Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Donnelly vows to work with Republicans, Trump – The Herald Bulletin

ANDERSON Democrat Joe Donnelly kicked off the second day of his re-election bid to the U.S. Senate proclaiming that the nation is stronger when everyone all works together.

Donnelly drew a crowd on Monday of more than 100 local Democrats at the United Auto Workers Local 1963 union hall in Anderson.

Before the rally began, members of the UAW asked several Republicans at the event to leave the parking lot because it was a private event.

Donnelly is seeking a second term in the U.S. Senate in what is expected to be a hotly contested election with several Republicans already announced as potential candidates seeking the GOP nomination in the May primary.

In his announcement comments, Donnelly stressed how he has worked with Republicans in Indiana and in the Congress to make the world safer and to bring prosperity to the nation.

There is no place for white supremacy, neo-Nazis and the KKK in the United States, Donnelly said of the recent events around the country. Thats not who we are and not what weve ever been. Were in this together.

Donnelly said the nation is stronger when everyone works together.

Provide a change for everyones hopes and dreams to come true, he said. Thats why Im running for re-election.

Donnelly said his job is to be a voice in Washington for Indiana farmers, small-business owners and working mothers.

There is a lot more wisdom in Anderson, Indiana, than there is in Washington, D.C., he said. Our best days are ahead, if we work together.

Donnelly said he worked with Republicans to provide more services to veterans and to combat the opiate epidemic that is sweeping the nation.

When asked if the 2018 election would be a referendum on the administration of President Donald Trump, Donnelly said he hopes it is a referendum on Indiana.

Its our Senate seat, he said. My focus is on Indiana.

Donnelly admitted it will be a tough race in 2018 because Indiana tends to lean Republican.

But all of the folks in our state are focused on the issues, he said. Were not a state that is focused on the next trend or next fancy thing. Our focus is on better jobs and the opportunities that are created.

Donnelly said he believes voters who cast ballots in 2016 for Republican Donald Trump are Joe Donnelly voters.

We all want the same thing: good jobs, a good education for our children, and that their voice counts.

My job is to work with the president, he said. When the president wants to work with me to end outsourcing of jobs and to end the opiate epidemic, Im on board. Its always better to work together."

Follow Ken de la Bastide on Twitter @KendelaBastide, or call 765-640-4863.

More:
Donnelly vows to work with Republicans, Trump - The Herald Bulletin

Republicans and conservatives defending Trump on Charlottesville are morally bankrupt – Washington Post

Wajahat Ali, a political commentator, Emmy-nominated producer, playwright and attorney, tells the scary story of America today. (Adriana Usero,Kate Woodsome/The Washington Post)

The affront that is the Trump presidency is a violation of everything I learned about morality and reverence for the Constitution and the presidency from Republicans. The party that spent my entire life lecturing liberals and Democrats on the finer points of being an upstanding American and upholding the honor and dignity of the presidency cant speak with a clear, unified voice when it comes to President Trump.

[The nation can only weep]

Democrats were soft on crime. Democrats werent serious about that bear in the woods, otherwise known as Russia. The late Jerry Falwell thundered about moral decline from his perches at the Moral Majority and Liberty University (nee Lynchburg Baptist College), helping Republicans win elective office all the way up to the Oval. And President Bill Clinton was impeached nearly 20 years ago for his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Because of Clintonsreprehensible conduct, then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush rallied Republicans by promising to restore honor and dignity to the White House.

[PODCAST: How can conservatives support a thrice-married Trump?]

Trump has used every minute of his 213 days in the White House (as of this writing) to upend all of those Republican lessons I learned. After running an overtly racist and xenophobic campaign for the presidency, Trump squandered its moral authority with a 20-minute celebration of white supremacy that gave aid and comfort to bigots, Nazis and white supremacists everywhere. He didnt even give a full-throated condemnation of the hate in Charlottesville that led to the death ofHeather Heyer. Talk about being soft on crime. And as shameful and un-American as that is, theres Falwells namesakeon TV on Sunday,uttering nonsense like this in support of the president:

One of the reasons I support him is because he doesnt say whats politically correct, he says whats in his heart. What he believes. And sometimes that gets him in trouble. But he does not have a racist bone in his body. I know him well.

If Trump does not have a racist bone in his body, then my eyes and ears have been lying to me all these years.

[Trump is a cancer on the presidency.]

Using dozens of clips from President Trump's speeches, The Post Editorial Board reimagines his disastrous Aug. 12 address. (Gillian Brockell/The Washington Post)

Listen, Ive already had my say about Trump and Charlottesville. How his coddling of the Confederacy and those who revere its treason make him unfit to be president. That many Republicans, including our 41st and 43rd presidents, have stepped forward to condemn what the 45th would not doesnt leave me entirely despairing of the sorry state of the GOP and our national psyche.

So, my message is for all those Republicans and conservatives rallying around Trump and his offensive both sides idiocy and the racism it supports: Youre morally bankrupt. Your lectures and righteous indignation are meaningless in the age of Trump. And you have harangued me and other liberals on our morality and patriotism for the last time.

Follow Jonathan on Twitter: @Capehartj Subscribe to Cape Up, Jonathan Capeharts weekly podcast.

See the original post:
Republicans and conservatives defending Trump on Charlottesville are morally bankrupt - Washington Post

Republicans praise Trump for charting new course on Afghanistan – Washington Examiner

Leading Republicans on Monday praised President Trump's new U.S. strategy in Afghanistan, including his call for a major shift from "arbitrary timetables" for American involvement to a conditions-based approach in the region.

In prime-time remarks from Fort Myer, Va., the president discussed his evolving views on the 16-year conflict in Afghanistan and his plan for "principled realism" moving forward. Trump said his administration's primary goal in Afghanistan is to avoid leaving the same type of vacuum that gave rise to the Islamic State terror group in Iraq, though he declined to specify how many additional American troops will be deployed to boost existing counter-terrorism operations.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz., who has been critical of Trump's previous failure to articulate a strategy, said the president took "a big step in the right direction" during his speech Monday.

"I believe the President is now moving us well beyond the prior administration's failed strategy of merely postponing defeat," McCain said in a statement, noting that Trump now faces the task of keeping "the right level of effort, in the right places, with the right authorities and resources [to] see this conflict through to success."

"To do this, the President must conduct himself as a wartime commander-in-chief. He must speak regularly to the American people, and to those waging this war on their behalf, about why we are fighting, why the additional sacrifices are worth it, and how we will success," said McCain, a naval aviator who spent more than five years as a prisoner of war.

Trump admitted Monday that his position on Afghanistan changed as he began to grasp his duties as president. It was a rare moment of self-reflection for the normally brash leader one that congressional Republicans like House Speaker Paul Ryan took note of.

"I was actually pleased with the way he went about making this decision," Ryan, R-Wis., told CNN. "I think I heard a new Trump strategy, or a new doctrine so to speak."

For the White House, the mostly positive reception to the president's speech was a welcome change from the barrage of criticism officials have faced in the wake of Trump's response to the violence in Charlottesville, Va. Republican lawmakers who criticized the president just last week were quick to praise him on Monday.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who described the president's speech as "excellent," said Trump's decision to base strategy "on the conditions on the ground not on arbitrary numbers and timelines is the right approach."

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., commended Trump for "refocusing our military efforts and supporting our brave warfighters by laying out a strategy that will help produce a more secure, stable, and sovereign Afghanistan."

And Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who the president accused of spreading a "disgusting lie" about himself last week, said Trump proved Monday that he has "the smarts and the moral courage to listen to his generals and take their advice."

"I am very pleased with this plan, and I am very proud of my president," Graham said in an appearance on Fox News.

"The President has outlined an important change from an approach driven by arbitrary deadlines to a strategy based on conditions on the ground," said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, in a statement. "He also made clear that the Afghan government needs to do its part in defending its people, ending havens for terrorists, and curtailing corruption."

Ohio Congressman Mike Turner, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said Trump made it clear that congressional Republicans "act as soon as possible to repeal the sequestration of defense in order to appropriately fund our military" and give American servicemen the resources they need to carry out their missions.

But not everyone was pleased with the Afghanistan strategy Trump described in his remarks.

"I don't trust him," said Rep. Eric Swalwell, a ranking Democratic on the House Intelligence panel. "Sixteen years of war in Afghanistan is enough. Time for Donald Trump to come to Congress for a vote on further action."

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., tweeted that the president's speech was "low on details but raises serious questions about the future."

"There's nothing hasty about ending America's longest war," tweeted Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., a rare GOP dissenter. Amash said Trump "bowed to the military-industrial establishment" and "doubled down on perpetual war."

More:
Republicans praise Trump for charting new course on Afghanistan - Washington Examiner

I warned of right-wing violence in 2009. Republicans objected. I was right. – Washington Post

By Daryl Johnson By Daryl Johnson August 21 at 6:00 AM Daryl Johnson is the former senior analyst for domestic terrorism at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. He now owns DT Analytics, a private consulting company for state and local law enforcement.

Here's why you can't ignore violent right-wing extremists when it comes to domestic terrorist attacks. (Monica Akhtar/The Washington Post)

Eight years ago, I warned of a singular threat the resurgence of right-wing extremist activity and associated violence in the United States as a result of the 2008 presidential election, the financial crisis and the stock market crash. My intelligence report, meant only for law enforcement, was leaked by conservative media.

A political backlash ensued because of an objection to the label right-wing extremism. The report also rightly pointed out that returning military veterans may be targeted for recruitment by extremists. Republican lawmakers demanded then-Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano rescind my report. The American Legion formally requested an apology to veterans. Some in Congress called for me to be fired. Amid the turmoil, my warning went unheeded by Republicans and Democrats. Unfortunately, the Department of Homeland Security caved to the political pressure: Work related to violent right-wing extremism was halted. Law enforcement training also stopped. My unit was disbanded. And, one-by-one, my team of analysts left for other employment. By 2010, there were no intelligence analysts at DHS working domestic terrorism threats.

Since 2008, though, the body count from numerous acts of violent right-wing terrorism continued to rise steadily with very little media interest, political discussion or concern from our national leaders. As this threat grew, government resources were scaled back, law enforcement counterterrorism training was defunded and policies to counter violent extremism narrowed to focus solely on Muslim extremism. Heated political campaigning by Donald Trump in 2016 pandered to these extremists. Now, right-wing terrorism has become the national security threat which many government leaders have yet to acknowledge.

[The Trump administration is showing white nationalists it wont fight them at all]

The mere existence of so many heavily armed citizens filled with hate and anger toward various elements of American society is troubling enough in its own right. They number in the hundreds of thousands. More troubling is the violent convergence now underway within right-wing extremist movements sanitized with the label alt-right. Largely under the media radar, disaffected extremist groups with long histories of squabbling have been independently pooling resources, some even infiltrating our government through the outreach efforts of right-wing extremist groups such as the Oath Keepers and the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association. Over the past year, weve witnessed political violence erupt between right-wing extremist protesters and counterprotesters at pro-Trump rallies in Minnesota, Washington, California and now Virginia. This rebranded alt-right extremist movement has the ultimate goal to disrupt civil society, undermine government institutions and pick which laws if any they will abide by, and what supposed justice they will administer on their own authority.

But the story, in a very real sense, didnt begin in 2017. As with the Waco and Ruby Ridge sieges during the 1990s, the 2014 Bundy standoff in Nevada and the 2016 Malheur National Wildlife Refuge siege in Oregon have served not only as recruitment opportunities for anti-government and hate groups, but they also serve as a radicalization facilitator. Why? Because extremists in the 2014 and 2016 standoffs were allowed to take up arms against the federal government and threaten law enforcement officers without suffering any legal consequences.

[Not punishing the Bundys for the Nevada standoff led to the occupation in Oregon]

More recently, the renewed debates over Confederate monuments, same-sex marriage and Black Lives Matter has reinvigorated alt-right extremists to mobilize toward a more radical fringe element capable of violent action at any moment. Of further concern, a new generation of charismatic leaders within the white supremacist movement has emerged after Trumps election, creating an opportunity for disparate groups to unite under one banner.

Neo-Nazis, Ku Klux Klan members, militia extremists, and other radical right-wing zealots march side-by-side at pro-Trump rallies across the country. Trumps endorsement of the border wall, the travel ban, mass deportations of illegal immigrants these ideas were touted on white supremacist message boards merely 10 years ago. Now theyre being put forth as official U.S. policy. Such controversial plans have placated white supremacists and anti-government extremists and will draw still more sympathetic individuals toward these extremist causes along with the sort of violent acts that too often follow, like Charlottesville.

Rhetoric from the president has further emboldened the alt-right. After the violence in Charlottesville, former KKK leader David Dukewelcomed President Trumps remarks: Thank you President Trump for your honesty & courage to tell the truth about #Charlottesville & condemn the leftist terrorists in BLM/Antifa. Similarly, other white nationalists praised the president for not attacking them.

[When white supremacists strike, police dont always strike back]

America finds itself overwhelmed with domestic terrorist attacks, increased terrorist plotting and the emergence of new polarizing political issues. Meanwhile, the U.S. government has not only failed to implement an effective strategy to combat right-wing terrorism; it is afraid to even raise the subject in public for fear of political backlash or contradicting its narrow-minded terrorism narrative (e.g., terrorism only comes from Muslims).

Extremists no longer hide anymore. They number in the hundreds of thousands and are extremely well-armed. The political apparatus and the news media appears confused in their reporting of the scope of the domestic terrorist threat some ignoring it completely. When 9/11 happened, the government made an effort to connect the dots beforehand, but failed because of a lack of communication among agencies. In this case, the government isnt even trying and worse, it appears to be enabling the threat to flourish.

The Islamist militants who brought down the World Trade Centers twin towers 16 years ago (or the ones who rammed their vehicles into pedestrians in London, Paris and Barcelona recently) had no domestic constituency. Their acts werent enshrined instantly on social media or obliquely heralded by the president, duly elected representatives or rationalized by media ideologues dead set on preventing a political backlash. The terrorists I have dedicated my life to stopping have had all that going in their favor. This is more than a formula for disaster. It virtually invites the disaster upon us.

Read more:

This is how you become a white supremacist

Attacks like Portlands will keep happening unless we all fight white supremacy

White supremacists love Vikings. But theyve got history all wrong.

Go here to read the rest:
I warned of right-wing violence in 2009. Republicans objected. I was right. - Washington Post

Republicans organize to raise concerns about Medicaid expansion in Maine – Press Herald

AUGUSTA Several Republican lawmakers are expected to announce their concerns Tuesday about expanding Medicaid, a first step toward what could become a formal campaign to oppose the question voters will face on the Nov. 7 ballot.

Rick Bennett of Oxford, a former Maine Senate president and former chairman of the Maine Republican Party, will join three sitting Republican lawmakers at an 11 a.m. State House news conference to make an announcement of importance to Maine taxpayers, senior citizens and families, said Brent Littlefield, a Washington-D.C.-based political consultant who also advises Gov. Paul LePage and Maines 2nd District U.S. Rep Bruce Poliquin.

The news conference is not meant to be a kickoff event for a campaign opposing Question 2, which would expand Medicaid in Maine under the federal Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, Littlefield said.

Its going to be much more specific than that, he said. But he noted that a campaign may follow.

Joining Bennett at the news conference will be Reps. Heather Sirocki, R-Scarborough; Paula Sutton, R-Warren; and Stephanie Hawke, R-Boothbay Harbor.

Maine Equal Justice Partners, a progressive advocacy group for low-income people, gathered more than 67,000 signatures of registered Maine voters to put the Medicaid expansion question on the Nov. 7 ballot. The proposal would expand Medicaid coverage to adults under 65 who earn below $16,000 for a single person and $22,000 for a family of two.

Currently, 19- and 20-year-olds, individuals with disabilities, the elderly and certain low-income parents qualify for Medicaid, which operates as MaineCare.

David Farmer, a spokesman for the expansion campaign, has said it will reduce the number of people without health insurance, it will create jobs.

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has called Maines uninsured rate of 8.8 percent in 2015 an all-time low, but Maine Hospital Association President Steven Michaud has said state eligibility rules cut MaineCare enrollment by 75,000 people in recent years, according to The Associated Press.

Michaud said that move shifted costs to Maine hospitals, which are providing about $250 million a year in charity care while Medicaid payments to hospitals are decreasing.

Expanding Medicaid is estimated to cost Maine $54 million each year once it is fully implemented, according to the ballot questions fiscal note.

That figure includes $27 million in estimated savings and the cost of 103 new state positions to administer the expansion. The federal government would chip in $525 million each year, and lawmakers would have to appropriate the $54 million if the ballot question passes.

But Republican opponents to the expansion, including Gov. Paul LePage, have said the expansion, even with the matching federal funds, would decimate the state budget and cause the Legislature to increase state tax rates to cover the shortfalls.

LePage has repeatedly told radio talk show hosts the expansion would set the states fiscal house in disarray for decades to come. Also in question is whether the Affordable Care Act will remain in place under President Trump and a Republican-controlled Congress, where both lawmakers and Trump have promised to repeal and replace the landmark law, which is considered a key accomplishment of former President Obama.

The ACA provides federally matching Medicaid funds for states that expand the health insurance program for the nations poorest citizens, and while the repeal effort has yet to succeed, the issue remains a top concern for lawmakers in Washington. Under the ACA, states that expand Medicaid would see a gradual tapering of the federal reimbursement rate to a low of 90 percent of a states expansion costs in 2020.

Scott Thistle can be contacted at 791-6330 or at:

[emailprotected]

Twitter: thisdog

Continue reading here:
Republicans organize to raise concerns about Medicaid expansion in Maine - Press Herald