Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Manhattan DA Fires Back at House Republicans Over Trump Hush-Money Case – The New York Times

A spokeswoman for the district attorneys office declined to comment, other than to say that the office was assessing the credibility of the claim.

Mr. Jordan also sent letters Wednesday to the two former leaders of the investigation, Carey R. Dunne and Mark F. Pomerantz, demanding documents and testimony relating to Mr. Braggs case. Mr. Dunne and Mr. Pomerantz both resigned from their positions in the district attorneys office in February 2022 after Mr. Bragg decided not to seek a separate indictment of Mr. Trump related to his business practices.

Mr. Dunne, Ms. Dubecks predecessor as general counsel, declined to comment, as did Mr. Pomerantz.

Stephen Gillers, a professor at New York Universitys law school and an expert in legal ethics, said that most of the material the congressmen were seeking was protected by either attorney client-privilege or another form of legal protection known as the attorney work product doctrine and called the demand an extraordinary overreach.

In their breadth, the letters represent an unprecedented demand for information about traditionally secret government activity, the enforcement of criminal law, he said.

Mr. Trump, for his own part, used racist language to describe the district attorney on Thursday, referring to Mr. Bragg, who is Black, as an animal in a post on his social media platform. Later in the day, he posted a link that included two juxtaposed images one of him wielding a bat and the other of Mr. Bragg with a hand raised suggestive of a physical attack on the district attorney.

The district attorneys prosecutors have been presenting evidence to a grand jury since January, and there have been a number of signals that they are likely to move for an indictment of Mr. Trump soon. First, they told Mr. Trumps lawyers that he could testify before the grand jury in his own defense, a right granted to people who are nearing indictment. (He declined.) They have also questioned nearly every witness involved in the hush-money payment to the porn star, Stormy Daniels, in front of the grand jury.

But an indictment is not expected until next week at the earliest. The grand jury hearing evidence about Mr. Trump does not meet on Fridays.

William K. Rashbaum and Karoun Demirjian contributed reporting.

See the original post here:
Manhattan DA Fires Back at House Republicans Over Trump Hush-Money Case - The New York Times

Ukraine ambassador drops by McCarthys office as Republicans split on aid – NBC News

WASHINGTON Ukraines ambassador to the U.S., Oksana Markarova, dropped by House Speaker Kevin McCarthys office suite Thursday as Republicans have grown increasingly divided on sending more aid to the country to combat the Russian invasion.

NBC News spotted Markarova entering the speaker's office Thursday evening, where she stayed for about 45 minutes before departing with House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Mike McCaul.

We have very strong bipartisan support and there are so many Republicans, the majority who supports us, so very strong bipartisan support, and we really appreciate it, Markarova said as she left.

McCaul, who is chairing a hearing titled Oversight, Transparency, and Accountability of Ukraine Assistance next Wednesday, took selfies with Markarova and walked with her down the hall as they both left McCarthys suite.

Asked about the ambassador's visit, McCarthy said Friday morning that he did not meet with Markarova, but he saw her in his office. She came by to drop off a book about Ukraine, he said.

McCaul a steadfast defender of U.S. aid and support for Ukraine said he did not meet with Markarova in McCarthys office.

Still, Markarovas visit comes amid a growing divide among congressional Republicans, amplified by 2024 hopefuls, over aid for Ukraine. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and other right-leaning members have said they want to end financial support for the country, while others have emphasized the need to back Ukraine against Russia.

Just before the midterm elections, McCarthy said he supports Ukraine but would not send the country a "blank check."

JulieTsirkin is acorrespondent covering Capitol Hill.

Ali Vitali is a Capitol Hill correspondent for NBC News, based in Washington.

Alexandra Bacallao contributed.

Continue reading here:
Ukraine ambassador drops by McCarthys office as Republicans split on aid - NBC News

Kyrsten Sinema is a problem for Republicans, Democrats, and herself – MSNBC

We still dont know whether Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz., will seek a second term next year. What we do know is that she has spent a lot of time rubbing elbows with the wealthy donors whose support shed count on if she did.

Those fetes are crucial, particularly because of her decision in December to leave the Democratic Party and become an independent. She still officially caucuses with Senate Democrats, despite Republicans blatant overtures to cross over. But a new article by Politicos Jonathan Martin shows that while Sinema has worked tirelessly to cultivate a bipartisan, above-the-fray mien in public, behind the scenes she has been busy burning bridges in a way that will leave her not just independent but isolated.

The column is filled with tidbits about Sinemas behavior behind closed doors at Republican-heavy events, where she has opted to belittle her Democratic colleagues, shower her GOP allies with praise and, in one case, quite literally give the middle finger to President Joe Bidens White House.

Behind the scenes, Sinema has been busy burning bridges in a way that will leave her not just independent but isolated.

Among the many snide comments attributed to Sinema are digs at Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and her pro-filibuster buddy Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. (she feels she has better tax policy ideas than he does). The barb most people have latched onto is about the weekly Democratic caucus lunches, which shed already rarely attended even before she went solo:

Those lunches were ridiculous, she told a small group of Republican lobbyists at a reception in Washington this year in explaining why she had stopped attending her caucus weekly luncheons in the Capitol, according to an attendee.

First off, she explained, she was no longer a Democrat. Im not caucusing with the Democrats, Im formally aligned with the Democrats for committee purposes, Sinema said. But apart from that I am not a part of the caucus.

Then she let loose.

Old dudes are eating Jell-O, everyone is talking about how great they are, Sinema recounted to gales of laughter. I dont really need to be there for that. Thats an hour and a half twice a week that I can get back.

I spend my days doing productive work, which is why Ive been able to lead every bipartisan vote thats happened the last two years, Sinema reportedly said. In fact, as writer Kyle Tharp pointed out on Twitter, Sinema has apparently decided that productive work is selling her used stuff on Facebook Marketplace. Because its certainly not meeting with her constituents. While she may appear at these fundraisers and at gala affairs like the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland, lets not forget that Arizonans had to chase her into a bathroom just to ask her about whether she supported Bidens agenda back in 2021.

Its not clear who many of the sources for Martins reporting are, but that matters less than that Sinema felt willing to say these things in front of these crowds at all. Its evidence of extremely poor judgment, especially when so much of the Senates activity is built on personal relationships. The bipartisan wins in the last Congress arent replicable in this one, not when House Republicans have already lambasted their Senate counterparts for being too open to compromise. Her willingness to bad-mouth her supposed allies makes it even less likely that shell be spearheading any deals in the near future.

Moreover, it seems Sinema was unaware that many of the people she was entertaining with her riffs on her colleagues dont have her best interests at heart. It may say I next to her name now, but so long as she still provides a vote for Democratic interests, shes a problem for many of the Republicans in the crowds. And while she has a long history of political shapeshifting, she cant change her scales enough to win a GOP primary against someone like failed gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake.

Meanwhile, Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., has already announced that hell run for the Democratic nomination to replace Sinema. For all her pandering to the supposed middle-of-the-road Arizonan, polling on behalf of Gallegos campaign last year had her crashing and burning in a potential three-way race. Thats on top of previous polling that had showed her with a net unfavorable rating among basically every demographic in the state. And just last month, Gallego was well ahead of his competition in both head-to-head and three-way races.

It may say I next to her name now, but so long as she still provides a vote for Democratic interests, shes a problem for many of the Republicans in the crowds.

Im not sure how Sinemas hobnobbing with elites will do much to change those numbers, no matter how much money big donors throw at her. Sinema may be banking on the newly established No Labels Party in her state to help counteract the structural disadvantages of running as an independent. Or maybe she hopes being able to contrast herself with a far-right extremist like Lake leaves her enough votes to eke out a victory. Or she may just be betting on her shilling for bankers to land a cushy gig once her term expires.

But for all her self-regard as an indispensable, savvy dealmaker, Im just not sure that Sinema is very good at this game. Washington is a town that doesnt forget slights easily, and if someone else is sitting at her desk come 2025, I doubt any Democrats will be heartbroken.

Hayes Brown is a writer and editor for MSNBC Daily, where he helps frame the news of the day for readers. He was previously at BuzzFeed News and holds a degree in international relations from Michigan State University.

Original post:
Kyrsten Sinema is a problem for Republicans, Democrats, and herself - MSNBC

John Fetterman Receives Boost as Republicans Grill Him Over Health Woes – Newsweek

A majority of Americans approve of Democratic Senator John Fetterman taking a leave absence from the Senate in order to recover from depression, according to a new poll.

A Redfield & Wilton Strategies poll conducted on behalf of Newsweek among 1,500 eligible voters on March 22 found that 33 percent of respondents strongly approved of the senator taking leave, while a further 28 percent said they approved of the move.

The polling came as Fetterman spokesperson Joe Calvello told The Philadelphia Inquirer on Friday that the Democrat should be out of the hospital "soon," but didn't provide an exact timeline.

"John will be out soon. Over a week but soon," Calvello said, adding that "recovery is going really well."

Fetterman is being treated for clinical depression at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Maryland. He checked himself into the facility on February 15.

Pennsylvania Republicans have questioned Fetterman's ability to serve and on February 28, the Washington County Republican Party released a statement calling on Fetterman to appear on camera to "show us he is alive and well, and if he is unable to do so, we call upon our elected Representatives in Washington, Senator [Bob] Casey and Congressman [Guy] Reschenthaler, to intervene immediately."

Sean Logue, chair of the Washington County Republican Party, told Newsweek earlier this month that they had not received the video of Fetterman they requested.

"We have been professional and polite, but the only responses we have gotten are hate mail or calls where our request has been twisted into an attack on people with mental-health challenges," Logue said.

"The campaign lied about Senator Fetterman's fitness for office, and threatened anyone who questioned it," he added.

Nonetheless, the Redfield & Wilton Strategies poll appears to show that a majority of eligible voters support Fetterman's efforts at recovery from depression.

The survey found that just 3 percent of respondents said they would disapprove of Fetterman taking leave from the Senate and another 3 percent said they would strongly disapprove.

A further 24 percent said that they would neither approve nor disapprove and 9 percent responded "don't know."

There also appeared to be broad agreement among those who voted for President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election, with 32 percent of Biden voters saying they would strongly approve of Fetterman taking leave and 30 percent saying they would approve.

Just 1 percent said they would disapprove, and another 1 percent of Biden voters said they would strongly disapprove, while 28 percent said they neither approved nor disapproved and 8 percent answered "don't know."

It was a similar picture among Trump voters, with 37 percent saying they would approve of Fetterman taking leave, 25 percent saying they would approve the move and 18 percent saying they neither approved nor disapproved.

A further 6 percent of Trump voters said they would strongly disapprove of Fetterman taking leave, while 5 percent said they would disapprove and 8 percent responded "don't know."

Newsweek has reached out to Fetterman's office via email for comment.

Read the original:
John Fetterman Receives Boost as Republicans Grill Him Over Health Woes - Newsweek

Opinion | What the Republican Push for Parents Rights Is Really About – The New York Times

You may have heard the phrase parents rights.

It sounds unobjectionable of course parents should have rights which is probably why its become the term of choice for the conservative effort to ban books, censor school curriculums and suppress politically undesirable forms of knowledge.

When House Republicans introduced a bill that would require public schools to notify parents that they are entitled to access course material and lists of books kept in school libraries, they cited parents rights as the reason.

Thats what today is all about: Its about every parent, mom and dad, but most importantly about the students in America, Speaker Kevin McCarthy said. Several Republican-controlled states have either proposed or passed similar measures.

The official name for Floridas infamous Dont Say Gay bill, prohibiting classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity, is the Parental Rights in Education Act. And the states Stop WOKE Act short for Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees, which outlaws any school instruction that classifies individuals as inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously, was framed, similarly, as a victory for the rights of parents.

By signing this legislation, which is the first in the nation to end corporate wokeness and Critical Race Theory in our schools, we are prioritizing education, not indoctrination, Lt. Gov. Jeanette Nuez said in a statement. We will always fight to protect our children and parents from this Marxist-inspired curriculum.

It should be said that this movement for parents rights in Florida has empowered certain parents to remove books, films, even whole classes that threaten to expose their children to material that might make them uncomfortable. In Pinellas County, for example, a single complaint about the Disney film Ruby Bridges about the 6-year-old girl who integrated an all-white New Orleans school in 1960 led to its removal from an elementary school.

In his 2021 campaign for the Virginia governors mansion, Glenn Youngkin made parents matter his slogan, and he has asserted parents rights in his effort to regulate the treatment of transgender children and end divisive concepts such as critical race theory in schools. His early moves included new history standards that removed discussions of racism and downplayed the role of slavery in causing the Civil War.

And at this moment, Texas Republicans are debating a bill backed by Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick that, according to The Texas Tribune, would severely restrict classroom lessons, school activities and teacher guidance about sexual orientation and gender identity in all public and charter schools up to 12th grade. Texas parents, the Tribune notes, already have the right to remove their child temporarily from a class or activity that conflicts with their beliefs or review all instructional materials. This bill would further empower parents to object to books, lessons and entire curriculums.

Parents rights, you will have noticed, never seems to involve parents who want schools to be more open and accommodating toward gender nonconforming students. Its never invoked for parents who want their students to learn more about race, identity and the darker parts of American history. And we never hear about the rights of parents who want schools to offer a wide library of books and materials to their children.

Parents rights, like states rights, is quite particular. Its not about all parents and all children and all the rights they might have.

The reality of the parents rights movement is that it is meant to empower a conservative and reactionary minority of parents to dictate education and curriculums to the rest of the community. It is, in essence, an institutionalization of the hecklers veto, in which a single parent or any individual, really can remove hundreds of books or shut down lessons on the basis of the political discomfort they feel. Parents rights, in other words, is when some parents have the right to dominate all the others.

And, of course, the point of this movement the point of creating this state-sanctioned hecklers veto is to undermine public education through a thousand little cuts, each meant to weaken public support for teachers and public schools, and to open the floodgates to policies that siphon funds and resources from public institutions and pumps them into private ones. The Texas bill I mentioned, for instance, would give taxpayer dollars to parents who chose to opt out of public schools for private schools or even home-schooling.

The culture war that conservatives are currently waging over education is, like the culture wars in other areas of American society, a cover for a more material and ideological agenda. The screaming over wokeness and D.E.I. is just another Trojan horse for a relentless effort to dismantle a pillar of American democracy that, for all of its flaws, is still one of the countrys most powerful engines for economic and social mobility.

Ultimately, then, the parents rights movement is not about parents at all; its about whether this country will continue to strive for a more equitable and democratic system of education, or whether well let a reactionary minority drag us as far from that goal as possible, in favor of something even more unequal and hierarchical than what we already have.

More:
Opinion | What the Republican Push for Parents Rights Is Really About - The New York Times