Archive for the ‘Second Amendment’ Category

Katie Britt: The Second Amendment is a ‘critical check’ against government tyranny – Yellowhammer News

Thursday, Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Katie Britt continued her campaigns efforts to raise awareness of her policy positions by releasing a memo regarding her stance on the Second Amendment.

In speaking to what she saw as the importance of upholding law-abiding American citizens gun rights, Britt made mention of the nationwide spike in crime.

As crime skyrockets across the country thanks to dangerous liberal policies and anti-law enforcement rhetoric, it is more important than ever that law-abiding citizens exercise our Second Amendment rights, she declared in the memo.

Britt pledged to introduce legislation shielding firearm manufacturers and dealers from financial targeting, sponsor nationwide concealed carry reciprocity, and work to legislatively prohibit the implementation of red flag laws.

Gun grabbers use so-called red flag laws as a gateway to push their disarming agenda, the candidate stated. In reality, a red flag law is an abridgment of the Second Amendment and can be abused to take away the right to self-defense with no due process.

Additionally, she announced her intentions to end the $200 transfer tax on rare guns levied under the National Firearms Act.

Britt, whose private sector experience includes the practice of law, vowed to author an amicus brief in support of the New York State Rifle and Pistol Associations case against New Yorks Second Amendment restrictions.

According to Britt, the Second Amendment serves as a critical check against government tyranny.

The Second Amendment is a critical check against the timeless tyranny of government, stated Britt. Our Founders wisely knew that the Second Amendment will always be necessary to protect our God-given, inalienable right to defend ourselves, our families, our freedom, our homes, and our communities.

She concluded, As the Biden Administration continues to put law-abiding, hardworking Americans in their crosshairs, we must stand firm and preserve the country we know and love for our children and our childrens children. In the Senate, I will always fight to defend our Second Amendment rights and our Christian conservative values.

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @DylanSmithAL

See the article here:
Katie Britt: The Second Amendment is a 'critical check' against government tyranny - Yellowhammer News

City of Edgewater to consider sweeping gun rights restrictions; concealed carry among targets – Complete Colorado

EDGEWATER Home to just more than 5,000 people, this suburban Jefferson County town bordered by Denver to the east, Lakewood to the south and west, and Wheat Ridge to the north, is looking to limit Second Amendment rights like no city before in Colorado.

Although Denver has long banned open carry and recently announced its intent to look at banning concealed carry in public spaces including parks and city buildings, Edgewater has a laundry list of items targeting gun owners coming up for discussion that far exceeds anything seen to date.

On April 5th, the city council heard a presentation on gun violence prevention from Colorado Ceasefire, an anti-gun rights organization, and subsequently decided to move forward with a more detailed discussion on possible municipal ordinances. Such local gun rights restrictions would be allowed under Senate Bill 21- 256, passed during last years legislative session and signed into law by Governor Polis, which unwound decades of state preemption and allows local governments to manage their own gun laws, but only so long as they are more restrictive than those at the state level, a condition that has been referred to as a bastardization of the concept of local control.

According to an Edgewater City Council agenda for the April 19th meeting, the following will be considered for passage:

The presentation will include comments from Tom Mauser, father of a Columbine High School shooting victim and current board member of Colorado Ceasefire, which was started after the Columbine shooting and Ellen McCarron, Colorado Ceasefire Legislative Action board president.

Among justifications in the presentation are claims that the majority of Americans support reasonable gun restrictions and that there are no easy solutions, but that doing nothing will not solve the problem.

But according to David Kopel, research director at the Denver-based Independence Institute* and professor of advanced constitutional law at the University of Denver, concealed carry permit holderswho are heavily targeted in the potential Edgewater ordinancesare exceptionally law-abiding.

According to FBI data in the annually published Crime in the United States, about 5 percent of the Colorado adult population is arrested each year, says Kopel. In contrast, the figure for concealed handgun permit holders is only 1/10th of 1 percent. Permit holders are vastly more law-abiding than the general population.

Kopel continues that obtaining a concealed carry permit requires hundreds of dollars in fees and expenses for the required training, as well as long waits for appointments for a fingerprint-based background check. The only people who bother are those who are so concerned about legal compliance that they spend significant resources just to obtain a card from the government allowing them to legally do what they could done anyway for free, and with very low risk of being caught, continued Kopel. Its no wonder that Colorados concealed carry permitees are 50 times more law-abiding than the general population.

Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams, who is a vocal, statewide advocate for Second Amendment rights said the restrictions Edgewater is considering are neither reasonable nor will they solve any problem. Reams has continually spoke out against SB21-256 calling it a trampling on the Constitution.

Gun restrictions have not fixed the problem, Reams said. It was a huge overreach by the state. Restrictions on the Constitution are never taken lightly (by Democrats) until it comes to the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is different than any other freedom for them.

According to Colorado Ceasefire, concealed carry permits are up the past three years in Colorado from 257,166 in 2019 to 297,003 in 2021.

Reams said from a law enforcement perspective, he doesnt see how such patchwork laws could be enforced, adding keeping up with state laws are complicated enough already without adding another layer.

I cant imagine how you would even go about it, Reams said, questioning whether current owners of banned guns would be grandfathered in. How do you prove you did not already own it? If Im driving through town going from point A to point B, and I get pulled over for a speeding ticket, am I going to lose my guns?

Reams said municipal laws are normally specific to property issues, not gun rights.

They are setting themselves up for a huge court battle, Reams said. I guess were finally about to see if the legislation is constitutional, but it will come at the expense of Edgewater residents.

The item will be discussed Tuesday during the city council regular business meeting. The meeting begins at 6:30 p.m. at 1800 Harlan St., Edgewater.

*Independence Institute is the publisher of Complete Colorado.

Our unofficial motto at Complete Colorado is Always free, never fake, but annoyingly enough, our reporters, columnists and staff all want to be paid in actual US dollars rather than our preferred currency of pats on the back and a muttered kind word. Fact is that theres an entire staff working every day to bring you the most timely and relevant political news (updated twice daily) from around the state on Completes main page aggregator, as well as top-notch original reporting and commentary on Page Two.

CLICK HERE TO LADLE A LITTLE GRAVY ON THE CREW AT COMPLETE COLORADO. Youll be giving to the Independence Institute, the not-for-profit publisher of Complete Colorado, which makes your donation tax deductible. But rest assured that your giving will go specifically to the Complete Colorado news operation. Thanks for being a Complete Colorado reader, keep coming back.

Visit link:
City of Edgewater to consider sweeping gun rights restrictions; concealed carry among targets - Complete Colorado

Running to represent the working class | Local News | lockportjournal.com – Lockport Union-Sun & Journal

Mario Fratto, an attorney and businessman from Ontario County who counts himself as a small-c conservative, is running for the Republican ballot line in the election for New York's newly formed 24th Congressional District. He's attempting a primary challenge on the presumptive Republican favorite, Chris Jacobs, the incumbent 27th district representative from Orchard Park.

The new, rural 24th Congressional District is enormous, geographically speaking. It runs from Lewiston eastward along Lake Ontario, south around Rochester and then north to the U.S.-Canada border, coming to rest near Watertown.

Fratto campaigned in Newfane earlier this week and pledged to return to the area every week to talk with voters in Niagara County. The day after his appearance at a Second Amendment For Ever (SAFE) meeting at Newfane Community Center, he met up with Union-Sun & Journal reporter Ben Joe to chat about his background and his campaign. Here is a partial transcript of his interview with Joe.

Q: Where did you grow up and how did that affect your values?

A: I grew up in Geneva, in Ontario County. Its a small town and a city. ... Small town USA is where the American Dream still exists. You work hard. You do the right thing. You look out for your friends and family and things should work out for you. I think thats what every American wants. ... You dont get something for nothing.

Q: What is your take on your opponent, Chris Jacobs?

A: Ill just speak on his record as a congressman. ... Chris Jacobs was a Democrat. He registered as a Democrat in the '90s ... I think when you have someone of 11 Republicans voting to strip another Republican, like Marjorie Taylor Greene, of her committee assignment, youre not really a part of the majority of the party. Eighty-five to 90 percent of Republicans wouldnt do something like that.

Q: How do you deal with this expanded district?

A: Its challenging and its definitely an advantage for somebody like Chis Jacobs who has basically unlimited funds. ... But I actually prefer grassroots. ... I mean, its easy when you have money and just put out an ad and blast it on the radio or the television. But when you need to do the hard work and go out and meet the voters to find out what their concerns are, its a different ballgame. ... It is more difficult, because of the size of the district. No question. But I think its something thats absolutely necessary.

Q: Tell me about your online channels.

A: During the initial lockdowns of March 2020, I was working at home I felt I needed to be more productive. So, I started a Facebook page called Making the Case." It was geared towards talking about the pandemic, initially, but really became just for President Trumps reelection. ... Then I started to get censored pretty heavily. I had a video on Dr Fauci, (on his opposition to) hydroxychloroquine. but (Fauci) was for Remdesivir and I put out a short video ... about that study and the conflicts involved and that video got 35,000 views. . (Then) my average views (dropped). Everything was better than any channel I could find as far as how good the numbers were, but I was getting no views. So I was getting frustrated with that. ... I ran it through my friends and family and said, What if I ran for office? This is the only way to really get the message out because they cant silence me if Im taking it right to the people.

Q: Explain your take on the economy.

A: I believe in lower taxes, less regulation, a free market economy and I also believe you have to have sound money and you cant have that when you have a printing press running at light speed right now and youre devaluing the dollar. ... So I think we need to roll that back. ... (Also there's) getting our dependence greatly reduced on China. That would help us bring back manufacturing and making products here. ... Wed be helping fellow Americans by creating jobs, but also giving them better products that are available on the ground. Theres a supply chain issue and its hard when you have to import things ... but if they were already on the ground in the United Sates, I think we can trust that we can move those goods as well.

Q: Explain your take on the environment.

A: I think its important to have a clean environment, but ... it cant be to the detriment of the people here now. Everybody wants to preserve and protect the planet for the next generation ... but what are we going to leave them if we dont make sure we have the energy we have now so we have the businesses we need to provide them with opportunities? ... (Also) we cant have countries like China or other competitors that arent following any of these rules we want to implement for ourselves. We want to talk about reducing carbon footprints and using renewable energies, but they arent doing that around the world. ... We cant just transition to wind and solar if its too expensive and its not as efficient.

Q: Explain your take on war, specifically the wars in Ukraine and Afghanistan and subsequent refugees.

A: I dont think these wars around the world should be our responsibility, unless there is direct U.S. interest. . We dont want a no fly-zone that would eventually land us in a war. I dont think anybody wants that. And Afghanistan we shouldnt have been leaving Americans on the ground. We shouldnt have been leaving people who helped us on the ground. It shouldve been handled a lot better. But I also dont think its our responsibility to take in all these refugees. Its great Poland is taking in these refugees, but I dont think Poland has the homelessness problems that we have (and)the opioid crisis thats plaguing this country. So how can we take care of those people when we cant get our senior citizens or veterans that are hooked on drugs and alcohol, who are sleeping on the street? ... What business do we have importing more people that need help if we cant help our own?

Q: What does your candidacy mean for the district?

A: It means that theres somebody in this race that is an everyday American that understands working class people, that is a working class person and who understands their needs and values, and this is an opportunity to send someone to D.C. thats actually a conservative, whos actually going to fight for the people.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Read the original here:
Running to represent the working class | Local News | lockportjournal.com - Lockport Union-Sun & Journal

‘The View’ rails against the Second Amendment, blames it for gun violence: ‘That’s the problem’ – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The co-hosts of ABC's liberal daytime gabfest "The View" spent an entire segment of Wednesday's show railing against the Second Amendment and blaming it for gun violence across the U.S.

The segment, which began with Tuesday's attack by a gunman on the New York City subway, consisted of the liberal co-hosts lamenting laws being passed in Republican states allowing for concealed carry without a permit and claiming other Western countries don't experience levels of gun violence seen in the U.S. because they have no protections for gun rights.

The co-hosts of ABC's "The View" debate the Second Amendment during a segment on April 13, 2022. (Screenshot/ABC)

NYC MAYOR ADAMS FLOATS NEW TECH, BAG CHECKS ON SUBWAY SYSTEM TO DETECT WEAPONS

"The usual allegations are being thrown around about the left being too soft on crime while at the same time, red states like Georgia are making it even easier to get guns," co-host Joy Behar said after mentioning the attack in New York City.

"This is a tragic and uniquely American problem, it seems. I dont understand why we cant solve this problem," she added, mentioning that guest co-host Julia Haart said to her before the show that other countries didn't have the same issues because "there aren't guns all over the place."

"Those countries do not have a Second Amendment and that's the difference," Behar said.

Haart claimed that the Second Amendment is "the problem" and that there is "almost no gun violence" in countries like the U.K., Australia and New Zealand.

"When you take guns away, you take away gun violence," she declared, to which Behar agreed and co-host Sunny Hostin said, "That's absolutely true."

At least 13 people injured in New York City subway shooting on April 12, 2022, officials confirm. (Armen Armenian/Facebook)

SEXTON: DEMOCRATS UNSURPRISINGLY' GO AFTER GUNS, NOT CRIMINALS AFTER BIDEN'S MORONIC HUNTING STORY

Guest co-host Alyssa Farah jumped in, arguing that there were "too many guns on the streets," but pointed to Democrats pushing "defund the police" policies as part of the reason for the rise in crime in cities across the U.S.

Hostin blamed Republicans for the rise in crime, citing their opposition to gun control measures proposed by Democrats. She then claimed that there were actually higher levels of gun violence in states and cities controlled by Republicans than in those run by Democrats.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JULY 14: Police converge on the scene of a shooting in Brooklyn, one of numerous during the day, on July 14, 2021 in New York City. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Farah pushed back by stating that the top ten cities with the highest crime rates were all Democrat-controlled.

The panel continued the discussion, with Hostin lamenting what she claimed was a lack of training for people handling guns without permits and Behar calling the notion that people in New York City could be allowed to carry a concealed firearm "insane."

Support for stricter gun laws has been going down, reaching its lowest point since 2014 last November with only 52% of Americans supporting the implementation of stricter gun control laws.

See the article here:
'The View' rails against the Second Amendment, blames it for gun violence: 'That's the problem' - Fox News

Joe Biden recycles false claim that the Second Amendment limited gun ownership – PolitiFact

President Joe Biden announced new regulations to curb the proliferation of so-called "ghost guns,"unserialized firearms made from kits.

Biden spoke of codifying a prohibition on manufacturing these firearms without serial numbers, requiring sellers to conduct a background check on prospective buyers, among other rules. He also detailed his desire to see assault weapons and high-capacity magazines banned.

Then the president invoked history to support his stance.

"From the very beginning, the Second Amendment didnt say you can own any gun you want, big as you want," Biden said at the press conference. "You couldnt buy a cannon when, in fact, the Second Amendment passed."

This isnt the first time Biden made such an assertion about the Second Amendment. Or even the second.

During his presidential campaign, he made a similar claim about cannon ownership in the Revolutionary War. We rated that False.

Then, in 2021, Biden said the Second Amendment "limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own." False again.

The Second Amendment did not place limits on individual ownership of cannons.

Historians have previously told PolitiFact that Biden mischaracterized the history of gun regulation and its ties to the Second Amendment.

The White House did not return PolitiFacts request for comment.

For Biden, the third time isnt the charm. We rate this claim False.

Continued here:
Joe Biden recycles false claim that the Second Amendment limited gun ownership - PolitiFact