Cuts to Medicaid? What cuts to Medicaid? There are no cuts to Medicaid here.
Kellyanne Conway appears on ABC News This Week on June 25, 2017. (ABC News)
The lies came fast and furious on the Sunday shows this weekend, as Republican lawmakers and their surrogates reckoned with a tough truth: The only way to sell the Senates cruel and deeply unpopular health-care bill is to absolutely misrepresent what is in it. And that was before the Congressional Budget Office scored the Senate bill, and found 15 million people will be insured bynext year.Which, by the way, is a kind of crucial midterm election year, in which the presidents party almost always loses power.
Those Sunday lies, though, should force journalists to acknowledge another truth: Donald Trump isnt a rogue Republican; he is making the party over in his image. Before and after Trumps election, youll recall, optimistic Republican leaders predicted that being president might change and sober Trump and that elected GOP leaders could have some influence over the erratic, unprepared commander in chief. But influence seems to have worked the other way: Republicans have seen that Trump can lie without consequence, and theyre trying to make the same approach work for them. Its not that theyve never lied before, but this weekends Lie-O-Rama was remarkable.
White House Counselor Kellyanne Conway won the prize for lying most brazenly, telling ABCs This Week that while the bill cuts $800 billion from Medicaid, These are not cuts to Medicaid. She then contradicted herself by acknowledging the bill could maybe, possibly cut Medicaid for the able-bodied, but insisted: If they are able-bodied, and they want to work, then theyll have employer-sponsored benefits like you and I do.
Of course, 60 percent of able-bodied adults currently on Medicaid already do work, and 80 percent are in households where somebody worksat jobs that dont provide benefits. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the House bill would throw 14 million Americans off Medicaid over the next 10 years; the Senate bill slashes 15 million patients. Its Medicaid cuts are ultimately deeper, and they both shave and cap funds for the traditional program, not just the Obama expansion. On the same show, Maine GOP Senator Susan Collins contradicted Conway: I respectfully disagree with her analysis. Based on what Ive seen, given the inflation rate that would be applied in the outer years to the Medicaid program, the Senate bill is going to have more impact on the Medicaid program than even the House bill.
On CNN, Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price might have tied Conway for brazen lying, insisting,We will not have individuals lose coverage. The CBO, of course, said the House bill would cost 23 million Americans their health insurance; on Monday the score for the Senate bill said it would cut 22 million. But Price didnt leave his lies there; he also claimed that the plan, in its entirety, will absolutely bring prices down. Maybe he meant tax costs for millionaires? Theyll get a $50,000 tax cut, while the top .01 percent gets a $250,000 tax cut. Thats the only explanation of Prices claim that makes sense; older Americans, in particular, are going to face higher costs, and lower federal subsidies. (Oh, and also: The tax cuts Price and others defend as job-creating will be retroactive to the end of 2016. How do you create jobs in the past?)
Even with all the lying, the Sunday shows were unable to find a single senator who would flat-out defend the bill and commit to supporting it, although many of those who claimed to be on the fence probably are not. Pennsylvanias Pat Toomey was deeply involved in drafting the bill; on Face the Nation he insisted that Conway is right, and no one will lose coverage if theyre on Medicaid. His colleague, Louisianas Bill Cassidy, explained that the goal is to move some of the Medicaid recipients to private insurance, proving again that the bill is written primarily with the interests of the insurance industry in mind. Cassidy has claimed he would vote against any bill that didnt meet the Jimmy Kimmel test, referring to the comedians viral monologue in which he broke down describing his newborn sons struggle with a congenital heart defect and demanded that no family should have to go without the care that saved his sons life. But magically, on Thursday, when the bill was released, Cassidy crowed to reporters that the new draft met the Jimmy Kimmel test.
Jimmy Kimmel, who happens to be an actual living person, quickly took to Twitter to disagree:
But while were talking lies, we should also praise the GOP senators who told the truth, at least as they see it. Senator Ron Johnson, another supposed opponent of the bill who will probably cave to McConnell, deserves a prize for the most honest, if unfortunate, explanation of how Republicans look at people with preexisting conditions (including, sadly, Jimmy Kimmels infant son). Think of them as people with bad driving records, who are expected to pay higher insurance than safe, careful drivers.
Weve done something with our health care system that you would never think about doing, for example, with auto insurance, where you would require auto insurance companies to sell a policy to somebody after they crash their car. States that haveguarantees for preexisting conditions, it crashes their markets, said Johnson.
So infant Billy Kimmel is like someone who crashed his car, although he cant even crawl yet, let alone drive. Obviously, he should have been more careful before winding up with congenital heart disease. Im sorry, thats not even funny. But this is how they think.
Also on Sunday, Vice President Mike Pence Tweeted that Trumpcare will restore personal responsibility to the issue of health care. He was swarmed by people sharing their stories of cancer and other diseases that would now be considered preexisting conditions and lock them out of affordable health insurance, lamenting their own lack of personal responsibility and the fact that they had the terrible judgment to get sick.
The Nation is reader-supported. Donate today to fund more reporting like this.
Those stories wont move Pence, but maybe theyll move others. Collins professes to be concerned not only about defunding Planned Parenthoodwhich some argue might be impossible because of arcane Senate rules that come into play because McConnell is using reconciliation to pass this billbut also steep Medicaid cuts. Alaskas Lisa Murkowski and West Virginias Shelly Moore Capito express similar reservations. The countrys most vulnerable Republican senator, Nevadas Dean Heller, has come out formally against the bill, in language that makes it hard to imagine he can be bought off, with, say, additional funding for opioid treatment and rural hospitals that might lure Capito and Ohios Rob Portman. I would say that, listening to Susan Collins, her objections sound so thoroughgoing, it would be hard to see her vote yes. But experience shows that Collins frequently talks compassion and then caves to her leaders and votes for cruelty. We can hope this time is different.
On the right, Utahs Mike Lee, Texass Ted Cruz, Kentuckys Rand Paul and Ron Johnson all say they are a no, but almost nobody believes them. Paul, thoughlike Collins and Hellerspeaks in such apocalyptic terms about the bill, he almost seems un-gettable. Heller, Paul and Collins are all thats needed to sink the bill; if they stand strong, theyd probably wind up with more company from the partys right and centrist flanks. Nobody wants to be the one that makes this bill fail, but if it looks like it will fail, expect a stampede to avoid having another Rose Garden party to celebrate legislation that will literally cause thousands of deaths.
Only one thing is certain: Protest is making a difference. Planned Parenthood will storm the Capitol on Tuesday. On Wednesday at five, protesters will form a human chain around the Capitol to demonstrate against the bill. After weeks of quiet, congressional offices are reporting new activism; many Republicans voice mail systems are full. The sad defeatism of last week has given way to optimism by Affordable Care Act defenders. But its going to take a lot of work to overcome the determination and structural advantages of House Speaker Paul Ryan, McConnell and Trump, as well as their willingness to lie.
View original post here:
Republicans Spent the Weekend Lying Their Faces Off About Health Care - The Nation.