rape Culture is a Panic Where Paranoia, Censorship, and False Accusations Flourish

Lisle museum exhibit to explore film censorship in Chicago

LISLE A Lisle native, museum curator and 22-year-old college student has joined forces with his North Central College professor to create an exhibit exploring the history of Chicago film censorship.

Brian Failing, a senior at North Central, cowrote an upcoming exhibit at the Lisle Station Museum with associate professor of speech communication and coordinator for the college's urban and suburban studies program, Steve Macek, called, "Banned in Chicago: Eight Decades of Film Censorship in the Windy City."

The exhibit is the result of research the two conducted for a book Macek is working on. Failing was Macek's research assistant over the course of two summers.

"He was very excited about the research we were doing on the history of film censorship in Chicago," Macek said. "He thought it would make a compelling exhibit."

Failing has worked at the museum since he was 15 years old, and took over as curator his senior year of high school.

"I thought (film censorship) was a topic that's really important and really interesting that I think a lot of people will like, because everyone likes stuff that has to do with films, movies and Hollywood," Failing said.

In 1907, Chicago became the first city in the country to create a local film censorship authority, Macek said. The city also had the longest-lasting such authority in the country it was dissolved in 1984 after funding for the agency stopped.

"When it was first created, the police chief the head of Chicago police was responsible for reviewing and licensing films," Macek said. "Any films that were amoral or obscene could be banned."

About a decade after the agency was created, Macek said the authority was delegated to a civilian board, which was usually chaired by a police officer. The other members of the board were often women.

"The thinking was that women had a stronger moral sense than men and were better able to determine what was suitable," Macek said.

More:
Lisle museum exhibit to explore film censorship in Chicago