Mediaboss Marketing

The executive committee of the Lynchburg Republican City Committee formally handed down a censure of Vice Mayor Chris Faraldi on Monday, rebuking him for a slew of actions they believe failed to meet the expectations of conduct put forth by the party, according to a news release from the party.

The basis of the censure, according to the resolution, dates back to actions of the vice mayor as early as the bodys heated Feb. 14 meeting, all the way through to the bodys most recent meeting on June 27, where Faraldi led a push to adjourn Lynchburg City Councils meeting before a scheduled discussion on a controversial workplace resolution put forth by another Republican member of council.

The censure resolution starts by accusing Faraldi of committing a perceived abuse of his power by asking a law enforcement officer to spy on Ward III Councilor Jeff Helgeson the night of the Feb. 14 meeting, which is when Helgeson was caught on the microphone calling Mayor Stephanie Reed the stupidest person Ive ever seen, she claims.

Continuing on, the executive committee later accused Faraldi of disparaging the committee in council meetings and in the media; betraying the trust of the party and its members by working with media against the other Republicans; abusing his office by retaliating against At-large Councilor Martin Misjuns to advance a personal agenda; blocking Misjuns workplace resolution debate; and refusing to communicate with his entire Republican caucus while promoting division in the public eye.

Wednesday afternoon, Faraldi issued a statement regarding the censure, saying hes profoundly disappointed to learn of the action taken by the committees executive board, but added he will refuse to succumb to and reject the bullying tactics and intimidation from those who would rather play political games than address the grave problems left by decades of liberal leadership in Lynchburg.

The vice mayor said the censure motion was propelled by a small group of unelected, biased individuals who are wailing in emotion because the council chose to make School Board appointments outside of their own personal preferences, and whose leader is rumored to be exploring a council run in Ward IV all this will not alter my course.

Firmly, he added, I believe that the overwhelming majority of our citys residents, regardless of their political leanings, would concur that I am not the one who is deviating from the proper course among the seven members of the City Council.

The censure is yet another instance of persistent infighting amongst Lynchburgs Republican-majority city council, dating back to the bodys organizational meeting this year, where the five Republicans split amongst themselves on their first vote for mayor.

Since that meeting, the body endured a months-long heated debate over how and when to bring forth tax relief, where numerous spats between councilors transpired. Misjuns wrote a note and passed it to Faraldi on the dais in late January, calling him a RINO, or Republican In Name Only, during a tax relief debate, according to Faraldi.

There was jostling amongst the Republicans over city council committee assignments, the aforementioned hot mic moment, confusion prior to approving the citys capital improvement plan and, most recently, the motion by Faraldi to adjourn councils meeting before engaging on a discussion regarding a controversial workplace resolution brought forth by Misjuns.

The latest event was one of the catalysts for the censure, according to the resolution, as Faraldi said he was retaliating against Misjuns for his treatment of city staff.

According to the resolution, Faraldi was informed of the censure on July 4; the committee adopted the censure on July 3.

In closing his statement, Faraldi said that he is devoted to the tasks at hand, and concentrated on the matters that truly impact our city. I will continue my focus on governing the city of Lynchburg with the conservative ideals I hold dear, principles endorsed by 61% of the voters in May of 2020.

Faraldi is in the midst of the third year of his first term on city council, having been elected in May 2020 to represent Ward IV.

On its face, censure is merely a symbolic gesture condemning an elected representative for their words or actions. The act has no bearing on an elected officials ability to remain in office, nor does it strip them of any governing abilities.

Its unclear, however, the effect the censure might have on Faraldis standing inside the party. Veronica Bratton, chair of the LRCC and leader of the executive committee, did not respond to attempts for comment or questions regarding the resolution or its allegations as of publication time Wednesday evening.

Bryson Gordon , (434) 385-5547

bgordon@newsadvance.com

@brysongordon on Twitter

Subscribe to our Daily Headlines newsletter.

Read more:
Citing a slew of complaints, Lynchburg Republicans formally ... - Lynchburg News and Advance

Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos talks to the media after Gov. Tony Evers addressed a joint session of the state Legislature in the Assembly chambers during his State of the State speech at the state Capitol, Feb. 15, 2022, in Madison, Wis.

Conservatives have made it their mission to abolish diversity initiatives in schools around the country. In a historic blow to affirmative action, last week the Supreme Court ruled that Harvard University and the University of North Carolinas race-based admissions policy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.

In addition to years of censoring educational materials in schools written by Black and brown authors as well as reversing affirmative action, it appears that the GOP is also setting its sights on scholarship programs for students of color as another way to eliminate diversity.

Read more

Last week, the Republican speaker of the Wisconsin State Assembly, Robin Vos, implied that hell soon work to ban grants designated for minority undergraduate students. Vos took it upon himself to respond to a tweet asserting a scholarship program for Black, Indigenous, Hispanic and other minority students was equivalent to discrimination.

We are reviewing the decision and will introduce legislation to correct the discriminatory laws on the books and pass repeals in the fall, Vos wrote. Vos has always opposed anything related to diversity, equity and inclusion and even went as far as calling DEI programming at the University of Wisconsin as indoctrination.

Even though Wisconsin is projected to operate at a $7 billion surplus budget, Vos and other Republicans in the state Legislature voted to cut $32 million from the UW Systems budget unless it agrees to allocate the money toward workforce development as opposed to DEI resources. The Republicans are also planning on doing away with nearly 200 DEI jobs on UW campuses.

On the heels of the Supreme Courts devastating decision, we are certain this is just the beginning.

Story continues

More from The Root

Sign up for The Root's Newsletter. For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Click here to read the full article.

Read the original here:
As If Affirmative Action Wasn't Enough, Now Republicans Are Coming for Minority Scholarships - Yahoo News

U.S. Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) talked with the Washington Blade on Saturday about the LGBTQ and womens history education bill that she and U.S. Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) reintroduced last week.

The legislation, just like actions recently announced by the White House, responds to book bans and curriculum restrictions that have increasingly cropped up in conservative states and school districts, which disproportionately target educational materials inclusive of LGBTQ subjects and histories.

Balint and Torress LGBTQI+ and Womens History Education Act of 2023 would authorize the director of the Smithsonian Institutions National Museum of American History to develop and distribute resources for educators to teach LGBTQI+ and womens history education in a more inclusive and intersectional manner.

On June 8, meanwhile, the White House debuted plans to address attacks on the safety and rights of LGBTQ Americans. Among these were instructions to the U.S. Department of Education to appoint a coordinator who will address the growing threat that book bans pose for the civil rights of students, such as by providingnew trainings for schools nationwide on how book bans that target specific communities and create a hostile school environment may violate federal civil rights laws.

Balint told the Blade the education bill and these moves by the White House complement each other, but her efforts with Torres were not coordinated as much with the Biden-Harris administration as they were a product of the lawmakers shared understanding of this moment that were in as were both queer Americans trying to live our lives and not have our histories erased.

And I also come to this, Balint said, as a longtime social studies teacher in junior high who also taught history as the community college level. This push from the GOP to erase us from not just society but from history, she said, is so dangerous.

Its important for us to make sure that our histories and our stories are preserved, not just for posterity sake, but also because students across this country need to be able to see themselves in their history that were taught, Balint said.

Battles over the inclusion of Black, LGBTQ and womens history have roiled school districts across the country, leading to legislative restrictions that were passed in conservative states and even flaring up in areas traditionally known as liberal strongholds, like Southern California.

Last week saw protests over the inclusion of curricula that included the late gay rights activist and politician Harvey Milk in Temecula in Riverside County.

We cant write off any area of the country, Balint said. There are movements from from the right coming in more traditionally blue states, as well, and theyre trying to make parents and community members feel afraid of their neighbors.

As the right has sought to deliberately scapegoat queer and transgender kids, fear mongering to rile up the conservative base, the congresswoman said its really important that those of us in a position to shore up those those teachers in those schools who are trying to do the right thing, [because] they need help, theyre under siege right now.

Balint said that her wife is from Wyoming, a solidly conservative state where she also has experience teaching.

I understand the struggles that teachers have in those schools, when they want to bring in a more inclusive history, a more true history, of the complexity of life in this country, she said.

So, I think its a really important message for us to send, both from the White House and from Congress, and in this case, also, from the Smithsonian Institution, to say this is real history. Its important that you expose your students to it. And I think that gives those teachers more courage to be able to teach a curriculum that is more inclusive and true.

The LGBTQI+ and Womens History Education Act of 2023, Balint said, can also help educators in a more direct sense. Whether youre trying to teach the history of people of color in this country, or of women, or of queer and trans people, she said, it is a huge undertaking to try to do that research on your own.

Unfortunately, however, the congressman acknowledged the political roadblocks to its passage with Republicans controlling the U.S. House of Representatives.

Just before flying home to her district, Balint said she had to sit through a speech on the House floor in which a GOP member railed against how disgusting it was that there any kind of federal building or State Department building would fly, you know, a Pride flag, telling his colleagues thats not the kind of thing that we in this country want to be known for.

The congresswoman characterized the language this member used as hurtful and cruel, intended to demonize LGBTQ people.

There are good people in the Republican conference, Balint said. But when it comes to these issues, we have not seen any of them. In this congressional session, they are all falling in line. I welcome any partners across the aisle. To stand up to this kind of scapegoating.

For this reason, when it comes to her and Torres legislation, she said, I am not hopeful in this Congress. But we have to lay the groundwork for what will come when we hopefully are able to recapture the majority and really make movement on these things.

Balint told the Blade some of her Republican colleagues have assured her and other Democrats well, you know I dont believe this stuff that the extremists are pushing.

GOP members will admit that they have to take extreme anti-LGBTQ positions that they do not actually believe in for fear of losing a primary race to someone further to the right, she said.

And one of the things that Ive been talking about with my friends within my caucus is if, in the end, youre gonna vote just like your extremist colleagues, then frankly, youre not better! If youre not gonna use your position to stand up when you know [your colleagues in the GOP caucus] are shamelessly and cruelly scapegoating a group of people, then what will it take?

Balint said she nevertheless remains optimistic that the tides will eventually turn, but in the meantime we have to hold them accountable. And we have to stand with them when they are courageous, which is why I always try to point out that youve got a few bright spots one being the [Republican] governor of Utah, Gov. [Spencer] Cox, who made a very powerful statement about these anti-trans bills.

When legislation that would have prohibited trans students from playing on girls sports teams reached his desk in March, Cox vetoed it. When in doubt, he wrote, I always try to err on the side of kindness, mercy and compassion.

I cant overstate what it has meant for young queer and trans kids in Vermont and across the country, to be able to come and talk with me, Balint said, or any of her colleagues who are openly gay. We also are working so hard right now to make sure that we will be able to elect our first trans American to Congress, she said, we are so committed to that we have to have true representation.

Read more:
Gay and trans Republicans shocked DeSantis now targeting them - Washington Blade

Few issues have been more divisive among the Republican presidential candidates than the war in Ukraine and how, if at all, the United States should be involved.

It has illuminated one of the biggest ideological divides within the Republican Party: between traditional members who see the United States as having a significant role to play in world affairs, and an anti-interventionist wing that sees foreign involvement as a distraction from more important issues at home.

The old school has more adherents in the 2024 field, including Nikki Haley, Mike Pence and Tim Scott, who support sending Ukraine military equipment and weapons but not troops. This aligns with President Bidens strategy, though they maintain that Mr. Biden is executing it wrong.

But the anti-interventionist wing is dominant in terms of influence, with two members, Donald J. Trump and Ron DeSantis, far outpolling everybody else.

Only one candidate, Will Hurd, wants to significantly expand U.S. involvement.

Former President Donald J. Trump has said that the war in Ukraine is not of vital importance to the United States.

In a CNN town hall event, he did not give a straight answer when asked repeatedly whether he would continue to provide military aid, instead declaring that he would end the war within 24 hours by meeting with Presidents Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. He claimed falsely that the United States was sending so much equipment that we dont have ammunition for ourselves.

Mr. Trump who was impeached in 2019 for withholding aid to Ukraine to pressure Mr. Zelensky to help him electorally also suggested to Fox News that he could have prevented the war by ceding Ukrainian land to Russia. I couldve made a deal to take over something, he said. There are certain areas that are Russian-speaking areas, frankly.

Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida has called the war a territorial dispute whose outcome does not materially affect the United States.

While the U.S. has many vital national interests securing our borders, addressing the crisis of readiness with our military, achieving energy security and independence, and checking the economic, cultural and military power of the Chinese Communist Party becoming further entangled in a territorial dispute between Ukraine and Russia is not one of them, he told the Fox News host Tucker Carlson in March.

After criticism from fellow Republicans, he backtracked, saying that his comments had been mischaracterized and that Russias invasion was wrong.

He has since endorsed a cease-fire, saying he wants to avoid a situation where you just have mass casualties, mass expense and end up with a stalemate. He has maintained his position that the United States should not get more involved.

The entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy opposes aid to Ukraine because, he argues, the war does not affect American interests.

He says he would pursue an agreement that would offer sweeping concessions to Mr. Putin, including ceding most of Ukraines Donbas region to Russia, lifting sanctions, closing all U.S. military bases in Eastern Europe and barring Ukraine from NATO. In exchange, he would require Russia to end its military alliance with China and rejoin the START nuclear treaty.

I dont think it is preferable for Russia to be able to invade a sovereign country that is its neighbor, but I think the job of the U.S. president is to look after American interests, and what I think the No. 1 threat to the U.S. military is right now, our top military threat, is the Sino-Russian alliance, Mr. Ramaswamy told ABC News. I think that by fighting further in Russia, by further arming Ukraine, we are driving Russia into Chinas hands.

Nikki Haley, a former ambassador to the United Nations, says that it is in the best interest of America for Ukraine to repel Russias invasion, and that she would continue sending equipment and ammunition.

A win for Ukraine is a win for all of us, because tyrants tell us exactly what theyre going to do, she said on CNN. She added: China says Taiwans next wed better believe them. Russia said Poland and the Baltics are next if that happens, were looking at a world war. This is about preventing war.

Victory for Ukraine, Ms. Haley said, would send a message more broadly: warning China against invading Taiwan, Iran against building a nuclear bomb, and North Korea against testing more ballistic missiles. To Russia, it would signal that its over.

In a speech at the American Enterprise Institute, she said President Biden had been far too slow and weak in helping Ukraine.

Former Vice President Mike Pence supports aid to Ukraine and has accused Mr. Biden of not supplying it quickly enough. In June, he was the first Republican candidate to travel to Ukraine, where he met with Mr. Zelensky.

Like Ms. Haley, he has described helping Ukraine as a way to show China that the United States and the West will not tolerate the use of military force to redraw international lines, a reference to a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan.

This position sets him apart from the president he served under. Criticizing Mr. Trumps description of Mr. Putin as a genius, Mr. Pence said on CNN that he knew the difference between a genius and a war criminal.

He has emphasized that he would never send American troops to Ukraine, and said he did not yet want to admit Ukraine to NATO because he wanted to prevent the United States from becoming obligated to send troops. But he said he was open to admitting the country into NATO after the war.

Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina supports aid to Ukraine and told NBC News that Mr. Biden had done a terrible job explaining and articulating to the American people what the United States interests are there, an argument Mr. Pence has also made.

First, it prevents or reduces attacks on the homeland, Mr. Scott said. Second, as part of NATO and land being contiguous to Ukraine, it will reduce the likelihood that Russia will have the weaponry or the will to attack on NATO territory, which would get us involved.

He has endorsed a forceful defense of Ukraine from the start, writing in March 2022 that the fight was for the principles that America has always championed. That May, he voted for an emergency funding measure that went beyond what Mr. Biden proposed. He accused Mr. Biden of waiting too long to provide too little support, but Mr. Biden supported the increase.

Former Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey has said that the United States should continue to support Ukraine until the war is resolved.

None of us like the idea that theres a war going on and that were supporting it, but the alternative is for the Chinese to take over, the Russians, the Iranians and the North Koreans, Mr. Christie said in a CNN town hall, calling the conflict a proxy war with China.

He added that some kind of compromise with Russia might eventually be needed, and that the United States should help negotiate it once Ukraine can protect the land thats been taken by Russia in this latest incursion.

He has said that Mr. Trump set the groundwork for the war and called him Putins puppet. And he compared Mr. DeSantis to Neville Chamberlain, the British prime minister who tried to appease Hitler.

Former Gov. Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas supports aid to Ukraine with audits to ensure funds are used as intended. He told C-SPAN that U.S. leadership was important in supporting Ukraine and bringing the European allies together against Russia, and that he disagreed with Mr. Trumps and Mr. DeSantiss more isolationist view.

Like several other candidates, he has argued that allowing Russia to win would embolden it and other authoritarian countries to attack elsewhere.

If we stand by and let this nation falter, it leaves a hostile Russia on the doorstep of our NATO allies, he said, adding, By taking a supportive and public stand in Ukraine, were sending a message to Russia and to China that their aggressive posture towards other nation-states is unacceptable.

Gov. Doug Burgum of North Dakota has indicated that he supports military aid with accountability on every dollar.

Russia cannot have a win coming out of this, because if its a win for them, its a win for China, Mr. Burgum told KFYR, a television station in North Dakota, while adding that he wanted Europe to shoulder more of the financial burden.

He told CNN in June that the domestic turmoil in Russia had created an opening that the United States and NATO could exploit. Lets give them the support they need, he said of Ukraine, without elaborating. Lets get this war over now instead of having it be protracted.

Mayor Francis X. Suarez of Miami supports aid but wants to tie it to new NATO rules requiring Europe to carry an equal burden.

In a National Review essay, he said Mayor Vitali Klitschko of Kyiv had warned him that if Mr. Putin was not stopped, Russia and China would continue to attack the West, possibly including the United States. Mr. Suarez added that Russia had to be defeated because it was part of a broader resurgence of communist-inspired regimes, though Mr. Putins Russia is not communist.

Without naming him, Mr. Suarez criticized Mr. DeSantiss position. It doesnt take a Harvard lawyer to see that the war in Ukraine is not a territorial dispute, he wrote, shortly after Mr. DeSantis used that phrase to describe it. It is a moral and geopolitical struggle between two visions of the world.

Former Representative Will Hurd of Texas who said from the start that the United States should send Ukraine as much weaponry as we can has espoused a more hawkish policy than any other major candidate, arguing that the United States should go well beyond providing equipment and weapons.

Mr. Hurd told ABC News that he supported establishing and helping enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine. NATO leaders and U.S. lawmakers from both parties rejected that last year, saying they feared escalation. Mr. Hurd has brushed that concern aside, arguing that Mr. Putin had not escalated when a mercenary leader threatened a coup.

He said that the United States should help Ukraine retake not only the territory Russia invaded in 2022, but also Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014.

Read more:
Where Trump, DeSantis and the Other Republican Candidates ... - The New York Times

POLITICO illustration/Photo by iStock

Hi rulers! This week I learned that, in many hunter gather societies, women hunted just as much as men. My female hunter ancestors would probably be embarrassed to know that Ive been vegetarian for 14 years. Lets get to it!

Young women are increasingly voting for Democrats. The GOP agrees that they need to fix that now they just need to agree on how.

In the 2022 midterms, young women broke hard for Democratic candidates. According to CNN exit polling, 72 percent of women between the ages of 18-29 voted Democratic in house races nationwide, compared to 26 percent of young women who voted for Republicans. (Polling data for the 2018 midterms doesnt break down age and gender, but 59 percent of women of all ages voted for Democrats in house races that year.) Meanwhile, the percentage of young women who identify as liberal has been steadily increasing for the last several years.

Republicans strategists say if the GOP doesnt find a way to better appeal to young women, they run the risk of missing out on a key group in a general election thats sure to be decided on razor-thin margins. But Republicans have conflicting opinions about what might bring that bloc over to the GOP.

It would be the perfect time to come up with a cohesive plan to speak to women, clearly has not happened, says Jennifer Lim, the founder and executive director of Republican Women for Progress.

Why the disenchantment with the GOP? No surprises here: experts say that the recent shift likely has everything to do with abortion. After all, 71 percent of young women say that abortion should be legal in most or all cases.

Young women did have a big increase in voting Democratic even though they normally are more Democratic, says William Frey, a senior fellow with Brookings Metro who analyzed exit polls from the 2022 midterm. I think you can chalk that up, to some degree, to the abortion issue.

The huge turnout we saw this past midterm is a direct result of the rollback of freedoms related directly to abortion, says Jessica Herrera, the communications and marketing director for Supermajority, a left-leaning organization that aims to up womens participation in elections.

So how does the GOP hope to remedy this ideological divide before November 2024? Conservative CNN commentator Alice Stewart thinks that Republicans need to change how they talk about abortion, without necessarily changing their policies.

I fought really hard for overturning Roe v. Wade, and Im extremely pro-life and unapologetically pro-life, Stewart tells Women Rule.

I also acknowledged that it has been a double-edged sword because that issue has motivated pro-abortion voters. This obviously is an issue that is important for younger voters, women voters, and we need to make sure that they understand that abortion isnt the only option.

Rep. Kat Cammack (R-FL), one of the youngest women in Congress, echoed that sentiment. As she sees it, the GOP needs to make sure that pregnant women have support systems in place so they dont need an abortion in the first place.

Being pro-life is not just being pro-life in the womb. Its being pro-life after the fact, says Cammack, who serves as the Bipartisan Congressional Pro-Life Caucus co-chair.

All too often, she says, some political personalities oversimplify the issue.

Theres so many times women feel like they dont have options or resources. So youve really seen in the last several years, a significant push for additional resources for crisis pregnancy centers really looking to support adoption and fostering initiatives. (Crisis pregnancy centers have become something of a rallying point for Democrats, who argue theyre often misleading about their mission.)

Cammack also notes young women are not a monolith and that they care about a plurality of issues outside of abortion. For the longest time, the GOP has treated women like single issue voters, she says.

Karoline Leavitt, who became the first Republican Gen Z congressional nominee during her unsuccessful 2022 bid to unseat Rep. Chris Pappas (D-N.H.), agrees that the GOP needs to lean into a variety of other issues that she believes will motivate young women.

She names crime and economic issues as two hard hitters. Women want good paying jobs, too. We dont want to be unable to afford our groceries or our gas bills. We want safety in our communities.

Eileen Sobjack, president of the National Federation of Republican Women, tells Women Rule she thinks the key might be in getting more young women into positions of power in the GOP which she hopes will encourage other young women to join the party.

We need more women of all ages. We need that perspective. Sobjack said. We need more of them running and in Congress and in the Senate.

In addition to not having any women represented in the field besides Nikki Haley, [the GOP] is still not addressing any issues women are dealing with, says Lim of Republican Women for Progress.

So if youre a younger woman, and youre watching this presidential election, theres still nothing to attract you to the Republican Party.

But even pushing for more women in politics is controversial among the partys most conservative faction. At Turning Point USAs annual Young Womens Leadership Summit in June, conservative podcast host Alex Clark, who is a woman herself, said that politics should not be a priority right now for conservative women. Women, she said, would be happier if they would go back to biblical roots and what God had designed for women to do.

Clarence Thomas, Ketanji Brown Jackson air sharp disagreement on race in America, by Josh Gerstein for POLITICO: Jacksons 28-page dissent defended the use of race-conscious programs to ameliorate the pervasive, present-day effects of Americas history of state-sponsored racism.

New York Dems put abortion on the ballot in bid to retake the House, by Brittany Gibson for POLITICO: Left-leaning New York groups pledged $20 million Thursday to support a change to the New York State constitution to protect abortion rights that will be on the 2024 ballot something they believe will boost turnout for Democrats in key swing House districts..

Harris on the hot seat: Veep has critical stretch ahead as campaign heats up, by Eugene Daniels for POLITICO.

Michelle Obama speaks about how affirmative action personally affected her college life, by Lucy Hodgman for POLITICO.

Read more here.

David Zalubowski/AP Photo

Migrant women find work building New York, their adopted city, by Stefanos Chen and Ana Ley for the New York Times: Attracted by the prospect of steadier work and better pay, more migrant women are entering the male-dominated construction industry, social service providers said, at a time when the city is struggling to accommodate tens of thousands of asylum seekers.

Women Interviewing for Bill Gatess Private Office Were Asked Sexually Explicit Questions, by Khadeeja Safdar and Emily Glazer for the Wall Street Journal.

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act is a game changer for U.S. women. Heres why, by Megan Cerullo for CBS News: Starting Tuesday, millions of U.S. workers will gain vastly expanded protections under a new law that bars employers from discriminating against pregnant women and requires companies to provide accommodations so they can keep doing their jobs while theyre expecting.

Women in Leadership Face Ageism at Every Age, by Amy Diehl, Leanne M. Dzubinski, and Amber L. Stephenson for Harvard Business Review.

Read more here.

Marta Hansen is now a national program manager at Power the Polls. She most recently ran national partnerships for Power the Polls and was Assistant Dean of the Womens Community Center at Stanford University.

Cecilia Rouse will be president of Brookings. She currently is a Katzman-Ernst professor in economics and education at Princeton University and is a Biden White House alum.

Karla McKanders is joining the Thurgood Marshall Institute as director. She previously was a professor for critical race theory and immigration law at Vanderbilt University Law School.

Kelley Hudak is now director of federal relations at the American Petroleum Institute. She most recently was director of government affairs at Tyson Foods and is a Steve Scalise alum (h/t Playbook.)

Read this article:
Republicans have a young woman problem - POLITICO - POLITICO