Mediaboss Marketing

Adelaide-based marketing agency, Refuel Creative, has added Lot Fourteen, South Australias expanding innovation district for high-tech, defence, space and creative industries, to its diverse client roster.

Following a competitive selection process, Lot Fourteen selected Refuel Creative to lead its social media marketing and show the world that South Australia is an exciting centre for business, innovation, and culture.

Refuel Creative will be responsible for taking Lot Fourteens social media to the next level. The team at Refuel will produce original and creative social content that matches Lot Fourteens forward-thinking ambition leveraging its current market position and momentum and continuing to drive national and international business and investment attraction.

Partnering with Refuel allows us direct access to a multi-skilled account management team, says Jenny Hassam, Communications and Media Manager at Lot Fourteen.

Refuel Creative brings a creative, data-driven approach to its work, and are excited to be playing a role in the future of South Australian business and innovation with Lot Fourteen.

Were really excited to welcome Lot Fourteen to the team at Refuel Creative, says Ryan Jones, Founder and CEO at Refuel Creative. Ive benefited from Adelaides startup training ecosystem, allowing us to grow Refuel into the business it is today. Adding South Australias new home of innovation and startups to our client roster is a great next step for Refuel and something Im truly passionate about on a personal level.

Refuel Creative has enjoyed success with a diverse range of clients across different industries, including the tourism, not for profit, and industrial sectors. Its work with Lot Fourteen will build on this.

See more here:
Lot Fourteen chooses Refuel Creative to spearhead their social media marketing - NewsMaker

By Thomas Kohout

The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences under the leadership of Maranda C. Ward, Ed.D 17, has been awarded a pair of grants totaling more than $816,000 from Gilead Sciences Inc., in support of an 18-month research-informed educational initiative, Two in One: HIV+COVID Screening and Testing Model.

This study aims to make the policy case for updating guidelines so that primary care practitioners can make HIV screeningand PrEP screening and HIV testing, as appropriateroutine for all patients while also screening for COVID vaccines and boosters in the same visit. The research themes will also be used to provide capacity building support for primary care practitioners to provide culturally responsive and nonjudgmental communication about HIV and COVID with patients who identify as Black, Indigenous or people of color (BIPOC) and LGBTQIA+.

We built this national training model to reflect and meet the goals of the Healthy People 2030 initiative that outlines benchmarks to achieve health equity, eliminate health disparities and attain health literacy in the United States, said Ward, assistant professor of clinical research and leadership.

Two in One includes three parts: research, training and social marketing, beginning with qualitative stories from BIPOC and LGBTQIA+ patients and primary care practitioners.

Our national advisory board of content experts will supplement what we learn from [primary care practitioners] and patients on the facilitators and barriers to HIV and COVID prevention to ultimately guide the facets of this training model, said Ward. Our scoping reviews will also inform two white papers on HIV and COVID policy implications for practice-based changes.

The project will target 10,000 primary care practitioners, such as doctors, osteopaths, physician assistants, nurse practitioners and registered nurses in practice across the United States or those who are in the pipeline as medical students and trainees at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs). The two-part training series will offer nine live-streamed, continuing medical education (CME)-bearing monthly lectures as well as an asynchronous CME-bearing module-based training course and toolkit. The series will culminate in a symposium focused on translating knowledge gained from the speaker series into policy-based and practice-based action.

Running concurrently with the training will be a series of social marketing messages, or vignettes, of primary care practitioners talking to other physicians and health care professionals about how to bring nonjudgmental HIV screening and testing and COVID vaccines/boosters into their standard of care.

For more information on this research-informed model, visit the Two-in-One website: twoinone.smhs.gwu.edu.

Continue reading here:
SMHS Awarded Grants to Improve Cultural Responsiveness about HIV and COVID Screening - GW Today

ESG is in the spotlight and, in many instances, for all the wrong reasons, with some vilifying it as a marketing exercise.

In the US, anti-ESG rhetoric accelerated after Texas passed a law in 2021 preventing the state from doing business with companies found to be boycotting fossil fuel-based energy companies. Since then, officials of 19 states have publicly criticized ESG-focused investment and engagement activities of prominent investment managers with respect to fossil fuels.

In the UK, the appointment of Liz Truss as new prime minister may bode ill for the near-term environmental agenda, with the government needing to prioritise the cost-of-living crisis and spiralling energy costs, thus delaying delivery on the UKs legally enshrined net zero target.

So, is this the end for ESG? No, we think it marks a new evolution for investing, as the market starts to sharpen definitions and professionals start to refine the products and strategies which best fit clients changing needs.

A key issue with ESG is that the term is used to cover a broad range of investing strategies. ESG is a tool, not an investment style. At BNY Mellon Investment Management, we use Responsible Investment (RI) as the umbrella term. RI covers a spectrum of styles: exclusionary, ESG-integration, best-in-class, sustainable, thematic and impact investing. ESG-integration describes the input of environmental, social and governance factors into financial analysis and investment decisions.

ESG-integrated funds may be responsible by outcome, but will always prioritise financial objectives. Other RI investing styles, such as sustainable and impact investing, have objectives to be responsible, benefit stakeholders and a dual intent to deliver environmental and social returns, as well as financial performance. Because these ESG terms are not clearly defined in global regulations, there is heightened potential for client confusion.

Recent underperformance of exclusionary ESG funds has stoked more backlash. Rising inflationary pressures, the Ukraine war and the resultant energy crisis have caused exclusionary ESG funds, which are typically underweight energy and overweight the more ESG-metric-friendly tech sector to underperform. But we still see growing appetite for products in the RI space.

A review by Morningstar found sustainable funds performed better than the broader market in the second quarter and a recent Barclays survey highlights only 5% of respondents agreed that ESG is a fad and will decline in popularity/importance in the coming years.

We are seeing a shift towards best-in-class investing and funds with an environmental and/or social objective, i.e., those that report under Article 9 of the European Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). Investors are demanding greater attention to reporting of sustainability metrics and impact, bringing into focus the need for harmonised regulation of ESG data providers.

To date, most corporate disclosures on key sustainability metrics have been voluntary, sometimes leading to lack of consistency and decision-useful information, and a focus on backward-looking metrics, over forward-looking ones.

Asset managers are now better positioned to report on RI portfolios with the regulatory environment tightening globally, continued focus on preventing greenwashing, and the increase in corporate sustainability reporting. Clients are increasingly demanding funds report on the outcomes of engagement and formulate formal escalation processes (ultimately divestment) when engagement is unsuccessful.

Another area of focus is the inclusion of transitioning industries in sustainable investing portfolios. SFDR regulations are supportive of exclusionary investing and sustainably aligned strategies but there is less clarity on how to position transitioning companies. There is increasing scrutiny on the definition of sustainable investment (SI), after guidance from the European Commission (EC) indicated Article 9 funds should be made up entirely of SI (except for hedging and liquidity purposes).

Where does this leave high-emitting companies, which may be vital for future economic growth but most urgently require capital to decarbonise? Investors must assess the credibility of companies transition plans, but should sustainable funds be precluded from investing in sectors which are vital to a successful transition? In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority and the UK government are leading the work on sustainability disclosures and have included transitioning industries in their regulatory focus.

By mandating disclosures aligned to the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), proposing the introduction of sustainable investment labels and working on gold standard net zero transition plans (via the Transition Plan Taskforce), UK regulations look set to support investors identify credible transition plans.

This must be set in the context of enabling a just transition that is fair and creates better social and economic opportunities for all. Energy affordability and security are key priorities, which may mean further short-term underperformance of ESG funds which exclude the energy sector.

We also risk losing the momentum and commitments built at COP26. Despite Mark Carneys pledge to build a financial system entirely focused on net zero, legal action has been brought in the UK demanding a more robust net zero strategy. One of Truss governments first announcements was the extension of fossil fuel licenses in the UK, including North Sea fracking.

We do not expect governments to roll back net zero targets, but climate may drop down the priority list on near-term agendas, likely causing the private sector to bear more of the strain. This places even greater urgency on ramping up sustainable investment flows, identifying the best RI opportunities and delivering a greater range of RI products to clients.

Kristina Church is global head of responsible strategy at BNY Mellon Investment Management

Excerpt from:
How will ESG drive product innovation? - Money Marketing

Mini

On the basis of follower counts, marketing agencies worldwide have divided social media influencers into nano (1000-10,000 followers), micro (10,000-100,000), macro (100,000-1 million) and mega (over one million). Read on to find out the money dynamics of each group and also get some handy tips on how to start your journey.

Instagram, Facebook, YouTube are abuzz with social media influencers. These influencers have an ever-widening reach, with events, brand deals, TV shows and magazine covers their playing fields. Where canny social influencers go, big bucks follow.

As per the Influencer Marketing Report, the Indian influencer industry is predicted to be valued at Rs 2,200 crore by 2025 and grow at a 25 percent CAGR, underscoring the fact that the influencer business is getting serious.

But the layperson may still wonder if social influencer can be a lucrative career option because after all, its just a hobby. Well, clearly, its not so. For those who master the art of influencing, incomes can go well beyond hard-earned corporate jobs.

When the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a 20 percent decline across advertising in India, social media influencers enjoyed a 46 percent increase in their advertising-based revenue, as per a survey published by iCubesWire in March this year.

I did it out of pure passion without knowing where it would lead me and if this could even become any reliable source of income at some point. I tried creating content in the cheapest way possible and with any resource I had on hand, like shooting on my phone and using basic editing skills I learned via YouTube without hiring anybody, said Anisha Dixit who started her journey as an influencer in 2013 and now has over three million subscribers on YouTube.

Dixit added that initially, the finances start flowing when platforms like YouTube or Facebook pays you based on the number of views that your content generates but thats not exactly a reliable income source. Here is where the major source for influencers to earn money brand collaborations come into the picture.

Brand collaborations can include barter deals, which include product placements, shoutouts, ambassador programmes, ads, meet & greets, and sponsorships, explained Aashutosh Katre, Director at content marketing company Yellow Seed.

Like any other job, being a social media influencer also requires passion, strategy and dedication to make the most out of it. Aanchal Agrawal, who started her journey in 2020, now has over 300,000 followers on Instagram. She believes, as an influencer brand, integrations form an integral part of the finances.

You can make content that you think a brand can easily pick up which is also well-liked by your audience. When I started creating content, I started a series called Dating app etiquettes, which I thought would work well if a dating app would want to collaborate with me and that is exactly what happened, advised Agrawal.

After this, once an influencer gets a loyal fan base, according to Arushi Gupta, Business Head at Influencer.in, another popular way for influencers to earn money is by hosting paid courses, fan membership, licensing of the content they produce, becoming a consultant and offering career courses or setting up ones own brand.

How much do influencers earn?

On the basis of follower counts, marketing agencies worldwide have divided influencers into nano (1000-10,000 followers), micro (10,000-100,000), macro (100,000-1 million) and mega (over one million).

Micro-influencers in the 5,000-20,000 group accounted for 54.3 percent of Instagram users across India in 2020, according to a report by hypeauditor.com. On Instagram, influencers with over one million followers, also called mega influencers, had only 0.41 percent share.

As per marketing experts an influencer based on the category they cater to, the niche and the deliverables can earn from Rs 15,000-5 lakh from one brand deal.

Gupta provided us with a breakdown of the money dynamics:

What I can say for sure is that being an influencer today is as lucrative as having a top job in most corporate sectors. It pays well if the audience relates with what you're putting out there and if you manage to build a community authentically over a period of time, added Aanam Chashmawala, a social media influencer and the Founder of Wearified, a beauty cosmetic brand.

What do brands look for while investing in an influencer?

As brand integrations are very important to the finances of an influencer, its imperative to know what brands want and how influencers target them.

According to Arihant Jain, CEO of a meme marketing agency, Wubbalubbadubdub, every brand has a specific strategy, personalised and driven by the need to build a robust portfolio that can cater to any kind of target audience.

However, brands do look out for three core things whether the influencer is real or not, does the influencer suit the niche of the brand and whether would they be ready to tour offline places and do re-shoots.

Balasubramaniam, AGM - Digital, brand-comm, said for brands there are usually two priority buckets, the first includes the number of followers, demographic, context and engagement rate and the second factors in quality, editorial content and personality.

Social media influencers and technology go hand in hand, so the tech that the influencers use is also important.

While shortlisting influencers for campaigns, brands are also keen on having a good video quality, and aesthetic output that brings out the brand well. The video should engage the audience and reach the appropriate target audience.

They also look out for how innovative the creator is while engaging the brand with his own content. Timely delivery of content is also a key factor for a brand to essentially work with the creators, added Gupta.

Are you an aspiring influencer?

Statistics and research firm Statista reports that YouTube had the highest number of professional content creators globally at one million in January 2020, meaning that over one million of them made a living completely from publishing. content on the platform. With 30 million amateur creators monetising content on the Facebook-owned platform that year, Instagram was the most popular platform among creators in 2020.

How does one actually start the journey?

Although brand integrations are important, Dixit advises budding influencers to produce content and tell stories because they like it and not keep the money in mind. If you are just starting out as a content creator, don't invest too much in your equipment or hire a team. We currently have amazing phones with great cameras on the market, use that as a start and once you see more consistent money coming in, you can slowly start investing more and more, she said.

Meanwhile, Agrawals advice to budding influencers was to not go crazy and always keep on investing.

The world is changing rapidly, the advertising paradigm is shifting every day and you do not know if the money inflow is going to be the same. Invest money in things that will bring money too; at least until you are in a stable place.

They keep going up and down and you do not want to be in a position where you are stressed about money because when that starts, it will reflect in your content which can harm your growth, so be wise with your money. added Agrawal.

It's very easy to get lost in the noise, just calm yourself down, is the advice of influencer and mentor Anudeep Reddy Mannem, who owns a food and lifestyle YouTube channel.

As of January 2022, Google-owned YouTube had more than 265 million monthly active users in India and 1,200 of its creators have crossed the one-million subscriber milestone. Five years ago, only two creators crossed the milestone.

Marketing experts advise budding influencers to:

(Edited by : Shoma Bhattacharjee)

First Published:Oct 02, 2022, 11:33 AM IST

See the original post:
How Social Media Influencers Make Money And How You Too Can Get The Ball Rolling - CNBCTV18

With more and more brands exploring a presence in the metaverse (however you define it), new opportunities for creators and influencers are arising.

One main area of opportunity is characterised by the virtual influencer a digital persona who acts just as any other influencer would, but who is entirely computer-generated. The concept has been around for a while, but a combination of the metaverse and the burgeoning creator economy has led to an expansion of the market, with brands increasingly partnering with creators who want to promote a virtual persona rather than their real selves. According to reports, there are more than 200 virtual influencers in existence, with this number only set to grow in future.

But with authenticity being the key to influencer success or so we have previously been told will consumers buy into virtual influencers in the same way as humans? I recently spoke with Eric Dahan, CEO of global influencer marketing company, Open Influence, to discuss the benefits, challenges, and potential opportunities for brands in this space.

The battle for creative control has been an issue within brand-influencer partnerships for a number of years a 2019 Takumi study found that 45% of marketers feel they should have complete control over the written captions and visual elements of an influencers post, in order to ensure that the influencer does not veer away from the agreed tone or content of a campaign. Dahan says that virtual influencers can take away this debate.

For brands, it gives them the ability to have more control in one or two ways. Either they are partnering with a virtual influencer, and they can take a little bit more control than with a human influencer. Or and I think this is whats really exciting brands can create their own virtual influencers and really design them from the ground up.

Dahan suggests that, in this context, a virtual influencer can become a brand mascot or spokesperson of sorts. Ideally thats your CEO or founder, but most companies dont have that, or they have been around for so long that their CEO is more of an operator than the face of the business, he says. And so, theres really an opportunity there for brands to create their own mascots.

The question is, will virtual influencers lack authenticity if they are entirely manufactured? Or rather, if consumers are willing to buy in, is authenticity less important than marketers tend to think?

Dahan suggests that real authenticity doesnt necessarily come from the face of the influencer, but the voice. Im sure there are meme accounts that you follow [on social media] there are a bunch that I certainly follow, where Ive never seen the actual creator who is putting out the content and writing the captions. But I dont need to, right? he proposes. Theres an authenticity, a voice, and the messaging and the values are reflected by whats being shared. So, theres that level of authenticity to it even though theres not a face attached to it.

There are additional challenges here of course, which Dahan says it is vital for brands to consider before they jump into virtual influencers. It cant just be something that feels corporate and empty it needs to feel like there is a true reflection or values and personality, he states. Ultimately, theres going to be a team behind it who is running it, aiming to focus the values of the organisation and personifying it into a single individual to make it more relatable.

Ethical considerations are important, too, particularly when it comes to the audience that a virtual influencer might be targeting. Fashion retailer PacSun was recently criticised after it named Lil Miquela an AI influencer first created in 2016 as its latest ambassador and the face of its 2022 holiday campaigns. Despite Lil Miquela aligning with PacSuns positive brand values, such as her stance on social activism, some have suggested the CGI influencer also promotes a largely unattainable image that is potentially harmful to a young female audience. Not to mention that the clothes Lil Miquela wears are perhaps unlikely to look the same in real life.

Dahan concedes that social media can perpetuate harmful standards, but that its also the case irrespective of whether the influencer is virtual or human.

With influencers in general, if they alienate their audience, they arent going to maintain that audience they will start losing followers, he says. Of course, theres the question of what sort of things are you influencing, but thats not specific to the virtual side.

Perhaps more concerning, suggests Dahan, is if brands begin to rely on AI. Youve only got to look at BlenderBot the prototype of Metas conversational AI, which recently generated media coverage for its propensity for making offensive and untrue statements.

Ethically, there are more questions [with AI]. Theres the same danger of nefarious things happening with virtual influencers, and you dont have the same accountability that you do with an individual, so there is a heightened risk for misinformation and swaying opinion, he acknowledges.

In terms of the additional challenges that come with virtual influencers (compared to human influencers), Dahan suggests that brands need to be aware of the ongoing commitment and workload. As people we all have experiences and life stories and were used to expressing every little thing we do, but were not conscious of it, he explains. With a virtual influencer, somebody has to consciously write that down. Its like a movie script ten people sat in a room for hours and deliberately decided to include that piece of dialogue it is much more finite and isolated, but with a virtual influencer it is continuous, and it is a lot of content.

Despite lingering concerns over AI technology, Dahan says that the potential will eventually outweigh the risks. We are seeing it with chatbots getting smarter and smarter every year, so who is to say a few years from now virtual influencers cant be managed in the metaverse by AI, [with this technology] controlling most of the interactions and creating personalised experiences for users? he asks.

Dahan suggests that another factor that is likely to propel the popularity of virtual influencers is the impact of the metaverse and Web3 culture, and the avatarisation of real people.

If you look at the crypto world, people are buying NFTs and making them their profile picture, right? And with the metaverse, you need an avatar you cant just go in live action, he says. I think that will make it easier for virtual influencers to exist, because how do you know whether or not that avatar is a real flesh and blood person or a team of people carefully crafting their messaging?

The other thing thats interesting is that you can have the same virtual influencer in more than one virtual location, and you can customise experiences. All this feels very pie in the sky but the advances in AI are moving really quickly.

Finally, Dahan touches on the industry shifts that could result in the emergence of more digital creators (and virtual influencers) than ever before. Most notably, he says, is Apples privacy updates and the impact it has had on ROAS and ad performance.

This has created a push towards social commerce, he says. But there has also been a bigger shift in the past couple of years in how platforms look at creators. Where Facebook used to look at influencers as a nuisance taking money away from its ad platform now they realise ok well, we actually need to reward the creators, so they stay on and create and keep the audience.

So, whether it be video or affiliate revenue through social commerce, the bigger shift that is happening for creators is platforms finding new ways to monetise aside from just selling impressions and clicks.

See the article here:
Can avatars be authentic? Eric Dahan on the rise of virtual influencers - Econsultancy