Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Ukraine war: Russia’s blockade will increase starvation and global instability, UN organisation warns – Sky News

Russia's blockade of Ukraine will lead to worsening starvation, famine and instability around the world if it cannot be lifted, the World Food Programme has said.

The warning came as Sky News gained rare access to Odesa port on Ukraine's Black Sea coast.

The port should be busy exporting tens of thousands of tonnes of grain but its huge grain elevators stand idle.

Sky was shown a huge grain cargo vessel loaded with 60,000 tonnes.

It should have sailed for Egypt in February but remains moored up thanks to Russia's naval blockade.

Opposite the ship, 30 huge silos stand full of grain.

A quarter of a million tonnes has been sitting there for months with no means of getting it out to sea.

Matthew Hollingworth is World Food Programme emergency co-ordinator for Ukraine.

He says unless something gives the impact will be devastating around the world.

'Public dissatisfaction' predicted in Russia after death toll claim - live Ukraine war updates

"There's no question it's going to mean areas of starvation in the world are going to get worse. That famine will get worse.

"And we're in a situation where the world's economies are only partially getting better from COVID-19 and this situation is going to tip many countries over the edge."

They call Ukraine the breadbasket of the world.

Its rich black earth is among the best soil in the world. Its fertility allows Ukraine to export 70% of its crops. Its harvest last year fed an extraordinary 400 million people.

Dutch farmer Kees Huizinga came here to Odesa to farm 20 years ago.

His farm is vast by British standards, stretching over 37,000 acres.

He has managed to export some of last year's harvest overland by truck, but it's a six-day wait at the border and will only shift a fraction of his grain.

If the naval blockade is not lifted he says, it will be disastrous for those who depend on him and millions around the world.

He said: "For us, for the company, it means bankruptcy and 400 employees without a job and me without a job and for the world it means a huge gap in the world food supply.

"I mean more than 70% of Ukrainian crops are meant for export and people who really need them in the poor countries, they won't receive it, so they're going to die."

Even if the EU opened up its land borders to Ukrainian grain, two million tonnes at the most could be exported a month.

Between five and seven million tonnes needs to be getting out.

Ukraine says it needs NATO to take action to escort cargo ships through the blockade or be given weapons to let it attack Russia's navy instead.

That would risk confrontation between NATO and Russia.

But the alternative could be global instability, civil unrest elsewhere, possibly revolution and war.

Western governments are wrestling with the problem but three months in they have not found a solution and time is running out.

Ukraine's next harvest is in a month or two's time. If Ukrainian farmers cannot sell their harvest by then, they will go bankrupt and will be unable to buy seed or fertiliser.

Then the world's breadbasket will see its agricultural sector become a basket case with potentially disastrous consequences for hundreds of millions.

More:
Ukraine war: Russia's blockade will increase starvation and global instability, UN organisation warns - Sky News

As the French Open Begins, the War in Ukraine Roils the Locker Room – The New York Times

PARIS The idea by the mens and womens tennis tours was to take a strong stand against Wimbledons decision to keep out players from Russia and Belarus, then let tennis and competition move the conversation away from politics and the invasion of Ukraine.

It has not worked out that way.

On Monday, the second day of the French Open, the politics of tennis and Russia reared its head once more. The professional tours announcement Friday night that they would not award rankings points this year at Wimbledon, essentially turning the most prestigious event in tennis into an exhibition and punishing players who did well there last year, has roiled the sport, igniting a sharp debate over the games role in a deeply unpopular war and dominating the conversation at the years second Grand Slam.

Lesia Tsurenko of Ukraine spoke emotionally about the invasion, saying it has made her care little about winning or losing. Iga Swiatek, the world No. 1, talked of the sport being in disarray. Naomi Osaka, one of the biggest stars, said she was leaning toward skipping Wimbledon if the decision not to award rankings points for match victories there stands.

I feel like its not united, Swiatek said after defeating Tsurenko, 6-2, 6-0, in her opening match while wearing a Ukraine pin on her cap, as she has for the past three months. Its all the people who are organizing tournaments, like, for example, WTA, ATP and I.T.F., they all have separate views, and its not joint. We feel that in the locker room a little bit, so its pretty hard.

Swiateks comments came shortly after Tsurenko described how lost she has been since late February. Tsurenko, who was ranked as high as No. 23 in 2019, said she at first wanted simply to go home and figure out how she could help with the war effort, but she decided to keep playing and competed in important tournaments in Miami and Indian Wells, Calif.

Then, after an early loss at a tournament in Marbella, Spain, and no tournament on her schedule for another three weeks, she realized she had nowhere to live or train. With the help of another player from Ukraine, Marta Kostyuk, she landed at the Piatti Tennis Center in Italy, but the psychological challenge remains of balancing her career while her country faces an existential threat.

I just want to enjoy every match, but at the same time, I dont feel that I care too much, she said. Im trying to find this balance between just go on court and dont care versus try to care. In some cases it helps.

After feeling emboldened by Wimbledons decision to bar players from Russia and Belarus, Tsurenko and her compatriots were disheartened by the WTAs decision to strike back.

When its not in your country you dont really understand how terrible it is, Tsurenko said. Compared with what she and her country have been through, giving up the chances for rankings points seems like a small price to pay, she said. For them, they feel like they are losing their job, she said of the players who are barred. I also feel many bad things. I feel a lot of terrible things, and I think, compared to that, losing a chance to play in one tournament is nothing.

She hates the propaganda used by the Russian government to disparage her country. She said no more than five players had expressed their support for her since the start of the war. She dreads being drawn against a Russian player in a tournament.

Dayana Yastremska, who is also from Ukraine and who also lost Monday, said the decision to withhold points for Wimbledon was not fair to players from Ukraine.

We are not a happy family right now, said Yastremska, who still does not have a training base and was unsure where she would spend the next weeks.

In an interview this month, Steve Simon, the chief executive of the WTA Tour, said the organization had to live up to its principle that access to tournaments for players should be based on merit alone. He also said that discriminating against a player because of the actions of her countrys government was not acceptable.

I cant imagine what the Ukrainian people are going through and feeling at this moment, and I feel bad for these athletes who are being asked to take the blame for someone elses actions, Simon said.

Russian players have expressed disappointment in Wimbledons decision and appreciation for the tours support in protecting what they view as their right to play, though no player has sought relief in the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Jeffrey Kessler, a lawyer with experience in right-to-play cases, said tennis players from Russia and Belarus would most likely have a strong case.

We are professional athletes, we put effort every day in what we do and basically want to work, said Karen Khachanov of Russia, who won his opening-round match Sunday and was a semifinalist at Wimbledon last year.

One of the few players not to express an opinion was Victoria Azarenka of Belarus, a former world No. 1 and member of the WTA Players Council, but her distress over the disagreement was clear.

I say one thing, its going to be criticized; I say another thing, its going to be criticized, said Azarenka, who once had a close relationship with President Aleksandr Lukashenko of Belarus.

In its statement Friday, the ATP said its rules and agreements existed to protect the rights of all players as a whole: Unilateral decisions of this nature, if unaddressed, set a damaging precedent for the rest of the tour. Discrimination by individual tournaments is simply not viable on a tour that operates in more than 30 countries.

The tangible impact of the ATP and WTA decisions on the sport was evident Monday as Osaka made her feelings known about possibly skipping Wimbledon. She is not a fan of grass surfaces to begin with, and without an opportunity to improve her ranking, she might struggle to find motivation.

The intention was really good, but the execution is kind of all over the place, Osaka said.

Swiatek, who is from Poland, which has supported Ukraine perhaps more than any other country, said locker room conversations, which might once have been about changing balls during matches, have shifted to discussions of war, peace and politics. She stopped short of overtly stating her position, but she hardly masked her sentiments.

All the Russian and Belarusian players are not responsible in whats going on in their country, Swiatek said. But on the other hand, the sport has been used in politics and we are kind of public personas and we have some impact on people. It would be nice if the people who are making decisions were making decisions that are going to stop Russias aggression.

Read the original here:
As the French Open Begins, the War in Ukraine Roils the Locker Room - The New York Times

"Looking Over The Italy Peace Plan To End War In Ukraine": Russia – NDTV

The Ukrainian and Russian foreign ministers met for inconclusive talks in Turkey in March. (File)

Russia today said it was looking over an Italian peace plan proposal to end the conflict in Ukraine.

"We have received it recently and are studying it," Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei Rudenko told reporters. He declined to provide any details, saying Russia would comment at a later stage.

"It has not been discussed between Russia and Italy," he said in comments carried by Russian news agencies. Talks between Russia and Ukraine to end the hostilities have essentially ground to a halt.

Russia's lead negotiator Vladimir Medinsky said yesterday that Russia was willing to resume negotiations but the onus was on Kyiv.

"Freezing the current negotiations and putting everything on pause is not our initiative," Mr Rudenko said.

"We will be ready to resume as soon as Ukraine shows a constructive position and at least provides a reaction to the proposals submitted to it."

Talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations have been held regularly, both in person and via video-link, since the Russian military offensive began on February 24.

The Ukrainian and Russian foreign ministers met for inconclusive talks in Turkey in March, followed by a meeting of the delegations in Istanbul, which also failed to bring about concrete results.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Waiting for response to load...

Read the original here:
"Looking Over The Italy Peace Plan To End War In Ukraine": Russia - NDTV

Three months into his war in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin wants to restore Russian glory and protect his iron grip on power – ABC News

Three months into his war in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin is holding firm on his plantorestore Russian glory and protect his iron grip on power.

To understand why, it pays to understand hispast.

Things are not going to plan for Vladimir Putin.

The once-fearedRussian army has long since abandoned its goal of capturing Ukraine'scapital Kyiv,and it's been largely beaten back from the country's second-largest city, Kharkiv.

Moscow's tactics for its invasion havechanged it isnow solelyfocused on the ground war in the eastern Donbas region, and in the south.

In those areas, ithas managed to push its lines forwardbut the gains are incremental, often just a few kilometres at a time.

There has been no breakthrough.

Many experts classify the fighting now as little more than a standstill, with both sides braced for months of combat ahead.

No matter how you look at it, Putin's "special military operation"as he calls it is far from achieving the goals he spelled out at the beginning of the invasion in his televised address to thenation, and the world, on February 24.

"[The]goal is to protect people who have been subjected to abuse and genocide by the regime in Kyiv for eight years," Putinsaid.

"And for this, we will pursue the demilitarisation and 'de-nazification' of Ukraine."

As the world has witnessed, rather than laying down itsarms, Ukraine's armed forces and its civilians have mounted fierce resistance.

Three months into the war, estimating the scale of Russian losses is difficult the Kremlin hasn't released any figures for the pasttwo months.

Ukraine claims the current toll is now close to 30,000 Russian soldiers killed. Some Western intelligence sources suggest this number is too high. Yet Britain's Ministry of Defence estimates50,000 Russian troops have been killed or wounded.

In a sign the losses are mounting, Russiais now considering scrapping the upper 40-year-old age limit for soldiers.

At home, Putin still talks of the "de-nazification" of Ukraine, but there's little prospect now of toppling the government of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Zelenskyyhassurvived attempts to kill him, and his government remains in Kyiv. His video addresseshave rallied Ukrainian support at home and around the world.

He's had visits from the White House,Downing Street and the UN the country even won last week's Eurovision song contest.

But Putin is showingno sign of weakening.He has acknowledged there will be painbut, according to the world of Vladimir,Russia will endure.

On VictoryDay earlier this month, the Russian President told his nation and the world his country had no choice but toact in Ukraine.

"The danger was rising by the day," he said in his speech onRed Square.

"Russia has given a pre-emptive response to an aggression [the] only correct decision by a sovereign, powerful and independent country".

Putin said Russian troops in Ukraine had been fighting for "the motherland".

"No-one will forget the lessons of World War II and there will be no place in the world for hangmen, executioners and the Nazis".

As international companies abandon the country, as the last vestiges of independent media disappear, as connections to Europe and the US are cut, Russia is bracing for more self-reliance an existencelargely isolated from the West.

It's a future Vladimir Putin is verycomfortable with.

It's much like the country that moulded his past: The USSR.

Amidst stories of Vladimir Putin's enormous personal wealth and power, it's worth remembering his childhood.

It was simple,typically Soviet, and there is no doubt it shaped him.

His father barely survived World War II and he was born after two older siblings had died.

The Putins lived in a shared "kommunalka" apartment in Leningrad, now StPetersburg. There was one stove and one toilet, shared by three families.

At the height of the Cold War in the sixties, most Soviet kids dreamed of becoming cosmonauts.

Not Vladimir Putin.

As journalist Masha Gessen writes in her biography of Putin, as a teenager he had a portrait of Yan Berzin, the founder of Soviet military intelligence, on his desk.

Putin himself enjoys telling the story of how he tried to join the KGB when he was just 16. They passed then, but he did find his way in after graduating from Leningrad State University.

It would be hard to describe his KGB career as stellar. Putin had studied Germanand his only international assignment was in Germany.

In 1985 he was posted not to East Berlin, where, as Masha Gessen points out, he could have actively recruited spies in the West, but instead went to Dresden, an industrial city in the heart of East Germany.

He was there when the Berlin Wall fell and the German Democratic Republic began to implode. Putin, his first wife and two daughters returned to Leningrad in 1990 as the Soviet Union itself was falling apart.

They moved back into one room in his parent'stwo-bedroom apartment in Leningrad.

But soon, his long climb up the political ladder would begin.

In 1990, at theage of 38, Putin became an adviser to the Mayor of StPetersburg and gradually became a power player in the city's administration.

Within just a few years, he was suspected of orchestrating a multi-million-dollar kickback schemebut he was never charged.

At this time, Putin started to learn some valuable lessons about how politics in the new Russia worked.

"His formative years were spent, essentially, as a deputy mayor in StPetersburg (formerly Leningrad), enriching himself off the backs of people who were going hungry," said Sydney-based journalistZoya Sheftalovich, a contributing editor for Politico Europe.

"There wasn't going to be any accountability as long as you kept people very, very close and as long as you maintained a system of corruption that kept the power at the top."

By 1996, he moved to the Kremlin.

His KGB background undoubtedly helped him move up the ranksand by 1998, he was running the FSB, the organisation that had succeeded the KGB after the USSR dissolved.

Putin was little known outside of the Kremlin when then-president Boris Yeltsin appointed him prime minister in 1999.

He was a compromise candidate, not seen as having much political ambition.

But manyspeculated his background in the security services was a big advantage.

Putin could provide stability after a period of economic chaos, as well asprotecting the financial gains Yelstin and those around him had made while they were in power.

Soon after his appointment, a series of apartment bombings swept Russia. Putin blamed Chechen terrorists, but many have suspected the blasts were actually the work of the FSB.

"All of a sudden, we saw these very mysterious bombings in Moscow apartment buildings that had quite interesting links to the FSB and all of a sudden we had to blame that on Chechnya," Sheftalovich said.

Putin talked tough and sentRussian troops to crush Chechnya's capital, Grozny. His popularity soared.

Relentless favourable coverage from Russia's state media pushed him to the top of a crowded field in the presidential election in 2000.

He easily won that election, receiving53 per centof the vote 23 per centmore than his nearest rival, the leader of the Communist Party.

Russia's first post-Soviet leader, Boris Yeltsin, had been widely ridiculed.

At times he appeared drunk and out of control in public. In the final years of his presidency, Russia's economy was in chaos.

Putin quickly set about building an image as the anti-Yeltsin. Bare-chested hunting trips. Judo competitions. Hardworking and deadly serious.

And the Russian public liked the image they were shown.

Initially, Putin sought to engage the West. In 2001, he addressed the German Bundestag in fluent German and spoke of Russia's place in Europe.

"I am convinced that today we are turning over a new page in our bilateral relations, thereby making our joint contribution to building a common European home," he said at the time.

Far from ridicule, Putin inspiredfear and respect.

In 2009, Australian James Blake was one of the few "Angliiski"or non-Russians allowed to be in the main Russia Today newsroom when Putin came to visit.

RT, as it's known, is the Kremlin's international news channel.

"There was considerable nervousness in the newsroom,"said Blake, who was RT's business editor at the time.

"I was amazed when someone spilled a cup of coffee on a patch of carpet not far from where I was sitting, and the entire patch was immediately replaced."

Despite days of preparation, what struck Blake was how brief the visit was; Putin was clearly uncomfortable in this kind of environment.

"He and [RT Editor Margarita Simonyan]spent all of about 90 seconds down at the front of the newsroom standing alongside the desk of one of the translators [then], no sooner was he there than he was gone.

"When I asked one of the Russian journalists I was with what she thought of proceedings she replied:'Heis a short man, but he has an energy.'"

Not long after the war in Ukrainebegan, so did the questions about Putin's hold on power.

There was speculation that powerful elements in the security services and the elites might decide the costs of the war were too high, particularly as Russia'sinvasion became bogged down and the economy felt the heavy impact of sanctions.

Some even predicted Putin would be ousted in a coup.

But three months into the war,his control in Moscow seems as strong as ever.

On Russian state media every night, audiences are fed hours of coverageportrayinga very different picture of the war one in which Ukraine is the aggressor and itstroops are the onescommitting war crimes.

Despite occasional public displays of opposition, Putin can still count on sizeable public support for the war

Behind the scenes, there has been plenty of intrigue as security services scramble to escape the fallout from the disastrous pre-war intelligence provided to the Kremlin.

But none of that appears to have threatened Putin's control.

A little more than a decade ago, there were real questions about whether or notVladimir Putin would voluntarily give up power.

In 2011, Putin had to decide whether he would again run for presidentafter spending one term as prime minister. Russia's constitution forbids more than two consecutive presidential terms, so in 2008 the Kremlin arranged a switch.

Deputy PM Dmitry Medvedev easily won the election as Russia's presidentand he appointed Putin as his prime minister.

I arrived as the ABC's correspondent in Moscow during this timeand witnessed this political charade play out.

Dmitry Medvedev was Russia's presidentbut everyone knew the real power had simply moved to the prime minister's office.

No one doubted Vladimir Putin was still running the country.

When Kutuzovsky Prospekt, the main road outside our office window, fell silent, that was the cue that in a few minutes Putin's convey would be speeding down the closed-off eight-lane street into the centre of Moscow.

But he wasn't heading to the Kremlin.

In the period from 2008-2012, the prime minister's office was in the "Russian White House", the Russian Federation Government House on the Moscow River.

The real power had followed Putin there.

As the decision whether to return to the presidency approached, the Arab Spring revolutions were sweeping the Middle East. The events deeply impacted Putin.

"Seeing the film footage of the Arab Spring was what caused him to essentially take power back because he didn't think he could trust Medvedev to keep his grip on power," said Sheftalovich.

"It's quite well known that he saw the mobile phone footage of [Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi]being captured and then tortured and killed.

"Apparently, according to those who were close to him, [he was] horrified by that footage.

"I think he saw that what was happening to Gaddafi could very well happen to him."

Sheftalovichlived in Ukraine until she was seven years old, when it was still part of the USSR. Her family immigrated to Australia in 1992.

For her, thefear of an Arab Spring-type revolution in Russiais oneof thedrivers behindPutin's war inUkraine.

And it'snot just NATO, she says,it's that Ukraine wason the path to becoming a successful, democratic country.

"I think for Putin, you don't want an example of a successful democracy right next door speaking your language."

From the Kremlin's viewpoint, if Ukraine could move to the West, so, theoretically, could Russia. And that would mean Putin and his entire power apparatus, all of their wealth and influence,would be dismantled.

Sheftalovich believes for those around Putin, there's no turning back.

"These people are not going to care about the lost lives and wanting to stop Putin for any sort of ideological reason," she said.

Go here to see the original:
Three months into his war in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin wants to restore Russian glory and protect his iron grip on power - ABC News

Lukashenko accuses Poland and NATO of plotting to partition Ukraine – Reuters

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko attends a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia March 11, 2022. Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/Kremlin via REUTERS

Register

May 23 (Reuters) - Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said on Monday he was concerned about what he called moves by the West to "dismember" Ukraine, and accused Poland of seeking to seize the Western part of the country.

He offered no evidence for his assertions.

"What worries us is that they are ready, the Poles and NATO, to come out, to help take western Ukraine like it was before 1939," Lukashenko said during a televised meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Register

Lukashenko, a close ally of Putin, said Kyiv would eventually have to ask for help in preventing the seizure of western Ukraine.

Moscow has in the past suggested that Poland seeks to establish control over historical Polish lands in Ukraine, a claim that Warsaw denies as disinformation. read more

Poland is one of Ukraine's strongest supporters, sending weapons across the border and taking in more than 3 million Ukrainian refugees.

Belarus said in March its armed forces were not taking part in what Moscow calls its "special operation" in Ukraine, but it did serve as a launchpad for Russia to send thousands of troops across the border on Feb. 24.

Under a non-aggression pact signed in 1939 just before the outbreak of World War Two, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union carved Poland up between them. Most of the territory seized by Moscow is now in either Belarus or Ukraine. Kaliningrad, formerly German East Prussia, became an exclave of Russia.

Register

Reporting by Reuters; Editing by Kevin Liffey and Angus MacSwan

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read more:
Lukashenko accuses Poland and NATO of plotting to partition Ukraine - Reuters