Archive for the ‘Tea Party’ Category

Freedom Caucus functions as a Tea Party firewall | Washington … – Washington Examiner

By now it is well-established that advocates of the American Health Care Act failed to secure sufficient support from conservative members of the House Freedom Caucus last Friday to pass the bill. Both Paul Ryan and Donald Trump made that clear.

Of course, the debate will continue to rage over who ultimately deserves the blame (or credit), but in an immediate, practical sense, insufficient support from the Freedom Caucus prompted proponents to pull the vote Friday afternoon.

Earlier this month, I identified the mounting friction between AHCA supporters and skeptics as a sign that the Tea Party infrastructure was working. From March 10:

After the House released its repeal and replace plan earlier this week, conservative movement groups and elected officials such as the Tea Party Patriots and Rand Paul voiced vehement opposition to the legislation. The threat of heightened backlash from Tea Party players triggered the administration to respond by inviting them to share that opposition with the president and the vice president at the White House.

Whether these Tea Party-backed Republicans will be able to lobby successfully for healthcare legislation that meets their standards is yet to be determined. But those people the movement imported to Washington during the long winter of Obama's presidency have not forgotten what brought them there.

On Friday, the Freedom Caucus successfully leveraged their clout to uphold, from members' perspectives, what constitutes a key campaign promise. The group does not disclose its membership, but a very significant chunk of its publicly-confirmed members were swept into Congress by the Tea Party wave. Veterans, such as founding Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, eagerly aligned with the movement as well.

Some of the bill's most visible opponents outside the House, from Rand Paul to Ted Cruz to Sean Hannity, were vocal Tea Party supporters.

In fact, in an op-ed urging the GOP to fix the AHCA, Hannity himself wrote, "It's very important the House Freedom Caucus and senators such as Rand Paul, Ted Cruz Marco Rubio and Lee have input into this bill."

Still, a full two-thirds of the entire Republican House Majority was elected in 2010 or later, and it's likely every single one of these (and many of those first elected before that) campaigned against Obamacare. Freedom Caucus members, for their part, just disagreed that the bill achieved what constituents sent them to Washington to do.

The cry at Tea Party rallies years ago was for a "full-scale" repeal of the Affordable Care Act. That is not what the House bill offered. Thus, Tea Party-beneficiaries worked to stay true to their pledges.

Also from the Washington Examiner

Bannon received a $191,000 salary for his work as Breitbart's chairman, a role he left in August.

03/31/17 8:31 PM

Given the way the party is operating now, come 2020, it may turn out the only effective wall Republicans were able to build this decade was the Tea Party firewall.

Emily Jashinsky is a commentary writer for the Washington Examiner.

Read more:
Freedom Caucus functions as a Tea Party firewall | Washington ... - Washington Examiner

The Tea Party Helped Build the Bridge to Single-Payer | The Nation – The Nation.

By pushing a draconian repeal of Obamacare, they awakened a giant. Thanks, guys!

Health-care-justice advocates outside Trump Tower in New York on January 13, 2016. (Sipa USA via AP)

In September 2011, a little over two years into its existence and fresh off some high-profile victories in the midterm elections, the Tea Party hosted its first presidential debate in Tampa, Florida. Late in the evening, CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer asked Congressman Ron Paul, a physician by training, what should happen to a 30-year-old healthy young man who decides to forgo insurance but then becomes catastrophically ill. Whos going to pay if he goes into a coma, for example? Blitzer inquired.

Paul rattled off some libertarian bromides about the evils of welfarism and socialism and how freedom is all about taking your own risks. Unsatisfied, Blitzer drove home the point: But Congressman, are you saying that society should just let him die? At which point, the audience burst into applause, as several members roared out Yeah! followed by all-around laughter. It was a stunning moment, spiked with instant and unfaked schadenfreude, that caused even Paul to blink back surprise and that overshadowed anything else on the stage that night. (The debates other newsworthy moment came when then-front-runner Rick Perry was jeered for defending the HPV vaccine.)

The GOPs ignominious withdrawal of the American Health Care Act, backed by President Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan, brought this insurrectionary moment full circle. Rebranded and purified as the House Freedom Caucus, the Tea Partys hard-core members took Ryans already shoddy proposalincluding a giant tax cut for the super-wealthy and the end of coverage for some 24 million Americansand extracted concessions that would have made it remarkably worse. The caucus insisted on gutting the requirement that insurance companies offer essential benefits, permitting them to sell junk plans. As the clock wound down on negotiations, it was still holding out in the hope of repealing Obamacares most popular provisions, which allow young adults to stay on their parents plans and require coverage of patients with preexisting conditions. The resulting monstrosity would have simply allowed millions of sick Americans to die. Moderates bolted, even as the Freedom Caucus refused to budge. And so ended, at least for now, the Republican Partys abiding obsession with abolishing Obamacare.

A complete disaster! as Trump might say. But one richly earned. Since the first year of Obamas presidency, the Republican establishment has allowed its extreme right-wingers to run off the leash. It has amplified their every outburst, fed every conspiracy theory, nurtured every grievance, and enabled every act of hostage-taking. Now, itand the vandal in chief that the Tea Party helped elect presidentis their hostage. In the battles ahead on infrastructure spending, taxation, and the debt ceiling, theres no reason to believe that the GOP will behave in any less dysfunctional a manner.

Given this self-inflicted gridlock, Democrats may be tempted to let the Republicans implode and live with the status quo. This would be a catastrophic mistake. The grassroots uprisings that swarmed congressional town halls with angry constituents were not, at their core, a defense of Obamacares particulars. Keep your hands off my Affordable Care Act premium tax credit! protested nobody, ever. The 25-year-olds who raged at the prospect of getting kicked off their parents plans, the senior citizens worried about out-of-control costs, the patients anxious about preexisting conditions, were expressing a much more profound belief: that health care is a fundamental right.

Obamacare falls far short of that mark. The fact that it has become more popular49 percent of Americans now support itas more people have used and understood it should come as no surprise. That was always its design. The more unexpected turn of events is that significant majorities of Americansand 41 percent of Republicans in one pollnow support a single-payer plan. To that end, in the coming weeks, Senator Bernie Sanders plans to reintroduce his Medicare for All bill, an idea that has backers in both expected (Keith Ellison, John Conyers) and unexpected quarters: Nancy Pelosi, Obama-cares true architect, recently told a questioner at a town hall, I supported single payer since before you were born. More importantly, the citizen coalition to defend Obamacarebacked by Planned Parenthood, the AARP, MoveOn, Our Revolution, the chapters of Indivisible, and othersis amped up to push for its passage. In 2009, the Obama administration purposefully tamped down that energy, preferring to run an inside game. But with Trump in the White House and the Freedom Caucus bullying Congress, the only game now is on the outside.

The stakes are higher now than ever. Get The Nation in your inbox.

Along the way, Democrats must continue to defend the current law. Trumps promise to let Obamacare explode was not an empty threat. Already hes appointed two leading saboteurs to head key agencies: Tom Price at the Department of Health and Human Services and Seema Verma at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Together, they could radically reduce subsidies to insurance companies, causing more to leave the exchanges; discourage enrollment and weaken enforcement of the individual mandate; undermine Medicaid by allowing states to impose premiums and work requirements; and reinterpret what qualifies as an essential benefit, letting insurance companies offer stingier plans. These changes will come wrapped in a thick fog of bureaucracyand its up to progressives to expose and humanize whats really happening. We also need to counter each proposed cut with an alternative plan to expand and improve coverage: to extend Medicaid, increase subsidies, elevate insurance standards, and lower the Medicare eligibility age to 50, as Senator Jeff Merkley has proposed.

Taken together, these steps would grow the public aspects of Obamacare while reducing its reliance on private markets. When the bill was first passed, centrist Democrats placated its critics on the left by claiming that Obamacare could act as a bridge to a single-payer system. Wouldnt it be amazing if that actually came trueand if the Tea Party helped make it happen?

See the rest here:
The Tea Party Helped Build the Bridge to Single-Payer | The Nation - The Nation.

How the Tea Party Taught Texas Progressives to Troll Their Government – San Antonio Current

In Texas, it began in the parking lot of a South Austin grocery store.

Congressman Lloyd Doggett had set up the casual neighborhood meeting outside a Randalls supermarket on August 1, 2009 to answer questions about the new presidents sweeping health care plan, recently dubbed Obamacare. Doggett wasnt expecting a crowd it was the middle of a sweltering Texas summer, not the most appealing time to gather in an open parking lot.

But shortly after the Democrat began to speak, dozens of people flooded the lot, hoisting homemade signs reading No Socialized Health Care and Dont Tread on Me. One man carried a blown-up photo of Doggett with scribbled-on devil horns. Another waved a cardboard tombstone with Doggetts name on it.

At first, the flustered congressman tried to address the groups obvious concerns by explaining why he supported President Barack Obamas plan. Obamacare, he argued, would protect millions of uninsured and low-income Texans, but it wasnt an answer they wanted to hear. Soon, the crowds chants of Just say no! drowned out Doggetts voice. His staff began to usher him away from the unexpected rally, but the crowd followed, swarming him as he tried to get to a staffers car, the chants morphing into Dont vote for Doggett! Even the pixelated cell phone video of the event cant mask the look of thinly-veiled alarm on Doggetts face as he finally steps into a black sedan and drives off.

This was Doggetts abrupt introduction to the Texas Tea Party.

It was a scene that became commonplace across the country in the following months, as the Tea Party, a conservative movement whose crusade against government spending grew out of the economic recession, began its energized push to reconfigure national politics. But for a few Doggett staffers, that particular moment in the grocery store parking lot was the textbook example of a strategy theyd need to remember: How to troll your government.

Fast-forward seven years and five miles north, to East Austins Scoot Inn, and it appears little has changed. Hundreds of Texans fill into the venues outdoor patio, carrying handmade signs with health care demands and waving poster-size photos of Congressman Lamar Smith, a Republian, with the caption: Chicken. As the February afternoon fades, the group chants in unison, Do your job!

Whats different about this boisterous crowd is that theyre mostly anti-Trump Democrats. Their likeness to their radical right-wing counterpart, however, isnt an accident. In fact, the group of chanting liberals are using a playbook penned by former Doggett staffers, explicitly based off the Tea Partys success at influencing members of Congress to echo their concerns.

Perhaps its ironic that a progressive group is using Tea Party tactics to oppose the very administration the Tea Party helped take to Washington. Or maybe just refreshingly clever.

*****

Sarah Dohl, Doggetts former communications director, remembers the deluge of postcards, calls, and emails that flooded her boss office immediately after the Randalls protest. Shed pick up the office phone to hear someone shouting Just say no! before hanging up.

The supermarket dustup had actually made national news, meaning Dohl and her fellow staffers were fielding messages of Tea Party support everywhere from Alaska to North Carolina.

It was hard to get anything done because of the constant ringing [in the office]. Id wake up in the middle of the night because I thought a phone was ringing somewhere, she told the Current. Some of the calls took on a dark tone. I was told I should be ashamed of myself. That I wasnt an American. That I should kill myself, she said.

She said that from the start, it was very clear that this movement was going to have a lasting impact.

It was striking how much energy there was in the opposition. You could feel the momentum growing, said Jeremy Haile, Doggetts former legal counsel. It became this wave, and we watched it crash.

What made it different than past protests was the Tea Partys direct approach. They werent just writing angry letters or berating liberal lawmakers. They showed up to town halls, congressional offices, and city centers with their three-cornered-hats and NObamacare signs. Democrat lawmakers like Doggett werent even their primary target. The Tea Party was mostly pissed off at Republicans in Congress who cheered them on but stayed quiet when it came to fighting Obama.

The most interesting part is that Tea Partiers were hyper-focused on Republican members of Congress, Dohl said. They knew they had sway over moderate Republicans and could push them further to the right.

And it worked. As the movement whipped across Texas, moderate Republicans in the state legislature dropped their support of Medicaid expansion under Obamacare. Tea Party organizers from Dallas, Corpus Christi, and Houston began running for office and winning. In 2011, the movement put a record number of GOP representatives in the Texas House (99) and by 2012, Tea Party darling Ted Cruz had secured a spot in the U.S. Senate, blowing past GOP establishment candidate David Dewhurst.

The slowly simmering Tea Party takeover came to a boil in 2014, when the top three offices in the state were filled by far-right conservatives with the Tea Party's blessing: Gov. Greg Abbott (who used Ted Nugent, the Tea Partys favorite minstrel, to open a campaign rally), Attorney General Ken Paxton, and Lieutenant Gov. Dan Patrick. And after Cruz's presidential campaign fizzled, Texas Tea Partiers went on to play a big part in Donald Trumps presidential campaign. Patrick eagerly served as Trumps Texas campaign chair, and Dallas Tea Party activist Katrina Pierson became the candidates national spokesperson until Kellyanne Conway took over in August.

The movement that began as a handful of Texas parking lot protests undoubtedly shifted federal and state politics further to the radical right.

Doggett readily admits this, telling the Current, Theres no doubt that the Texas Tea Party, in its determination, had some impact.

But its not like Texas GOP was wavering before 2009. Republicans ruled Texas long before the Tea Party made its raucous entrance, carrying every statewide election since 1994.

The creeping conservative takeover, however, didnt truly take off until 2003, when the GOP took control of the Texas House for the first time in 130 years. Their first mission? Redraw state election districts to push Republican members of the U.S. House into the majority. That meant clumping groups of liberal Latinos in the same district to ultimately weaken their votes. This so outraged House Democrats that eleven of them fled to New Mexico for 46 days to deny their GOP counterparts the quorum needed to pass the redistricting law. Regardless, the Texas Legislature managed to pass the redrawn district map, and by 2004, Texas U.S. House delegation also had a Republican majority. Despite a slap on the wrist from the Supreme Court, who, in 2006 ruled that one of the new districts blatantly oppressed minority votes, Texas Republicans did it all over again in 2011. This time, they passed even more ridiculously-shaped districts to mute the votes of a growing minority population, a plan that has only recently been ruled illegal (and racist) by a federal judge. These new district lines made it possible for far-right Tea Partiers to set up shop in traditionally moderate corners of the state.

Meanwhile, Texas Democrats, once the state's comfortable leaders, grew increasingly agitated as more and more blue districts turned red. This sea change wasnt restricted to Texas thousands of liberals in states where redistricting had shifted power into Republican hands, like Wisconsin, Georgia, and North Carolina, were equally concerned. Trump's election to the White House appeared to be their tipping point.

Luckily for them, a group of battle-worn congressional staffers from Texas had a plan.

*****

Like most liberals, Ezra Levin began his 2016 Thanksgiving holiday in a post-election stupor. Trumps unexpected presidential win had been a gut-punch to Democrats across the country, but it felt even gloomier in Levins hometown of Austin, a blue dot in a sea of red on the state map of election results.

Levin, another former Doggett staffer, saw his fellow Texas Dems scrambling to regain some sense of control after the election. Liberals across the country, many of whom had taken Obamas progressive command for granted, had been shaken out of complacency and wanted to do something. But they needed guidance.

Levin recalled watching the Tea Partys rise to power during his time in Doggetts office, a movement sparked by a controversial presidential election. A couple days after Thanksgiving, Levin found himself sitting beside his wife and longtime congressional policy director Leah Greenberg at an Austin bar, outlining a rough playbook on how to resist the Trump administration inspired by the Texas Tea Party. Greenberg picked a name with nonpartisan and historic connotations, pulled straight from the Pledge of Allegiance: The Indivisible Guide.

What happened next was unexpected. Levin dumped their ideas into a Google document that he shared with fellow ex-Doggett staffers Haile and Dohl, along with other friends who worked in Congress during the rise of the Tea Party. They added their own tips on how the public can put pressure on their members of Congress from outside the D.C. beltway what to say at town halls, who to call before big votes, how to run a local campaign.

Together, we have the power to resist and we have the power to win, the guides introduction reads. We know this because weve seen it before.

On Wednesday, December 14, Levin shared the document on Twitter. The next morning, Haile got a call from a friend saying, You broke Google.

So many people were sharing and viewing the guide that Google Docs actually stopped working for a few minutes. To remedy the situation, the Indivisible team made the guide a downloadable PDF. By late January, 1 million people had already downloaded the guide. Groups began to pop up on Facebook with Indivisible in their name, representing districts across the country. People began meeting in coffee shops, living rooms, and school basements to create action plans based off the guide.

By March, 2 million people had downloaded the guide, sparking some 5,800 verified Indivisible groups, at least two for every congressional district in the country.

All we did was pull back the curtain to let people see how Congress runs, see what makes their representatives tick, Levin said. We just provide the tools demystify Congress, everyone else does the rest.

While wildly polarized fights, the parallels between the Tea Party and Indivisible groups are hard to miss. Like the 2009 movement, Indivisible groups are zeroed in on their member of Congress not necessarily Trump or his cabinet or whats happening the next district over.

Its key to understand that Trumps agenda doesnt rest on Trump alone, Haile told the Current. Congress holds significant power. Haile assures people that every member of Congress wakes up every morning thinking about how to get reelected. If they hear their constituents are unhappy, theyre going to listen, he says.

And, like the Tea Party, the Indivisible groups in Texas are particularly loud. On February 14, a small crowd of District 21 constituents decorated Congressman Lamar Smiths San Antonio office with a long string of snarky, heart-shaped Valentines (one read: Roses are red, Violets are blue, I love science, Wish you did, too). Later in the month, hundreds of Dripping Springs voters held a town hall for Congressman Roger Williams, who declined to show up. In his place, a local actor read quotes Williams had said in the past, pulled from his website or news stories. Behind him, a cardboard cutout of the beaming, absent congressman leaned on the wall.

Doing things like this makes people stop and think about how silly Congress really is, said Jeanie Valenzuela, an original member of Texas District 21s Indivisible group the group known for scattering lawn signs with a black and white photo of Congressman Smith stamped MISSING across San Antonio. Like the majority of Texas Indivisible groups, this is Valenzuelas first encounter with political organizing.

When I fell asleep on election night, I was just a housewife, she says. When I woke the next day, I was an activist. Valenzuela said the majority of her District 21 Indivisible group is also new to activism something they share with the Tea Partiers. Donna Starnes, a founder of the Far North Dallas Tea Party, said she maybe protested once in college, but never thought shed get into politics. But then Barack Obama entered the White House, sending ripples of alarm and despair across the conservative party not unlike the shock felt by liberals in November. Starnes, a CPA, was worried that big government spending and tax hikes would further crush the countrys fragile economy.

Some people were scared, and hid. Others of us decided to do something, Starnes recalled. So she began hosting meetings in her Dallas living room. Shortly after igniting the local Tea Party movement, Starnes challenged a longtime favorite in Dallas public sector for a city council seat and lost by a mere six percentage points.

The movement was an awakening for people like me, she said.

But dont tell either woman they have anything in common.

Valenzuela said she remembers the Tea Party holding violent rallies with an attitude that made her feel like they wanted to burn the whole world down. According to Starnes, however, these new groups of anti-Trump protesters are violent, nothing like the peaceful Tea Party rallies she attended.

These groups have both been painted as violent mobs of paid protesters by their political opponents since their inception. Theres little evidence to substantiate any of these claims, save for a few viral moments where fringe members turned violent like when black-bloc protesters smashed windows and set fires during a UC Berkeley anti-Trump rally, or when Tea Partiers threw punches at a Florida anti-immigration rally.

These conspiracy theories paraded by political pundits (and quickly regurgitated in online forums) include claims that billionaires, like the Koch brothers or George Soros, bankrolled the movements, making them more astroturf than grassroots.

And members of Congress (who have reportedly renamed the group Indigestible) are eager to echo these conspiracy theories.

You can imagine the volume of phone calls and mail and social media contacts that we get on a daily basis, Texas Sen. John Cornyn told Houston Public Media in a February interview, shortly after Indivisible members began flooding his office with requests to oppose Trumps cabinet nominees. Theres no doubt that there was a concerted campaign by the establishment.

His response, however, sounds a lot like Doggetts comments after the Randalls protest in 2009. This mob, sent by the local Republican and Libertarian parties, did not come just to be heard, but to deny others the right to be heard, Doggett told the Austin American-Statesman at the time. And this appears to be part of a coordinated, nationwide effort.

To both lawmakers, these Texas rabble-rousers were party pawns, not part of the localized movements to which they swore allegiance which might actually serve as proof this kind of trolling works.

The worst thing you can do to constituents is tell them their concerns are not real, Levin said. If you tell them theyre full of it, youre just going to rile them up more.

Especially if theyre Texans.

*****

Congressman Doggett first met Levin when he was in high school. The Austin teenager had organized a campus fundraiser for John Kerrys presidential run, and had somehow caught the attention of the already seasoned senator. I was so impressed with him, Doggett recalled. He showed grit, determination. As soon as Levin graduated from Princeton, Doggett offered him a job in his D.C. office.

In Texas, were used to knowing a lot of people we dont always agree with. Theyre neighbors and family, and you learn how to interact with them, Levin said. Its not like growing up in Berkeley or New York City where youre generally surrounded by like-minded people.

Which could explain why this resistance began in Texas.

Texans are uniquely equipped in the fight, said Dohl. Its certainly not a new fight for liberals in this state. These are fights that have had to be fought before, and theyll have to be fought again. Texans, along with other red state Democrats theyre prepared for that.

It only makes sense, Starnes said, if you look at the states turbulent history. The people who originally moved to Texas were brave pioneers...this place was a real hellhole back then, she said. Were still pioneering, its just the challenges that have changed. You dont mess with Texas.

But can this new wave of pioneers be as successful as its predecessors?

When Jeff Rogers first met with Arlington Tea Partiers in 2011, he felt a shared sense of anger and urgency. But he could tell there was something was missing in the conversation. I remember thinking: Were all preaching to the choir...but what are we going to do about it?

Rogers said. After drafting strategy plans that were drawn out over months, and years and seeing progress the group found solace in playing the long game.

You work with what you got, Rogers said, pointing to the January reelection of moderate Republican Joe Straus to speaker of the Texas House. We didnt want Straus. But we arent always going to get what we want. Instead of complaining, we just continue working toward the next election cycle. Were in it for the long haul.

And, as Trumps election proves, theres no telling what political interchange is on the horizon.

When Obama came into the White House in 2009, we thought Democrats would have government control for a long time. We thought we were set, Haile said. But these things are unpredictable.

That unpredictability is still felt by Tea Partiers, even after their 8-year-long movement helped flip both chambers of Congress to Republican control and place a Tea Party ally in the White House. On Friday, March 24, the party watched as their very first goal, the repeal of Obamacare, got even further out of reach. House Speaker Paul Ryan, another politician boosted by the Tea Party, was forced to withdraw his American Health Care Act before it even reached Congress. Ironically, this bill was largely killed by what appears to be a rebranded version of the Tea Party Caucus in Congress, the Freedom Caucus. Friday evening, Ryan somberly informed reporters that were going to be living with Obamacare for the foreseeable future.

A day after arguing against Ryans bill on the House floor, Congressman Doggett stood at the pulpit of a San Antonio church answering questions about the debate around health care. To his left, a new crop of congressional office staffers looked on. An energized crowd filled the chapels pews, some wearing nurses scrubs, others in pink knitted hats left over from Januarys Womens March. A few handmade posters leaned against a front wall, reading Dont Mess with Obamacare and Impeach TrumPutin Now! The audience had welcomed Doggett with an explosion of applause and cheers one woman even rattled a tambourine in appreciation.

A key part of democracy is holding every elected official accountable, Doggett began. Unfortunately, with all the gerrymandering thats occurred thats become increasingly difficult.

You find some officials that dont feel like they have to worry about accountability... so all you have is a cardboard cutout, he joked, and the crowd chuckled in response.

But they werent there to praise Doggett. Like the Tea Partiers before them, this liberal-leaning crowd had come to press their Democrat congressman to go further. A medical student asked what Doggett was doing to advocate for single-payer health care. When Doggett said he favored the health care model, but doubted it would pass in this Congress, the audience jeered. Someone shouted Do your job! One woman wanted to know where the congressman stood on abortion access for minorities. Another wanted answers on Medicare expansion. The line for asking questions went out the chapel door.

Even with the pushback, Doggett did seem genuinely delighted to engage with constituents, thanking each speaker for their piece of mind. Instead of being chased across the parking lot by an angry group of protesters, Doggett left this neighborhood meeting with handshakes and pats on the back. And a reminder.

Its a troubling time in our history...people are loosing faith in our democracy, Doggett said, before leaving the podium. It is not enough just to tweet or just to protest. Its time to get involved in politics.

See the original post:
How the Tea Party Taught Texas Progressives to Troll Their Government - San Antonio Current

How to Marginalize the Tea Party – The American Prospect

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Representative Mark Meadows rushes to a caucus in the basement of the Capitol in Washington, Friday, March 24, 2017, before House Speaker Paul Ryan announced that he is abruptly pulling their troubled health-care bill off the House floor.

An earlier version of this article appeared at The Huffington Post. Subscribe here.

How is it that the 37 most right-wing members of the House, the so-called Freedom Caucus, have disabled the Republican majority?

The explanation is the relatively recent tradition that Republicans never make bipartisan agreements with Democrats, except in the rare cases when they can peel off a few conservative Democrats to totally capitulate to Republican terms. If Republicans could bring themselves to work with Democratsthe norm for most of American historythe outsized influence of the most extreme Republicans would collapse.

The Republican posture of ultra-partisanship, which has now backfired, is something recent in American legislative politics. It dates only to the presidency of George W. Bush, and more recently to the Republican wall-to-wall blockage of Democratic initiatives under President Obama.

Before that, President Bill Clinton, who had a Republican majority in Congress for six of his eight years, frequently reached across the aisle to win majorities for policies, some of them liberal and some conservative.

This posture, commended by the strategist Dick Morris, was called triangulation. It drove liberals crazy, but enabled Clinton to govern. (Clinton was also willing to play partisan hardball when then-Speaker Newt Gingrich shut down the governmentand had to back down.)

Under Clinton, liberal legislation like the Family and Medical Leave Act and the hike in the minimum wage were passed with mostly Democratic votes, but also with support of some Republicans. Conversely, more conservative bills, like the NAFTA deal in 1993 and the enactment of a draconian welfare reform (TANF) in 1996, passed with mostly Republican votes and a minority of Democrats.

Before Clinton, Republican President George H.W. Bush governed in the same fashion. He reached across the aisle to get Republican and Democratic support for the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 1990 Clean Air Amendments. He enlisted Democrats when his fellow Republicans balked at a tax increase.

Several bills in the eras of the first President Bush and Bill Clinton bore the names of Ted Kennedy and Republican co-sponsors Nancy Kassebaum or Orrin Hatch.

Early in the Bush II administration, W. worked with Democrats over the objection of some Republicans to win support for an expansion in federal aid to education in exchange for federal standards, and to add a Medicare drug benefit.

And then partisanship gradually hardened. Under the so-called Hastert Rule, Republicans avoided bipartisan coalitions. It was first propounded in November 2004 by the then-House Speaker Dennis Hastert as a way to maintain tighter party discipline. The Hastert rule bound Republicans to vote with a majority of the Republican caucus position.

Hastert left Congress in 2007, after Republicans lost control of the House. Hastert was subsequently found guilty of ethics violations and went to prison in a sex scandal, after it was revealed that he had been paying hush money to former students whom he had abused as a wrestling coach.

But when Republicans took back Congress after 2010, they imposed a more extreme version of the same idea. They simply stopped working across the aisle.

This strategy worked well enough in their cynical opposition to anything Barack Obama imposed, but it has now given a de facto veto power to their own most extremist membersthe Freedom Caucus. Basically, the caucus has inverted the Hastert Rule, and feels free to oppose the GOPs right-wing policies if the are not right-wing enough. This has made it all but impossible for the Republican majority to govern.

There is a very simple cure, one that would consign the Freedom Caucus the political oblivion that it so richly deserves: Trump and the Republicans should rediscover the benefits of bipartisanship.

After all, Trump did not campaign as a conservative but as a populist. He is not much of a partisan Republican and is cordially detested by most Republicans, who tolerate him only to the extent that they can use him.

If any president should be practicing triangulation, it is Donald Trump. Where is the ur-opportunist Dick Morris now that we need him? (Morris fell from grace in 1996 when he was caught with a prostitute.) He and Trump were surely destined for each other.

If Trump and relatively sane Republicans could get together with Democrats to improve the aspects of the Affordable Care Act that do in fact need fixing, like rising premiums, they could tell the Tea Party Republicans in the Freedom Caucus to take a hike. Likewise on infrastructure and trade measures.

That maneuver and repositioning would show the true artistry of the deal. With upwards of 100 Democrats supporting bipartisan measures, the 37 whack jobs in the Freedom Caucus, who surely have no loyalty to Trump, would cease to have influence.

Are some House Republicans and Trump himself ready to acknowledge that reality and this option? It would allow for a restart of his presidency, more consistent with the promises he made in the campaign.

Or do they just share a hatred of Democrats so profound that they will continue to allow the Freedom Caucus to wreck the Republican Party and the Trump presidency alike?

When the Ryan/Trump health bill went down, Trump declared, I honestly believe Democrats will come to us and say lets get together and get a great health bill or plan. Not exactly. With the Republican habit of governing as if the Democrats did not exist, its up to Trump and the Republicans to reach out to Democrats, not vice versa.

See more here:
How to Marginalize the Tea Party - The American Prospect

State GOP Chair hopefuls speak to Forsyth Couty Tea Party – Forsyth County News Online

A local political group heard from two candidates for chairman of the Georgia Republican Party this week.

On Monday, the United Tea Party of Georgia hosted candidates Alex Johnson and Michael McNeely at the groups monthly meeting at VFW Post 9143 on Dahlonega Highway. The next chairman will be chosen at the partys state convention in Augusta on June 2-3.

Johnson, an attorney and former state Senate candidate from DeKalb County, said the state party needs to expand its outreach.

We should be thinking big; we should be doing better, Johnson said. We should be working with groups around the state to get more people involved in Republican politics. The Georgia GOP needs to be a one-stop shop for political involvement; it needs to be working with groups that are not necessarily called Republican, but getting involved with gun rights groups, Tea Party groups, 9/12 groups.

The state party has run into financial issues, which Johnson said could be tackled by reaching out to smaller donors.

If we expect to be a strong growing party, the state GOP, we will serve you, Johnson said. Thats the culture Ill be putting out in every way I possibly can, is that we need to be standing for the people. We need to be letting people know how to be empowered in politics so they can make a difference.

McNeely, a former police officer and current first vice chairman of the party, also spoke on the need to build relationships with voters moving forward, including hosting training for selecting delegates and other party functions.

Talking about our principles in a very real way that speaks to people by knowing them and engaging them personally; its a win for Republicans, and Ive done that for many, many years, he said. We want to recruit conservative men and women to serve in our party.

Though having a top position with the party, McNeely said his role was to serve in the absence of the chairman and do what the chair gave him to do.

That doesnt bode well for me and what I might want to do different than the current chair, he said. When you talk about who the chairman needs to be, thats why its so important is because that person, they run the show.

Both Johnson and McNeely will return to Forsyth to speak to the Forsyth County Republican Party. McNeely will speak at the April 13 meeting, and Johnson and candidate Mike Welsh will speak at the May 11 meeting.

Earlier this month, the party heard from John Watson, who is also running for chair, and Mansell McCord, the partys current treasurer who is running for re-election.

Whoever is chosen as the new chairman could serve with a local candidate, as Carolyn Hall Fisher, former chair of the local party, is running for first vice chair.

Whoever the chairman is will need a very, very good first vice chair that will be joined with you at the hip, Fisher joked at the meeting.

Read the original here:
State GOP Chair hopefuls speak to Forsyth Couty Tea Party - Forsyth County News Online