Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

‘I Am Dreaming It Will Stop’: A Deadlocked War Tests Ukrainian Morale – The New York Times

Listening to the daily thud of artillery hitting nearby towns, a school principal in southern Ukraine appealed to parents for donations for a new bomb shelter.

A soldier and his girlfriend gave up hope that the war against Russia would end soon, and decided to get engaged, despite not having any idea when he might come home.

A woman, depressed for months about the instability, decided to stop worrying and just imagine that peace would come next spring, maybe, along with the flower blossoms.

I felt so helpless, said the woman, Tetyana Kuksa, who works at a market in Kyiv, Ukraines capital. I am dreaming it will stop.

With Ukraines army stalled in trenches along the front line and a sense that weaponry from allies arrived too late and will now begin to dwindle, Ukrainians are increasingly pessimistic over prospects for a quick victory, polling and interviews show. Hopefulness, a linchpin of Ukraines fight against a much more powerful foe, has been dented.

The result is a nation preparing, with a sort of sober resignation, for life with war as a constant, and no end in sight.

It is a trend, not a waving of the white flag. The vast majority of Ukrainians remain defiant, support President Volodymyr Zelensky and trust their military. The spirit that drove Ukrainian bartenders, truck drivers and university professors to enlist in the army after Russia invaded in February 2022 is still evident daily.

But recent polling shows that it has faded by several measures.

Readiness for a negotiated settlement with Russia has increased in a small but still significant way for the first time since the invasion began, polling and focus group studies show, rising to 14 percent from 10 percent, though the vast majority of Ukrainians still staunchly reject trading territory for peace.

Ukrainians were most hopeful, polls indicated, last winter, in the run-up to the counteroffensive in the south. Trust in all institutions other than the army has since dropped, according to a survey by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, one of the countrys leading pollsters. Trust in government fell from 74 percent in May to 39 percent in October, the period when the Ukrainian offensive began and then petered out, the institute found.

Ukraines last significant military gain, the reclaiming of Kherson city, came a year ago. Despite months of bloody trench fighting and tens of thousands of casualties, little land has changed hands since.

This past week, Ukraines top military commander, Gen. Valery Zaluzhny, provided a blunt assessment of the countrys near-term prospects, telling The Economist that the fighting had settled into a stalemate. Mechanized assaults are failing, he wrote, and without more advanced technological weaponry, a new, long phase of war would settle in.

It was a conclusion that Andriy Tkachyk, the mayor of the village of Tukhlia, in western Ukraine, had already drawn after volunteering to drive the bodies of soldiers from the front to their hometowns and organize funerals. In conversations, he said, he heard of difficult, bloody battles just to hold positions, and complaints by war-weary soldiers that they lacked ammunition.

The boys who are at the front are physically and psychologically tired, Mr. Tkachyk said. Very tired. This war will last a long time.

Frustration is rising, he said, including a sense that poor village boys are dying while civilians from wealthier families in the cities find ways to avoid conscription. Draft dodging is on the rise, as men hide to avoid receiving notices or try to bribe officials at local recruiting centers.

Every village has graves, he said. The situation is bad.

Ukrainians who were once quick to express healthy skepticism about their government rallied around the flag when the full-scale war started, elevating trust in Mr. Zelensky, the army and nearly all institutions of their threatened state.

That, too, is fading with the stalled military advance, the daily shelling and the mounting casualties.

Trust in Mr. Zelensky, though still shared by a majority of Ukrainians, has slumped, falling to 76 percent in October from 91 percent in May, the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology survey showed. Other polls have shown Mr. Zelenskys job approval ratings at 72 percent.

Only 48 percent of Ukrainians say they trust the government-controlled television news channel, called the Telemarafon, which aired upbeat reporting of the military operation in the south, the institutes survey found. The programming was intended to bolster Ukrainians morale as their army fought to push Russian forces from the coast of the Sea of Azov, but its divergence from events on the ground ended up prompting skepticism among Ukrainians.

We should be honest, Anton Hrushetsky, the director of the Kyiv institute, said in an interview. People are becoming pessimistic.

Stress is rising, he said, as Ukrainians want to move on with their lives in safety but see no promising prospects.

The pervasive sense of insecurity in Ukraine, said Mr. Hrushetsky, is leading Ukrainians to search for somebody to blame.

People dont describe it as a failure, and they do not blame the army, Mr. Hrushetsky said of the stalled effort to reclaim territory, or, in the words of General Zaluzhny, the stalemate in the war.

But anger is rising toward government corruption at home and toward the countrys Western allies, who, in Ukrainians view, have slow-walked the delivery of weapons.

A survey commissioned by the European Union found the number of Ukrainians who say the West does not want Ukraine to win the war has doubled, to 30 percent from 15 percent, over the past year.

Fault lines are emerging, too, in the countrys domestic politics. Those who support Mr. Zelensky are more inclined to blame allies, while Mr. Zelenskys political opponents draw attention to corruption at home.

Small protests broke out in October, revealing points of stress. Families of Ukrainian soldiers missing in action pressed the government for answers in a street demonstration in Kyiv. And in the capital and other cities, families of soldiers who have been in the army for the duration of the war protested to demand the government rotate them off the front. Its time others stepped up, they chanted on Maidan Square in Kyiv.

Thwarted expectations of a summer military success largely lie behind the trend toward pessimism, the polling suggests.

After a winter of darkness last year when Russia targeted electrical power plants and transformer substations, leading to blackouts, Ukrainians felt hopeful as the power returned in the spring.

We said, Well, we managed, everything is over, now there will be a counteroffensive, said Andriy Liubka, a Ukrainian novelist. We had this inspired optimism.

Now, families hear from soldiers in the trenches, where autumn rain is drenching them and life is like something from past historical eras of hardship and violence, Mr. Liubka said.

The trenches are yielding a steady stream of dead and wounded. In their most recent estimate, U.S. officials said in August that about 70,000 Ukrainians had been killed in the war, and that more than 100,000 had been wounded. The Ukrainian government does not provide casualty figures.

Many Ukrainians look with alarm at the politicization of military aid in the United States, Slovakia, Poland and other countries.

A stage of great anxiety has set in, Mr. Liubka said.

And yet any concession to Russia risks leaving millions of Ukrainians under occupation, facing potential repression, arrest and execution.

In the village of Blahodatne, in the Kherson region of southern Ukraine, a school director, Halyna Bolokan, deemed it safe enough to reopen the elementary school, despite the daily nearby explosions. But she took pains to refurbish the basement as a bomb shelter, with donations from the community.

I am using strength to put a smile on my face, she said. People are now dreaming about our new bomb shelter.

Serhiy Mykhailyuk, a soldier in the air-defense forces, walked on a recent blustery fall day in Kyiv with his fiance, Yekaterina Bordyuk. Of course, there is sadness every day he is not home, Ms. Bordyuk said. But the war will take a lot of time, not one or two or three years. We kind of got used to it.

Maria Varenikova contributed reporting.

Go here to see the original:
'I Am Dreaming It Will Stop': A Deadlocked War Tests Ukrainian Morale - The New York Times

Anti-Ukraine party gathers strength in Romania – Financial Times

What is included in my trial?

During your trial you will have complete digital access to FT.com with everything in both of our Standard Digital and Premium Digital packages.

Standard Digital includes access to a wealth of global news, analysis and expert opinion. Premium Digital includes access to our premier business column, Lex, as well as 15 curated newsletters covering key business themes with original, in-depth reporting. For a full comparison of Standard and Premium Digital, click here.

Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account section.

If you do nothing, you will be auto-enrolled in our premium digital monthly subscription plan and retain complete access for $69 per month.

For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the Settings & Account section. If youd like to retain your premium access and save 20%, you can opt to pay annually at the end of the trial.

You may also opt to downgrade to Standard Digital, a robust journalistic offering that fulfils many users needs. Compare Standard and Premium Digital here.

Any changes made can be done at any time and will become effective at the end of the trial period, allowing you to retain full access for 4 weeks, even if you downgrade or cancel.

You may change or cancel your subscription or trial at any time online. Simply log into Settings & Account and select "Cancel" on the right-hand side.

You can still enjoy your subscription until the end of your current billing period.

We support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments.

Read the original post:
Anti-Ukraine party gathers strength in Romania - Financial Times

Zelenskyy: Ukraine’s success in battle for Black Sea will be in history books – Yahoo News

On International Black Sea Day, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine, noted the country's success in the battle for the Black Sea.

Source: Zelenskyy's evening video address

Quote: "The modern world quickly gets accustomed to success. When full-scale aggression began, many around the world expected Ukraine to not withstand it. Now, the incredible things our people, our soldiers, are doing are perceived as a given. Ukraine's success in the battle for the Black Sea is what will be in history textbooks, though it's not discussed as often now."

Details: The President also said that the work of export corridors and the protection of Ukraine's South were considered at sessions of the Staff of Commander-in-Chief.

Zelenskyy also held a preparatory meeting on working with the European Union. He noted that all levels of governments should be ready to open negotiations on Ukraine's membership in the European Union.

Support UP or become our patron!

Read more:
Zelenskyy: Ukraine's success in battle for Black Sea will be in history books - Yahoo News

Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces behind attack that claimed lives of 400 Russian soldiers – Yahoo News

The attack on a Russian military base in Russian-held Makiivka, Donetsk Oblast, on New Years Eve, which claimed the lives of around 400 Russian soldiers, was part of Ukraines Special Operations Forces operation.

Source: Major General Viktor Khorenko, Commander of the Special Operations Forces (SOF) of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, in an interview on Ukraines national 24/7 newscast on 30 October

Quote: "Lets recall the operations that were carried out on New Years Eve, when the enemys major logistics centre in the city of Makiivka was hit, where their forces transferred from Russia were amassed ahead of those new units being deployed to our territory. As a result of this [attack], the enemy received their [New Years] gifts: 400 black [body] bags. Another 300 [Russian soldiers] sustained injuries. Im not even talking about the equipment and weapons [that were damaged in the attack]. They suffered significant losses."

Details: Khorenko also mentioned several other SOF operations: the attack on the Bay of Sevastopol, where the Russian Rostov-on-Don submarine and the Minsk ship were based; the attack on Russias Black Sea Fleet headquarters; and attacks on Luhansk, Berdiansk, Melitopol and Saky airfields.

Khorenko promised to share the details of these operations after the war is over.

The SOF shared the full version of the interview on its social media accounts.

Support UP or become our patron!

View post:
Ukraine's Special Operations Forces behind attack that claimed lives of 400 Russian soldiers - Yahoo News

Putin will win if Israel funding split from Ukraine, Blinken and Austin tell senators – The Hill

The heads of the State Department and Pentagon on Tuesday warned senators that should lawmakers approve funding for Israel but not Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin will win. 

Speaking during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin urged senators to keep intact the Biden administrations$106 billion supplemental request for Israel, Ukraine and the Indo-Pacific.

Though many lawmakers in both parties support a joint package, House Republicans skeptical of additional Ukraine aid have threatened to sink the plan.And Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is pushing an Israel-only package that would also cut billions in funding for the Internal Revenue Service.

Austin and Blinken warned that without continued U.S. funding for Ukraine, Russian forces would be sure to defeat Kyiv, with wider consequences for the globe.

Its hard to put an exact timeline on how long it would take, Austin said when asked how long until Russia wins should the U.S. fail to provide more aid to Kyiv. I can guarantee that without our support, Putin will be successful … If we pull the rug out from under [Ukraine] now, Putin will only get stronger.

Blinken, meanwhile, said it would do both terrible harm to our values, but also to our core interests to leave Ukraine out in the cold.

There is no doubt in my mind that if Putin is allowed to continue to act with impunity, that not only would he not stop at Ukraine and potentially go to a NATO country next …it would send a message to would-be aggressors everywhere in the world, that, If he can get away with it, so can we, and then we’re likely to have a world full of conflict, Blinken said.

We are much better sustaining our effort now, seeing this to success, than having to pay a much higher price later when we have to deal with a world full of aggression. 

The hearing comes as the Senate and House are headed for a clash over Ukraine aid, with House Republicans looking tovote on a separate $14.3 billion military aid package for Israel.

The amount matches Bidens request for the country, but it cuts outmore than $60 billionfor Ukraine under the presidents supplemental. TheWhite House has warned it has less than $5.5 billion left to pull weapons from U.S. stockpiles to send to Ukrainian troops.

The GOP’s proposal to slash dollars for the IRS is also a nonstarter in the Senate.

Johnson has said he expects his chambers Israel aid package to go to the floor Thursday. His opposition to pairing Israel and Ukraine aid puts the new Speaker at odds with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

At the Tuesday hearing, multiple lawmakers stressed the importance of passing aid for Israel and Ukraine in a single package, including Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Vice Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine).

Make no mistake, we need to address all of these priorities as part of one package because the reality is these issues are all connected and they are all urgent, Murray said in her opening remarks, noting that huge supermajorities in both chambers support continued Ukraine aid.  

Getting this funding across the finish line should not be controversial,” she said. 

Murray added that both China and Russia were watching closely how the U.S. would respond to the two conflicts.

Collins, meanwhile, stressed that there would be dire consequences that will jeopardize our national security should the two spending efforts not be passed together.

Sen.John Hoeven(R-N.D.) also pressed to support both countries, arguing thatif you look at history, you understand that tyrants, like Putin, dont stop. They have to be stopped.

In his testimony, Blinken sought to link the Ukraine-Russia war and the Hamas-Israel conflict in arguing for the full supplemental. Russia is reportedly seeking more military assistance from Iran, including drones, and in return giving Tehran advanced military technology.

If we start to peel off pieces of this package, [adversaries will ] see that; they’ll understand that we are playing whack-a-mole while they cooperate increasingly and pose an ever greater threat to our security as well as that of allies and partners, Blinken said.

He also made the case for Taiwan aid to be included in the package, arguing that what happens in Ukraine, what happens in the Middle East, also matters to the Indo-Pacific. 

Austin offered a starker assessment for failing to link the funding. 

If Putin is successful, he will not stop at Ukraine, Austin said. Theres no question in my mind that sooner or later, he will challenge NATO and well find ourselves in a shooting war. 

Read the original:
Putin will win if Israel funding split from Ukraine, Blinken and Austin tell senators - The Hill