Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

Socialism Is So Hot Right Now. Thank Bernie Sanders. | HuffPost – HuffPost

WASHINGTON Consider the Bernie Bro (Wellus actuallius), an aggressive subgenus of Sen. Bernie Sanders supporters.

In the year since Sanders lost the Democratic primary, members of this species have been pushed out of their native habitat and forced to migrate to new ecosystems. Some nested down in social media, encroaching on classmates Facebook posts and female journalists Twitter updates with condescending diatribes about Slavoj iek. Others made their way to the hostile environs of Donald Trumps campaign, finding sustenance in the idea that there was no difference between the Republican and Democratic nominees for president. Still more found their way to your dinner table, nourishing themselves on ponderous expositions of neoliberalism, where and how they refill their beer growlers, and why Bernie wouldve won.

Herds of other Bernie Bros, however, have staked out a far more hospitable environment: the Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA. For the uninitiated, DSA the inheritor of the American Socialist Party, co-founded by Eugene Debs and instrumental in the progressive reforms of the early 20th century is a chapter-based national political advocacy organization that crusades for policies such as a higher minimum wage, safer working conditions and universal health care.

DSA openly uses the big, bad, scary s-word that countless Republican consultants have used to smear Democrats over the years. And despite decades of efforts to stigmatize it, socialism is kind of in right now.

This was partly fueled by Sanders underdog presidential campaign he identifies as a democratic socialist but caucuses with the Democrats in the Senate as well as by an economic recovery that has left many working people in the dust, experiencing a growing sense of disillusionment with the Democratic Party.

We were highly visible in the Sanders campaign, Joseph Schwartz, a DSA national vice chair and professor of political science at Temple University in Philadelphia, told HuffPost. Schwartz said DSAs growth began to accelerate as the Sanders campaign picked up steam in mid-2015,and has continued since Trump took office.

DSA has rooted itself in the millennial psyche with astonishing speed. A quiz posted on Reductress earlier this month was titled, Is He Into You, Just a Friend, or Trying to Get You to Join the Democratic Socialists? Comedian Rob Delaney regularly promotes the groupon social media. And that rose emoji you keep see popping up on Twitter? Its likely a reference to both DSAs logo and that of Socialist International, the global consortium of socialist organizations. Along with #resist and #NeverthelessShePersisted, the rose emoji has remained one of the more enduring social media trends since last November.

The real massive influx was starting with the day Trump was elected, Schwartz recalled. Many people want to fight back against Trump, but they also realize that the centrist, pro-corporatist views of the Democratic Party are partially what gave rise to him.

Universal History Archive via Getty Images

DSA officials say their member rolls shot up from around 8,500 on Election Day to about 21,000 as of early May, and theyre getting upwards of 10 requests a week to help open new chapters. New members are overwhelmingly young and tech-savvy, thanks in no small part to the groundwork the Sanders campaign laid by bringing millions of young people into politics.

This engagement was on full display at a May Day rally in Washington, D.C., earlier this month. Around noon, some 100 or so activists from a variety of progressive organizations gathered in a small park in D.C.s Mount Pleasant neighborhood. Making small talk near the obligatory drum circle were around 10 members of DSAs D.C.-area chapter, nearly all of whom had signed up to join DSA on or after Election Day.

DSAs contingent was one of the largest on hand, but was nearly all white and male contrasting sharply with the rest of the crowd, which was far more diverse and representative of the neighborhoods large Salvadoran community. The DSA attendees who spoke with HuffPost said they had joined DSA since November and were first drawn to it through the Sanders campaign.

Ever since Trump won, I think people have been feeling very scared and want to do something, and DSA is a great organization to channel that, said Nick from Poughkeepsie, New York, who declined to give his last name. I had an awakening during Sanders campaign. I was monitoring the growth of all these organizations and saw that DSA was gaining all these members and felt like DSA spoke to me.

James Mathias, 25, from northern Virginia, had previously volunteered for Barack Obamas first presidential campaign and later participated in the Occupy Wall Street movement. After voting for Sanders in the 2016 primary, he voted for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in the general election. While he wasnt wild about Clintons policies, he felt compelled to vote for her out of political necessity, given Virginias swing state status.

Mathias said political realism drew him to DSA and that he has yet to experience the organizational or political disappointment he did with Occupy and Obama.

Each time, I kind of drifted in and out, because both of those things petered out, either literally or philosophically, Mathias recalled. Occupy wasnt focused on engaging with existing political structures. DSA is focused on building power for political ends. I really see a bias for action and not shying away from political structures.

Indeed, DSA doesnt fashion itself as a vehicle for high-level political office most of its members who have run for office have run in municipal elections but rather as Americas largest Socialist organization, per its website. This isnt a wishy-washy expression of being (The Socialist International was in our hearts all along!), but an acknowledgement that its foundational work is in lending organizational support to candidates from other parties and organizations whose policies align with its agenda.

This includes other liberal advocacy organizations and economically progressive politicians like Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Sanders.

DSA didnt endorse Clinton in the 2016 general election, but its chapters actively organized a Dump Trump movement targeted at the Republican nominee. That left open the possibility of voting for Green Party nominee Jill Stein or even Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson, but DSA officials told HuffPost they expected a large number of their supporters would back Clinton.

Despite DSAs often antagonistic attitude toward the Democrats, Democratic officials say theyll happily accept DSAs support whenever its willing to offer it.

We welcome the help of groups across the country who are fighting to defeat Republicans and elect progressive leaders that stand for the same values that make our party so great, DNC spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa told HuffPost in an email.

Yuri Gripas/Reuters

While a membership of 21,000 is still small as political entities go progressive advocacy group MoveOn.org touts over 7 million members, for example DSA members engagement has caught the attention of the progressive community. They showed up in large numbers at May Day rallies across the country this year, including a New York City rally that attracted well over 1,000 DSA members.

The people who are joining DSA are people who are extremely active, said Bob Master, a veteran labor activist and the co-founder and co-chair of the Working Families Party of New York. This gives the group tremendous leverage, Master said: Having a young, energized and tech-fluent base of volunteers is a welcome addition to any political coalition.

DSAs willingness to adapt to the current political framework and engage with other organizations has drawn plaudits from other progressive activist and organizations.

DSA has been an excellent ally, joining with our members in canvassing area businesses; they hosted a fundraiser party that raised $1,000 and helped us expand our operations, said Hannah Kane, an organizer at Many Languages One Voice, a Washington, D.C., immigrant community group that led the May Day protest. Theyve just been all-around excellent partners.

George Goehl, the co-director of Peoples Action & Peoples Action Institute, a Chicago-based advocacy organization, partly attributes DSAs rise to the Democratic Party and its constant tacking toward the middle and feeling like the answers to its problems lay in a more moderate, less-structural set of reforms.

We failed in the last election because we had a candidate who was unable to tap into the anger that people are feeling, echoed Master. The Democratic Party cannot limit itself to saying Trump is a bad guy because he fired James Comey. [It] has to speak to the growing sense of economic stagnation and diminishment.

Naturally, Democratic officials disagree with this assessment. Hinojosa, the DNC spokeswoman, said the party and its new chairman, Tom Perez, possess an unwavering commitment to workers and will continue to fight for working families on behalf of the Democratic Party.

DSA naturally draws comparisons to the Green Party, a fact that is not lost on DSA members or leaders. But DSA officials see major differences between the organizations particularly in the Green Partys complete separation from other political parties and what they see as the Greens inordinate focus on presidential elections.

Were more flexible in terms of tactics, said Schwartz. We prioritize doing social movement work, and we see electoral politics as coming out of that. The Green Partys emphasis on its presidential tickets, he added, is not an intelligent way to build an independent third party.

Green Party officials dispute that. In an email to HuffPost, Scott McLarty, media director for the Green Party of the United States, noted that the Green Party runs hundreds of candidates for local and state office every election cycle.

One of the main reasons we run presidential candidates is the support they give to state parties and to state and local candidates, added McLarty.

DSA has several challenges as its membership balloons, including what to do with all those new members. Although individuals unable to pay membership dues are still allowed to join, DSA relies on dues to maintain operations, which includes paying the salaries of the eight full-time employees in its national office. Right now, only two DSA chapters employ part-time employees, but DSA officials expect that number to grow considerably as large chapters in places like Los Angeles, Chicago and San Francisco continue to add members.

Activists outside DSA also say its imperative that the group not lose focus on its overarching mission, or let the Democratic Partys decidedly less-than-socialist views dilute its platform.

DSAs biennial convention in Chicago this August will be a major test of both its organization and focus. The groups 2015 gathering in Baltimore featured roughly 150 attendees, but organizers expect this years convention to attract 500.

Organizers hope to avoid what transpired at last years Green Party convention, which got so bogged down by ideologicalinfighting and poor planning that it ultimately devolved into one giant lightbulb joke.

Managing growth is really hard, and when organizations grow, its hard to stick with your principles, said Goehl. A little too much power or access can pollute things.

An arguably greater challenge for DSA is diversifying its ranks and combating the growing impressionthat it is merely a refuge for wayward Bernie Bros. Indeed, most DSA members interviewed for this article were white men.

DSA officials acknowledge that this overwhelming whiteness is inherently limiting. We have to make space for diverse voices, including from immigrant communities, said Schwartz. If we dont tackle things like mass incarceration, police brutality and the lack of economic opportunity for people of all races, we wont unite working people.

In addition to promoting an agenda that it believes appeals to communities of color, DSA officials argue that the groups focus on economic matters has the potential to appeal to female voters, who tend to back Democratic candidates and prioritize social welfare issues such as paid maternity leave and access to affordable health care.

Julia Griffin is a 21-year-old DSA member from northern Virginia who works in the service industry and who attended the May Day rally in Washington. She said her Christian faith helped draw her to DSA; she sees in socialism a helping-thy-neighbor ethos thats central to her religious beliefs.

After the election, I was so frustrated with the Democratic Party and so disappointed with everything that went on, I definitely needed to feel part of an organization that was actively working to make peoples lives better, said Griffin.

Ultimately, activists outside DSA say that if it wants to transcend its status as yet another outside group hoping to influence Democratic politics, itll need to establish itself as a real third party not only by notching some wins with local candidates, but also by enacting reforms once they take office.

If youre attracting working-class and low-income members, you got to deliver some tangible victories, said Goehl, of Peoples Action & Peoples Action Institute. He listed the establishment of local credit unions as an example of the type of policy reforms he believes locally-elected DSA members could achieve.

You can deliver a wide range of victories they can be electoral, they can be narrative, but they have to be tangible after a while, Goehl added. This is not theoretical to people; this is about having a place to live and having health care.

Go here to see the original:
Socialism Is So Hot Right Now. Thank Bernie Sanders. | HuffPost - HuffPost

Twitter’s savior may yet be a socialism network Breakingviews – Breakingviews

The $13 bln microblogging sites investors voted against studying whether to become a user-owned cooperative. It would be a smart solution for a company with lots of dedicated users but few revenue opportunities. Twitters sky-high valuation would need to drop considerably, though.

To access full Breakingviews.com content you must be a subscriber. Please use the following link to request a trial.

Source: REUTERS/Kacper Pempel

People holding mobile phones are silhouetted against a backdrop projected with the Twitter logo in this illustration picture taken in Warsaw September 27, 2013.

Breakingviews is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Twitter investors at the annual meeting on May 23 voted against a shareholder proposal that the company consider becoming a cooperative owned by users. Just 4 percent of owners backed the idea. The proponents argued it bring in new and reliable revenue streams, greater focus on the services long-term potential and more accountability in handling abuse.

X

Required fields *

Eikon

Information, analytics and exclusive news on financial markets - delivered in an intuitive desktop and mobile interface

Elektron

Everything you need to empower your workflow and enhance your enterprise data management

World-Check

Screen for heightened risk individual and entities globally to help uncover hidden risks in business relationships and human networks

Westlaw

Build the strongest argument relying on authoritative content, attorney-editor expertise, and industry defining technology

ONESOURCE

The most comprehensive solution to manage all your complex and ever-expanding tax and compliance needs

CHECKPOINT

The industry leader for online information for tax, accounting and finance professionals

Thomson Reuters 2017. All rights reserved.

Continue reading here:
Twitter's savior may yet be a socialism network Breakingviews - Breakingviews

Prufrock: JS Mill’s Socialism, Saul Bellow’s Politics, and the Science of ESP – The Weekly Standard

Reviews and News:

Helen Andrews on John Stuart Milla self-righteous adulterer who had a nave belief in the power of education to perfect humanity: "In his correspondence with true-believing socialists, Mill usually told them that he fully expected socialism to come to England one day but that at present mankind was unprepared for it. Mill had every hope that this unpreparedness would be temporary, for he had limitless faith in the power of education to shape humanity. If a single group of children could be raised to be socialists as deliberately as James Mill had raised him to be a Benthamite, then it would only take one generation to prove to the world that cooperative socialism was no utopia but an alternative within reach. Instructing this pioneer generation was one of the things he thought Harriet could have done for humanity, if she had lived. For a thinker whose entire philosophy depended on human perfectibility, Mill had remarkably little idea how to bring it about."

* *

"Anthony Horowitz has said he was warned off including a black character in his new book after being told by an editor it would be inappropriate. Horowitz, best known for his Alex Rider series of novels, said he found it 'disturbing' that he was being advised against a white writer creating a black character."

* *

Pax Romana revisited: "Rome kept the peace in Palestine as it did across a breathtakingly large empire: through a combination of laissez-faire government and military might. On the one hand, Roman governors were sensitive to local laws and customs. Goldsworthy quotes letters from the Emperor Trajan to his magistrate in Bithynia, Pliny the Younger, instructing him to rule in disputes according to Bithynian laws. Similarly, Rome left in place local religion, rulers, and even currency. On the other hand, if locals got uppityor worse, revolutionaryRoman force came down like a crushing hammer. The Jews learned this in 64 BC, and again in AD 70."

* *

Saul Bellow's politics: "Unlike his friend and colleague on The University of Chicago's Committee on Social Thought, Edward Shils, Bellow was shy about identifying himself overtly with the political right."

* *

The lost typefaces of W.A. Dwiggins.

* *

NASA's infographic for aliens.

* *

Essay of the Day:

In Slate, Daniel Engber revisits Daryl Bem's 2011 article in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology that presented evidence of ESP:

"When the study went public...some of Bem's colleagues guessed it was a hoax. Other scholars, those who believed in ESPtheirs is a small but fervent field of studysaw his paper as validation of their work and a chance for mainstream credibility.

"But for most observers, at least the mainstream ones, the paper posed a very difficult dilemma. It was both methodologically sound and logically insane. Daryl Bem had seemed to prove that time can flow in two directionsthat ESP is real. If you bought into those results, you'd be admitting that much of what you understood about the universe was wrong. If you rejected them, you'd be admitting something almost as momentous: that the standard methods of psychology cannot be trusted, and that much of what gets published in the fieldand thus, much of what we think we understand about the mindcould be total bunk."

Read the rest.

* *

Image: Lagoon Nebula

* *

Poem: Dana Gioia, "Prayer"

Get Prufrock in your inbox every weekday morning. Subscribe here.

Read the original here:
Prufrock: JS Mill's Socialism, Saul Bellow's Politics, and the Science of ESP - The Weekly Standard

Is socialism social work? Minister clueless – New Zimbabwe.com – New Zimbabwe.com

PSYCHOMOTOR minister, Josiah Hungwe, cannot distinguish between socialism and social work.

This was the view of guests at a function organised by the National Social Security Authority (NSSA) in Bulawayo last Friday where the minister constantly referred to social work as socialism.

Ironically, Hungwe was introduced as a veteran educationist during the NSSA Rehabilitation Centre open day.

Invited to speak at the event, he said, Basa ramuri kuita iri reSocialism rinoda vanhu vane moyo wekuzvipra. (The socialism work that you are doing here requires that you be committed and have the welfare of people at heart.

Throughout his remarks, Hungwe continued to refer to social work as socialism, leaving his audience confused while some could be heard whispering to each other trying to decipher what the minister was failing to put across.

In the end, many people concluded that Hungwe in fact meant social work and not socialism as activities at the centre are far divorced from socialism.

Hungwe, who is also the Secretary for labour and Social Welfare in the Zanu PF politburo, also praised President Robert Mugabe for espousing socialism principles.

Socialism is a political and economic theory while social work is a professional discipline.

Socialisms view is that society as a whole should own and control the means of production and distribution while social work is concerned with the welfare of people at community and family level.

Many people view Hungwe as cluelessabout the role of his ministry while plenty others believe his ministry is not necessary.

Meanwhile, Social welfare minister, Priscah Mupfumira, revealed at the event that NSSA is set to increase pension pay-outs by end of September this year.

Mupfumira said NSSA is currently engaged in an actuarial evaluation in order to determine the increases, adding that the pay-outs will be increased to a minimum of a hundred dollars.

Pensioners are currently receiving an average of $40 per month. During her tour of the rehabilitation centre, inmates pleaded with her to increase the pension.

Link:
Is socialism social work? Minister clueless - New Zimbabwe.com - New Zimbabwe.com

Democratic socialism, capitalism, personal freedom – Washington Times

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

When Bernie Sanders, the socialist senator from Vermont, entered the Democratic primaries last year, a lot of people wondered. What is democratic socialism?

The classic definition of socialism is a system of government in which the means of production and distribution of goods are owned, controlled or regulated by the government. Socialism is distinguished from capitalism where the means of production and distribution are owned by private (non-governmental) parties, either individuals or organizations (such as companies).

The most radical form of socialism is communism, where all property is owned and distributed by the government. Less radical forms of socialism are seen in the governments of Western Europe, where private property is recognized but government has the responsibility of acquiring (through taxes) enough wealth to provide for physical well-being of all its citizens, however that may be interpreted at any given time.

As the demands of the population grow, so does the amount of tax revenue needed to provide for these demands. At some point, especially when unemployment is high, the taxes on the companies producing the countrys wealth get so great that those companies cannot keep up, and the entire system fails. If not stopped, people will start to go hungry, and riots follow as is happening in Venezuela right now. American examples of this situation are Detroit and Puerto Rico, which have taxed themselves into bankruptcy.

If we remember that taxes depend on profits, it is easy to understand that there is always tension between government and industry over control of profits. This tension takes place on two levels. The first is the practical requirements of governments need to fund citizen services versus industrys need to fund its operations and expansion to keep up with increasing population. Both have altruistic justifications as well as practical needs. Government takes care of the poor with welfare programs; and industry takes care of everybody else with employment and the material means to enjoy life.

But there is also an underlying, less obvious tension between government and industry, a tension which transcends the matter of who signs the paycheck. This is the struggle for power. Socialism is synonymous with big government. Big government means control. Control means the ability to impose ones ideas and preferences on others. Government control means the capacity to suppress the freedom of people by requiring people to do unreasonable things, such as giving up meat or cigarettes or Coca Cola.

It is this aspect of a socialist government which is most objectionable to many people, especially Americans. The entire legacy of American culture is built around personal freedom. It is in the American DNA. We cede to government only the minimum authority over us that is required to live together in peace. But no more.

Americans realize that people do not have to have a lot of money in order to enjoy life if they have a big office, a chauffeured limousine, a staff to do their bidding, a gym, a private dining room, access to media at will, and all the other perquisites of power enjoyed by our government officials. These people have power over the rest of us, and, especially in the bureaucracy, they can live in a bubble which only vaguely resembles the ordinary lives the rest of us lead. These are the people who invent the rules by which the rest of us are supposed to live. And the rest of us want those rules to be as few and as reasonable as possible. The bigger the government, the more intrusive the rules, and the less we like it. The recent election might be called the revenge of the masses.

A view of our American system reveals a mixture of both ideologies, socialism and capitalism. At its core, however, the difference between these systems is their views of the role of government. The socialist believes it is the role of government to distribute the nations wealth as broadly and equally as possible. This means taking from the rich and giving to the poor. A noble goal indeed. But it is a strategy based on a view of society which is static: the rich are always rich and the poor are always poor.

This is why class conflict is essential to the socialist view of society. Class conflict is based on most of human history, in which there were always the masters and the servants. The masters were rich because of their station in life they were born into the ruling class, and the servants were born into the underclass. In different cultures and different times, there was some social mobility often due to wars, but an Untouchable in India would never have a chance to become a Maharaja.

Against this background, the servants only chance to improve their lives was to take over the government. This is essentially what happened in the Western world through a series of revolutions from 1776 (USA) to 1917 (Russia). The people who came to power in Europe saw the plight of the poor as a bottomless pit and the wealth of the rulers as unlimited pot of gold. Guided to a large extent by the ideas of Karl Marx, they designed governments accordingly.

Not so in the United States of America. This was a land controlled by people who had escaped both the walls and the comforts of the Old World and had survived in an environment which rewarded courage, skill and endurance, rather than birth and privilege. Their bias was against rather than favorable to government. They saw government as a greedy king out to take away their liberty. They therefore fashioned a government which was limited in every way by competing forces: the federal government by the states, the president by the legislature, each House of Congress was limited by the other, everybody by the courts and so on down the line to the local dogcatcher.

The purpose behind this design was to keep government officials from ascending to the powers of that old king. They understood intuitively the saying of John Lord Acton a century later: Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

What they have left us isthe American version of a capitalist society. It isdynamic, constantly changing. The poor may not always be poor; the rich may notalways be rich. In fact, most Americans (58.5 percent) will spend at least one year belowthe poverty line at some point between ages 25 and 75 according to Yale UniversitysJacob S. Hacker (The Great Risk Shift, New York, 2006). The wealth of the society isexpected to grow constantly through the creation of new opportunities, new products andservices, new jobs, new skills, and new technologies, leading to new and expandingwealth.

For Americans, the fundamental error of socialism is that it does not account for the creation of that wealth in the first place. Government cannot confiscate what isnt there. Socialists foresee the proverbial pie of underclass income being cut into more and more pieces; Americans keep creating a bigger pie.

The United States of America has brought together economic capitalism and political democracy in a dynamic tension which we call democratic capitalism, and which has produced the most prosperous nation in the history of the world. Its greater attribute is that it provides hope hope that the poor may be able toescape the bonds of poverty as so many Americans have done in the past. This hope isthe shining light on the hill which still attractsthe envy of millions.

It has taken Americans most of our history as a nation to achieve the balance bywhich capitalism is accountable to democracy, and there are still many problems tobe solved. Nevertheless, Americans are always optimistic. The challenge toAmericans is not to change an evil system; it is in living up to the ideals which arerequired for that system to succeed.

The motivation for individual Americans to persevere in pursuit of their personalgoals is provided by the real and potential ownership of private property. No othermotivator not coercion, not slavery, not charity, not communal property noteven religion has ever been found which can impel vast numbers of individuals in asociety to be hard working and creative. Providing a good life for oneself and onesfamily is a motivator above all others. Our history has proven that personal freedom is a necessary prerequisite for the success of this system. An oppressive government even if well-intentioned sucks out the initiative required to make an ever better life for all of us.

Personal freedom without economic freedom is no freedom at all. Capitalism, in arefined and mature linkage with democracy, provides the economic power whichmakes freedom possible.

Read more here:
Democratic socialism, capitalism, personal freedom - Washington Times