Archive for the ‘Ukraine’ Category

Republicans Savage Border and Ukraine Deal, Threatening Its Survival – The New York Times

Top House and Senate Republicans on Monday savaged a $118.3 billion bipartisan compromise bill to crack down on unlawful migration across the U.S. border with Mexico and speed critical security aid to Ukraine, threatening to kill the deals chances of clearing a deeply divided Congress.

Senate Republicans and Democrats released the agreement on Sunday after more than three months of near-daily talks, cementing an improbable breakthrough on a policy matter that has bedeviled presidents of both parties and defied decades of efforts at compromise on Capitol Hill. But the swift backlash from Republicans who denounced the immigration restrictions as too weak suggested that it had little path to enactment.

Any consideration of this Senate bill in its current form is a waste of time, Speaker Mike Johnson said in a joint statement with Republican leaders on Monday. It is dead on arrival in the House. We encourage the U.S. Senate to reject it.

Several Senate Republicans also quickly condemned the measure, raising questions about whether it could even advance in that chamber, where members of both parties have clamored for a compromise.

I cant support a bill that doesnt secure the border, provides taxpayer-funded lawyers to illegal immigrants and gives billions to radical open borders groups, Senator Steve Daines, Republican of Montana and the chairman of the partys campaign committee, wrote in a social media post. Im a no.

The mounting Republican opposition was a grim sign ahead for an initial test vote on Wednesday in the Senate, where the measure would need bipartisan support including a minimum of 10 G.O.P. votes to move forward.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andlog intoyour Times account, orsubscribefor all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?Log in.

Want all of The Times?Subscribe.

Go here to read the rest:
Republicans Savage Border and Ukraine Deal, Threatening Its Survival - The New York Times

Ukraine is about to get new US long-range bombs. How will it use them? – Kyiv Independent

Striking Russian pressure points deep behind enemy lines has become a near-daily task for Ukraine and the countrys long-range arsenal continues to grow to serve the purpose.

Ukraines latest acquisition, the Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bomb, is due for its combat debut any day now.

The GLSDB is the brainchild of Boeing and Saab. As its name suggests, it is an attempt to combine the versatility of a ground launcher with the cost-efficiency and precision of a small guided bomb.

The warhead is modest, with less than 20 kilograms of explosives. But its 150-kilometer range, high evasiveness, cheap cost, and ability to strike from multiple angles can be harnessed to harass high-value targets in the enemys rear, without using up expensive Western missiles.

Politico reported that the first batch of the new weapons was supposed to arrive in Ukraine as early as Jan. 31, although the military has yet to confirm.

The U.S. first pledged to provide GLSDBs to Ukraine in February 2023. Following the Politico report, Pentagon Press Secretary Pat Ryder confirmed the upcoming delivery but declined to comment on the timeline due to operational security reasons.

The GLSDB is technically a new weapon that began mass production in 2023. But no part of it is actually new. Its a precision-guided 250-pound aircraft bomb attached to an M26 rocket; both have been separately used for decades.

Ukraine will be the first to use their combined form in combat. On launch, the motor accelerates the munition and falls off. The wings then unfold, and the SDB glides to its target. Its GPS-aided inertial navigation system is claimed to be precise within one meter.

It can be launched from platforms Ukraine already has, like the HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System) and M270 multiple-launch rocket system, or from its own launcher disguised as a shipping container.

The specifications and design hint at the weapons background, partially as an attempted solution to the U.S. militarys stockpiles of unused M26 rockets during the so-called War on Terror while creating an affordable way to sell guided bombs to countries without an air force.

The GBU-39 Small Diameter Bombs used in the weapon were designed to take out enemy insurgent or terror cells with their high accuracy and limit collateral damage with their reduced explosive power, Fabian Hoffmann, Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of Oslo, who specializes in missile technology, told the Kyiv Independent.

The limited blast radius is less useful for Ukrainians, but other aspects of the weapon can give it new life in their hands.

The cheapness and commonality of parts is one advantage. According to Hoffman, the bomb itself is worth around $40,000, and attaching a rocket wouldnt bring the price up very significantly.

Right now, all Ukraine has that can hit that far are the 165-kilometer ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System) and the 250-kilometer air-launched Storm Shadow/SCALP missiles. Because they cost around $1 million and $2.5 million, respectively, Ukraine has to save them for only top priority targets.

Allies use these weapons and have to leave a certain amount for themselves, which was likely the reason why Kyiv has so far received a relatively small number of these missiles.

According to Reuters, France has provided around 50 SCALP missiles to Ukraine, while the U.K. hasnt disclosed the number of missiles they sent. The New York Times reported on Oct. 19 that the U.S. had delivered to Ukraine 20 ATACMS missiles, with Kyiv saying it was just one of the first batches.

While slow for a long-range assassin, the GLSDB makes up for it with its maneuverability in the air. It can be programmed to approach the target from a variety of angles and any direction, theoretically allowing it to negate many forms of cover, Kelly Grieco, a senior fellow at the U.S.-based think tank Stimson Center, told the Kyiv Independent.

The manufacturer claims that the GLSDB also has an advanced anti-jamming system that will counteract Russias expected electronic countermeasures. ECMs can be expected, as Russia has used them against other Ukrainian guided rockets, according to John Hardie, deputy director of the Russia Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Russias military doesnt have anything exactly like the GLSDB in its arsenal and uses the Iskander-M system or guided missiles fired by the Tornado-S MLRS for ground-launched precise strikes at a similar range, Hardie told the Kyiv Independent.

The tactical possibilities of the GLSDB are also analogous to how Russia uses Iranian-designed Shahed drones as cheap, small, long-range, maneuverable replacements for its expensive missiles like the Iskander or Kindzhal. Shaheds also use cheap, easily available parts, can maintain a low profile, and strike from any angle with a modest warhead, though they are easy to take down.

How Russia uses Iranian drones to try to overwhelm Ukraines air defense

Russias been shelling civilian housing and infrastructure since the war escalated on Feb. 24 and has a body count in the thousands to show for it. But recently, Moscow prioritized attacking power plants throughout Ukraine, damaging more than a third with big missile and loitering munition attacks.

The GLSDB is best suited for attacking soft targets, such as arms depots, barracks, logistics nodes, temporary bases basically anything thats not heavily protected, experts said. The goal would be to inflict costly losses and force Russian troops to move their supply lines farther from the front.

Because the bomb is flexible and quickly deployed, Ukrainian forces can effectively use them to hit time-sensitive targets, like high-ranking officers during their base visits, according to Hoffman.

But whether or not the GLSDB makes a big difference greatly depends on the number of bombs Ukraine will receive from the U.S., which is currently unclear.

I think Ukraine will need to receive hundreds this year to realize the GLSDBs full potential, and I expect that will happen. Initial deliveries may be small, perhaps measured in the tens, but I expect production will ramp up as the year goes on, said Hardie.

The GLSDB will complement Ukraines capabilities amid the constant need to replenish its missile and artillery stocks depleted by intense fighting.

It creates more flexibility on the side of Ukraine, and that is really good because, as a decision-maker, you want to have options. This just gives you another thing you can use, Hoffmann said.

This is also something that Russia now has to take into account, and it will complicate their planning.

F-16s for Ukraine: When will they arrive and what can they do?

The General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon is an American air superiority fighter that Kyiv has begged for since the start of the full-scale invasion and is expected to finally start receiving this year. Its a versatile workhorse of a jet thats fought in dozens of wars and is

Hi, this is Dinara Khalilova, the author of this article. I hope it brought you more clarity on the new long-range weapons pledged by the U.S. and why Ukraine needs them. To continue reporting on the most important developments of the war, we need your support. Please consider becoming a member of the Kyiv Independent community.

The rest is here:
Ukraine is about to get new US long-range bombs. How will it use them? - Kyiv Independent

Zelensky Hints at Major Shake-Up of Ukraine’s Government – The New York Times

President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said that a broad overhaul of the countrys military and civilian leadership was needed to reboot the war effort against Russia, suggesting that a major shake-up of his government was imminent.

Mr. Zelenskys comments, in a broadcast on Sunday night, indicated that his plans would likely go beyond replacing the top military commander, Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny. And they signaled a search for a new strategy among Ukraines leadership at a precarious moment, with depleted Ukrainian forces on the defensive and leaders in Kyiv waiting to see whether the United States will provide much-needed military and financial assistance.

A reset, a new beginning is necessary, Mr. Zelensky told the Italian media outlet Rai News. I have something serious in mind, which is not about a single person but about the direction of the countrys leadership.

Friction between the military and the civilian government represents the most serious schism in Ukraines leadership since the start of the war almost two years ago. The acrimony, which has been building for months, seemed to reach a breaking point last week, when Mr. Zelensky summoned General Zaluzhny for a meeting to tell him he was being fired, only to back off at least temporarily, according to Ukrainian officials familiar with the discussion.

Heightening the tension in Kyiv is the prospect of a new mobilization bill that could lead to the drafting of up to 500,000 troops. The bill, under debate in the Ukrainian Parliament, could be politically unpopular with the countrys war-weary citizenry.

Amid the speculation about his future, General Zaluzhnys only public comment Monday was a cryptic Facebook message to a top deputy, General Serhiy Shaptala, reminiscing about collaboration through two years of war. We can be sure that we will never feel shame, Mr. Zaluzhny wrote.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andlog intoyour Times account, orsubscribefor all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?Log in.

Want all of The Times?Subscribe.

Original post:
Zelensky Hints at Major Shake-Up of Ukraine's Government - The New York Times

Biden Threatens to Veto Bill That Would Help Israel but Not Ukraine – The New York Times

President Biden vowed on Monday to veto a House Republican bill that would provide $17.6 billion in aid to Israel, calling it a cynical political maneuver intended to hurt the chances of passage for broader legislation that would provide money for Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan and the U.S. border.

House Republicans fiercely oppose the larger bill, which was unveiled by a small, bipartisan group of senators over the weekend. It calls for $118.3 billion in spending and would overhaul some of the nations immigration laws to deal with recent surges of migrants at the southern border.

Speaker Mike Johnson said on Saturday that Republicans would instead offer the Israel-only funding bill instead.

In its official response on Monday, the Biden administration said the president would veto the House bill if it came to his desk.

The administration strongly opposes this ploy, which does nothing to secure the border, does nothing to help the people of Ukraine defend themselves against Putins aggression, fails to support the security of American synagogues, mosques and vulnerable places of worship, and denies humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians, the majority of whom are women and children, the White Houses Office of Management and Budget said in a statement.

Mr. Johnson called Mr. Bidens veto threat an act of betrayal toward Israel.

Israel is at war, fighting for its very right to exist, while our brave men and women in uniform are in harms way on his orders to deter Iran, Mr. Johnson said. In threatening to veto aid to Israel and to our military forces, President Biden is abandoning our ally in its time of greatest need. I urge friends of Israel and opponents of Iran to call the presidents bluff and pass this clean aid package.

If neither bill passes, Mr. Biden will be forced to find a new approach to supporting Israels war against Hamas, the armed group in Gaza that launched a terrorist attack inside Israel on Oct. 7 that killed about 1,200 people.

Israel has traditionally been one of the largest recipients of foreign aid from the United States, and support for that aid has generally been supported by majorities in both parties.

Read the original here:
Biden Threatens to Veto Bill That Would Help Israel but Not Ukraine - The New York Times

The White Lotus replaces actor after Ukraine controversy – The A.V. Club

Photo: Srdjan Stevanovic; HBO/YouTube; Dave J Hogan ( Getty Images)

Milo Bikovi, the Serbian-Russian actor originally cast in the upcoming third season of The White Lotus, has been replaced by Julian Kostov, according to Deadline. Kostov was previously seen in Netflixs Shadow And Bone and co-owns a production company (Five Oceans) with fellow Bulgarian actor and Oscar nominee Maria Bakalova. Filming for the new season of Mike Whites comedy anthology series is expected to begin soon in Bangkok.

Bikovi was originally cast in the role as a recurring Russian character but was let go after HBO faced criticism from Ukraine. The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs shared a video to Twitter/X accusing Bikovi of being the Kremlins foreign mouthpiece and calling him a person who supports genocide & violates international law. He has reportedly been banned from entering Ukraine for several years now.

Today, a targeted campaign has been unleashed against me, seemingly as an external maneuver to influence decisions that can create a disturbing precedent shadowing the essence of artistic freedom. The result of such a narrative is the triumph of absurdity and the defeat of art, Bikovi said in a statement about his firing (which can be read in full over at Variety). I was honored to be chosen to be a part of White Lotus, a TV series that I hold in high regard and with colleagues whom I deeply respect. However, my participation is not possible due to reasons beyond the realm of art and I will not bow to any narrative that seeks to compromise my integrity.

I would like to thank everyone who stood by me. I wish my colleagues great success in creating the next season, he concluded. Regardless of everything, I strongly believe that art can heal. I believe it can help humanity unite. My beliefs and my dedication to art will remain unchanged.

See more here:
The White Lotus replaces actor after Ukraine controversy - The A.V. Club