Mediaboss Marketing

Key points:

Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin declared that the blockchain ecosystem is already prepared to confront potential quantum attacks through a recovery fork. In a recent blog post, Buterin shared insights on the possible availability of quantum computers in the near future, which poses potential risks as hackers would have access to the devices.

While such a scenario poses the risk of users losing their funds through unauthorized access and exploits, Buterin asserted that Ethereum is immune to it. He stated, I argue that actually, we are already well-positioned to make a pretty simple recovery fork to deal with such a situation.

Colin Wu, a Chinese crypto researcher, recently shared an X post on his Wu Blockchain page, shedding light on Buterins insights. He highlighted that the infrastructure for such a hard fork implementation could be begun immediately, making the Ethereum ecosystem maximally ready in case a quantum emergency does actually come to pass.

Vitalik: If quantum computers are available, and bad actors are able to use them to steal users funds. The blockchain would have to hard fork and users would have to download new wallet software, but few users would lose their funds. The infrastructure to implement a hard fork

As per the post, during the blockchains hard fork event, the backup plan could be implemented while the users need to download a new software wallet. However, Buterin added that there is a possibility that a few users will lose their funds.

Buterin detailed the procedures involved in the proposed hard fork. When a large-scale theft is detected, users are recommended to revert all blocks after the first block. Then, traditional EOA-based transactions should be disabled.

The next step includes adding a new transaction type, allowing smart contract wallet transactions. Finally, new transaction types or opcodes are added to allow for STARK proofs. If the proof is successful, the account code will switch to a new verification code, permitting the users to use it as a smart contract wallet.

See the original post:

Ethereum Founder Proposes Recovery Fork to Confront Quantum Attacks - TradingView

Source: ShutterStock

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has revealed that a larger section of the crypto community did not respect Sam Bankman-Fried as depicted by the mainstream media.

Buterin has been a long critic of Bankman Fried since the collapse of the latters digital asset exchange, FTX, and has made new revelations concerning the matter.

Speaking in a podcast interview with Sriram Krishnan and Aarthi Ramamurthy, Buterin spoke on the reputation of SBF, how the sector continues to recover from the infamous scandal, and the growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI).

According to Buterin, the crypto industry had reservations about SBF from the beginning although no one expected $8 billion to go into thin air.

I think a lot of people have this misconception that everybody deeply respected Sam and that he caught the entire ecosystem by surprise but if you're looking at Ethereum influencers like Anthony Sassano, a lot of them disrespected him and FTX from the beginning."

The main reason for Buterins judgment was SBFs inability to project the cause of cryptocurrencies and related technologies without financial benefits.

He was just not able to articulate a vision of why crypto was goodhe just clearly saw it as purely a business opportunity. It's like, 'Oh, hey, crypto is this thing where you can make money, he added.

Recall that after the collapse of FTX, Buterin noted that people were mostly drawn to the marketing of FTX which he compared to the 1930 dictators adding that cryptocurrencies are more than the lifestyle and brands of the company.

Buterin also spoke on the rapid development of AI in several industries including cryptocurrencies hailing the level of adoption so far.

According to him, AI would help human capabilities in the workspace and should be embraced at this stage citing the example of ChatGPT.

"I think one of the positive aspects of this is that I think it's a good example of how, instead of AI killing 30% of the jobs, which would be catastrophic and terrible, it's like, AI is killing 30% of your job, which is an amazing time saver.

He touched on the ability of AI to disrupt the creative space including the production of movies in Hollywood. Although he stated that he doesnt want to see artists get replaced, he added that he would love to see an author easily produce a movie with the numerous tools provided by AI.

I would want to see the cost of making a movie go down from $100,000 to one person with basically just his creativity and a couple of months with an AI platform."

Here is the original post:

Ethereum Co-founder Vitalik Buterin Shares Insights on Sam Bankman-Fried's Reputation - Cryptonews

The co-founder of Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin said that the crypto community had reservations about Sam Bankman-Fried and his cryptocurrency exchange, FTX. But the mainstream media paid attention to him as an industry leader due to his high-profile image.

Recently, Buterin had a podcast interview with Sriram Krishnan and Aarthi Ramamurthy. In an interview, he said, I think a lot of people have this misconception that everybody deeply respected Sam and that he caught the entire ecosystem by surprise,

I think it is true that nobody expected a literal $8 billion blow up, but if youre looking at Ethereum influencers like Anthony Sassano, a lot of them disrespected him and FTX from the beginning, he added.

Buterin continued by saying that many people in the cryptocurrency community had doubts about Bankman-Fried since he seemed to have a clear vision of why cryptocurrency technology was valuable.

He was just not able to articulate a vision of why crypto was goodhe just clearly saw it as purely a business opportunity, Buterin recalled. Its like, Oh, hey, crypto is this thing where you can make money.'

Buterin differed Bankman-Frieds outlook with the foundational principle of cypherpunk ideology and decentralization goals which support projects like Bitcoin and Ethereum, Buterin underscores a misalignment in values.

He just, I think, never really struck the community as a person who deeply believed it, he said. That more than anything else might really be the cause of the mistrust that existed already.

The interview clarifies the complexity of the cryptocurrency industry, where well-known people and initiatives can generate conflicting responses from the community. Buterin also gives a deeper understanding of the ethos and values of the crypto space which is essential for building trust.

Also Read: Unseen Portrait of Vitalik Buterin Auction as NFT

Link:

Vitalik Buterin reveals Crypto Community Never respected SBF - Crypto Times

What is The Surge (Ethereum)?

The Surge is the second phase of Ethereums developmental roadmap, where the blockchain is poised to scale using rollups. This phase follows the Merge, which marked Ethereums transition from a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism to proof-of-stake (PoS).

Within The Surge, various network upgrades are planned, with Proto-Danksharding being a standout feature. Its anticipated that this development phase will significantly enhance network throughput and curtail Ethereums gas fees.

According to Ethereums co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, the main goal is to achieve a network throughput of 100,000 transactions per second and beyond on rollups.

Blockchain technology, still in its nascent stages, is constantly evolving. The thought leaders of the industry are always seeking superior methods to scale public blockchain networks without compromising security and decentralization.

This context leads us to the trajectory of Ethereums development. Originally, the blueprint envisaged the blockchains scaling through sharding. The strategy aimed to bolster Ethereums capacity by segmenting the mainnet into 64 distinct shard chains.

Each shard was designed with a specific use case in mind and would have its own unique set of miner/validators. These multiple chains were projected to distribute the network load, leading to quicker transactions and reduced fees. But as rollup technology advanced, it captured the attention of the Ethereum community, emerging as a potentially more efficient method for scaling the blockchain.

Rollups help layer one (L1) blockchains, such as Ethereum, scale by processing transactions off-chain, thereby reducing the computational load on the L1.

Developers can build applications on top of rollup chains without adding undue strain to the Ethereum mainnet. In such as setup, Ethereum only serves as the settlement layer. Rollups submit their transactions to the Ethereum L1, which can be used to verify transactions, resolve disputes, and create Merkle proofs essential for affirming ownership of assets and facilitating cryptocurrency withdrawals from the rollup

While the initial roadmap emphasized execution sharding, the current strategy pivots to data sharding. Now, The Surge is heralded as the next stage to help Ethereum achieve large-scale expansion through rollups.

According to Buterins infographics, EIP-4844 or Proto-Danksharding is the first component of The Surge. Here is all you need to know about EIP-4844:

Here is the thesis behind why it is OK to delete the data in the blobs.

According to Ethereum developers, a rollup is composed of two parts: data and execution check.

The advocates of EIP-4844 argue that theres no necessity for transaction data to be perpetually accessible. Instead, it should only remain available for a sufficient duration, enabling anyone to check and validate the transactions recorded on Ethereum.

EIP-4844 suggests purging transaction data after a fixed period ranging between one and three months, thereby alleviating the need for Ethereum nodes to retain extensive data. Leading Ethereum developers believe this approach will shift the onus of comprehensive data storage off-chain to third parties.

By utilizing temporary data blobs, Ethereum aims to facilitate a greater throughput of transactions. Additionally, this approach is expected to notably reduce gas fees for end users

Proto-Danksharding serves as the initial phase in Ethereums rollup scaling strategy, paving the way for the complete rollup scaling solution called Danksharding.

To put it simply, Danksharding can be thought of as Proto-Danksharding on steroids. The ongoing strategy aims to increase the number of temporary data blobs from a single one in Proto-Danksharding to 64 in Danksharding.

According to Ethereum.org,

Danksharding will bring massive amounts of space on Ethereum for rollups to dump their compressed transaction data. This means Ethereum will be able to support hundreds of individual rollups with ease and make millions of transactions per second a reality.

Yet, according to the company, Danksharding is still several years away from realization. For the Ethereum network to accommodate Danksharding, it must undergo multiple upgrades, including the introduction of proposer-builder separation and data availability sampling.

Just like the Merge, The Surge is anticipated to span over multiple years. Although the Merge neither diminished Ethereums gas fees nor enhanced its network throughput, The Surge promises tangible benefits for end users.

As of now, the timeline for EIP-4844 remains uncertain. Some media outlets speculate its implementation could materialize by the close of 2023.

See original here:

What is the Surge (Ethereum)? Definition, Feratures, and Timeline - Techopedia

Digital Art XRP Logo Symbol. Ripple Cryptocurrency Futuristic 3D Illustration.

In the latest controversial revelation, oversight watchdog group Empower Oversight released a new batch of documents for a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The documents highlight the deeper involvement of Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin and his blockchain firm ConsenSys in the crypto speech by former SEC Director of Corporation Finance, William Hinman, on June 14, 2018.

This speech has been a source of disagreement in the Ripple case, particularly because the SEC has stated that other cryptocurrencies, like XRP, were also considered unregistered securities. Ripple attorneys stressed much on the Hinman speech of 2018 during its fight with the SEC, as it noted that assets like Ethereum arent securities. However, the latest details of Lubins involvement have sparked major outrage in the XRP community.

The documents released by the watchdog group reveal that Lubin also appears to have been responsible for bringing Hinman and Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin together as the speech drafting advanced. Moreover, investors and lawyers closely linked to Ethereum were notably present at a meeting on March 28, 2018, regarding a proposal for a crypto safe harbor.

The documents also show that Hinman had a meeting with Chris Lin, a partner at Simpson Thacher, which goes against advice on conflicts of interest rules. The SEC Ethics Office had warned Hinman multiple times because he was receiving millions of dollars from Simpson Thacher while working at the SEC.

Empower Oversight has been leading the fight for more transparency at the SEC. They have filed many requests and lawsuits under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to make the SEC release documents related to their decisions about cryptocurrency matters.

Follow us for the latest crypto news!

The news has sparked reactions among XRP supporters. In a tweet yesterday, Crypto-Law.US pointed out that the newly disclosed emails show how Lubin influenced Hinmans decision to title his speech The Ether Speech.

As a response, Attorney John Deaton, the founder of Crypto-Law.US, shared how Hinman lied during his deposition in the Ripple lawsuit. Hinman had claimed that he never discussed the content of his speech with anyone outside the SEC before June 14. However, the Hinman documents revealed that he had a meeting with Buterin a week before his speech on cryptocurrencies.

Fred Rispoli, a lawyer at HODLaw, praised the efforts of Empower Oversight, tweeting, Great job Empower Oversight. SEC never expected these documents to be made public

Similarly, Digital Asset Investor.XRP also questioned the double standards noting: Why was Bill Hinman doing backflips to accommodate Joseph Lubin and Vitalik Buterin while at the same time giving Brad Garlinghouse the run-around with the help of Jay Clayton and even coming back to the SEC after he left to make sure the Ripple lawsuit went through?

Crypto News Flash does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to cryptocurrencies. Crypto News Flash is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.

The rest is here:

XRP Army Outrages Over Joseph Lubin's Involvement in Hinman ... - Crypto News Flash