Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

Jason Chaffetz, Powerful House Republican, Won’t Run in 2018 – New York Times


New York Times
Jason Chaffetz, Powerful House Republican, Won't Run in 2018
New York Times
WASHINGTON Representative Jason Chaffetz, the powerful chairman of the House oversight committee, told supporters on Wednesday that he would not seek re-election to Congress or run for any office in 2018. Mr. Chaffetz, 50, a Utah Republican ...
Powerful Republican Jason Chaffetz says he won't run for Congress againVICE News
Top Republican and Benghazi crusader Jason Chaffetz will not seek reelection in CongressRaw Story
Republican ethics chairman refusing to investigate Trump says he will not seek re-electionThe Independent

all 187 news articles »

See more here:
Jason Chaffetz, Powerful House Republican, Won't Run in 2018 - New York Times

Top Republican presses Trump to submit war authorization – The Hill

A top House Republican is urging President Trump to submit to Congress a new use-of-force resolution governing the country's fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said the sustained nature of the U.S. military actions against ISIS demands that Congress grant the president the authority to conduct future operations against the terrorist group. Hes calling on Trump to take the first step.

The president ought to submit on his own a new, you know, request for the authorization and use of military force, Cole told CNNs New Day on Wednesday. We should debate it and pose the approach limits, if there are, and go from there.

Trump escalated the militarys involvement in the Middle East earlier this month, firing 59 missiles at an airfield controlled by the Syrian government. The strike was a direct response to a poison gas attack against civilians said to be initiated by Syrian President Bashar Assad days earlier.

He had the right to do that. That was a one-strike thing. I don't think that required congressional approval, Cole said of Trump.

But we're in sustained military activity against ISIS. I think that does require a new authorization, because ISIS didn't exist in 2002 and we certainly weren't fighting in Syria and didn't expect to be, he added.

So if you are fighting against a new enemy in new places, it seems to me you need a new authorization for the use of military force.

Following the recent strike on Syria, a number of Republican leaders, including House Speaker Paul RyanPaul RyanChaffetz decision stuns Washington House GOP to hold Saturday conference call Ryan: GOP putting 'finishing touches' on healthcare bill MORE (R-Wis.), have urged Trump to confer with Congress about what should come next in the fight against ISIS. But they havent gone as far as Cole in calling for a new resolution authorizing the use of military force, known as an AUMF.

It is now appropriate for the administration to consult with Congress as it considers next steps to resolve the long-running crisis in Syria, Ryans office said following the strike.

Democrats have been much more aggressive. Behind House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), theyve been pushing Ryan to bring an early halt to Congresss current recess so lawmakers can start debating the future of military operations in Syria. By ignoring the issue, they argue, Congress is shirking its responsibility to protect the separation of powers dictated by the Constitution.

Congress last passed an AUMF in 2002, which authorized the post-9/11 fight in Iraq. A year earlier, lawmakers had passed another AUMF to govern the battle against al Qaeda in Afghanistan and beyond. Those calling now for a new resolution say the existing AUMFs are outdated and no longer apply to the expanded fight against terrorism, which is focused largely in Syria.

Trump had criticized Obama in 2013, suggesting any military actions in Syria would require congressional clearance.

The President must get Congressional approval before attacking Syria big mistake if he does not! Trump, then a reality TV star, tweeted at the time.

In 2015, Obama had proposed a new AUMF designed to dictate the terms of U.S. military involvement in Syria and other Middle Eastern hotspots. But many lawmakers on both sides of the aisle opposed the measure, and GOP leaders, who controlled both chambers of Congress, never considered it.

Cole on Wednesday took a jab at Obama for not proposing an AUMF sooner, but also acknowledged the political difficulties facing leaders of both parties when it comes to voting on new military campaigns more than 15 years after 9/11.

Frankly, the leadership of both parties in the House has not wanted to have a vote on the use of military force. And the reason [is] they want to try to protect their members, Democrats and Republican leaders, Cole told CNN.

[But] the reality is we're paid to vote. And the Constitution is pretty clear on this, he added. So I don't think there is any excuse for Congress not taking this up.

Congress is scheduled to return to Washington on Tuesday.

The rest is here:
Top Republican presses Trump to submit war authorization - The Hill

Jason Chaffetz and Devin Nunes were both faced with investigating Trump. Now both are stepping aside. – Washington Post

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) announced on April 19, that he won't run for office in 2018, amid speculations of higher political ambitions. Here's a look back at the rocky year Chaffetz has had since Trump took office. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

There are two House Republican chairmen tasked with possibly investigatingPresident Trump. One of them Rep. Devin Nunes (Calif.) messed it up so badly that he had to step aside. And now the other is retiring from Congress.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz's retirement announcement Wednesday came as a surprise. Talk quickly turned to whether it was because liberals successfully berated him at town hall meetings, whether he feared a well-funded opponent in 2018,and/or whether he was just trying to get a head start on the 2020 Utah governor's race.

The last of these makes complete sense, as The Fix's Amber Phillips notes.But the first feeds into an emerging reality of 2017: Trump is giving the people charged with investigating him fits.

Because Republicans are in the majority, those people happen to be fellow Republicans. And that's creatingsome impossible choices.

Through Trump's reluctance to quash potential conflicts of interest and his penchant for making wild accusations and then pawning them off on investigators, jobs such as Chaffetz's House Oversight Committee chairmanship have become completely thankless. Less than three months into the Trump administration, Chaffetz was forced to repeatedly shrug off Democrats and watchdogs' calls for him to investigate Trump's possible conflicts of interest. He also had to answer for Trump's allegation that millions of people voted illegally in the 2016 election. He was even pressed to investigate Nunes's conduct, which led the House Intelligence Committee chairman to hand off hisRussia investigation.

The only investigation Chaffetz has actually leaned into, it turns out, was the one Trump really wanted him to: rooting out leaks in the federal government.

McKay Coppins sums it up well:

Even before Chaffetz announced his abrupt exit, his political luck had suffered a steep decline when Trump was elected. As oversight chairman, he was preparing to spend four years investigating President Hillary Clintons alleged scandals and misdeeds. Then the Republicans unexpectedly seized control of the White House, leaving Chaffetz with the unenviable task of policing his own party. It was a fraught job to begin with, and his casual attitude toward the Trump familys potential conflicts of interest demonstratedin his interview with melast month has only increased the pressure on him.

Aside from Trump and Clinton, one Utah Republican told me last month, nobodys fortunes changed more on presidential election night than Jason Chaffetz.

It's one thing to shrug off clearly partisan efforts to get you to investigate a president, and most presidents are careful to avoid doing the kinds of things that put you in that position. But Trump has no such compunction. He's not afraid to saddle you with investigating his wild, evidence-free claims. And not only that; he will gladly take you on publicly if you run afoul of him.

For Chaffetz and Nunes, that leads to decisions between giving in to extraordinary and in many cases, legitimate public pressure to investigate Trump and doing what your president and party want you to.

Nunes erred way too much toward the latter and paid the price. Andyou can bet an ambitious and smart politician like Chaffetz knows this whole thing is a lose-lose situation for him.

Continue reading here:
Jason Chaffetz and Devin Nunes were both faced with investigating Trump. Now both are stepping aside. - Washington Post

Dissident republican parade held in Derry – BBC News


BBC News
Dissident republican parade held in Derry
BBC News
About 2,000 people have attended a dissident republican parade in Londonderry. It was organised by Saoradh. The parade started in the Bogside at Free Derry Corner and made its way into the Creggan estate where a wreath was laid at a republican ...
Dissident republicans march through DerryBelfast Telegraph
Dissident republicans parade through Derry's BogsideIrish Times

all 6 news articles »

Go here to see the original:
Dissident republican parade held in Derry - BBC News

Millenial opens up about his remarkable journey from Democratic activist to Republican stalwart – TheBlaze.com

It wasnt all that long ago that Erich Reimer, 26, was an active member of the Democratic Party. Today, hes a conservative Republican.

As early as in high school, Reimer was a member of his schools High School Democrats in his hometown ofAlbany, New York. After high school, Reimer spent two years at Johns Hopkins University, where he majored in international studies. He then transferred to the University of Pennsylvania, where he studied economics. At both colleges, Reimer was involved with College Democrats.

In 2008, Reimer worked as an unpaid staffer for former President Barack Obamas re-election campaign. Four years later, as Reimer watched the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, he said there was one particular moment that began his personal journey from a Democratic activist to a staunch Republican ally.

Specifically, Reimer told TheBlaze that the jaw dropping moment that would shift his politics forever was when the Democratic Party held a vote to reinsert the mention of God back into the partys platform and recognize Jerusalem as the official capital of Israel, a proposal that garnered loud boos in the convention hall after the attendees voted three times, due to the first two voice votes being too close to call.

It was that moment that the party Reimer had been actively involved with more than four years was no longer recognizable to him.

It felt like traditional Democrats, traditional liberals simply were not the dominant force anymore, let alone the centrist moderates, Reimer said. It was definitely a noticeable hard shift to the left. It was very disappointing, shocking, as well as bad for the country as a whole to have that become normalized.

This year, the Democratic Party has lost its way. An ideologically progressive agenda has replaced the diversity of viewpoints that previously reflected the partys composition and style for so many years, Reimer wrote in a September 2012 opinion editorial for the Daily Pennsylvanian newspaper.

Reimer said the moment was not just a stunning moment for him politically, but also personally.

Faith is definitely a very important foundation of my life, said Reimer, a devout Lutheran.

He also added that faith is a very important foundation of our American civil society, since our founding, essentially.

Reimer said it was the God moment at the 2012 DNC, combined with the Lefts increasing acceptance of progressively liberal positions that eventually led him to seriously ponder his future with the party.

As the Obama era went on and especially as became evident during the 2012 election, the Democrats became both more tolerant as well as embracing more hard-left positions that I felt were beyond simple, liberal things, Reimer told TheBlaze. They were more like, instead of say, like a liberal who might advocate raising the minimum wage a little, to a vengeful, justice against Wall Street and corporations.

So in 2013, Reimer officially switched his party affiliation from Democrat to Republican.

This was no easy decision, Reimer wrote in a February 2016 opinion editorial for the Hill. I had spent years in the Democratic Party. I had always been passionate about politics and had given the Democratic Party my all. By switching, I was putting on the line not only much of my lifes work but also the connections with countless thousands of comrades-in-arms I had met through this work.

Switching parties wasnt the only major event of Reimers life in 2013. It was also the year that he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a political science degree. He went on to enroll at the University of Virginia School of Law, where he is currently a J.D. candidate scheduled to graduate in May 2017.

In Virginia, Reimer has continued his political activism. He was one of two statewide electors in the 2016 presidential campaign. He was one of the first prominent Republicans in Virginia to endorse Donald Trump as the partys nominee, even though he supported Ohio Gov. John Kasich throughout the primaries.

In May 2016, when it became clear that Trump would be the nominee, Reimer wrote in an opinion editorial for the Richmond Times-Dispatch:

Its time for Republicans to unite behind our nominee. Trump won it fair and square, and the voters have spoken. Trump has re-energized many disillusioned and apathetic Americans in a way that can do a lot of good for the publics trust in our institutions and help us build a healthier republic. We have a Supreme Court vacancy to fill, executive branch departments to staff, policies to correct, and laws to be enacted. Its going to be tough, thats for sure. But our party will be better off with the renewal Trump has brought to it.

Despite the fact that he disagreed with many of Trumps policies, not to mention Trumps unique style of speaking, Reimer made the case for Trump in a piece for the Loudoun Tribune newspaper in Loudoun County, Virginia, in September 2016, urging his fellow Republicans to not get bogged down in ultimately irrelevant, even if distasteful, distractions.

Trumps rhetoric and actions over the course of the primary and general campaign have been at many times disappointing, Reimer wrote.

However, he added that over the course of the campaign, Trump improved greatly when it came to making fewer controversial comments.

That, Reimer concluded, was enough to give Republicans enough hope that a President Trump would act appropriately.Reimer then urged his fellow Virginians in swing Loudoun County, just outside Washington, D.C., to vote for Trump on Election Day.

Even the most liberal among us certainly must agree that a revolving door of power is something naturally American and beneficial in keeping the excesses of one party in check, Reimer wrote.

The Democratic Party has been able to deeply shape the course of this nation over the past decade. Maybe now its time to give the Republican Party a turn, Reimer said.

See the original post:
Millenial opens up about his remarkable journey from Democratic activist to Republican stalwart - TheBlaze.com