Archive for the ‘Tim Wise’ Category

‘Vanilla brother’ Tim Wise takes on white privilege and politics – KUOW News and Information

Tim Wise is known for his commitment to exposing and countering racism. He grew up in Tennessee and went to college in New Orleans, where he became involved in efforts to oppose Ku Klux Clansman David Dukes political aspirations. Dr. Cornel West referred to Wise as a vanilla brother in the tradition of John Brown.

Wise is the author of several books, including his memoir, White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son, Dear White America: Letter to a New Minority, and his latest,Under the Affluence: Shaming the Poor, Praising the Rich and Sacrificing the Future of America.

He spoke at The University of Washingtons Kane Hall on January 27, as part of the UW Graduate School public lecture series Equity and Difference: Privilege.

Please note: This talk contains unedited language of an adult nature.

Listen to the full version below:

See original here:
'Vanilla brother' Tim Wise takes on white privilege and politics - KUOW News and Information

Anti-racist talk at St. Elizabeth in Morris Township – New Jersey Hills

MORRIS TWP. Tim Wise, an anti-racist writer and activist, will speak at 6 p.m. on Thursday, Feb. 16 in Dolan Performance Hall at the College of St. Elizabeth as the second guest in the College Womens Leadership Speaker Series.

His topic will be Speaking Treason Fluently: Anti-Racist Reflections from an Angry White Male. The free event is open to the public.

Wise has trained many different industry professionals on methods for dismantling racism in their institutions, and anti-racism training. He has written seven books, including Under the Affluence: Shaming the Poor, Praising the Rich, and Sacrificing the Future of America.

He has been featured in several documentaries including White Like Me: Race, Racism, and White Privilege in America, released by the Media Education Foundation. Wise also appears regularly on CNN and MSNBC to discuss race issues. He has spoken on more than 400 college campuses, including Harvard and Stanford.

The Womens Leadership Speaker Series will conclude with Marquita Pool-Eckerts Post-Truth: Civic Responsibilities and Human Rights at 6 p.m. on Wednesday, March 15 in Dolan Performance Hall.

Pool-Eckert has recently retired from a 30-year career as an award-winning producer for CBS News Sunday Morning and CBS Evening News. She has worked in 15 countries covering war, famine, political campaigns, domestic economy issues, the arts and breaking news.

Continue reading here:
Anti-racist talk at St. Elizabeth in Morris Township - New Jersey Hills

Wising up about privilege – Dailyuw

Hundreds filled Kane Hall on Friday night to hear anti-racist activist, speaker, and writer Tim Wise at an event that was planned by UW Public Lectures months in advance, well before President Donald Trump became a reality.

As a result, much of what Wise discussed couldnt be disentangled from current events, and in fact was directly correlated to them. At times, Wises cadences and motions matched that of a televangelist, and at other points he was a great comedic relief, but his words reflected those of an educated activist throughout the night.

What I want to talk about is how we can understand white privilege as an operative thing that gives advantage to those so called, he said.

Wise contended that white privilege tends to perpetuate American exceptionalism to sustain itself. American exceptionalism, to put it simply, is believing irrevocably in the concept that everyone can pull themselves up by their bootstraps, and that its all anyone needs to do to achieve middle class status or higher.

Wises discussion then pivoted this concept to conclude that using the system of privilege and American exceptionalism creates an unsustainable one that isnt healthy for the vast majority of people who believe in it.

If Im white and Ive been told that all Ive got to do is work hard, and Ill always have a job and pay for my kids college, Wise said, and always have money for health care, and money for retirement And had the luxury of believing it then Im in trouble when the economy shifts under my feet.

To drive this point home, Wise pointed out that the medias conclusion that white voters went to Trump out of economic anxiety is false, because if it were true, Trump would have had the backing of the most disproportionately poor groups in America: people of color.

When the double-digit unemployment hit the rust belt, that was not new for [people of color], Wise said. That was called Monday. White working class America had the luxury of thinking it wouldnt get that bad [they] had never known that level of collective insecurity.

His argument was that Trump came to power not because white people are feeling forgotten, but because they were privileged enough to believe in American exceptionalism. He contended that the economic anxiety is real, but its privilege and the idea of American exceptionalism that set people up to fail.

Wise then expanded this concept into systemic issues: How politicians and people in power use the poor and working class to do their dirty work, but then tell that class its these fellow poor people who look different that caused the turmoil.

The history of this country is the history of rich white men telling people that not-rich peoples problems are black and brown people, Wise said.

His example here was labor unions. Back in the day, unions were segregated because the leaders didnt allow people of color to be striking alongside them. That led to the bosses hiring people who would take less pay, the very people that white laborers excluded from the union. So people of color got the jobs, at lower pay, that white people werent occupying when on strike. But who got the blame? Narrative typically shows, Wise argued, that it was not the money-hungry boss who was wronging his workers.

But what is more hateful: To believe this country can do better than a 15:1 wealth gap or to assume thats the best we can do? Wise asked rhetorically, alluding to the Trump campaigns Make America Great Again slogan. You cannot get more cynical than somebody who believes Americas best days are behind It is a defeatist vision for everyone in this room, including those who are not marginalized by these systems of oppression.

At the end of the event, audience members were able to ask questions.

Mariama Suwaneh asked how Wise got engaged in his work, and how he engaged with people of color to be sure the narrative thats being shared is the one they want shared.

Wise answered that his work began with a community. He has since grown from that community but stays in communication with a cadre of people, mostly people of color, who try to keep him on point, honest, and reflective of his own privilege. Wise also makes sure that he promotes the work of people of color who do the same work as him, and admitted much of what hes doing has already been said by marginalized people.

The basis of that wisdom is black and brown and its important to make that point, he said. Its an ongoing conversation.

Listening in the audience was UW alumnus Kathy Hsieh. She felt very aligned with Wises discussion, but pointed out his ability to have these forums.

A lot of times people feel like they dont have the agency, she said. Any woman of color might not come across in the same way [compared to a white male], no matter how bright, vibrant, or intelligent they might be.

Hsieh is an Asian-American woman who works in theater. She said that Asian-American women often view each other as competitors in the business, when in reality its directors who restrict the number of Asian-American roles to one woman.

And although many things she experiences in her life paralleled Wises talk, Hsieh felt he missed discussing white guilt and white fragility. She had attended the Seattles Womxns March just a week prior, which had a turnout of 130,000 people, but women of color questioned if the march was intersectional enough. In their questioning, Hsieh explained, white women felt defensive and began feeling like they shouldnt try anymore. White fragility, in these moments, is very real in self-proclaimed progressive Seattle. While white womens feelings and reactions are valid, it also tends to turn the focus back on them rather than acknowledging the exclusion and concerns of others.

But the issue isnt between women, Hsieh said. Theres this expectation that we [women of color] have to care for and validate you. But who validates us?

Reach reporter Kelsey Hamlin at news@dailyuw.com. Twitter: @ItsKelseyHamlin

Excerpt from:
Wising up about privilege - Dailyuw

The Day of the Marches: On Uniting our Efforts to be more Conscious of ALL WHO ARE MARGINALIZED – Huffington Post

I stayed home today because my balance is not yet all that good, but I mean to be involved. Today, January 21, 2017, is the day of women's marches all over the United States. There are different sets of urgencies--that of health care and the honoring of women's bodies and their/our choices, the deserving of dignity and equality of all kinds of diverse groups, including--including just about everyone.

The ringing and quasi-melodious voice of Tamika D. Mallory, the young African American activist and organizer, touched me big time when she spoke of standing up for the most marginalized among us. There are diverse motivations for those who are attending these marches of today, and those who would have wanted to. But I suppose that although most of the issues resonate, the notion of "marginal" and "marginalized" for me rings a crucial bell. And that's because I have been noticing just how easy it is for a number of people, as individuals or as groups to become marginalized.

"Marginalizing," means treating a person--a group or even concept--as insignificant or peripheral. To marginalize can mean to sideline or to trivialize. In an age where celebrity has meant importance and power to many of us, to be on the sidelines watching the strong and dominant people can feel like we have a marginal position. Any of us in families or groups where we have either not fit in, agreed not to fit in, or we have been ignored to the stronger beat of those who were louder or performed more dramatically, may know the feeling. Of course there is also marginalizing as in not rendering people important or deserving to be heard, and then there is marginalizing all the way down to making people subhuman, that is not even considering them worthy of attention or treatment that would include a modicum of dignity.

Over recent years, I have in my own way paid particular attention to American acts of torture, including the use of brutality that has yielded suicidal depressions and years of post-traumatic stress. To my regret, I have seen those victimized to be truly marginalized, in terms of their seeming not worthy of the basics of human respect, including the assumption of innocence before proven guilty. I have seen the issue marginalized, under the radar for most.

Today, however, there is the face of much fear about the Presidency of Donald Trump, in terms of his "America First" rhetoric in which he has made our Allies, our poor people--many people feel excluded, disrespected and as such marginalized. There are of course immigrants, Muslims, Mexicans; the list goes on. And as important there are the warnings that Trump has uttered to and about the press, an entity that has already been subject to exaggerated editing by financial and corporate considerations.

There are of course reasons for us to have our concerns about separate groups of marginalized people; for one reason or another we are either part of that group, or we identify personally and politically with a particular interest and a particular arena of racial injustice, as one example. At the same time, I am starting to see how this division seduces us to marginalizing certain people and even groups in our daily lives.

As someone in the mental health field, my pain over issues of torture also involves some of the planning and procedures having been empowered and led by actual psychologists. However when I read about the streets of Chicago and terrible racism--including brutality--enacted towards black citizens, I am appalled as well. And then I hear about the people in the Philippines murdered in the streets even if they are only suspected of merely using marijuana in a dictatorial terrorizing regime, and I am sickened. And then I realize how perhaps I'm becoming too limited in my focus.

Finally I question my own role in marginalizing. It's a teeny bit like noticing all the pregnant women when one is a pregnant woman, noticing all the older people when one is a baby boomer and entering into that phase. Somehow we need to become more inclusive. And by this I mean truly learn to live the connection to the notion that we are connected to all people, and that human dignity can't be limited to our own enclaves. The human climate affects us all, and affects our capacity to experience emotional flexibility and empathy, as well as the admission of scientific knowledge about physical climate that too many people in power are trying to marginalize.

I would also like to ask the organizers of today's marches to help us push ourselves to include issues and people that we sometimes, well yes--marginalize. I remember reading that Angela Davis had said that Bernie Sanders could have used a bit of coursework on blackness, the better for him to understand aspects of our population that he was perhaps less than literate enough about. She was not condemning, just right.

Perhaps we need to recognize that to focus in one area alone is to forget, to perhaps even marginalize too many other important arenas and people. This might mean, and I suggest here, a group of issues being drawn up and added to, which would commit to helping us all to become better informed. We need more literacy without being humiliated for arenas of ignorance. I have, as one small example, told a number of psychologists about the role of the American Psychological Association in acts of torture. Rather than staying in a sort of shock about how they could not know, maybe we need to be teaching each other.

Those of us, who are white, as Robin Di Angelo and Tim Wise advise us, need to learn more about our own racism, about how we have marginalized black people. The idea here is to open ourselves to the radical possibility of learning how and why we marginalize in our own lives.

The rest is here:
The Day of the Marches: On Uniting our Efforts to be more Conscious of ALL WHO ARE MARGINALIZED - Huffington Post

MTR, Would You Take over Metro, Please? – Bacon’s Rebellion

MTR, the Hong Kong commuter rail system, is arguably the worlds most efficient.

Heres an idea for readers to chew on while the Big Bacon is on vacation: How about privatizing the Washington Metro system? Honk Kong privatized its subway system in 2000, and it has worked out pretty well.

Writing on the Cato Institute blog, Chris Edwards quotes a report by McKinsey:

Hong Kongs MTR Corporation has defied the odds and delivered significant financial and social benefits: excellent transit, new and vibrant neighborhoods, opportunities for real-estate developers and small businesses, and the conservation of open space. The whole system operates on a self-sustaining basis, without the need for direct taxpayer subsidies.

MTRs railway system covers 221 kilometers and is used by more than five million people each weekday. It not only performs welltrains run on schedule 99.9 percent of the timebut actually makes a profit: $1.5 billion in 2014. MTR fares are also relatively low compared with those of metro systems in other developed cities. The average fare for an MTR trip in 2014 was less than $1.00, well under base fares in Tokyo (about $1.50), New York ($2.75), and Stockholm (about $4.00).

The ratio of passenger fares to operating costs is a high 185 percent, which means that fares cover not only operating costs but a share of capital costs. MTR raises other funds for capital from real estate deals under which it gains from land value increases near stations a concept known as value capture that we have touted on this blog.MTR is so highly regarded in the mass transit world that it has contracted to run commuter rail systems in cities China, the United Kingdom Sweden and Australia. Why not Washington?(Hat tip: Tim Wise.)

Bacons bottom line: It would be unrealistic to expect Hong Kong results in in the Washington Metro. For one reason, Hong Kong is far more densely populated and rail is a more attractive option compared to driving. For another, its not clear whether Washington Metro could extract the same economic benefit from putting real estate deals together that MTR could. Zoning controls and land use planning may work very differently in the U.S. than in Honk Kong. But the idea certainly appears to be worth pursuing. If MTR could do no more than bring operational efficiencies to Metro, Virginians would benefit from better service and lower subsidies.

Read the rest here:
MTR, Would You Take over Metro, Please? - Bacon's Rebellion