Archive for the ‘Stand Your Ground Law’ Category

Congressman Gaetz, Senator Mullin Introduce National Stand Your Ground Act – Congressman Matt Gaetz

Washington, D.C. U.S. Congressman Matt Gaetz (FL-01) and U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) will introduce the National Stand Your Ground Act of 2023 in the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, respectively. These bills would codify Floridas Stand Your Ground law at the federal level, abolishing the duty of retreat when attacked. Rep. Gaetzs House legislation is co-sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (AZ-05) and Rep. Paul Gosar (AZ-09).

Every American has the right to defend themselves and their loved ones from an attacker. If someone tries to kill you, you should have the right to return fire and preserve your life. Its time to reaffirm in law what exists in our Constitution and in the hearts of our fellow Americans. We must abolish the legal duty of retreat everywhere, Congressman Gaetz said.

Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) filed the companion National Stand Your Ground legislation in the Senate this afternoon.

States like Oklahoma and Florida recognize that in some cases, the use of lethal force is justified to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm. Every American should have the right to defend himself or herself against imminent threats to personal safety without the duty to retreat. Im proud to introduce the Stand Your Ground Act in the Senate to codify these commonsense self-defense protections for all law-abiding Americans, Senator Mullin said.

Full text of Rep. Gaetzs Stand Your Ground Act of 2023 can be found HERE. Additionally, exclusive coverage of the Stand Your Ground bills by Rep. Gaetz and Senator Mullin on Fox News can be found HERE.

###

Forupdates, subscribe to Congressman Gaetzs newsletterhere.

Originally posted here:
Congressman Gaetz, Senator Mullin Introduce National Stand Your Ground Act - Congressman Matt Gaetz

Rep. Gaetz, Sen. Mullin introduce national Stand Your Ground bills: Legal duty to retreat helps attacker – Fox News

FIRST ON FOX: Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz and Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin, both Republicans, are proposing a national "Stand Your Ground" law against attackers.

Gaetz caught up over the phone with Fox News Digital on Thursday about his and Mullins companion bills dropping the same day, with the Florida Republican saying the proposed law came out of his efforts in the Sunshine State legislature "after the Trayvon Martin death."

While chairman of the Florida Houses Criminal Justice Subcommittee, Gaetz said he held hearings on the states Stand Your Ground law amid "national calls to repeal" the statute.

ATF DIRECTOR REFUSES TO DEFINE ASSAULT WEAPON, SAYS ITS UP TO CONGRESS

Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz and Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin, both Republicans, are introducing a bill to create a national "Stand Your Ground" law against attackers. ((Photo by Nathan Howard/Getty Images))

"I became even more convinced that the legal duty to retreat from common law puts the law on the side of the attacker, not the victim," Gaetz said.

"And as Ive gotten to Congress, I dont believe that the legal duty to retreat as an American ought to be different in Florida and Connecticut and Massachusetts and California," he continued.

"I think we ought to have a national reckoning on the duty to retreat, and we ought to extinguish it," Gaetz added.

Gaetz said America has "too many states that continue to maintain the duty to retreat if one is attacked outside their home" and that Congress "should supersede that state law because it leaves Americans vulnerable."

The Florida Republican noted that in "our nations capital today," a person being attacked on the street has to make a "split-second" decision on whether they can "turn their back and run," with a "miscalculation" potentially proving "fatal."

Mullin told Fox News Digital that states "like Oklahoma and Florida recognize that in some cases, the use of lethal force is justified to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm." (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

"And if you miscalculate toward the side of self-defense, you could be under arrest," Gaetz said. "If someone is intending to commit a forcible felony on an American, an American right should be meeting that force with comparable force."

Gaetz said he is seeing increasing support for the measure among his GOP colleagues and said Mullins companion bill in the Senate "is a big boost."

"Since I serve on the Judiciary Committee, Im going to be using that perch to inject my views on self-defense and extinguishing the duty to retreat in the various legislative proposals that the committee may consider," Gaetz said.

Gaetz also blasted Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., saying he hasnt been the greatest when it comes to putting the law on the sides of the victim."

"He seems to hold a different view, so we may have to use leverage on a must-pass bill to get Stand Your Ground considered," Gaetz said.

The Florida congressman said "in practice," Stand Your Ground laws have "stopped arrests on sight when someone has engaged in legitimate self-defense."

"That defanged arrest has a chilling effect when someone justly defends themselves," Gaetz added.

Mullin told Fox News Digital that states "like Oklahoma and Florida recognize that in some cases, the use of lethal force is justified to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm."

"Every American should have the right to defend himself or herself against imminent threats to personal safety without the duty to retreat," Mullin said.

"Im proud to introduce the Stand Your Ground Act in the Senate to codify these commonsense self-defense protections for all law-abiding Americans," he added.

Gaetz said America has "too many states that continue to maintain the duty to retreat if one is attacked outside their home" and that Congress "should supersede that state law because it leaves Americans vulnerable." (Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Stand Your Ground laws, such as the one in Florida, allow law-abiding persons in a lawful place who are attacked to forcefully defend themselves from death or great injury, including with deadly force, without having to retreat first if the person believes its reasonably necessary to do so.

The Republicans bill comes as Democrats in Congress and the White House aim to expand gun control amid rising crime in America.

Last month, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Director Steve Dettelbach refused to define the term "assault weapon," saying it was a decision for Congress.

Dettlebach testified before the House Judiciary Committee to speak about the pistol brace rule that would outlaw common stabilizing mechanisms.

Dettlebach was questioned by Democratic Texas Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, who asked the ATF director whether he knew what an "assault weapon" was after acknowledging the recent mass shooting in Buffalo, New York.

"Let me just hold up just to pay tribute and acknowledge that these are the deceased their families are still mourning of the incident in Buffalo at the grocery store. It was an assault weapon that killed them," said Lee.

She continued: "My question to you is just simply a yes or no.' You know what an assault weapon is? You've seen one?"

Last month, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Director Steve Dettelbach refused to define the term "assault weapon," saying it was a decision for Congress. (House Committee)

Dettlebach deflected the question, saying the term is not something he's qualified to rule on.

"Again, that would be a decision for Congress to make, respectfully, as to make that definition. It is There are numerous different legislative bodies that have taken up that question," Dettlebach said before being cut off.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"If we laid a weapon on the table, you could pretty much say, That falls in the category of assault weapon?'" Lee interjected during Dettlebach's testimony.

The ATF director did not budge, responding: "Respectfully, that is a decision that different legislative bodies have come up with different definitions for. It would be for the legislators to make that determined action as to how they would define it unless they were to delegate that authority to ATF."

Fox News Digital's Timothy H.J. Nerozzi contributed reporting.

See the original post here:
Rep. Gaetz, Sen. Mullin introduce national Stand Your Ground bills: Legal duty to retreat helps attacker - Fox News

T&T PM Rowley Rejects Stand Your Ground Law, It’s Used For … – NYCaribNews

As Prime Minister Keith Rowley attempts to address the crime situation in Trinidad and Tobago, he once again rejected aproposal by Opposition Leader KamlaPersad-Bissessar to use deadly force, stand-your-ground laws for home invasions.

Rowley rejected the proposal saying it can be used to commit legal murder. He even went so far to call the proposal dogwhistling and urged his supporters to reject the notion of crime and criminalitylinked to race, with one targeting the other.

Speaking at the PNMs sport and family day at the Toco Composite High School on Sunday afternoon, Rowley said armingcitizens was not the answer to the countrys crime problems, and the proposal by the Opposition to enact stand-your-ground legislation is also not a viable solution.

We will bring legislation to Parliament to create a specific criminal offense of home invasion, which will involve increasing the sentences for larceny, burglary, serious assault, unlawful entry to your properties, whether it be your homes or businesses; and that you will be able to use force they come using force with guns, cutlasses, whatever it may be.

Speaking at the United National Congress (UNC) Monday Night Forum in April, Persad-Bisessar said if in power, the UNC would enact such legislation.

She said: That to me is one of the most terrifying experiences that you could ever imagine. And so we have taken note of this unacceptable situation, and while Dr. Rowley spends two full days talking foolishness at the Hyattthe UNC will do the following to put an end to this devilish offense of home invasion.

We will bring legislation to Parliament to create a specific criminal offense of home invasion. I propose that our next UNC government will create this full offense; this will involve increasing the sentences for larceny, burglary, serious assault, and unlawful entry to your properties, whether it be your home or your businesses, and that you will be able to use force, firearm, weapon, cutlass, whatever it may bewe will create that offense with a penalty of 25 years in jail.

We will also bring stand your ground laws. At the moment the law is, a man invades your house, a woman invades your house, andyou have to use something they call reasonable force. A man going with a gun in your face and you must do nothing.

I propose that we adopt the stand your ground legal principlethis means putting into our laws the legal principle that allows a person to use force in self-defense without retreating.

Rowley, however, referred to such laws as American-based legislation, which, he pointed out, were currently being challenged in US states that had passed it, although he admits violent behavior, violent crime, violent crime involving the use of firearms, the associated individual and group mental health trauma accompanying violent behavior, pose a far greater destructive threat than many diseases and on that basis alone qualifies violence as a public health emergency.

He said dealing with crime has become a significant drain on the countrys economy and agrees it must be urgently addressed.

Rejecting an invitation to meet withPersad-Bissessar and former policecommissioner-turned-politician Gary Griffith on crime solutions, Rowley said the government would win the fight against crime but not through meeting with people who are part of the problem.

The current Section 29 of the Larceny Act states:

Any person who, with intent to commit any arrestable offence therein

(a) enters any dwelling house in the night; or

(b) breaks and enters any dwelling house, place of divine worship, or any building within the curtilage, or any school-house, shop, warehouse, counting-house, office, store, garage, pavilion, factory or workshop, or any building belonging to the State, or to any Government department, or to any Municipal or other public authority, is liable to imprisonment for seven years.

See the original post here:
T&T PM Rowley Rejects Stand Your Ground Law, It's Used For ... - NYCaribNews

New information uncovered about person who fatally shot Carson Senfield in Florida – WGRZ.com

TAMPA, Fla. We have new information about the shooting death of Orchard Park native Carson Senfield.

The 19-year-old was a freshman at the University of Tampa when he was killed while getting into a car he mistakenly thought was his Uber.

The driver shot Senfield, claiming he feared for his life. He was never charged.

The attorneys for Senfield's family are now making several claims, after getting an eight-page report from the Florida State Attorney's Office.

The report was shared with 2 On Your Side and has the name of the shooter and a mugshot. We are not sharing either of those because he hasn't been criminally charged.

Tampa Police say the driver feared for his life and would not identify him pointing to Florida's Marsy's Law, which shields victims.

Florida's State Attorney's Office wrote a letter to the police department, citing the Stand Your Ground Law for why they didn't press charges. The Florida law allows anyone who feels under threat to protect themselves with deadly force.

However, Fernandez claims the shooter has a history of drug and firearm violations and believes he was an informant for Tampa Police.

We asked Fernandez for evidence to confirm his claims, but he didn't produce anything to substantiate them.

The state attorney's report only shows the shooter previously had a charge for carrying a concealed weapon.

Fernandez also claims the shooter was Senfield's neighbor.

"That's what law enforcement said when we asked who is this guy and why was he there," Fernandez said. "He was picking up his girlfriend at her place, and he had the veil of protection because he was parked adjacent to the garage door, so we was on private property. And so he had a right to have, what would be on the street, an illegal gun.

"And we asked, 'Did he have a permit?' and were then told no. That's also a troubling thing because of some things that may unravel here in some point in time," Fernandez added.

Fernandez says despite several attempts, he has yet to receive a police report from the Tampa Police Department and may file a lawsuit to get it.

2 On Your Side has also requested the report. Tampa Police have not responded to our repeated requests for comment.

We're also told attorneys for the Senfield family may file a civil lawsuit against the shooter because they now know his name.

Continued here:
New information uncovered about person who fatally shot Carson Senfield in Florida - WGRZ.com

Dadeville mass shooting cases now head to courts. What to expect … – Montgomery Advertiser

DADEVILLE Now that five of the six co-defendants charged with four counts of reckless murder each in the Dadeville shootings are being held without bond, whats next?

To say its a complicated case is an understatement. Four victims dead, 32 injured, some critically, by gunshots, and six co-defendants that include a 15-year-old. There are mountains of forensic evidence to sift through. The recent Aniahs Law hearing a judge ruled the five co-defendants being charged as adults will be held without bond included the first public airing of details in the case.

Investigators recovered 89 shell casings, many from .45-caliber, .40 caliber, 9 mm and .22-caliber handguns. Testimony indicated that seven guns were fired, including a gun found on one of the slain victims. There were 50 to 60 people in the tightly packed room when gunshots began about 10:30 p.m. on the recent Saturday night.

Evidence continues to be gathered, interviews of witnesses and injured party celebrants are ongoing. The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency is leading the investigation, which also includes the Dadeville Police Department, Tallapoosa County Sheriffs Office, 5th Circuit District Attorneys Office and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the FBI.

And dont forget, charges relating to those injured in the shootings have not been filed yet. They could range from felonious assault, since a firearm or other dangerous weapon or instrument was used, to attempted murder.

A Tallapoosa County Grand Jury is likely to review the cases to determine if enough evidence exists that a crime occurred. There are also several stages in the lengthy legal process where charges against the defendants could be dropped.

The brutal truth is, it could be years before any trials occur. Along the way will be possibly several years worth of court proceedings before the first jury is selected and seated.

Its going to be a long, difficult journey for this close-knit community.

The shootings occurred at a 16th birthday party April 15 at a dance studio in downtown Dadeville.

Killed were: Philstavious Phil Dowdell, 18, Shaunkivia Nicole Keke Smith, 17, Marsiah Emmanuel Siah Collins, 19, and Corbin Dahmontrey Holston, 23.

Police arrested brothers Tyreese "Ty Reik" McCullough, 17, and Travis McCullough, 16, of Tuskegee on April 18. Wilson LaMar Hill Jr., 20, of Auburn, was arrested April 19, and cousins Johnny Letron Brown, 20, of Tuskegee, and Willie George Brown Jr., 19, of Auburn, were arrested on April 20.

A 15-year-old juvenile from Tuskegee was arrested on April 20. His name has not been released due to his age. District Attorney Mike Segrest is seeking to have the teen charged as an adult. That requires a hearing in juvenile court.

The following court action will precede any trials. For the purposes of this story, these are the proceedings that will involve the co-defendants who are being charged as adults.

Set for May 23 before District Judge Clayton Taylor. The defendants will be read the charges against them and asked if they understand the charges. The matter of bond again can be raised for Taylor to consider. A purpose of the initial appearance also is to ensure the defendants have attorneys. The court has appointed attorneys for each of the defendants.

Defendants have a right to a preliminary hearing, where the state informs the court of the evidence investigators have collected so far. Defense attorneys can cross examine prosecution witnesses. Defense attorneys often waive preliminary hearings. After an initial appearance or preliminary hearing, the judge will determine if enough evidence exists to establish probable cause that a crime occurred so the grand jury can review the case.

Alabama has a Youthful Offender Statute where defendants ages 18 to 21 can seek review. It is open to people who have not been in legal trouble before and who are charged with non-violent crimes. If the judge grants Youthful Offender Status, the original charge or charges are dropped and the defendant is found guilty of violating the Youthful Offender Statute. The maximum punishment is three years in prison, and the persons record is sealed.

Its common for people who fall within the given age range and who are charged with violent crimes, up to capital murder, to seek Youthful Offender Status. The courts entertain the motions so as not to present an issue for any conviction to be reversed upon appeal. The court of criminal appeals could also order a retrial on the charges if a higher court finds proper legal methods were not followed.

During testimony in the Aniahs Law bond hearing, allegations were raised that Holston, one of the four who were killed, was armed and allegedly fired the first shot. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) investigations showed his gun had been fired, testimony revealed. That opens the door for defendants to argue self-defense. A judge would review evidence to determine if Alabamas Stand Your Ground Law applies. If it does, charges against all or some of the defendants could be dropped. If the judge determines Stand Your Ground doesnt apply, the cases go to the grand jury.

The grand jury reviews the evidence and could return indictments if the panel believes there is enough evidence present that a crime occurred. An indictment is not a finding of guilt, but is required for the case to go to trial. The grand jury could also no bill the case against some or all of the defendants, finding no evidence exists that a crime occurred; charges would then be dropped.

If a grand jury clears a defendant, they can never be charged with that particular crime again under the Constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy.

If indictments are returned by the grand jury, they can be on the original charge, or a stronger or lessor charge. The defendants appear before a circuit judge at arraignment to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Then the trials can be scheduled.

Defense attorneys could also seek a change of venue, asking that any trials be moved from Tallapoosa County. A change of venue is sought when the defense believes that media attention, or the high-profile status of the case, makes it impossible to find an impartial jury in the county.

Tallapoosa County is unique, divided into an Alexander City judicial district and a Dadeville district. Jurisdiction is determined by which side of the Tallapoosa River the crime occurs. Assuming no change of venue, any trials in the shootings would take place at the courthouse in Dadeville.

The grand jury meets twice a year in Tallapoosa County. During an April 16 press conference, Segrest said the grand jury serves a six-month term, and he could call them back at any time during those six months for a special session. He called such a move unprecedented in the history of the county.

Each district in Tallapoosa County has two, two-week criminal terms a year. The six co-defendants, if the 15-year-old is charged as an adult, would be tried separately. So, with that court schedule, it could take three years to have all the trials, trying two defendants a year.

Hopefully it wouldn't take that long, Segrest said during a Friday morning phone conversation.

These cases are a priority, he said, adding that the first trial could take place in June of 2024, if everything falls into place. We are going to follow the law in preparing for trials. There are also two, two-week civil terms a year. We could use any leftover civil term court days to have criminal trials. That would allow us to have more than two trials a year in these cases.

Shortcuts cannot be taken, said Tom Azar, a seasoned River Region defense attorney and former Montgomery police officer. He does not represent any of the defendants, but he has decades of courtroom time under his belt.

This is a complicated case, a very complicated case where you have multiple defendants and multiple victims, he said. You cant get in a hurry. You want to preserve the defendants rights to a fair trial. While you are also seeking justice for the victims and their families.

No one; not the defense, not the state, wants to do any of these trials more than once due to some mistake in the process.

Contact Montgomery Advertiser reporter Marty Roney at mroney@gannett.com.

Excerpt from:
Dadeville mass shooting cases now head to courts. What to expect ... - Montgomery Advertiser