Archive for the ‘Second Amendment’ Category

Job protection for gays clears Senate hurdle

CHEYENNE - The Wyoming Senate on Monday approved second reading of a bill that would extend workplace and other anti-discrimination protections on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Senate File 115 was approved after consideration of several new amendments to the bill.

The first, sponsored by Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, would have added creed, disability, political affiliation, economic status, ethnic background and ancestry to the protected classes afforded under SF 115. It also would have struck the "gender" in gender identity and replaced it with "sex," with Hicks arguing the two terms are interchangeable and the change would make the language consistent with the rest of Wyoming statutes.

But the bill's key sponsor, Sen. Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie, noted that the purpose of the bill is to exclusively address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

While he appreciated what Hicks was attempting to do, he suggested the amendment overreached, given the bill's intent. "In my reading, it's outside the scope," he said.

"It's a little too broad for what the bill title indicates," Rothfuss said.

Sen. Michael Von Flatern, R-Gillette, agreed, adding that Hicks' amendment covered a lot of ground that already exists elsewhere in Wyoming statute.

Senate President Phil Nicholas, R-Laramie, ruled that the amendment was not germane to the bill, and it was subsequently withdrawn.

The second amendment to the bill, offered by Senate Vice President Drew Perkins, R-Casper, sought to rework his previous amendment, which was approved on the bill's first reading.

The amendment sought to expand the list of organizations that would be exempt from SF 115, going beyond religious organizations to include nonprofit "expressive associations" whose primary purpose or function "are grounded in religious teachings."

Original post:
Job protection for gays clears Senate hurdle

The Moral and Practical Case for Second Amendment Rights – Video


The Moral and Practical Case for Second Amendment Rights
Andy Bernstein speaks at Constitution Day 2014 in NYC.

By: mzacharyjohnson

View post:
The Moral and Practical Case for Second Amendment Rights - Video

Cons to the second amendment – Video


Cons to the second amendment

By: jasminewittler

Read more:
Cons to the second amendment - Video

Alan Gottlieb: Smart guns at odds with the Second Amendment – Video


Alan Gottlieb: Smart guns at odds with the Second Amendment
Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, spoke with Guns.com last week about smart gun tech and why he thinks gun control advocates are using it...

By: Gunscom

More:
Alan Gottlieb: Smart guns at odds with the Second Amendment - Video

Protects Second Amendment

Wow! In his letter Re-election over safety , Gene Watson of Moon sounds like your typical left-wing anti-Second Amendment ranter who speaks without knowing the facts.

I am sure that Rep. Mustio was not motivated by the NRA and other gun nuts. All Act 192 covers is protection for all law-abiding citizens against local municipalities enacting restrictive prohibitions in violation of the Second Amendment of our U.S. Constitution.

Gilbert Dadowski

Moon

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

Read this article:
Protects Second Amendment