Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Column | House Republicans continue to flail, further endangering their majority – The Washington Post

In his bid to claim the House speakers gavel and end three weeks of chaos last fall, Rep. Mike Johnson mapped out an ambitious agenda.

Week by week, month by month, the Louisiana Republican promised to meet the urgency of this hour with bold, decisive action. Above all else, Johnson promised, the House GOP would finish funding federal agencies before the traditional end-of-summer five-week recess.

DO NOT break for district work period unless all 12 appropriations bills have passed the House, he wrote on Oct. 23, in a letter sent to all House Republicans with to-do lists and all-caps directives.

Well, that didnt pan out.

Before lunchtime Thursday, Speaker Johnson bowed to reality and sent lawmakers home a week earlier than originally planned, turning what is traditionally called August recess into a 6-week break from legislative action.

Republicans have passed five of the 12 bills that fund the federal government, putting them well ahead of last years absolutely dysfunctional timeline, when just one bill had been passed at this point. But the House GOP failed to pass two others and decided the rest were too politically tricky to even attempt at this point.

Even those bills that did pass contain so many extremely conservative policy riders and spending cuts to important programs that they are dead in the Senate, where a traditional bipartisan process is playing out as expected. All that House Republicans have to show for their work on government funding is creating more political exposure for a couple dozen incumbents that might further endanger their majority.

While most Americans have focused their attention on the made-for-Hollywood presidential campaign, House Republicans have continued sputtering along in the shadows the past three months in their traditionally chaotic fashion.

A few weeks ago, as President Biden struggled, that might have been a fine enough strategy. But his decision to stand down has lit a fire under liberal activists rallying for Vice President Harris, and up to 10 of the most vulnerable House Republicans reside in California or in the New York media market. In those places, former president Donald Trump remains a political anchor while Harris might energize her base out of their Biden-induced slumber possibly setting the stage for a net gain of at least four seats that would vault Democrats into the House majority next year.

It didnt have to be this way for House Republicans. Back in the early spring, Johnson allowed passage of a national security bill that included $60 billion for Ukraine. That came right after the passage of two massive packages that included all 12 spending bills at the funding level agreed to last year by Biden and Johnsons predecessor, Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).

As a result, some of Trumps loudest House allies tried to force him out in similar fashion to McCarthy. But Trump gave the speaker the support he needed to fend off the challenge (also bolstered by some Democratic votes). Johnsons path to remaining in power became clear: retain the majority and hope Trump wins the presidency and endorses him for another term.

Trump has never shown much interest in the specificity of agency budgets, other than those dealing with border security. Some of the most conservative members encouraged the speaker to not even bother trying to approve the 12 spending bills until after the election, hoping for a Republican sweep that would lead to a very conservative budget.

But House GOP leaders have tried to split the difference by sticking to the rigid outline of the Biden-McCarthy deal. Theyre ignoring side deals that led to billions more in domestic funding while also allowing some very conservative policy riders to creep into funding legislation.

Democrats accused the speaker of genuflecting, again, to his most conservative wing by engaging in a spending process that would fail. They knew these bills could never pass. They went through this charade to appease Republican extremists, and now, Speaker Johnson is sending members home despite promising he would not take August recess unless all 12 bills passed, said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee.

Republicans defend their dismal showing by blaming Democrats for never providing more than a handful of votes for the bills, leaving them little margin for error. You eventually hit a wall because, you know, we have a few of our own members that vote against some of these bills, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.), who made the call to send lawmakers home early, told The Hill.

By pushing ahead with these GOP-only bills, Republican leaders have repeatedly forced their most politically vulnerable members to cast votes in the committee and on the House floor that arent exactly appealing to centrist voters.

Because of their own conservative political demands, House Republicans protected funding for the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs, as well as Social Security and Medicare. That forced deep cuts to some domestic programs in order to slash overall spending consistent with their political and policy aims.

The result: Democrats estimate that 72,000 teacher positions for low-income students would be eliminated in the bill funding the Education Department, while the Environmental Protection Agency could face a 20 percent cut. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service budget would come in more than $300 million below the presidents request.

These domestic programs dont grab national headlines, but they are often beloved in certain regions and can be quite easily turned into political weapons.

Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.), a freshman whose district narrowly backed Biden over Trump four years ago, received an early lesson last year when he voted in committee for the bill funding the Agriculture Department. It included restrictions against mail delivery of pills related to abortions, a vote that Democrats turned into a quick video ad against him.

Democrats homed in on Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), a senior member of the committee who is facing a difficult reelection in his suburban district, for voting to strip LGBTQ+ community funding projects out of another bill.

The more establishment-friendly corner of the House Republican conference often begrudgingly goes along with leadership even if it means supporting bills pushed by far-right Republicans from safe conservative districts.

After final votes Thursday, Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), from a Long Island district that leans Republican, told reporters he would center his campaign on bills passed last year that tried to deal with key issues for swing-district voters.

Im going to focus my campaign on policy and ensuring that voters know where I stand on the issues that matter the most about the border, about the economy, public safety, pocketbook issues, inflation, said LaLota, who faces a well-funded opponent, former CNN news personality John Avlon.

He said he was ready to defend cuts to some domestic programs as a down payment toward reducing the nearly $35 trillion national debt.

There are things that responsible people from Washington need to do, and that should not be a partisan issue. Members of both parties should be able to join in reasonable, responsible spending cuts, LaLota said.

Some GOP moderates have rebelled against the spending bills along with some arch conservatives who make it a habit of voting against almost every funding plan and that has stalled the appropriations process until the fall, or more likely, until after the November elections.

In trying to placate his hard-line members, Johnson and other GOP leaders are fighting the last war. They continue to act as if their biggest fear is a right-wing coup, as befell McCarthy, when their most immediate concern should simply be protecting their majority.

About 20 House Republicans antagonized McCarthy last year, beginning with forcing him to go 15 rounds in early January 2023 before electing him speaker. In October, eight of them joined with Democrats to oust him as speaker.

After three weeks of paralysis over electing a speaker, Johnsons best rsum highlight might have been that no one hated him, meaning he could win the floor vote for speaker.

But in the past few months, the atmosphere shifted away from the 20 or so most strident conservatives and toward whatever best serves the interests of Trump who seems to clearly get that last years chaos should not be repeated anytime soon.

Trump demonstrated that by helping defeat the effort by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), considered one of Trumps closest allies, to oust Johnson. And not a single Republican has paid any political price in their primary election for supporting Ukraine aid, with Trump silent in most of those races.

The Trump-Johnson connection was on display at the GOP convention in Milwaukee, where the speaker regularly got spotted in the VIP front rows with Trump and other high-profile Republicans. And some of the fringier conservatives were somewhat sidelined, including Greene, who was often seated a row or two behind Trump and got relegated to a non-primetime speaking role. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) never spoke onstage.

If Trump wins and Republicans retain the House majority, Johnson stands a good chance of winning his endorsement to remain speaker which would all but silence Johnsons critics.

If Republicans lose the majority, whether or not Trump wins, Johnson will have a hard time remaining GOP leader.

And Democrats want to make Republicans pay for every vote theyve cast the past 18 months.

I think what we should use against them is the fact that they are incompetent, said Rep. Jim McGovern (Mass.), the top Democrat on the Rules Committee. I have served here for a long, long time, and Ive never seen such incompetence.

More here:
Column | House Republicans continue to flail, further endangering their majority - The Washington Post

Republicans call Kamala Harris a ‘DEI hire’ as attacks on her gender and race increase – NPR

Vice President Kamala Harris arrives to speak from the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Monday, July 22, 2024, during an event with NCAA college athletes. It was her first public appearance after President Joe Biden endorsed her to be the next presidential nominee of the Democratic Party. Alex Brandon/AP hide caption

As Vice President Harris moves closer to the Democratic presidential nomination, some top Republicans are focusing their attacks on her race and gender - and her supporters are warning that strategy might backfire for her opponents.

In recent public comments, Republican members of Congress including Harriet Hageman of Wyoming and Tim Burchett of Tennessee have described her as a DEI hire.

On Fox Business, a guest repeated that idea and referred to a vulgar TikTok meme, appearing to imply without evidence that Harris had somehow used sexual relationships with powerful men to advance her career.

Harris is the highest-ranking woman ever to hold office in the United States. And the first person of Black and South Asian heritage - not to mention that she could become the first female president.

To her supporters, like Fatima Goss Graves of the National Womens Law Center, the crude stereotypes about powerful women are no surprise.

Rather than talking about their out-of-step views, they're trying to resort to old tactics of scaring people using racist and sexist tropes, Graves said. And so it is totally predictable. But it is also ridiculous.

Its a sign, Graves contends, that Republicans are running scared after President Bidens decision to step aside from the presidential race upended the campaign.

These attacks just demonstrate how desperate they are, she said.

Supporters also see Harris as well-positioned to take on former President Donald Trump on key policy matters including abortion rights - an issue where Harris has been front and center and which motivates the Democratic base.

Ange-Marie Hancock, director of the Kirwan Institute at the Ohio State University, is curator of the Kamala Harris Project, which studies the vice president. Hancock says the messages about Harris race and gender appear designed by her opponents to undermine her credibility.

There is very much this idea that they want to make sure shes seen as not qualified, Hancock said.

Its not a new idea. In a Fox News clip from 2021 thats been circulating widely this week, JD Vance - now Trumps running mate - cast Harris as a childless cat lad[y] who is miserable and suggested that people without children exert too much influence over American politics.

Harris has two stepchildren with her husband, Doug Emhoff, whose former spouse and daughter both came to Harris defense this week.

Hancock, the political scientist, says messages about Harris gender may be aimed at key groups of swing voters.

Those kinds of things are really designed to appeal to those suburban women voters who are more traditional in their values about what kind of life women lead, Hancock suggested.

Vice President Kamala Harris campaigns for President as the presumptive Democratic candidate during an event at West Allis Central High School, Tuesday in Wisconsin. Kayla Wolf/AP hide caption

Harris supporters warn, though, that these attacks may backfire for Republicans by galvanizing the Democratic base.

What we know is that there are more people that are going to be re-engaged in this fight, explained Kelley Robinson, President of the Human Rights Campaign. They're going to see not only what's at risk, but what is possible, particularly if you're a person of color, if you're someone that lives at the margins. And those are the folks that were activating.

Some conservatives agree its not the right message. Republican strategist Deana Bass Williams, former press secretary for Ben Carsons 2016 presidential campaign, says Republicans should stay focused on policy.

Republicans do a much better job and we win when we are talking about the failed Biden policies, she said. So I dont think that it is appropriate to use that kind of language, and I also dont think its effective.

In a memo this week, the National Republican Senatorial Committee advised campaigns to focus on policy - including Harris role as the so-called border czar. It also encouraged candidates to label Harris as weird, and focus on several of her traits, including the way she laughs.

Read the original here:
Republicans call Kamala Harris a 'DEI hire' as attacks on her gender and race increase - NPR

Kamala Harris already faces racism and sexism from Trump and Republicans – NPR

Vice President Kamala Harris waves as she is introduced during the Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc.'s Grand Boul, Wednesday, July 24, 2024, in Indianapolis. Darron Cummings/AP hide caption

Vice President Kamala Harris waves as she is introduced during the Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc.'s Grand Boul, Wednesday, July 24, 2024, in Indianapolis.

It's not the first time a person of color or a woman has run for president, but Vice President Kamala Harris is already facing a new wave of sexist and racist personal attacks.

Her opponent, former president Donald Trump, has a long history of personally insulting people of color, women and immigrants. Here are just some of the attacks he's leveled at opponents:

Trump has called undocumented immigrants "animals." He has emphasized the non-European names of GOP presidential hopeful Nikki Haley and former president Barack Obama. He denigrates women of color as "angry" or "nasty."

The list could go on, but it's not just Trump attacking Harris.

Multiple Republican Congressmen have already called Harris a "DEI hire" or "DEI vice president," implying the former U.S. Senator and California Attorney General was not sufficiently qualified and only picked to fulfill a diversity, equity and inclusion quotient.

You're reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

Ange-Marie Hancock, director of the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity at The Ohio State University, has studied Harris' career and how it's been shaped by her identity as a multiracial woman.

She says Trump's language could impact swing voters whether consciously or unconsciously.

"If you were to survey independent voters or swing voters, I bet you would get a strong majority who would say...'We really don't like the way in which he talks about women or talks about his opponents,'" she says.

For swing voters leaning to the Democratic ticket, Hancock says it's unlikely that racist and sexist language would negatively impact their views of Harris. But for voters who are open to Trump:

"There would be actually a more negative impact there, both because people are filling in the gaps, and saying...'you know, maybe he's right in some way, shape or form'...But then the other piece of that is also that we have implicit biases."

Trump's rhetoric has had implications far beyond the campaign trail, Hancock says.

Hancock sees the current political climate as the result of a decades-long trend toward the "normalization" of racist and sexist attacks.

"I think, you know, in 2016 or in 2020, it was still on the upward swing...I think that trajectory has continued. I don't necessarily think it's going to change trajectory in 2024," she says.

And the hateful language and imagery used to describe Harris only gets worse in more conservative circles, she says.

"Some things can get particularly dark and really draw upon some of the most pernicious stereotypes of African American and Asian American women, sometimes very sexualized images."

This episode was produced by Brianna Scott. It was edited by Patrick Jarenwattananon. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.

Read the original:
Kamala Harris already faces racism and sexism from Trump and Republicans - NPR

If Colorado GOP Chair Dave Williams is ousted, here’s what some Republicans say they’ll do – Colorado Public Radio

If Colorado Republican Party members vote to oust Chair Dave Williams this weekend, a group of former party leaders led by Eli Bremer say theyre willing to step up and take the reins.

Bremer, a former U.S. Senate candidate and chair of the El Paso County Republicans, sent a letter to party central committee members saying hed be chair and offering a unity vision for the party moving forward.

What (Colorado Republicans) need is a group who can triage the situation and rectify a really bad situation and try to create something good out of it, Bremer explained. With that, I started talking to other former successful party chairs and people who are really well respected, who have the right skill set to come in on a short-term basis and try to fix the situation. And I'm very happy with the team that's come together in a unified vision of saying, let's end the drama.

Bremer would come with a full team including former Weld County GOP Chair Scott James, who would be vice chair, former Mesa County GOP chair Kevin McCarney, who would be secretary, and former Park County GOP chair Dick Elsner, who would be treasurer.

In the letter, they say if selected to replace Williams, the team would focus on restoring relationships with national Republican groups and Colorado congressional campaigns where the party did not endorse the winning candidates, state house leaders and in-state donors. They also said theyll institute financial oversight.

Its unclear if Williams, let alone the rest of the current GOP leadership team, will be removed Saturday. They argue the upcoming Saturday meeting is invalid and have sued two local Republicans leading the effort.

The State Party has the right to govern its affairs according to our bylaws and we wont allow rogue members to violate the rule of law and confuse other members with their illegal efforts, especially in a time we need to rally around President Trump to defeat radical Democrats, Vice Chair Hope Scheppelman told CPR News last week.

Bremer added hes unsure if anyone else will try to run for chair if Williams is removed. He said hed welcome that but wants to see a full plan.

I mean, I hope if anybody else decides to jump in, that they put forward a plan, a team, he explained. Because if its not going to be our team, I hope that we have another team that is competent, if not more so, and experienced and has the ability to get it done.

He said in the end its about helping Republican candidates win in close races.

Link:
If Colorado GOP Chair Dave Williams is ousted, here's what some Republicans say they'll do - Colorado Public Radio

First Trump, now Harris: LinkedIn billionaire Reid Hoffman has successfully angered both Democrats and Republicans – Fortune

LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman has long been involved in politics, but his recent actions have drawn criticism from both parties.

Hoffman is a longtime Democratic donor, but he recently denounced Bidens leader of the Federal Trade Commission, Lina Khan, who has been aggressive in her antitrust actions against big companies, including Microsoft, where Hoffman sits on the board of directors.

Lina Khan isa person who is not helping America, Hoffman told CNN. I would hope that Vice President Harris would replace her.

As the November presidential election draws closer, tech titans are more actively participating in politics, mostly on the side of Republicans. The worlds richest man, Elon Musk, along with influential venture capitalists like Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen, has publicly backed Trump. Meanwhile, Harris replacing Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket has reenergized Democratic donors, especially on Wall Street.

But Hoffmans recent comments about Khan were quickly rebuked by Democrats, especially progressives who accused the billionaire donor of meddling.

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D.-Mass.) praised Khan and said she was doing an excellent job in a statement to CNN. Meanwhile, progressive Senator Bernie Sanders (I.-Vt.) called out Hoffman for his arrogance and said Khan was one of the best FTC chairs in a long time.

Billionaires should not be telling candidates who to be keeping on or not, Sanders told CNN. This concerns me because Lina Khan is doing a great job and I would hope and expect that the VP, if she wins, keeps her on.

Hoffman told CNN that he certainly has not pushed for Harris to replace her if elected, although the vice president herself has privately criticized Khans broad view of antitrust powers, the New York Times reported, citing an unnamed donor who spoke with her privately.

FTC spokesperson Douglas Farrar said Khan stands by her record.

Chair Khan is honored to serve in the Biden Harris administration, where she has protected consumers, workers, and entrepreneurs from illegal conduct and corporate abuse, Farrar said in a statement to Fortune.

Hoffman did not immediately return Fortunes request for comment.

On the other side of the aisle, Hoffman recently angered Republicans for comments made just before the attempted assassination of former President Trump. While speaking at the elite Sun Valley Conference in Idaho earlier this month, Hoffman butted heads with venture capitalist and PayPal cofounder Peter Thiel, according to media outlet Puck.

Thiel, who has backed former President Donald Trump, sarcastically thanked Hoffman for making Trump into a martyr by funding E. Jean Carrolls lawsuit against the former president. Hoffman reportedly responded that he wished he had made Trump an actual martyr. Soon after, a gunman tried to assassinate Trump at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania and some on the right condemned Hoffman for his inopportune comments.

Tesla CEO Elon Muskwho, like Thiel, has backed Trumpcalled Hoffman out personally in a post on X following the assassination attempt.

The Reid Hoffmans of the world got their dearest wishbut then the martyr lived, Musk wrote.

The LinkedIn cofounder was quick to clarify and apologize, saying in a statement that his words were taken out of context and that there is no place for political violence in our society.

See the article here:
First Trump, now Harris: LinkedIn billionaire Reid Hoffman has successfully angered both Democrats and Republicans - Fortune