Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Polish and British foreign ministers on joint Ukraine trip – thenews.pl

PR dla Zagranicy

Roberto Galea 01.03.2017 15:10

Polish Foreign Minister Witold Waszczykowski and his British counterpart Boris Johnson visit the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, on Wednesday.

This will be the ministers first joint visit to a foreign country. The aim is to show continuing support for Ukraines pro-European course, sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to assure Ukrainian authorities and society about Europes backing.

The two ministers will hold a series of high level meetings with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman, Deputy Prime Minister Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze, and Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin, among others.

Before the visit, Waszczykowski stressed that Poland and the UK have supported Ukraine on its pro-European path since the beginning of the Revolution of Dignity.

Im extremely happy that together with... Boris Johnson we will be able to reiterate our commitment to Ukraines European choice, its sovereignty and territorial integrity, Waszczykowski said.

Poland was the first country to recognise Ukraines independence. Since then we consider Ukraine a strategic partner. We will continue to support Ukrainians reform process, he added.

(rg/pk)

Source: Polish foreign ministry

Read the original here:
Polish and British foreign ministers on joint Ukraine trip - thenews.pl

Kiev’s cutting-edge: the designers ignored by Ukrainian fashion week – The Guardian

Olha Demydova models during Ukrainian fashion week in Kiev on 6 February. Photograph: Valentyn Ogirenko/Reuters

Hanging from the snow-covered roof of Lesnoy fleamarket in the Ukrainian capital of Kiev is a fur coat, identical to that seen on the catwalk of trend-setting label Vetements in Paris in January. Suspended alongside it are oversized padded coats, sportswear, bootleg brands and washed-out denim the sartorial tropes by which the post-Soviet world has come to bewitch the contemporary fashion world.

The new east which typically comprises Russia, Georgia and Ukraine might not be one of the industrys so-called fashion capitals, but in the past 18 months its designers, models and aesthetic have burst on to the fashion scene, way beyond its borders.

Demna Gvasalia, fashions golden boy, is a Georgian who grew up in Ukraine and is now revolutionising traditional Parisian label Balenciaga (as well as being head designer for Vetements). From Russia, Gosha Rubchinskiy is the current darling of streetwear, while Ukrainian designer Anna K is a favourite among the Kardashians set and Vogue Ukraine is fast becoming a reference point. However, while the 1990s Soviet aesthetic that designers such as Gvasalia and Rubchinskiy champion is on the up around the world, many of them have yet to find success in their home countries.

Lesnoy fleamarket is a good place to find out more about Ukrainian fashion. It is packed with Kievs models, designers, stylists and photographers a new generation resurrecting the 90s aesthetic of their youth. For them, of course, the post-USSR fallout the corruption, economic chaos and Ukraines ongoing war, which has killed more than 9,000 people is a reality as well as an aesthetic.

For up-and-coming stylist Stas Soulkeeper, everything that went along with the fall of the Soviet Union forms a kind of moodboard. Dressed in a death metal T-shirt tucked into his high-waisted jeans, he cites: my friends sex stories, vintage porn, common things from our part of the world post-USSR films like Lilya 4-ever that kind of social situation as influences. His editorial in Februarys Vogue Ukraine is an exploration of all of the above.

But despite the popularity of this aesthetic, and despite the international success of some homegrown talents, many of Ukraines talented new wave of designers, such as draganddrop and Masha Reva claim to be priced out of the official schedule of their domestic fashion week, due to the fees it charges for a fashion show although many of them work at the event as stylists or models.

Others do not feel its the right context to share their designs despite the regions current global reputation for cutting-edge cool, Ukraine fashion week is more about plastic surgery and diamonds than the experimental Vetements aesthetic. And given the link between wealth and corruption that persists after the 2014 Maidan revolution, its no surprise that some young designers feel out of place. We dont feel comfortable there, we dont go there, said Yulia Grazhdan the founder of womenswear label draganddrop, she is one of the new generation of Ukrainian designers who is better received outside of her homeland.

But of course there are exceptions. One designer at Ukraine fashion week whose work has some of the edge the new east has become known for is 23-year-old Ivan Frolov. His collection explored themes of religion and sexual taboo. Incense, candles, stained-glass windows and a large male-voice choir framed clothes that featured kink, nods to 1980s jumble sales and churchy silhouettes in garish jacquard silks and knits. Frolov is attracting international interest and is soon to be stocked in Opening Ceremony, the American boutique label famous for collaborations with the likes of Chloe Sevigny.

Nikita Sereda, a 21-year-old model and arguably the best-dressed man at fashion week, cast and styled Frolovs show. Dressed head-to-toe in second-hand finds from Lesnoy, he is a regular at the underground techno club Closer. Like legendary Berlin club Berghain, Closer has become a hub of Kievs counterculture, where anti-corruption crusaders such as Serhiy Leshchenko (now in government) party to the cream of contemporary techno alongside the citys fashion underground. Based in a former factory, its unadorned walls are the opposite of the veneered, glitzy venues preferred by Ukraines wealthy socialites. And where the official fashion week fails, Closer succeeds this is where the citys true catwalk lies.

Given the fuss around the former Eastern bloc, organisers of Ukrainian fashion week need to find a way to harness the creativity of the underground scene and bring the countrys prolific young talent in from the cold.

More:
Kiev's cutting-edge: the designers ignored by Ukrainian fashion week - The Guardian

Ukraine to Probe Defaced Bulgarian Monument – Balkan Insight

Ukraine authorities have vowed to investigate the vandalization of a monument to Bulgarian volunteer fighters in the Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1888 in the city of Bolhrad in Ukraines Odessa region.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mariana Betsa condemned ccident on Tuesday and said the ministry suspected a deliberate provocation which aims to provoke tension and to undermine friendly Bulgarian-Ukranian relations.

Earlier on Tuesday, Ukraine's Trassa E-95 news agency reported that the monument, which was erected by the Association of Bulgarians in Ukraine in 2012, had been splashed with yellow paint, allegedly by Ukrainian nationalists.

A sign painted on one of the memorial plaques read: Suitcase station Sofia, which was interpreted as a call for the large Bulgarian ethnic community to leave the region of Odessa.

The accident has not been caught on video, as the cameras surrounding the monument had been stolen a year ago.

Bolhrads municipal council had promised to clean the monument for March 3, Bulgarias national holiday, when celebrations organized by the Bulgarian community are to take place.

Bulgarias Foreign Ministry condemned the attack on the monument and explained that it had happened on the night between 27 and 28 February.

We qualify this act as a provocation that is spreading tension in the Bulgarian community in the region, it said in a letter to BIRN on Wednesday.

It praised the quick reaction of the Foreign Ministry of Ukraine and said it expected Ukrainian law enforcement authorities to take all the necessary measures to identify and prosecute the perpetrators of the act and prevent such actions in the future.

Bolhrad, which is 167 kilometres away from the southern port city of Odessa, is home to some 16,000 ethnic Bulgarians. Bulgarian settlers founded the town in 1821.

The Russian-Turkish war ended with the liberation of Bulgaria from Ottoman Occupation and the establishment of a Bulgarian state in 1878.

This article has been ammended to include a comment from the Bulgarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on March 1, 2017.

Continued here:
Ukraine to Probe Defaced Bulgarian Monument - Balkan Insight

Book Forum: The Ukraine Crisis and US-Russian Relations – Cato Institute (blog)

Nearly three years ago, Ukraines Kremlin-backed president fled the countrys capital amidst massive anti-government protests. The series of events to follow would alter the geopolitical landscape of post-Soviet Eurasia, destabilize security within the wider region and pose a major challenge for U.S.-Russia relations.

Following an unrecognized referendum in eastern Ukraine, Russia proceeded in its annexation of the Crimean peninsula in a brazen act transgressing the notion of Westphalian sovereignty. The United States and the European Union responded by imposing sanctions on Russia, with debatable efficacy, while two ceasefire agreements have failed to end a protracted and bloody conflict on the ground.

Against this backdrop, the Trump administration has indicated a willingness to lift Russian sanctions in order to improve bilateral relationsa move which would be unpopular in Congress. Simultaneously, there is continued insistence from the United States and Europe that Russia must return control of the Crimea to Ukrainea stipulation which Russia refuses to consider. Where do U.S.-Russia relations go from here?

Prior to looking into the policy options, an upcoming Book Forum presenting the recently released book Everyone Loses: The Ukraine Crisis and the Ruinous Contest for Post-Soviet Eurasia (Routledge, January 2017) will first examine how U.S.-Russian relations arrived at such a precarious point in the first place.

The books authors, Timothy J. Colton (Morris and Anna Feldberg Professor of Government and Russian Studies, Harvard University) and Samuel Charap (Senior Fellow for Russia and Eurasia, International Institute for Strategic Studies; Former Senior Advisor, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security), argue that a series of grave strategic miscalculations, resulting from years of zero-sum behavior on the parts of both Russia and the United States, have destabilized the post-Soviet Eurasian sphere to the detriment of the West, Russia and the countries caught in the midst. With regional and international security now deteriorated and all parties worse off, Colton and Charap conclude that all governments must commit to patient negotiation aimed at finding mutually acceptable alternatives, rather than policies aimed at securing one-sided advantages.

Please join us for what is sure to be an insightful and comprehensive foray into the roots of the Ukraine crisis during Catos Book Forum on March 10th, featuring co-author Samuel Charap with comments provided by Emma Ashford, Cato Institute Research Fellow. You are invited to register for the event here.

See the article here:
Book Forum: The Ukraine Crisis and US-Russian Relations - Cato Institute (blog)

In Ukraine, blockade threatens to force issue at heart of civil war – Christian Science Monitor

February 28, 2017 MoscowSomething very unusual is happening along the frozen line of contact between the Ukrainian Army and Russian-backed rebels in the Donbass, where almost three years of bitter fighting has killed about 10,000 people. More than 74,000 train carsladen with anthracite coal from the rebel regions and bound for Ukrainian power stations have been halted for the past month by armed men beyond the control of either side.

Backed by a coalition of oligarchs, nationalist militias, and opposition politicians, the aim of the blockade is apparently to compel a beleaguered President Poroshenko to abandon hopes of integrating the self-proclaimed republics of Donetsk and Luhansk back into Ukraine, as called for under the Minsk II agreements, and officially declare them "occupied territories" of Russia. By graphically drawing attention to the trade that has for three years seen billions of dollars worth of iron ore, coal, and finished steel products pass easily along the rails in both directions even as armies were slaughtering each other they are forcing the most painful issue at the heart of the civil war: Can Ukraine reintegrate itself economically and politically, perhaps on new terms, or is it doomed to break up?

The blockade is fast precipitating a political and economic crisis that could conceivably bring Mr. Poroshenko down, or at least trigger early parliamentary elections that would almost certainly change the complexion of power in Kiev.A pivotal moment has suddenly arrived, without having been introduced through negotiations or any democratic political process, but because radicals have forced the issue.

The growing tensions in Ukraine, which has seen a sharp spike in fighting over recent weeks, have so far been mostly ignored in Washington. But Europeans have started to take noticeof Ukraine's dangerous slide into fresh crisis. Last week Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman declared a state of emergency in the energy sector, and warned that 300,000 jobs were at risk and that the already weakened Ukrainian currency could nosedive if the blockade continues much longer.

"Ukraine cannot go on without Donbass coal," says Vadim Karasyov, director of the independent Institute of Global Strategies in Kiev. "Poroshenko opposes the blockade, because it's a serious blow against him personally and [his vision of the way forward in] Ukraine."

On Monday the leaders of the two rebel regions issued a statement declaring that if the blockade is not lifted by Wednesday morning, they will take control of the coal mines and steel mills on their territory, and sell their production to Russia instead.

"Effectively, the Donbass is separating itself from Ukraine economically. Now our coal and metal products will be exported to Russia," says Dmitry Posrednikov, deputy dean of Donetsk University, in the rebel region of Donetsk. "Unfortunately, we see that Ukrainian authorities don't want to have any political dialogue with the Donbass.... Psychologically, we are breaking away from Ukraine."

That may be just what the blockaders want. They insist that the ongoing trade between the two Ukraines should be declared treasonous, and that there be a complete break in any relations.

"The goal is to end our dependence [on Donbass coal], because it's impossible to go on with reforms and integrate with Europe when someone can switch off the lights at any moment," says Vladimir Omelchenko, an energy expert at Kiev's Razumkov Center, who says the situation can accelerate Ukraine's efforts to attain energy independence through greater reliance on nuclear power and gas. "They want the financial burden of supporting these territories to be switched to Russia. In fact, these territories are already controlled by Russian troops and their puppets."

Though no one knows exactly who stands behind the armed men who are blockading the rail lines and highways along the battle front, everyone names the disgruntled oligarch Igor Kolomoisky as the most likely financial backer. Mr. Kolomoisky has lost a lot of ground at the hands of President Poroshenko over the past couple of years, including being stripped of his governorship of Dnipropetrovsk region in a battle over control of state energy properties, and more recently seeing his most lucrative property, PrivatBank, Ukraine's largest bank, nationalized by the government.

A range of opposition forces, most prominently former prime minister and "Orange Revolution" heroine Yulia Tymoshenko and ex-Georgian president-turned-Ukrainian-loose-cannon Mikhael Saakashvili, have come out in support of the blockaders.

The chief target is the multibillion dollar business arrangement that has seen Ukrainian iron ore shipped to steel mills in rebel-held territories, and coal and steel shipped back. Mr. Omelchenko says that Ukrainian power stations last year consumed 9 million tons of Donbass coal, or about 30 percent of the total. At least six of Ukraine's 12 coal-fired power stations were designed in Soviet times to run exclusively on the black anthracite dug out of the Donbass mines that are now almost completely under rebel control. Some sources say that trade across the dividing line has been worth up to $8 billion annually.

Most of the mines and mills on both sides of the front line are owned by Ukrainian oligarch Rinat Akhmetov, who has managed to maintain good relations in both Kiev and Donetsk, and presumably pays his taxes in both places.

"It certainly looks like the primary victim in this blockade is Akhmetov. And it's definitely good for Kolomoisky, who might obtain some revenge against the Ukrainian government," says Alexander Parashiy, an analyst with Concord Capital, a leading Kiev brokerage.

"What looks so strange to all of us is that Poroshenko has declared this blockade to be illegal, which means those carrying it out are criminals, right?" he says. "But he doesn't take any steps to arrest them, perhaps because the idea of the blockade is popular with the public. I think Poroshenko fears a new Maidan [revolution] if he makes any serious effort to end the blockade."

But some analysts fear that fresh political shocks in Kiev could lead to more than just isolating the relatively small Donetsk and Luhansk rebel regions. Three years after the Maidan Revolution, opinion polls continue to show a profound split between the attitudes of western Ukrainians and the more russified populations in Ukraine's south and east.

A December survey by the Kiev Internation Institute of Sociology, Ukraine's top pollster, found that 51 percent of respondents in the country's south, and 57 percent in the Kiev-controlled but restive eastcontinue to regard the revolution that brought the current Kiev authorities to power as an "illegal armed coup." In the more nationalist west of the country, and mixed central regions, from 80 percent to 60 percent regard the Maidan revolt as a "popular revolution."

"What we see with this blockade is that people who are not in power are succeeding in imposing their agenda. They are getting the upper hand," says Sergei Strokan, foreign affairs columnist with the Moscow daily Kommersant. "And they are playing with dynamite. There is growing potential for very serious political crisis to emerge from this."

See more here:
In Ukraine, blockade threatens to force issue at heart of civil war - Christian Science Monitor