Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

Portugal’s Socialists Highlight the Rot Within the European Left – The European Conservative

Antnio Costas eight years as prime minister of Portugal reached an ignominious end on 7 November 2023, when the justice authorities carried out a total of 43 raids on government buildings and homes, including the prime ministerial residence. They were investigating misuse of funds in ambitious green energy initiatives into which European Union funding was being ploughed. The smooth, paternalistic lawyer concluded within hours that his position had become untenable and he announced that he was quitting (to be followed by an insistence that he had no plans to resume office). Over 75,000 was discovered in wine boxes and bookshelvesmoney belonging to his chief aide, Vtor Escria, who was placed under arrest. Costa himself figured in a long list of suspects but insisted (and continues to insist) that he is blameless, which may well be the case. But he was the 13th member of his government to swiftly vacate office because of criminal investigations or conflicts of interest. Soon after, yet more government ministers would be facing the attentions of state investigators.

On Sunday, 10 March, in what was the third general election in five years, the Portuguese electorate removed the Socialist Party (PS) from power. It lost heavily, but the centre-right, the nominal winner, hardly budged. It was the surge in support for the populist challenger Chega (the word means enough in Portuguese) that made this a watershed election. Its support soared from 7% to 18% on a turnout of 64%, up nearly 12% since the last election. The young turned out in big numbers. They cast their votes for Chega in the hope that it could sweep away the torpor and the cronyism and promote structural change that could stem the hmorrhage of population that has been visible since the Eurozone crisis, from 2009 onwards.

Only the over-55s have remained broadly loyal to the Socialist Party. It had created a strong power base within an ageing electorate by depicting itself as the guarantor of social protection, much of which was paid for from EU transfer funds. A steady cash flow from Brussels passed through the hands of Socialist power brokers in local councils and state agencies. Patronage structures became embedded, which made it hard for the Left to be dislodged from office. Only its chronic economic mismanagement of the country, which intensified the effects of the Eurozone crisis for Portugal, condemned it to opposition status.

The early decades of the century have been very frustrating for young Portuguese. A declining level of productivity means that when they can acquire a job it will often be in a low-wage sector such as tourism. The money earned is rarely enough to be able to start a family. One in three Portuguese aged 15-39 have left Portugal, either to avoid unemployment or the high taxation on their paltry salaries, if they are even able to break into a tightly regulated labour market.

Chegas fluent, and self-confident leader, Andr Ventura, won over enough young people to place his party firmly on the electoral map. He has a varied career profile, unlike the worthies from the mainstream parties, which are staffed by lawyers or local government barons who often have backgrounds in teaching or public administration. His partys vote appears to have more than doubled, which means that a party which didnt even exist five years ago will now have 49 deputies elected. Late results seem set to give Chega two of the four seats allocated to the numerous Portuguese living overseasa group with no love for the blockedpolitics they left behind. Ventura is a professor of law who later became a popular radio sports commentator. His verbal prowess enables him to be a dominating presence in the National Assembly, and his social media followers outnumber those of the other main political contenders added together.

Conversely, the new leader of the PS, 46-year-old Pedro Nuno Santos, proved no match for Ventura on the campaign trail. Santos exemplifies the tendency across Europe for left-wing parties to choose leaders who promote a political order based on virtue rather than the ability to get things done. Santoswas infrastructure minister until his removal by Costa, in 2022, after he announced the location for a much-disputed new airport serving the capital, when the PM was out of the country, and without having cleared it with him. More seriously, billions of euros were wasted in a saga over the state airline, TAP, which is seen as one of the favourite sinecures of the PS. Originally privatised when the centre-right was in office, it was re-nationalised only for its privatisation to be arranged once again at huge cost to the exchequer but with no visible benefit.

Like any number of prominent Socialists across Europe, Santos owes practically his entire career to the party from student days onwards. From his teenage years, he has been a full-time politician, drawn from a middle-class family in business, the bulk of whose wealth derives from trading with the state. His attention is focused on redistributing wealth, not producing it. Just like the more moderate Costa, he lacks an economic vision for Portugal. He obtained the leadership by emphasising far-left themes requiring people to make major adjustments to their lives in order to fit in with the lofty climate and racial equality agendas imported from elsewhere.

Except for Chega, the aspirants for office are a pretty dull and uninspiring lot, perhaps because Portugal has been content to follow EU directives on most aspects of domestic policy. In office for most of the last third of a century, PS oversaw a period when what was once a trading organisation massively expanded its reach over perhaps most aspects of governance. The opening up of the Portuguese economy to competition from the rest of the EU has resulted in the shrivelling of the countrys once respectable industrial base and the rapid decline of its agriculture.

Most of the nations political players have come to accept Portugals dependency status because supervision is accompanied by what seems like a generous injection of funds on a regular basis. Portugal has thus far received 133 billion worth of EU funding, from joining the entity in 1986 to the start of 2023 (a figure that does not include the large amount released in order to promote post-COVID economic recovery). The property sector and infrastructure have benefited from this injection of funding. These are sectors which do not strengthen the labour market or long-term growth. Perhaps the lions share of EU funding goes into maintaining a large social state. The PS is careful to channel the money towards its own support groups via state agencies, where the party often has a strong grip.

A recent best-selling work, As Causas do Atraso Portugus (The Causes of Portugals Backwardness) by Nuno Palma, an economics professor at the University of Manchester, contends that Portugal would be better off in the long-run ifwithout leaving the EUit were weaned off external support from the EU and required to stand on its own two feet to carry out long-overdue structural reforms.

Arguably EU largesse has been a recipe for social stability. It has kept elite quarrels to a minimum and muffled social and economic tension. Without the avuncular supervision of the EU, it is an open question whether the liberal republic could have endured for so long. But the price has been high in terms of stagnation. As well as declining productivity, the Socialists have been content to preside over both a rate of emigration unsurpassed since the 1960s, and one of Europes lowest birth-rates. Moreover, the political class does not have to account for how the money from Brussels is spent. Checks are lax, and the heavily-subsidised local media rarely makes life difficult for the authorities by investigating potential scandals.

EU structural funds exist to narrow the gulf between rich and poor EU states and promote eventual economic convergence. Portugal is not the only country where this lofty goal has been forgotten, but it is perhaps one of the most glaring examples at present. Social mobility has declined, as favoured groups (often linked to those who wield influence) succeed in determining recruitment on informal rather than meritocratic criteria. More importantly, structural reform is ruled out in favour of gaining short-term advantages by the Machiavellian distribution of EU funds. Perhaps the main beneficiaries of the externally shaped status quo in Portugal are not vulnerable social groups relying on state help but rather cartels in the media and commerce. There is evidence that they are able to receive state financing, or else are shown leniency over price-fixing, in return for backing during elections and times of crisis.

It is perhaps no coincidence that the major media companies, with their plunging circulations and disappearing profit margins, have appeared keen to prevent Chega enjoying a major breakthrough in this election. Nevertheless, early results show that Portugal has become the latest European country where populists have broken through.

Even though his party now seems destined for opposition, Antnio Costa could still be the one who has the last laugh. If the authorities decide that he has no case to answer, he could end up holding the top job in the EUs European Council. He was seen as a favourite because of his negotiating skills and the friendships he had built across the political spectrum. Indeed, some allege that he neglected his duties at home to lobby for this position. It is unelected and it seems that such positions are the ones left-wingers on the continent of Europe have the best chance of acquiring these days.

Meanwhile, his successor Pedro N. Santos surveys the ruins of the Socialist house. The PS has lost 43 seats and has seen its vote share reduced by 13%. It was pinning its hopes on next months celebrations to mark the 50th anniversary of the army coup in Lisbon that placed Portugal on a long leftist path to socialism. However, the occasion is more likely to seem like a funeral than a festival.

Chega has eaten into the Lefts support base in what used to be its southern strongholds. Dismissing the vigorous political upstart as far-right means that the PS and parties further to the left (which mostly fared disastrously on 10 March) are besmirching many of their former supporters, and potentially alienating them permanently. The final bitter pill to swallow is that Chega will get nearly 4 million of state aid while PS funding has been slashed.

A majority right-wing government able to determine its spending priorities and its reform aims would have four years to dismantle the empire which the PS has constructed within the state apparatus, one that has enabled party bigwigs and their lieutenants to do business in politics with other peoples money.

The PS notables played the system and refused to govern. Santos and his shrinking army of Socialist sloganisers will be pinning their hopes on Chega playing a strong hand badly, resulting in it crashing to earth once early elections take place. This could be a forlorn hope. Most of Chegas 49 deputies are unlikely to be of any special calibre, though some may prove pleasant surprises. But in Ventura, the party has a skilful and tenacious commander. He currently has no equal elsewhere in Portuguese politics.

A low-grade political class, devoid of leadership, intellect and, above all, a sense of public service has got what it deserves. Enough voters deserted the Left, or else gave up on their non-voting habits, to place a new contestant in the game. Whatever comes next, the sterile two-party system, dominated by a swarm of usually unprepossessing careerists, looks like it has had its day. A critical mass of Portuguese have shaken off their deference and chronically low expectations.

Enough Portuguese seem still to believe in the nation and its need for long-overdue structural reforms in order for it to remain viable and keep its citizens productive and at home, rather than successful but abroad.

To the dismay of a shabby political class recruited to pursue business in politics and ill-equipped to perform its national duties, the Portuguese have suddenly become alert, vocal, and even demanding. A people too readily dismissed by the political bosses as ignorant, stupid, and incapable, seem at last to have awakened. It will be quite a job getting them to go back to sleep, especially because of the uproar that is occurring across Europe. Socialists who lost touch with electoral bases, and instead ended up pushing niche causes incubated in universities or woke boardrooms, are now struggling to stay relevant. In Portugal, the chances of them putting in place a status quobased on the post-national objectives dreamt up by European bureaucrats, corporate managers, and woke activistssuffered a considerable setback on 10 March. There is now a small window of opportunity for Portugal to renew itself, so that anniversary celebrations next month in favour of liberty might ring a little less hollow.

This essay was originally published at Scotview. It has been edited for length and is republished with kind permissionoftheauthor.

Read the original post:
Portugal's Socialists Highlight the Rot Within the European Left - The European Conservative

Tags:

Global temperatures increasing fight for socialism – Socialist Party

Lewis Rees, Liverpool Socialist Party

In recent months, global temperatures have surged, marking the hottest period in recorded history with an alarming average increase of 1.22C from pre-industrial levels. Here, this years February was the hottest, the same for each of the previous nine months!

This concerning trend should surely resonate with those in positions of power, urging them to take the necessary action to stop it. However because of their continued inaction, it is the silent majority, that stands to bear the brunt of the impending climate catastrophe. The number of climate-induced refugees has surpassed those displaced by escalating conflicts and wars worldwide. A poignant example is the 2022 flood in Pakistan, displacing 8 million and affecting the lives of 33 million people.

Young people are calling out for change, angry at a system that will rob us of our future.

While climate change campaign groups often call for a radical societal transformation and immediate action, there remains a gap in providing the comprehensive socialist programme needed to combat these issues.

Ed Brower, US energy editor of the Financial Times, boldly asserts that Capitalism wont deliver the energy transition fast enough. Without a distinct and incisive critique of the roots of climate change seeing it as a product of capitalisms production for profit based on competing nations, parties and groups simply claiming to be green cant offer a clear path forward.

We will need a socialist solution to the climate catastrophe and a fight for a planned socialist transition, that prioritises the needs and concerns of the majority over a select few. This would have to be democratically planned by the working class and based on nationalisation of the polluting industries, the banks and big business to prevent climate catastrophe without workers and the poor having to pay for it.

More here:
Global temperatures increasing fight for socialism - Socialist Party

Tags:

SEP candidates Joseph Kishore and Jerry White discuss war, inequality and the COVID-19 pandemic on the – WSWS

On Sunday, Socialist Equality Party (US) presidential candidate Joseph Kishore and vice presidential candidate Jerry White spoke with Chris Richards, host of the Eclectic Radical Show, and co-host Bess Goden, about the fight for socialism in the United States and around the world.

Loading Tweet ...

The interview dealt with pressing issues facing workers and youth around the world, including the ongoing US-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine and the increasing threat of nuclear war, the genocide in Gaza, widening social inequality, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the class struggle.

Kishore began the interview outlining the purpose of the Socialist Equality Partys intervention in the 2024 elections. Our campaign is about fighting for socialism, he said. This involves developing an understanding in the working class that socialism is the way forward.

Stressing the international character of the campaign, Kishore added later on, We are not just running to develop a socialist movement in the working class here. All the problems that we confront, that workers confront, everywhere are global problems. World war, dictatorship, inequality, the pandemic these are global problems.

With the war and the genocide in Gaza, Kishore explained, you have, we refer to it in the New Years Statement on the World Socialist Web Site, the normalization of mass death. And you have the normalization of nuclear war, and the normalization now of genocide. It all speaks to a ruling elite that is careening society towards barbarism and which has absolute contempt for human life.

White explained that the bipartisan war policy pursed by the Democratic and Republican parties is deeply unpopular in the population.

The only way they can impose such a policy, said White, is increasingly through the suppression of democratic rights. Thats why a couple of weeks ago Biden was on the border, dueling with Trump over who could attack immigrants more. And Biden said to Trump, Join me in passing the most reactionary anti-immigrant legislation.

Explaining the relationship between war abroad and the attack on the working class at home, White said, Last year, you saw Macron, in France, increase the retirement age. There were mass, mass protests in the streets, and then, by executive fiat, he imposed it. Its not separate from the fact that the French government is proposing sending NATO troops into Ukraine; they are all talking about war-time economy.

The interview covered many other subjects. It is available in full at @TheEclecticRad or by viewing the embedded video above.

The rest is here:
SEP candidates Joseph Kishore and Jerry White discuss war, inequality and the COVID-19 pandemic on the - WSWS

Tags:

Veteran of 1984-5 UK Miners’ Strike Malcolm Bray speaks on its lessons and the fight to build a socialist leadership in … – WSWS

Malcolm Bray was a miner at Woolley colliery in the Yorkshire coalfields during the year-long 1984-85 strike. The WSWS spoke to him about his experiences and the political lessons he drew from the heroic fight and its betrayal. Malcolm was convinced of the necessity to build a new party of the working class based on the principles of Trotskyism and international socialism.

I started mining life at Woolley colliery at the young age of 21 in 1979. I was married with two young children at the time. I now have three. Before that I was in the army for just over three years, serving in Ireland and Hong Kong. It was hard at the time to find a decent job until I was offered a job in the mines. I did my mining training at Grimethorpe colliery and later at Woolley colliery, where I worked until its closure in 1987. This came as a shock to us considering millions were spent on upgrading Woolley and produced a knock-on effect to other pits in the area it was linked to. It refuted the excuse of only closing the pits through exhaustion. The pit was demolished in the early 1990s and is now the home to a posh new housing estate called Woolley Grange.

I did not have much previous experience with industrial action other than a strike at Needham Brothers and Brown, an engineering firm in Barnsley I worked for between 1973 and 1979, which made the pulley wheels for the pit head gear. I was very young at the timeit was sit-down action and the police were called in. At the start of the 1984-85 Miners Strike I remember being very excited. In our view this was long overdue. We were ready for a fight, but we did not have a clue how long this would go on for and what we were going to face.

Some of the older miners had been involved in the 1972 Miners Strike when mass picketing closed down Saltley Gate coking depot in Birmingham, winning a pay increase against the Conservative government of Ted Heath. This was entirely different as it was a fight for our jobs, communities, and the future of the entire industry. The criminals who drew up the Ridley Report to privatise industries, stockpile coal, organise a scab herding operation and mobilise a national police force against flying pickets were far better prepared than we were.

I was involved every single day, mainly picketing my own pit with my brother and two other workmates. Then I got more involved with flying picketing and a go-slow cavalcade on the M1 motorway to stop traffic. I was arrested in Nottinghamshire for picketing and fined 200 for obstruction. We were often reliant on the soup kitchen to get at least one square meal a day. I was never injured myself by the police, but I know many who were, including my National Union of Mineworkers branch secretary Ralph Summerfield who was battered by the police so much that his clothing was soaked in blood.

Then came what became known as the Battle of Orgreave, the mass picket of a coking plant outside Rotherham three months into the strike, on June 18. This was a total set-up by the police and thousands of miners were led into a trap. Wed never seen as many police. We were faced with baton wielding police with shields and charges from police on horses. This went on for a number of days. It left us to ponder this was no ordinary dispute. We faced a lack of direction by NUM leader Arthur Scargill in the face of the full force of the state being brought down on us.

There was no victory in sight, but we still believed our action had stopped a lot of coal production and we had the upper hand. But faith in just miltancy was giving way to broader political considerations. I remember many miners were angry with the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and the Labour Party, who had no intention of mobilising the working class behind us against the Thatcher government. It was becoming apparent that financial donations and food parcels were not enough. Neil Kinnock, the leader of the Labour Party, was despised by the miners along with all the other union bureaucrats who were isolating our fight. I remember the hangmans noose being lowered symbolically from the ceiling in front of TUC General Secretary Norman Willis when he spoke at a rally of South Wales miners.

It was towards the end of the strike I met the Workers Revolutionary Party (WRP) after getting a copy of the News Line on the picket line. Id never joined any political organisation up to this point. Until then I knew nothing about Trotskyism and the fight against Stalinism, the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the history of the real socialist movement.

I attended the Marxist School of Education and spoke at a national rally of the WRP at Alexander Palace in front of 3,000 workers and youth about the need for the education of the working class to develop its political consciousness. I travelled down with a coach load of striking miners and their wives in the Women Against Pit Closures. I was part of a group of miners who joined the WRP in Barnsley, Rotherham and Doncaster in south Yorkshire, one of the most militant areas in the country and the News Line was read up and down the coalfields nationally.

We saw this as offering an independent way forward. We were also very aware of international support from workers the world over in terms of food parcels from families across Europe. I had one from a family in Germany. But this was limited to the trade union version of solidarity based on organisations rooted in a national outlook rather than a common fight against the powerful globally organised corporations.

I would fully recommend the WSWS pamphlet, The Lessons of the 1984-85 Miners Strike. The WRP as the British section of the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) was the only political tendency which could have provided a lead, but unbeknownst to me it had undergone a political degeneration and a turn away from its Trotskyist principles.

I saw Scargill as a good solid left-wing leader who spoke well and I often got caught up with supporting him. As the pamphlet explains his authority rested on the fact that he was seen as a principled alternative to Kinnock and the TUC, but he avoided any struggle against their isolation of the strike and class treachery. The WRP supported him uncritically. In the course of a strike which lasted a year, his left credentials could have been exposed and workers brought forward to build a new leadership against the labour and trade union bureaucracy in the fight for socialism. The failure to do this meant a betrayal became a defeat.

I never understood this fully until 1986 and the expulsion of the WRP from the ICFI. It was then I became clearer on Scargill and Mick McGahey and the Stalinist influence over the most powerful union in the country and the meaning of their call to return to the Plan for Coal to save the coal industry. This was not based on workers control and socialism, but economic nationalism and a corporatist agreement with the government.

Despite my ill health I remain active on social media spreading the word and sharing articles from the WSWS. I have my own Facebook site, Miners Strike 1984-5, with a thousand followers and I am an admin on the Centenary of the Russian Revolution with four thousand followers. We must take every opportunity to reach an international audience. I was very pleased to be able to speak at an online meeting in New Zealand in June 2022 to launch the WSWS book exposing the cover-up of the Pike River mining disaster by a Labour government and the unions and the fight for the truth and justice taken up by the families.

For me the struggle continues and is no different for the working class in Britain as it is internationally, with workers having nothing to look forward to except more strife and the imminent danger of world war. All these questions from war, poverty, climate change affect us all, including the fight to free Julian Assange and end the terrible genocide that is taking place in Gaza.

While these questions remain, the class struggle continues. It will never end until the working class ends capitalism and establishes a socialist society.

Marking the 40th anniversary, the Socialist Equality Party has published a pamphlet, The Lessons of the 1984-85 miners strike. Order your copy from Mehring Books here.

Sign up for the WSWS email newsletter

Here is the original post:
Veteran of 1984-5 UK Miners' Strike Malcolm Bray speaks on its lessons and the fight to build a socialist leadership in ... - WSWS

Tags:

The Antiwar Left Saved the Honor of German Socialism Amid the Horror of the Trenches – Jacobin magazine

The Antiwar Left Saved the Honor of German Socialism Amid the Horror of the Trenches  Jacobin magazine

Read more here:
The Antiwar Left Saved the Honor of German Socialism Amid the Horror of the Trenches - Jacobin magazine

Tags: