Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Ukraine crisis: Why is Germany out of step with the US, Europe? – Al Jazeera English

Brussels, Belgium Every time the European Union has to make big decisions on migration, trade or foreign relations, Germany takes the lead.

But Berlins restrictive stance on how to deal with Russia to deter the crisis in Ukraine has raised eyebrows among its allies, while experts accuse Germany of watching from the sidelines.

While the United States and some EU nations have sent military support to Ukraine, Germany has offered only medical aid and has been ridiculed for its promise to send helmets. It has also banned Estonia from supplying German-origin Howitzer weapons to Ukraine.

Germanys navy chief Kay-Achim Schnbach, who has since resigned, earlier downplayed the crisis, saying that Russian President Vladimir Putin deserved respect.

These developments have frustrated Germanys NATO allies, who are eager to secure unanimity to deal with the Kremlin.

European security cannot be done without a German leading role. At this moment, when were looking at how theyre acting on European defence and NATO, the readiness of the Bundeswehr, the hesitance to use military force, its absurd for the current times, Latvias Minister of Defence Artis Pabrik told the Financial Times, referring to the German military.

Last week, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz insisted the country is in tune with EU and NATO policies towards Russia, but stuck to his stance, telling reporters in Berlin: We dont provide any lethal weapons.

Stefan Scheller, an associate fellow at the German Council on Foreign Relations said the position of the current German government, a coalition of the Social Democrats (SPD), the Greens and the Free Democrats is rooted in history.

The SPD has a longstanding legacy from what they consider a successful Cold War strategy of rapprochement towards the Soviet Union. However, seeking rapprochement in the current situation with 100,000 Russian soldiers on the border to Ukraine is naive, he told Al Jazeera.

The Liberals and part of the Greens have a more assertive perspective towards dealing with Russia. However, the Greens having their roots in the peace movement have also historically had huge concerns about any kind of arms deliveries.

Germanys cautious approach towards deterring Russia has not gone down well in Ukraine.

Ukrainian foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba recently tweeted: Statements by Germany about the impossibility of transferring defence weapons to Ukraine, in particular due to permission to third parties, the futility of returning Crimea, hesitations to disconnect Russia from SWIFT- do not correspond to the level of our relations and the current security situation.

German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock responded quickly, saying Berlin is acting in a historically responsible manner; because of its role in the second world war, the countrys policy against sending arms to crisis zones.

But Mykola Bielieskov, an analyst at Ukraines National Institute for Strategic Studies, believes the idea that Germany has to fulfil a special responsibility towards Russia because of its second world war legacy is groundless.

In this WWII responsibility paradigm, Germany owes Ukraine much more than Russia, given the fact that all Ukraine was occupied from 1941-42 and we suffered more under The Third Reich, he told Al Jazeera.

On the other hand, Germany would need to shoulder the burden of negative outcomes if Russia indeed launched an all-out war against Ukraine.

Markus Ziener, Helmut Schmidt fellow at the German Marshall Fund (GMF) of the US, told Al Jazeera: This historical stance of the German government is lopsided. In the past, Germanys actions had made Ukraine suffer and while the uneasiness to supply weapons is understandable, in the current scenario, supplying arms to fortify Ukraine would actually help the country.

After Germanys offer to send 5,000 helmets and medical aid to Ukraine,Kyivs Mayor Vitali Klitschko joked to the German newspaper BILD Daily: What will Germany send next? Pillows?

Scheller told Al Jazeera Germany should consider providing substantial numbers of protective vests and night vision equipment.

Moreover, the country should not block European partners from supplying arms to Ukraine and should refrain from comments which weakens European cohesion, he said.

He added that the country has at times been flexible with its arms export policy.

While exporting arms to conflict zones is not a part of Germanys foreign policy tradition, Germany has at times and for good reasons- been flexible with its own benchmarks when it provided weapons to support the Kurds in Syria, who were fighting the Islamic State, said Scheller.

Germanys economic linkages and its gas pipeline project Nord Stream 2 with Russia, could be behind Germanys softer approach.

The contentious Nord Stream 2 pipeline which Washington fears Moscow is using to increase its leverage in Europe is meant to bring natural gas from Russia to Germany.

While Germany works towards a renewable future, GMFs Zeiner said that at present, if Germany decides to stop the Nord Stream 2 project, it is bound to hurt the country.

Germanys reliance on gas is high and will increase till there is sufficient renewable energy. So the country will need gas and energy supply from elsewhere, he told Al Jazeera.

Of Nord Stream 2, Rachel Rizzo, senior fellow at the Atlantic Councils Europe Center, said: What were seeing is a situation where those economic links hinder how [the West] can respond during a crisis that involves Russia.

When it comes to Germany, the country has a pacifist bent to it and it has for decades, especially after World War II. But I also think there are political elements at play here. The SPD, which holds the German chancellor, has historically been more friendly with Russia, whereas the Greens who are in charge of the foreign ministry and the economic and climate ministry, for instance, are much more hawkish and are famously anti-Nord Stream 2.

Keen to show Germanys interest in defusing the crisis in Ukraine, German foreign minister Baerbock is set to visit Ukraine on February 7 and announced at the Bundestag that the country is working on a strong package of sanctions against Russia, should it launch an attack.

She highlighted that this package covers several aspects, including Nord Stream 2.

Yet, Scheller explains that sanctions alone will not solve all problems.

Putin tests the West and tries to change the post-cold-war security order to his liking. Right now, Germany should refrain from comments which weakens European cohesion and find a compromise with its allies, he said.

Go here to see the original:
Ukraine crisis: Why is Germany out of step with the US, Europe? - Al Jazeera English

The Untold Story of the Ukraine Crisis – TIME

Great wars sometimes start over small offenses. A murdered duke. An angered pope. The belief of a lonely king that his rivals arent playing fair. When historians study why armies began gathering in Europe during the plague of 2021, their interest might turn to a teenage girl, the goddaughter of Moscows isolated sovereign.

Her name is Daria, a young Ukrainian with a shy smile and big brown eyes. When she was born in 2004, her parents asked their friend Vladimir Putin, then a few years into his reign in Russia, to christen her in the Orthodox tradition they all share. The girls father, Viktor Medvedchuk, has been close to Putin for decades. They holiday together on the Black Sea. They conduct business. They obsess over the bonds between their countries and the Western forces they see pulling them apart.

Our relationship has developed over 20 years, Medvedchuk told me in a rare interview last spring in Kyiv, near the start of the current standoff between Russia and the West over Ukraine. I dont want to say I exploit that relationship, but you could say it has been part of my political arsenal.

Putin could say the same about Medvedchuk. The leading voice for Russian interests in Ukraine, Medvedchuks political party is the biggest opposition force in parliament, with millions of supporters. Over the past year, that party has come under attack. Medvedchuk was charged with treason in May and placed under house arrest in Kyiv. Just last month, the U.S. accused him and his allies of plotting to stage a coup with help from the Russian military.

Read more: What the West Will Never Understand About Putins Ukraine Obsession

Throughout his 21 years in power, Putin has seen Ukraine as a fraternal nation, tied to Russia by bonds of faith, family, politics, and a millennium of common history. He has spent the past seven years using every tool at his disposal, including coercion and outright invasion, to preserve those ties, as the Ukrainian people increasingly turn toward the West. Short of war, one of the best ways that Putin has to influence Ukraine is through Medvedchuk and his political party. So it should not be surprising that Russias military standoff with the West has escalated in step with the crackdown against his friend.

Medvedchuk, center, faces treason charges in Kyiv

Sputnik/AP

Last February, days after the Inauguration of President Joe Biden, Americas allies in Kyiv decided to get tough on Medvedchuk. The Ukrainian government started by taking his TV channels off the air, depriving Russia of its propaganda outlets in the country. The U.S. embassy in Kyiv applauded the move. About two weeks later, on Feb. 19, 2021, Ukraine announced that it had seized the assets of Medvedchuks family. Among the most important, it said, was a pipeline that brings Russian oil to Europe, enriching Medvedchuk and his familyincluding Putins goddaughter, Dariaand helping to bankroll Medvedchuks political party.

The first inkling of Putins response came less than two days later, at 7 a.m. on Feb. 21. In a little-noticed statement, the Russian Defense Ministry announced the deployment of 3,000 paratroopers to the border with Ukraine for large-scale exercises, training them to seize enemy structures and hold them until the arrival of the main force. Those soldiers were the first in a military buildup that has since grown to more than 100,000 Russian troops. In their scramble to respond, the U.S. and its allies have sent planeloads of weapons to Ukraine and thousands of troops to secure the eastern flank of the NATO alliance.

The resulting standoff has revived the tensions of the Cold War and pushed Europe to the brink of a major military conflict. In trying to discern Putins motives, observers have raised his strategic wish to humble the Americans, divide the Europeans, and restore Moscows influence over the lands it controlled before its empire crumbled in 1991. But the roots of the crisis have been overlooked. To understand Putins objectives, you have to understand both his personal and political ties to Ukraine, as well as his long-standing aim to bring the nation under his control. When Medvedchuk was placed under house arrest, the Russian leader called the attack on his proxies an absolutely obvious purge of the political field, one that threatened to turn Ukraine into Russias antithesis, a kind of anti-Russia.

Read more: Alexei Navalny Urges Biden to Stand Up to Putin

Few people have a clearer vantage on Putins response than the alleged coup plotter, Medvedchuk. In the year before the crisis escalated, he met with Putin several times at his residence near Moscow, despite the pandemic protocols that have kept the Russian leader isolated from all but his top aides. The question that now fills headlines around the worldWhat does Putin want?is not a matter of conjecture for his closest friend in Kyiv.

It took me a while to find Medvedchuks office amid the alleys of the city center. The address led to an old apartment block near the end of a steep slope, with no outward sign of its political significance. Behind the unmarked door, a handful of armed guards looked at me in silence. One proceeded to search my bag, demanding to know whether it contained a knife or any kind of shiv. Medvedchuk was more cordial. Dressed in a fitted blue suit, he had the look of a Ken dolls fatherstiff, tanned, and manicured, with an angular jaw. Upon entering the conference room, he strutted over to a thermostat and asked, Are you warm enough?

The story of his friendship with Putin, he said, goes back to the early years of Putins presidency. Medvedchuk was chief of staff to Putins counterpart in Kyiv, and they often met at official functions. At the time, Russia had all the influence it wanted in Ukraine. Its economy depended on Russia for cheap gas and cheaper loans, and its leaders had no intention of joining any Western alliances.

To strengthen their bond with the Russian leader, Medvedchuk and his wife, a famous news anchor in Ukraine, asked Putin to be the godfather of their newborn. They have stayed close ever since. In one interview on Russian state TV, Medvedchuk recalled how Putin doted on Daria, bringing her a bouquet of flowers and a teddy bear, when he visited the Medvedchuks at their villa in Crimea.

Medvedchuk on vacation with his daughter Daria

Courtesy of Viktor Medvedchuk

Their friendship only grew closer after 2014, when a revolution tore their countries apart. Protesters built an encampment on Kyivs central square that winter, demanding Ukrainian leaders fight corruption and integrate with the West. More than two months of clashes with police ended on a frigid February morning, when security forces opened fire on the demonstrators, killing dozens of them in the streets.

The regime collapsed the following day. Its leaders fled across the border to Russia, and as their political party fell apart, so did the machinery of Russian influence over its neighbor. There is no legitimate authority in Ukraine now, Putin fumed in a speech at the Kremlin that spring. No one to talk to. The revolution, he claimed, was nothing more than a U.S.-backed coup, and he responded by ordering his troops to invade. After swiftly taking over Crimea, Russian forces moved into the coal-mining heartland of eastern Ukraine, installing separatist puppet regimes in two of its biggest cities.

Read more: The Man Putin Fears

As Ukraine fought back in the east, its capital became a political battleground. The remnants of the pro-Russian establishment set out to build new parties in Ukraine, each vying for the old regimes voters. We knew Putin does not want chaos and war in Ukraine in the long term, says an adviser to one of the Ukrainian oligarchs who funded these parties. He wants a protectorate, a loyal government, like he had before. Russias allies in Kyiv wanted the right to run for office, to buy up industries, and to control TV networks. As the Russian lawmaker Konstantin Zatulin explained it to me at the time: This would be our compromise. Russia would have its own soloists in the great Ukrainian choir, and they would sing for us. Under that arrangement, he added, We would have no need to tear Ukraine apart.

The U.S. was not open to that kind of deal, and the Obama Administration took a hard line against Russias operatives in Kyiv. Many of them were sanctioned right after Russia invaded in March 2014; Medvedchuk was at the top of the blacklist. Still, by the end of 2018, the pro-Russian parties achieved a breakthrough in Ukraine, forming an alliance called Opposition PlatformFor Life. Backed by billionaires sympathetic to Moscow, they owned three television networks in Ukraine. And their partys chairman was Putins old friend Medvedchuk.

During elections held the following year, Ukraine voted in a new President, an actor and comedian named Volodymyr Zelensky. His popularity derived from a hit sitcom called Servant of the People, in which he starred as a fictional President. Three months later, Zelenskys political party won a majority in parliament. But Medvedchuks faction came in second place, making it the biggest opposition force in the country. Millions of citizens voted for us, Medvedchuk told me. Putin gave a promise to protect them.

Read more: Russia Has Been Warning About Ukraine for Decades. The West Should Have Listened

Medvedchuks TV channels worked to weaken the new government. They were eating into the electoral base, just destroying Zelensky, says the Presidents first national security adviser, Oleksandr Danyliuk. The networks were especially relentless in attacking the governments response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its failure to secure vaccine supplies from Western allies. When Russia released its own vaccine in August 2020, Medvedchuk, his wife, and their daughter Daria were among the first to get it. They then flew to Moscow to talk to Putin. It was the first public meeting the Russian leader had with anyoneunmasked, on camera, and without social distancingsince the pandemic began. Their talks that day resulted in a deal for Russia to supply Ukraine with millions of doses of its vaccine, and to allow Ukrainian labs to produce it free of charge.

When Medvedchuk brought the offer to Kyiv, the government rejected it. So did the U.S. State Department, which accused Russia of using its vaccine as a tool of political influence. But as the death toll mounted in Ukraineand no vaccine shipments arrived from the Westvoters turned away from Zelensky in droves. By the fall of 2020, his approval ratings fell well below 40%, compared with over 70% a year earlier. In some polls taken that December, Medvedchuks party was in the lead.

Viktor Medvedchuk meeting Putin near Moscow in October 2020

Alexei DruzhininTASS/Getty Images

Zelensky grew especially concerned about the partys television channels, which he condemned as messengers of Russian propaganda. When he decided to take those channels off the air last February, it was not only a defensive move, says Danyliuk, his former security adviser. It was also conceived as a welcome gift to the Biden Administration, which had made the fight against international corruption a pillar of its foreign policy. As Danyliuk put it, the decision to go after Putins friend was calculated to fit in with the U.S. agenda.

Throughout the ensuing military crisis, the U.S. has had no ambassador in Kyiv. The last one, Marie Yovanovitch, was fired in April 2019 after she ran afoul of President Trumps campaign to extract political favors from Ukraine. Trump wanted the Ukrainians to investigate the Biden family, and he froze military aid to Kyiv as a means of pressure. The resulting scandal led to Trumps first impeachment in the House, and it left the U.S. embassy in Kyiv hollowed out and demoralized.

My chain of command went to sh-t, says Suriya Jayanti, who was then a senior diplomat at the embassy. We just disappeared. That did not change, she says, after Biden took office last year. His top foreign policy staff was focused on confronting China, she says, and they tended to see Russia as a nuisance to be managed or ignored. His team didnt care about Russia, Jayanti told me in Kyiv last fall, shortly before she resigned from government. And they didnt want to hear about Ukraine. Only in recent days, nearly a year into the crisis, did Biden pick a new ambassador to Kyiv, who has not yet been installed.

A senior U.S. official tells TIME that Ukraine has always been a top priority for the Administration: There has been very extensive and almost constant focus on Ukraine from day one. When the Zelensky government decided to go after Medvedchuk, the U.S. welcomed it as part of Ukraines struggle to counter Russian malign influence, the official said. The methods used in this struggle have been novel and controversial. Rather than working through the justice system, Zelensky has imposed sanctions against Ukrainian tycoons and politicians, freezing their assets by decree.

This strategy, which the government calls de-oligarchization, has targeted many of Zelenskys domestic opponents and, in particular, their television channels. The U.S. has avoided criticizing the crackdown, not wanting to micromanage what Ukraine was doing, said the senior U.S. official. But in the case of Medvedchuk, the U.S. embassy cheered Zelensky on. We support Ukraines efforts to protect its sovereignty and territorial integrity through sanctions, the embassy said in a tweet last February, the day after the sanctions froze Medvedchuks assets.

The party leader was furious. This is political repression, Medvedchuk told me. All my bank accounts are frozen. I cant manage my assets. I cant even pay my utility bills.

In April, as Russian forces assembled at the border, Zelensky traveled to the front lines to meet his troops, and invited me to come along. Military helicopters got us most of the way to the trenches, but the last few hundred paces required a hike through the mud with a handful of soldiers and bodyguards. One of them lugged a big machine gun, with boxes of shells latched to his belt.

The President spent the day talking to his troops, dining with them, and handing out medals. Considering the number of Russian tanks poised to invade from across the nearby border, he seemed remarkably upbeat. We spent the night near the garrison, and he arrived at the mess hall for breakfast in a track suit, fresh from a morning jog through the war zone.

Read more: Documents Reveal Erik Princes $10 Billion Plan to Make Weapons and Create a Private Army in Ukraine

On the flight back that day, we talked about Medvedchuk and his TV networks, and whether it seemed wise in hindsight to shut them down. Zelensky made no apologies. I consider them devils, the President told me. Their narratives seek to disarm Ukraine of its statehood. As the Kyiv skyline appeared through the window and the plane began to descend, Zelensky grew upset. Al Capone killed a lot of people, but he got locked up over his taxes, he told me. I think these TV channels killed a lot of people through the information war.

Some of his advisers, especially in the intelligence community, were less enthusiastic about the move against Medvedchuk. At least hes the devil we know, one retired spy chief told me in Kyiv, agreeing to discuss the issue on condition of anonymity. Since Russia first started the war in 2014, Medvedchuk has served as one of the lead negotiators in numerous rounds of peace talks, often winning the release of prisoners of war. He has direct access to Putin, the spy chief told me. That kind of access is rare, he says, and it has made Medvedchuk an effective mediator.

Zelensky was not moved by such arguments. On May 12, about a month after our trip to the front lines, Ukrainian authorities issued an arrest warrant for Medvedchuk. Prosecutors alleged that he had profited from the Russian occupation of Crimea, and they charged him with treason. A court ordered him to remain under house arrest pending trial, cut off from his voters and prevented from attending sessions of parliament.

U.S. law enforcement went after his allies. Oleh Voloshyn, a prominent member of Medvedchuks party, was greeted by the FBI when he arrived in Washington last July. Two agents approached him at Dulles International Airport and asked to have a word in private, away from his wife and infant son, who were traveling with him. Voloshyn, who serves as Medvedchuks envoy in the West, spent the next three hours answering the agents questions. They took my cell phone, Voloshyn told me of the incident, which has not been previously reported. And they took all the information from my cell phone.

Voloshyn, whom the U.S. has accused of being part of a coup plot, at his office in Kyiv Jan. 29

Maxim Dondyuk for TIME

In a statement on Jan. 20, the U.S. government leveled an astonishing series of allegations against Voloshyn and Medvedchuk. It claimed that they are part of an ongoing Kremlin plot to install a puppet government in Ukraine, propped up by a Russian military occupation. Russia has directed its intelligence services to recruit current and former Ukrainian government officials to prepare to take over the government of Ukraine and to control Ukraines critical infrastructure with an occupying Russian force, said the statement from the U.S. Treasury Department, which imposed sanctions on Voloshyn and other alleged plotters.

When we spoke by phone the following day, Voloshyn had already pulled his money out of the bank and was preparing to leave Kyiv with his family. Maybe Serbia, he says of his destination. Maybe Russia. He told me he has no intention of taking power in Ukraine with help from the Russian military, and said the aim of his party was always to win power peacefullyeither through elections or, as Voloshyn put it, a diplomatic compromise between the Russia and the West. There is no third option, he says. Russia either gets the influence it wants by peaceful means, or it gets it by force.

With Medvedchuk sidelined and his party in retreat, the Kremlin has no clear path to influence over Ukraine through politics, and that raises the temptation to use hard power, Voloshyn told me. You have to understand, he says. There are hawks around Putin who want this crisis. They are ready to invade. They come to him and say, Look at your Medvedchuk. Where is he now? Where is your peaceful solution? Sitting under house arrest? Should we wait until all pro-Russian forces are arrested?

Nearly 12 months since it began, the crisis in Ukraine has become far bigger and more dangerous than any political grudge. In early December, as over 100,000 Russian troops stood at the border with Ukraine, Biden held a call with Putin to defuse the tensions. According to the White House, the President offered to hear out all of Russias strategic concerns, opening the door to a far more sweeping set of talks. It was a breakthrough for Putin to get a U.S. President to engage with him on the future of the NATO alliance, which Putin has long described as the main threat to Russian security.

The response from Russian diplomats smacked of an old negotiating tactic: start high. They demanded a written guarantee from the U.S. that Ukraine would never join NATO. They also told the U.S. to withdraw its military forces from Eastern Europe, retreating to positions they held before Putin took power. As the lead Russian envoy put it ahead of talks in January, NATO needs to pack up its stuff and get back to where it was in 1997. Rather than defusing the standoff, Bidens overture allowed Russia to air a long list of grievances against the West, unleashing what one Kremlin insider in Moscow described to me as an enormous pile of pent-up tensions.

A satellite image taken Dec. 23 shows a deployment of Russian troops at the Opuk training ground in Crimea

Maxar Tech/AFP/Getty Images

As the talks progressed through January, Russians came to believe they had the upper hand as long as they could keep up the military pressure on Ukraine. Its the perfect time to make some trades, to get sanctions removed, to talk about security concerns, says the Kremlin insider, who agreed to discuss the negotiations on condition of anonymity. The logic is simple, the source adds. If we dont put a lot of fear into them, we will not get to a clear solution, because thats just how the Western system works. Its very hard for them to reach a consensus on something. All those moving parts, all those checks and balances, each one pulling in different directions. So the aim is to present a threat of such massive consequences that it forces everyone on that side to agree.

The gambit appears to be failing. The U.S. has rejected Russias core demands out of hand, and prepared a raft of sanctions that would cut much of the Russian economy off from the rest of the world. The gradualism of the past is out, and this time well start at the top of the escalation ladder and stay there, says a senior Administration official.

Biden has begun to warn Ukraine and other allies that a Russian invasion looks imminent. Over 8,500 U.S. troops were put on high alert in January, prepared to deploy to Eastern Europe alongside naval ships and warplanes. The State Department ordered nonessential staff and family members to leave the U.S. embassy in Kyiv, it said, out of an abundance of caution.

Ukrainian forces on a joint patrol Jan. 9 near the border with Belarus

Tyler HicksThe New York Times/REDUX

It is far from clear whether peace talks can bring Europe back from the brink of war, or what Putin might consider a face-saving compromise. Under the Kremlins pandemic protocols, the Russian leader has been more isolated during this crisis than at any point in his career. In early January, when he would normally celebrate Orthodox Christmas among the crowds at a Russian cathedral, the Kremlin issued footage of the President alone with a priest, solemnly holding a candle in the chapel of his private residence. Very few people can speak to him now, the Kremlin insider told me. The world inside his head is only his own.

In Kyiv, Putins friend is even more isolated. Stripped of its main TV channels and beset by criminal charges, Medvedchuks party has been sinking in the polls. Medvedchuk remains under house arrest, with a tracking device affixed to his ankle and police officers stationed outside his home. His daughters security was such a concern that he declined to say anything about her whereabouts. But one of his associates told me that Daria remains in Kyiv, surrounded by private security guards. The main concern, the associate said, is kidnapping. But yes, shes still here.

With reporting by Leslie Dickstein and Simmone Shah/New York; and Brian Bennett, W.J. Hennigan, and Nik Popli/Washington

More Must-Read Stories From TIME

Contact us at letters@time.com.

Go here to see the original:
The Untold Story of the Ukraine Crisis - TIME

Look inside life along Ukraine’s border with Russia, where war is a way of life : The Picture Show – NPR

A woman walks towards the only crossing right now between the rest of Ukraine and the northernmost occupied territory, manned by guards on both sides who check documents in Stanytsia Luhanska. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

A woman walks towards the only crossing right now between the rest of Ukraine and the northernmost occupied territory, manned by guards on both sides who check documents in Stanytsia Luhanska.

DONBAS, Ukraine An estimated 100,000 Russian troops are amassed at the border of Ukraine, surrounding the country from three sides like a horseshoe. The bulk of those troops are to the far east, hard up against the Russian border. It's an area of the country called Donbas, where life has already been turned upside down by war with Russia.

Tensions have been simmering there since 2014, when Russia-backed separatists moved in and declared breakaway republics. They have been fighting ever since.

Now, people here face the prospect of being caught in the middle of what the White House is warning could be the largest invasion since World War II.

To get to Donbas, we hop a highspeed train from Kyiv. Our journey takes us past vast grain fields and flat stretches of land, covered in deep, deep snow. The area is known for coal mining and farming although these days, it's mostly known for conflict.

Our first stop is Slovyansk, a small city that was overtaken by separatists in 2014. It was the first city they took, and they held it for three months before the Ukrainian army came in and took it back. The fighting was fierce.

The Kyiv train station in January. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

The Kyiv train station in January.

Trees reflected in a window on a train from Kyiv to Slovyansk. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

Trees reflected in a window on a train from Kyiv to Slovyansk.

People exit the train at a station on the way to Slovyansk. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

People exit the train at a station on the way to Slovyansk.

A man walks through a tunnel with street art in Slovyansk, a small city that was overtaken by separatists in 2014. It was the first city they took, and they held it for three months before the Ukrainian army came in and took it back. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

A man walks through a tunnel with street art in Slovyansk, a small city that was overtaken by separatists in 2014. It was the first city they took, and they held it for three months before the Ukrainian army came in and took it back.

Vitalii Milko (left) stands with his wife Vita, their daughter Milana, 4, and a stray dog in the central square in Slovyansk. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

Vitalii Milko (left) stands with his wife Vita, their daughter Milana, 4, and a stray dog in the central square in Slovyansk.

We meet Vita Milko, 41, who is out with her husband watching their young daughter play in the snow. She tells us she's proud to be Ukrainian, and she knows how close her life was to completely changing had the separatists not been run out eight years ago.

"I try not to think about it," she says, looking at her daughter. "I'm happy this city was freed. I would like all other cities to be freed as well."

Those "other cities" Vita is talking about lie even farther east. The Kyiv government calls them "temporarily occupied territories." The territories were seized in 2014, just like Slovyansk, but the Ukraine army never won them back. Russia has never formally annexed them, either. So the people who live there are in limbo cut off from Ukraine, cut off from Russia, cut off from the world.

The central square in Slovyansk where a statue of Lenin was removed in 2015. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

The central square in Slovyansk where a statue of Lenin was removed in 2015.

Left: A kiosk at night in Slovyansk. Right: Flowers pressed against the window of a florist in Slovyansk. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

Left: A kiosk at night in Slovyansk. Right: Flowers pressed against the window of a florist in Slovyansk.

A shop that sells food and drinks outside the train station in Slovyansk. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

A shop that sells food and drinks outside the train station in Slovyansk.

To get there, or as close as we can get, we hire a driver to take us another three hours further east, through multiple police and military checkpoints, to Stanytsia Luhanska.

This is the only crossing right now between the rest of Ukraine and the northernmost occupied territory, manned by guards on both sides who check documents. People cross out from the occupied territory to buy certain Ukrainian goods, get cash from ATMs, collect government pensions or visit family and friends.

A chemical factory that makes fertilizer in Eastern Ukraine on the way to Stanitsya Luhanska. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

A chemical factory that makes fertilizer in Eastern Ukraine on the way to Stanitsya Luhanska.

Top: A man walks towards the border with the northernmost separatist region in Eastern Ukraine. Bottom left: People guarding the border walk across some ice. Bottom right: A group heads towards the crossing with the separatist region. People cross out from the occupied territory to buy certain Ukrainian goods, get cash from ATMs, collect government pensions or visit family and friends. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

Top: A man walks towards the border with the northernmost separatist region in Eastern Ukraine. Bottom left: People guarding the border walk across some ice. Bottom right: A group heads towards the crossing with the separatist region. People cross out from the occupied territory to buy certain Ukrainian goods, get cash from ATMs, collect government pensions or visit family and friends.

Ukrainian flags are reflected in a puddle at the crossing to the occupied territory in Stanytsia Luhanska. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

Ukrainian flags are reflected in a puddle at the crossing to the occupied territory in Stanytsia Luhanska.

A Soviet star can be seen on a statue across the street from the crossing into occupied territories. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

A Soviet star can be seen on a statue across the street from the crossing into occupied territories.

Just a few blocks from the crossing is the village, with row after row of single-story homes and a small central park. But nearly everyone left during the war, and many died.

We meet 66-year-old Davydovych, who doesn't want to give his last name, for fear of retribution. Speaking freely inside the occupied territories is dangerous, but even here, near the border outside, is risky. He has lived here his whole life and stayed after the war.

Davydovych tells us that just this morning he heard shooting nearby. He doesn't know from which direction, or who was doing the shooting. He sighs in a way that suggests he's given up trying to keep track.

A home in Stanytsia Luhanska that now stands vacant like many others on the street. Numerous buildings like this have clear signs of bullet and mortar holes. Nearly everyone has left the area. Claire Harbage/NPR hide caption

A home in Stanytsia Luhanska that now stands vacant like many others on the street. Numerous buildings like this have clear signs of bullet and mortar holes. Nearly everyone has left the area.

We ask him what he'll do if more fighting comes, if Russia invades and the war starts again.

He shrugs and drops his arms to his sides. "I don't know, I'm just fed up," he says, and his eyes start to fill with tears. "I am broken inside."

For now, diplomatic efforts to resolve the standoff continue. But for many in this part of the world, the threat of war has become a way of life.

See the article here:
Look inside life along Ukraine's border with Russia, where war is a way of life : The Picture Show - NPR

Russia is willing to go to war and incur sanctions over Ukraine, analysts warn – CNBC

A serviceman of the Teykovo Missile Formation (54th Guards Missile Division) takes part in combat patrol and anti-sabotage drills involving RS-24 Yars road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile systems.

Vladimir Smirnov | TASS | Getty Images

Russia is willing to risk "real financial harm" and all-out war to achieve its political objectives in Ukraine, defense analysts have said.

Moscow has denied that it plans to invade neighboring Ukraine, a former part of the Soviet Union, despite having assembled around 100,000 troops at the border.

Russia is demanding that Ukraine never be permitted to become a member of the NATO military alliance and has said it wants the organization to roll back its presence in Eastern Europe.

Samuel Cranny-Evans, a research analyst at defense and security think tank the Royal United Services Institute, said it was likely there was still a way to go before Russia invades Ukraine.

"This isn't an invasion force yet," he told CNBC in a phone call. "Russia has very deliberately built [this situation] in such a way that we will know when it is an invasion force."

He added that what we have seen so far was "just the first step," and now that things like air defense assets, convoys of fuel and ammunition and the personnel to man all of the equipment were being moved to the border, Russia was taking its second step.

A satellite image shows Russian battle groups and vehicles parked in Yelnya, Russia January 19, 2022.

Maxar Technologies | via Reuters

"There are, I would argue, quite a few steps to go through before we actually get to Russian troops moving onto Ukrainian soil," he said. "We might see standoff tactics like cruise missile test launches and cyberwarfare attacks, a bit of unrest and assassination in Ukraine, perhaps."

Cranny-Evans speculated that the first act of war would most likely be long-range missile strikes that targeted key military and industrial infrastructure in Ukraine.

"It's all about showing that if you continue down this road of not doing what we want, we have the ability to target your values," he told CNBC. "It isn't about Russian men killing Ukrainian men and women, it's about targeting the Ukrainian way of life."

Mathieu Boulegue, a research fellow at Chatham House's Russia and Eurasia program, agreed, telling reporters during the think tank's press briefing on Friday that the Russians did not yet appear to be ready to invade.

A rocket launcher shoots missiles during tactical and special exercises with scouts of the Guards Tank Army of the Western Military District at the Golovenki training ground in the Moscow region, Russia, on January 28, 2022.

Russian Defense Ministry | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

"We have now one of the largest concentrations of force in Europe since World War II with a force that looks like an invasion force," he said. "[But] we're still missing some elements in terms of military logistics to make it fully able and capable of sustaining warfighting operations at the technical operational level."

However, he said he suspected that Russia was willing to go to extreme lengths to achieve its political goals.

"You don't send close to 100,000 troops and as many people in reserves to prove a point Russia has raised the stakes so high for me at this stage that it seems improbable it will just simply back down unless it gets something in return," he said.

Meanwhile, Cranny-Evans told CNBC that if these steps continued to unfold, it was worrying for the long-term outlook.

"According to Russian theory, they would actually only invade when they were pretty sure that the Ukrainians were already beaten," he said. "So they could, in theory, be beaten before Russian tanks even move across the border."

A screen grab captured from a video shows military units of the Southern Military District of Russia are on their way to a training site in the south of the country, for military exercises in Rostov, Russia on January 26, 2022.

Russian Defense Ministry | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

Some NATO members have signaled their support for Ukraine as troops have continued to be amassed at the country's border with Russia.

Speaking in Parliament last week, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson warned that "many Russian mothers' sons will not be coming home" if Russia moved to invade Ukraine.

Meanwhile, Britain's foreign secretary, Liz Truss, has said the U.K. will introduce legislation this week to allow it to hit Russian banks, oligarchs and energy companies with economic sanctions.

On Sunday,Bob Menendez, chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, told CNN that the committee was devising the "mother of all sanctions" against Russia that would be "crippling to their economy" as a method of defending Ukraine.

German ministers have also said that Russia will face "massive" economic consequences if it takes any aggressive action against Ukraine.

"Real financial harm could be inflicted on Russia if the right sanctions and the right enforcement were put into place," Cranny-Evans said.

Even without sanctions, the entire operation is already likely to have been costly for Russia and those costs will only continue to rise if its troops invade.

"Large-scale military action obviously comes with significant costs in terms of fuel consumption, ammunition, losses and replacement losses," Henry Boyd, research fellow for defense and military analysis at think tank the International Institute for Strategic Studies, told CNBC in a phone call. "The baseline cost of the [current] deployment is not a free action, but it's a relatively sustainable action you're not having to pay an awful lot more in terms of your budget to achieve what you're trying to do."

But he said the military action would already have had "knock-on consequences" domestically, with a large amount of civilian transportation being diverted to the military over the last few months.

"You've also already seen the effects that rumors of military action and likely economic sanctions have had on the stock market," he added. "So I think you will already have seen, indirectly, some level of significant economic cost for the action undertaken so far."

The finance and resources used in some recent military campaigns such as the Western-led air campaign in Libya may "pale in comparison" to what Russia would need to expend in a significant ground invasion, according to Boyd.

"But there's a pessimistic view that however costly and however much risk Russia may run in terms of short-term economic pain, it may still be seen as worth it if it's the only way to preserve what, in their mind, is the essential political situation in Russia's near abroad," he warned.

"If they need to go through war whatever the scale and the size to obtain their political strategic goals, they will do it," Chatham House's Boulegue agreed. "If they can avoid it, of course they will, because nobody in their right mind in the Kremlin would want more sanctions and to be ostracized even more."

War would be "costly and long" for Russia, he added, and potential sanctions and economic costs could carry additional political costs by sparking popular uprisings against the Kremlin.

"They would sign [Putin's] death in a way," Boulegue said.

Andrew Wood, associate fellow at Chatham House's Russia and Eurasia Program and a former British ambassador to Russia, added that Putin was "motivated by a fear of popular revolutions," such as the unrest seen recently in Belarus.

See original here:
Russia is willing to go to war and incur sanctions over Ukraine, analysts warn - CNBC

How the conflict in Ukraine threatens US cybersecurity – TechCrunch

Philip ReinerContributor

TheTechCrunch Global Affairs Projectexamines the increasingly intertwined relationship between the tech sector and global politics.

As Russian troops stand poised to yet again invade Ukraine, much attention has been focused in recent days on how to avoid escalation of the conflict. Recent (and likely ongoing) escalations in cyberattacks on Ukraine suggest that this conflict will be unfortunately severe in the digital domain. And unlike a ground invasion, the U.S. government has warned that the digital conflict zone may expand to include the United States, as well. Years of Russian cyber probing and preparing the environment could well culminate in significant and potentially destructive attacks against private-sector American interests in the coming weeks and months.

If this level of vulnerability feels intolerable, good it should. But how did we get here? And what are the moves needed to avoid disaster? To start, its critical to understand how President Vladimir Putin has experimented with 21st Century technical methods to contribute to achieving his longstanding vision for Russia.

Russias motives are conventional enough. In April 2005, Putin called the fall of the Soviet Union the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century and a genuine tragedyfor the Russian people. This core belief has guided many of Russias actions since. Today, the drums of war are unfortunately beating loudly in Europe, as Putin seeks to forcibly return more of Russias periphery back under formal control and push back on perceived Western encroachment.

While there are a number of factors driving why Russia has chosen now as the time to increase its aggression against Ukraine and assert itself in Europe more broadly its asymmetric capabilities in areas like cyber certainly give it a broader set of tools to shape the outcomes in its favor.

Russias geopolitical position with a waning population base and woeful economic situation drives its leadership to find ways to reassert itself on the global stage. Russian leaders know they cant compete conventionally, so they turn to more easily accessible and, as it turns out, immensely powerful and effective asymmetric tools. Their disinformation campaigns have done much to contribute to the pre-existing societal fissures here in the United States, exacerbating our fracturing politics in keeping with standard Russian intelligence practices. Indeed Russian leadership likely sees an opportunity with the West as distracted by the COVID pandemic and internal turmoil that it sometimes helps sow.

But Putins long embrace of asymmetrical methods means Russia has been preparing for this moment for years. There is a familiarity to these activities: old means and tools from the Soviet era that have taken on a new face through the manipulation of twenty-first-century digital tools and vulnerabilities. And in recent years, it has used Ukraine, Libya, the Central African Republic, Syria, and other contested spaces as testing grounds for its information operations and damaging cyber capabilities.

Today, Russian actors have deployed a vast array of techniques for active measures to confuse, sow doubt, and delegitimize basic democratic institutions. The mercenaries and clandestine agents Russia is deploying into Ukraine have honed their skills in hybrid battlespaces abroad, using a mix of deception and kinetic action, deftly mixed with deniable influence operations and offensive cyber actions.

In cyberspace, Russia has graduated from its then-unprecedented 2007 cyberattack on Estonia and later NotPetya-style cyber attacks, which targeted Ukrainian utilities, ministries, banks, and journalists, which spilled over into one of the most costly cyberattacks in history to date. Russian intelligence services have been found hacking into U.S. critical infrastructure systems for some time now as wellyet, to date, without significant kinetic or deleterious impact or actions (unlike in Ukraine and elsewhere as detailed in books like Andy Greenbergs Sandworm). Theyve tested the reactions of the United States and its Allies, learned what they can get away with, and are pressing ever further as NATO countries debate what to do about Ukraine.

In sum, Russia has done its reconnaissance and likely pre-placed tools it may want to use against countries like the United States on a rainy day. That day may soon arrive.

As Russia ramps up its aggression against Ukraine, the United States has threatened a devastating economic response as part of the escalatory ladder (how nations methodically raise the stakes in the hopes of deterring an adversary in a conflict) toward an ever-increasingly more dangerous and likely violent resolution. What often goes unsaid is that Russian cyber capabilities are attempts at their own form of deterrence. Those preparatory activities Russia has engaged in over the years, as noted above, would allow those cyber eggs to hatch and the consequences to come home to roost here in America.

The U.S. government has explicitly and broadly warned that Russia may attack American private industry in response to those potentially severe U.S. sanctions. It is highly unlikely, knowing the sophistication of Russian actors in this space, that these attacks would be brazen, or even immediate. While they can be sloppy and imprecise at times (see NotPetya), their capabilities will likely allow them to meddle with our critical infrastructure and private industry via supply-chain attacks and other indirect and difficult-to-attribute means. In the interim, companies and service providers could face significant damage and deleterious downtime. If the past has been a nuisance, the near term portends potentially much greater negative economic impact as Putin and his oligarchs continue to press their longstanding agenda.

Hope remains that Russia will not continue to ramp up its aggression, and will indeed find off-ramps, avoiding these various scenarios. We should all hope that none of this will ever unfold. It is prudent however, indeed overdue at this point, that industry ensure that it takes the appropriate steps to protect itself from what we must now consider a potentially highly likely attack doubling down on multi-factor authentication, segmenting networks, maintaining backups, gaming out crisis response plans, and closing off access to only those with real need. What is happening with Ukraine seems a world apart, but with a few clicks, the impact may end up right here at home.

Continued here:
How the conflict in Ukraine threatens US cybersecurity - TechCrunch