Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Ukraine to Probe Defaced Bulgarian Monument – Balkan Insight

Ukraine authorities have vowed to investigate the vandalization of a monument to Bulgarian volunteer fighters in the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1888 in the city of Bolhrad in Ukraines Odessa region.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mariana Betsa condemned ccident on Tuesday and said the ministry suspected a deliberate provocation which aims to provoke tension and to undermine friendly Bulgarian-Ukranian relations.

Earlier on Tuesday, Ukraine's Trassa E-95 news agency reported that the monument, which was erected by the Association of Bulgarians in Ukraine in 2012, had been splashed with yellow paint, allegedly by Ukrainian nationalists.

A sign painted on one of the memorial plaques read: Suitcase station Sofia, which was interpreted as a call for the large Bulgarian ethnic community to leave the region of Odessa.

The accident has not been caught on video, as the cameras surrounding the monument had been stolen a year ago.

Bolhrads municipal council had promised to clean the monument for March 3, Bulgarias national holiday, when celebrations organized by the Bulgarian community are to take place.

Bulgarias Foreign Ministry condemned the attack on the monument and explained that it had happened on the night between 27 and 28 February.

We qualify this act as a provocation that is spreading tension in the Bulgarian community in the region, it said in a letter to BIRN on Wednesday.

It praised the quick reaction of the Foreign Ministry of Ukraine and said it expected Ukrainian law enforcement authorities to take all the necessary measures to identify and prosecute the perpetrators of the act and prevent such actions in the future.

Bolhrad, which is 167 kilometres away from the southern port city of Odessa, is home to some 16,000 ethnic Bulgarians. Bulgarian settlers founded the town in 1821.

The Russian-Turkish war ended with the liberation of Bulgaria from Ottoman Occupation and the establishment of a Bulgarian state in 1878.

This article has been ammended to include a comment from the Bulgarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on March 1, 2017.

Continued here:
Ukraine to Probe Defaced Bulgarian Monument - Balkan Insight

Book Forum: The Ukraine Crisis and US-Russian Relations – Cato Institute (blog)

Nearly three years ago, Ukraines Kremlin-backed president fled the countrys capital amidst massive anti-government protests. The series of events to follow would alter the geopolitical landscape of post-Soviet Eurasia, destabilize security within the wider region and pose a major challenge for U.S.-Russia relations.

Following an unrecognized referendum in eastern Ukraine, Russia proceeded in its annexation of the Crimean peninsula in a brazen act transgressing the notion of Westphalian sovereignty. The United States and the European Union responded by imposing sanctions on Russia, with debatable efficacy, while two ceasefire agreements have failed to end a protracted and bloody conflict on the ground.

Against this backdrop, the Trump administration has indicated a willingness to lift Russian sanctions in order to improve bilateral relationsa move which would be unpopular in Congress. Simultaneously, there is continued insistence from the United States and Europe that Russia must return control of the Crimea to Ukrainea stipulation which Russia refuses to consider. Where do U.S.-Russia relations go from here?

Prior to looking into the policy options, an upcoming Book Forum presenting the recently released book Everyone Loses: The Ukraine Crisis and the Ruinous Contest for Post-Soviet Eurasia (Routledge, January 2017) will first examine how U.S.-Russian relations arrived at such a precarious point in the first place.

The books authors, Timothy J. Colton (Morris and Anna Feldberg Professor of Government and Russian Studies, Harvard University) and Samuel Charap (Senior Fellow for Russia and Eurasia, International Institute for Strategic Studies; Former Senior Advisor, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security), argue that a series of grave strategic miscalculations, resulting from years of zero-sum behavior on the parts of both Russia and the United States, have destabilized the post-Soviet Eurasian sphere to the detriment of the West, Russia and the countries caught in the midst. With regional and international security now deteriorated and all parties worse off, Colton and Charap conclude that all governments must commit to patient negotiation aimed at finding mutually acceptable alternatives, rather than policies aimed at securing one-sided advantages.

Please join us for what is sure to be an insightful and comprehensive foray into the roots of the Ukraine crisis during Catos Book Forum on March 10th, featuring co-author Samuel Charap with comments provided by Emma Ashford, Cato Institute Research Fellow. You are invited to register for the event here.

See the article here:
Book Forum: The Ukraine Crisis and US-Russian Relations - Cato Institute (blog)

In Ukraine, blockade threatens to force issue at heart of civil war – Christian Science Monitor

February 28, 2017 MoscowSomething very unusual is happening along the frozen line of contact between the Ukrainian Army and Russian-backed rebels in the Donbass, where almost three years of bitter fighting has killed about 10,000 people. More than 74,000 train carsladen with anthracite coal from the rebel regions and bound for Ukrainian power stations have been halted for the past month by armed men beyond the control of either side.

Backed by a coalition of oligarchs, nationalist militias, and opposition politicians, the aim of the blockade is apparently to compel a beleaguered President Poroshenko to abandon hopes of integrating the self-proclaimed republics of Donetsk and Luhansk back into Ukraine, as called for under the Minsk II agreements, and officially declare them "occupied territories" of Russia. By graphically drawing attention to the trade that has for three years seen billions of dollars worth of iron ore, coal, and finished steel products pass easily along the rails in both directions even as armies were slaughtering each other they are forcing the most painful issue at the heart of the civil war: Can Ukraine reintegrate itself economically and politically, perhaps on new terms, or is it doomed to break up?

The blockade is fast precipitating a political and economic crisis that could conceivably bring Mr. Poroshenko down, or at least trigger early parliamentary elections that would almost certainly change the complexion of power in Kiev.A pivotal moment has suddenly arrived, without having been introduced through negotiations or any democratic political process, but because radicals have forced the issue.

The growing tensions in Ukraine, which has seen a sharp spike in fighting over recent weeks, have so far been mostly ignored in Washington. But Europeans have started to take noticeof Ukraine's dangerous slide into fresh crisis. Last week Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman declared a state of emergency in the energy sector, and warned that 300,000 jobs were at risk and that the already weakened Ukrainian currency could nosedive if the blockade continues much longer.

"Ukraine cannot go on without Donbass coal," says Vadim Karasyov, director of the independent Institute of Global Strategies in Kiev. "Poroshenko opposes the blockade, because it's a serious blow against him personally and [his vision of the way forward in] Ukraine."

On Monday the leaders of the two rebel regions issued a statement declaring that if the blockade is not lifted by Wednesday morning, they will take control of the coal mines and steel mills on their territory, and sell their production to Russia instead.

"Effectively, the Donbass is separating itself from Ukraine economically. Now our coal and metal products will be exported to Russia," says Dmitry Posrednikov, deputy dean of Donetsk University, in the rebel region of Donetsk. "Unfortunately, we see that Ukrainian authorities don't want to have any political dialogue with the Donbass.... Psychologically, we are breaking away from Ukraine."

That may be just what the blockaders want. They insist that the ongoing trade between the two Ukraines should be declared treasonous, and that there be a complete break in any relations.

"The goal is to end our dependence [on Donbass coal], because it's impossible to go on with reforms and integrate with Europe when someone can switch off the lights at any moment," says Vladimir Omelchenko, an energy expert at Kiev's Razumkov Center, who says the situation can accelerate Ukraine's efforts to attain energy independence through greater reliance on nuclear power and gas. "They want the financial burden of supporting these territories to be switched to Russia. In fact, these territories are already controlled by Russian troops and their puppets."

Though no one knows exactly who stands behind the armed men who are blockading the rail lines and highways along the battle front, everyone names the disgruntled oligarch Igor Kolomoisky as the most likely financial backer. Mr. Kolomoisky has lost a lot of ground at the hands of President Poroshenko over the past couple of years, including being stripped of his governorship of Dnipropetrovsk region in a battle over control of state energy properties, and more recently seeing his most lucrative property, PrivatBank, Ukraine's largest bank, nationalized by the government.

A range of opposition forces, most prominently former prime minister and "Orange Revolution" heroine Yulia Tymoshenko and ex-Georgian president-turned-Ukrainian-loose-cannon Mikhael Saakashvili, have come out in support of the blockaders.

The chief target is the multibillion dollar business arrangement that has seen Ukrainian iron ore shipped to steel mills in rebel-held territories, and coal and steel shipped back. Mr. Omelchenko says that Ukrainian power stations last year consumed 9 million tons of Donbass coal, or about 30 percent of the total. At least six of Ukraine's 12 coal-fired power stations were designed in Soviet times to run exclusively on the black anthracite dug out of the Donbass mines that are now almost completely under rebel control. Some sources say that trade across the dividing line has been worth up to $8 billion annually.

Most of the mines and mills on both sides of the front line are owned by Ukrainian oligarch Rinat Akhmetov, who has managed to maintain good relations in both Kiev and Donetsk, and presumably pays his taxes in both places.

"It certainly looks like the primary victim in this blockade is Akhmetov. And it's definitely good for Kolomoisky, who might obtain some revenge against the Ukrainian government," says Alexander Parashiy, an analyst with Concord Capital, a leading Kiev brokerage.

"What looks so strange to all of us is that Poroshenko has declared this blockade to be illegal, which means those carrying it out are criminals, right?" he says. "But he doesn't take any steps to arrest them, perhaps because the idea of the blockade is popular with the public. I think Poroshenko fears a new Maidan [revolution] if he makes any serious effort to end the blockade."

But some analysts fear that fresh political shocks in Kiev could lead to more than just isolating the relatively small Donetsk and Luhansk rebel regions. Three years after the Maidan Revolution, opinion polls continue to show a profound split between the attitudes of western Ukrainians and the more russified populations in Ukraine's south and east.

A December survey by the Kiev Internation Institute of Sociology, Ukraine's top pollster, found that 51 percent of respondents in the country's south, and 57 percent in the Kiev-controlled but restive eastcontinue to regard the revolution that brought the current Kiev authorities to power as an "illegal armed coup." In the more nationalist west of the country, and mixed central regions, from 80 percent to 60 percent regard the Maidan revolt as a "popular revolution."

"What we see with this blockade is that people who are not in power are succeeding in imposing their agenda. They are getting the upper hand," says Sergei Strokan, foreign affairs columnist with the Moscow daily Kommersant. "And they are playing with dynamite. There is growing potential for very serious political crisis to emerge from this."

See more here:
In Ukraine, blockade threatens to force issue at heart of civil war - Christian Science Monitor

Ukraine – The Conversation AU

Ukraine, a young democracy in the heart of Europe, is grappling with an almost impossible set of tasks.

The emergence of a democratic and independent Ukraine is transforming the geo-strategic landscape of Central Europe.

In the past three years, the 2013/2014 Euromaidan protests, the annexation of Crimea and the war in East Ukraine have reshaped the geopolitical map of Europe and derailed cooperation between Russia and the West.

In the years leading to the Euromaidan protests, the directionless political drift and pervasive corruption inspired not only the movement for democratisation in Ukraine, but also the ambition to join the European Union and solidify ties with the West.

Following the Euromaidan protests, the sharp departure from Russias sphere of influence caused social cleavages, particularly in the Ukrainian cross-border territories, and the rise of extremism on both sides.

Ukraine is now in sharp economic and industrial decline. It is battling a massive decline in population (due to a mass exodus for economic reasons and an increase in death rates caused by war) and ecological catastrophe in the self-proclaimed independent republics of Donetsk and Luhansk. The prospect of joining the EU as a full member is now very distant.

As a result, Ukraine, a young democracy in the heart of Europe, is grappling with an almost impossible set of tasks. It must prevent its economy from collapsing, reform its state and secure international support to defend its territory.

Despite these challenges, Ukraine may be nearer to the democratic pole than other regimes in the post-Soviet region. This offers us an insight into how a young democracy with turbulent internal dynamics can develop and strengthen in a hostile geopolitical environment.

Political scholars, observers and international leaders from around the world recognise the global importance of Ukraines crisis. It has impacts on European security policy, US strategy, efforts to calm the Syrian war and Chinas foreign policy, as well as broader democratic developments in post-Soviet Eastern Europe.

Read more here:
Ukraine - The Conversation AU

Russia’s Calculus in Ukraine Is a Mix of Strategic Patience and Grim Resignation – World Politics Review

There is a new landmark in Moscow, opposite the towering ramparts of the Kremlins Borovitskaya Gate. That imposing fortified passage, through which presidential motorcades traditionally enter and exit, now shares its position on the Kremlins southern flank with an enormous statue of Vladimir, which was unveiled late last year. This Vladimir is not Putin, but the sainted Grand Prince Vladimir of Kiev, whose baptism signaled the conversion of the Rus to Orthodox Christianity in the 10th century, and the alignment of their vast Eastern European empire with Constantinople and the heirs of Rome. Notably, the so-called Baptism of the Rus took place neither in Moscow nor in Kiev, but in Crimea.

This symbolism is not lost on Russian officials or ordinary Moscovites. Both understand that just as Soviet and post-Soviet rulers have governed Russia from the Kremlin, they now seek to assert their sway over lands once ruled by Vladimir. The conviction that Crimea is legitimately Russian landnever again to be lost, bartered or leasedhas become a catechism. As for the rest of Ukraine, Russians see a mix of a grim but acceptable status quo and developments that may gradually break in their favor. That is why, for now at least, Moscows strategy is to stay the course there. ...

The rest is here:
Russia's Calculus in Ukraine Is a Mix of Strategic Patience and Grim Resignation - World Politics Review