Georgia Republican Party Dawsonville Rally at Burt #39;s Pumpkin Farm 08/23/14
Please join Governor Nathan Deal and David Perdue - U.S. Senate for a rally at Burt #39;s Pumpkin Farm, 5 Burts Pumpkin Farm Road, Dawsonville, GA 30534 on Saturday, August 23, 2013 at 3:30 p.m....
By: Nydia Tisdale
Read more here:
Georgia Republican Party Dawsonville Rally at Burt's Pumpkin Farm 08/23/14 - Video
Weekly Republican Address: Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN)
In this week #39;s Republican Address, Rep. Bucshon marks the upcoming Labor Day Holiday, celebrating the nation #39;s workforce and highlighting Republicans #39; soluti...
By: House Republicans
Excerpt from:
Weekly Republican Address: Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN) - Video
BOSTON, Aug. 29 (UPI) -- The governor's race in Massachusetts, one of the most Democratic states in the country, is in a statistical tie between the likely candidates, a new poll found.
The Boston Globe poll released Friday is the first to give Republican Charlie Baker a lead over Attorney General Martha Coakley. While 37 percent of respondents said they plan to vote for Coakley, 38 percent picked Baker.
A Globe poll earlier this month gave Coakley a lead of 7 percentage points.
Coakley faces two opponents in the Sept. 9 Democratic primary, where she has an overwhelming lead.
Baker, the former president and CEO of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, served in the cabinets of Republican governors in the 1990s. He lost the governor's race in 2010 to the incumbent, Deval Patrick, and the only elective office he has held is Swampscott selectman.
Coakley, who was elected attorney general in 2006, lost a special election in 2010 for the U.S. Senate seat left vacant by the death of Edward Kennedy. She was defeated by Scott Brown, who became the first Republican to win a Senate race in Massachusetts in 40 years.
This month, a SuperPAC linked to the Republican Governors Association began running ads in Massachusetts touting Baker's experience in state government and business.
The Globe interviewed 605 likely voters from Aug. 17 to Aug. 19 and Aug. 24 to Aug. 26. The margin of error is 4 points.
2014 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI's prior written consent.
Read more:
Poll gives Republican slim lead in Mass. governor's race
The most likely Republican presidential candidate for 2016 is . . . Mitt Romney?
The former Massachusetts governor has run and lost two bids for the White House in the 2008 Republican primaries and again in the 2012 general election. Whats more, he proved to be a foot-in-mouth candidate who blew his chances of winning in 2012 by writing off 47% of the electorate and suggesting that illegal immigrants self-deport.
And yet, establishment insiders in the GOP tell me that the third time may be the charm.
The smart folks in the party are not committed to any presidential candidate this early, said Scott Reed, the senior political strategist for the US Chamber of Commerce, the powerful business lobby that has scored a string of establishment victories over Tea Party candidates in this years Republican primaries. But Romney cant be dismissed as the guy who lost last time.
You watch him on TV these days, and hes a new guy with total command of the issues and a real presence, Reed added. He could throw an organization together and get the money.
Mitt Romney speaks during a campaign rally in Nevada in 2012.Photo: Getty Images
A wealthy New York-based Republican with close ties to members of the donor class, who spoke to me on the condition of anonymity, wholeheartedly agrees.
Most of the people I talk to who are involved in Republican politics as donors want a winner, he told me. And many of these people are talking about Romney because so many of the things he said in 2012 about Russia being a geopolitical foe and people losing their health insurance under ObamaCare have come to pass.
Until a few months ago, the favorite among establishment Republicans was Chris Christie. And there are still those in the GOP, such as Kenneth Langone, the billionaire co-founder of The Home Depot, who support the New Jersey governor.
You watch him on TV these days, and hes a new guy with total command of the issues and a real presence. He could throw an organization together and get the money.-Political strategist Scott Reed
See original here:
Why Mitt Romney may again be the GOPs next great hope
As of 2014, 19 states -- 18 of which are led by Republican governors -- have declined outright to...
The Republican fight against Medicaid expansion is far from over, but there are fewer opponents than there used to be.
The expansion of the government health insurance program was originally supposed to be mandatory under the Affordable Care Act, but the Supreme Court made it optional as part of a landmark decision on the law in June of 2012.
In the wake of the decision, Republican governors flocked to announce they were declining to expand coverage.
As of 2014, 19 states 18 of which are led by Republican governors have declined outright to expand coverage, but some former holdouts are beginning to come to terms with expansion.
This week, Pennsylvania formally agreed to terms with federal regulators, raising the number of states that have expanded coverage for low-income residents under Obamacare to 27. Pennsylvania is the ninth state led by a Republican governor to expand Medicaid.
Another Republican, Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam, also announced Friday that his state will begin the process of preparing a plan for Medicaid expansion.
The state is expected to pursue a hybrid plan to help lower-income residents enroll in plans on the Obamacare exchanges.
Tennessee joins Utah and Indiana in the pool of states where Republican governors are actively negotiating with the Obama administration to expand coverage, and more states could be joining the pool soon.
Democratic governors in Missouri and Virginia are on record for supporting expansion, but have have failed to persuade their respective legislatures to go along.
Read more here:
Is the Republican fight against Medicaid expansion over?