Mediaboss Marketing

Yet instead of holding the Koch brothers lackeys to account, the media says the GOPs murder-suicide policy can be chalked up in part to Democratic hubris.

President Trump announcing that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris Accord, Thursday, June 1, 2017. (Cheriss May / Sipa via AP Images)

Come take a nostalgic spin with me into the pastbefore, that is, James Comeys dramatic testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee. Im thinking of the day Donald Trump announced the United States withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. Boy, was that big news. The New York Times ran three articles about it above the fold. The story led the news broadcasts, cable programs, and Sunday shows, and it dominated social-media feeds for days.

Preserving the atmosphere interferes with the Koch brothers business plan. Theyll let their heirs worry about a poisoned planet.

Leave aside certain subtleties, like the fact that the withdrawal wont take effect until November 4, 2020, which happens to be the day after our next presidential election. What was really new about this news? Given the attention lavished on Trumps decision, an observer might imagine that addressing climate change had long been deemed a matter of crucial political importance. Think back to last years campaign: Remember all the coverage that the two candidates views on climate change and the Paris accord received?

Neither do I. Not a single question about climate change was asked of any presidential candidate by a moderator during the 2016 debates (or the 2012 debates, for that matter). Clinton did bring the subject up unbidden during one of them, when she noted, accurately, that Trump had repeatedly made and tweeted ridiculous accusations, such as that the concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make US manufacturing non-competitive. But neither the moderators at the debates nor the vast majority of pundits who graded the candidates performances thought this lunatic assertion worthy of further exploration.

When it comes to global warming, as on so many other issues, Trump is perfectly in sync with the Republican Party and out of sync with pretty much the entire educated world. No other major political party on the planet rejects the international scientific consensus that global warming is both caused by humans and poses a profound threat to civilization, including our own. Once upon a time, politicians like John McCain and Lindsey Graham dabbled in common sense on the issue, but they soon found that their national ambitions demanded a complete reversal. Now its almost impossible to find a Republican politician willing to put his or her career at risk by speaking the truth about climate change. Even supposedly sensible conservative pundits pledge fealty to this know-nothing, anti-science view. Anti-Trump conservative Erick Erickson is frequently lauded for his criticisms of the president. This American hero recently tweeted, I just have a hard time believing climate change extremists when so many of them also believe boys can become girls. And as Ive noted, Bret Stephens is the latest recipient of the honor of a New York Times op-ed column, despite having dismissed human-caused global warming as a mass hysteria phenomenon.

No other major party on the planet rejects the scientific consensus that human-caused global warming is a threat to civilization.

Sure, Trump is the worst in every way. But the United States would still have withdrawn from the Paris accord if any Republican had won the presidency. Not a single candidate supported it; the GOPs platform dismissed it. And Trumps withdrawal received not a single word of criticism from any influential member of the party. One can point to any number of causes for this devotion to willful ignorance, but the most obvious is that it is highly remunerative. Shortly after Trumps decision, the Times published an investigation into how David and Charles Koch have used their multibillion-dollar fortune to ensure that smearing mainstream climate science as fake and a conspiracy became, in the words of Republican strategist Whit Ayres, yet another of the long list of litmus test issues that determine whether or not youre a good Republican.

For the Koch brothers, the trade-off is simple. Their fortune is in fossil fuels, and preserving the atmosphere interferes with their business plan. Theyll leave it to their heirs to worry about the consequences of a poisoned planet. The Times piece, written by Coral Davenport and Eric Lipton, is a valuable contribution toward helping us understand how so many ostensibly sensible people can be made to utter total nonsense in public with only minimal embarrassment. But the article suffered from a fundamental and typical Times-ian flaw: It sought to blame the problem not only on Republicans, their funders, and their apologists, but also on what it termed Democratic hubris. The term appeared in the articles subhead and its opening paragraph, in which we learned that the GOPs murder-suicide policy on climate change can be chalked up in part to Democratic hubris in the Obama years and a partisan chasm that grew over nine years like a crack in the Antarctic shelf, favoring extreme positions and uncompromising rhetoric over cooperation and conciliation.

THE STAKES ARE HIGHER NOW THAN EVER. GET THE NATION IN YOUR INBOX.

The only extreme position the article mentioned is that of the Republicans. As for Democratic hubris, in the course of more than 4,500 words, we dont actually get any. Yes, Henry A. Waxman, a retired House Democrat, is quoted as saying that he had expected a cap-and-trade bill to pass in 2009 because (back then) McCain, the partys presidential candidate, supported it together with a few Republicans and most Democrats. I thought we could get it done, Waxman told the reporters. Thats it.

In short, the Koch brothers and their allies paid the Republicans to repudiate their extremely tentative steps for dealing with a threat to the future habitability of the planet (as well as a massive national-security risk), while one Democratic House memberhaving underestimated the other sides craven willingness to bow down before its megabucks donors and ideological obsessivesmistakenly opined that a successful agreement was possible.

So there you have it, yet again: Both sides do it. Just dont examine the evidence too carefully.

More:
Lying About Climate Change Is What Makes a Good Republican - The Nation.

BBC News

Republican says Obama 'deepened' divisions that sparked shooting BBC News Republican congressman Steve King has blamed President Barack Obama for fuelling political divisions that led to an attack on Republican lawmakers. Mr Obama "focused on our differences rather than our things that unify us", the Iowa Republican said. and more »

Originally posted here:
Republican says Obama 'deepened' divisions that sparked shooting - BBC News

James T. Hodgkinson.

James Hodgkinson/Handout via Reuters

Law enforcement officials reportedly identified Wednesdays congressional Republican baseball practice shooter as James T. Hodgkinson of Belleville, Illinois. President Donald Trump reported that Hodgkinson died after exchanging gunfire with law enforcement.

The 66-year-old home inspectors social media accounts reveal him to have been a longtime Bernie Sanders supporter who held a vociferous grudge against Republican lawmakers and also disliked Hillary Clinton.

In recent months he had taken to posting multiple political memes a day on his Facebook page often with a heavily anti-Republican slant. He would also attach his own messages to those memes. Here are some of the most notable of those posts:

Rep. Ron DeSantis said earlier on Wednesday that as he was leaving the field before the shooting occurred, a guy ... walked up to us that was asking whether it was Republicans or Democrats out there.

The Washington Post reported that Hodgkinson was charged in April 2006 with battery and aiding damage to a motor vehicle and the charges were eventually dismissed. The paper also noted that he owned a home inspection business, but his license expired in November and had not been renewed.

Hodgkinson's wife reportedly told ABC News that hed been living in Alexandria, Virginiathe site of the shootingfor the past two months.

Update, 12:30 p.m.: Hodgkinson volunteered for the Sanders campaign. The former presidential candidate has issued this statement on the Senate floor:

Meanwhile, NBC News' Peter Alexander is reporting that the 2006 assault charge was for attacking his then-girlfriend. "At the time police recovered a pocket knife, hair they say was pulled out of his girlfriend's head, and they recovered a 12-guage shotgun at the scene," NBC reported.

In a letter to the editor to the Belleville News-Democrat, Hodgkinson also once said he believed that President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and most of Bush's Cabinet to be "traitors."

See the original post here:
Congressional Baseball Shooter Hated Republicans, Has Died of Injuries - Slate Magazine (blog)

Natalie Matthews-Ramo

On a balmy May evening at a D.C. rooftop bar with a view of the Capitol, two dozen or so Republicans milled around drinking topical cocktails. There was the bourbon-based Pre-Existing Condition. Russian to the White House paired vodka with elderflower and grapefruit. The Spicey Margarita paid homage to the long-suffering, bush-hiding, Holocaust centering White House press secretary.

Christina Cauterucci is a Slate staff writer.

The crowd had gathered to celebrate the launch of Republican Women for Progress, a nonprofit that grew out of opposition to the partys de facto leader. Formerly named Republican Women for Hillarya loose network of women who temporarily turned against their party to support the Democratic nominee over Donald TrumpRWFP is fashioning itself as a home for women who want to see the GOP abandon Trumpism in favor of a more inclusive, moderate ideology. Meghan Milloy, one of RWFPs co-founders, says the organizations goal is eventually to become an EMILYs List for the reasonable Republican woman, name-checking the 30-year-old fundraising and training organization for pro-choice Democratic women. What does reasonable mean to Milloy? Not being an asshole, mainly.

Every day, I think Hillary Clinton should have been president, says 31-year-old Jennifer Pierotti Lim, who founded Republican Women for Hillary and RWFP. There were a number of policy areas I didnt agree with her on, but when it came to biggest faults of Trumpnational security and trade policy and general adeptness at being a leaderHillary came out far ahead.

The women of RWFP see Clinton as a moderate, even a moderate Republican, as board member Ariel Hill-Davis, 32, puts it. A self-professed business conservative, Hill-Davis can sound a lot like a Democrat: She believes in reasonable gun control, abortion access, and reforming a justice system thats imprisoned an entire generation of black men. She protested Trumps travel ban and is passionate about LGBTQ rights. But Hill-Davis comes from a long line of Republicans and says she salivates at the thought of entitlement reform. Her years working for trade associations in the mining and manufacturing industries shored up a belief that regulations on businesses can poison a healthy economy. Lets just say I dont have a problem with the fact that Scott Pruitt is running the EPA, she says.

Milloy, whos 30, was turned off by Trumps misogyny and general incompetence during the campaignand still isbut also felt that his positions on trade and immigration didnt reflect traditional Republican values. We kind of want to rewind to, I guess, if there ever was an era of the moderate Republican that really does care about small business and the middle class, and wants to grow the economy, and isnt focused on wedge issues, she said at the launch party. Milloy had hoped GOP leaders could personally oppose things like LGBTQ rights and abortion while publicly recognizing that the Supreme Court had already affirmed these rights. The majority of the country supports those rulings, and though RWFP women harbor a range of views on abortion, they support gay rights and agree that extreme anti-choice measures, like shutting down womens health centers in the way of Texas, make for bad public policy.

Tim Lim

Yet the GOP has doubled down on social issues, which wouldnt appear to help them court younger voters. The Pew Research Center put millennial support for equal marriage at 71 percent in 2016, when 62 percent of people aged 1829 said abortion should be legal in all or most circumstances. While in the last decade young people have increasingly forgone identification with either partya trend that should concern Democrats, toomillennials have become more likely to identify as liberal, while the proportion of conservative millennials has remained constant.

In the short term, RWFPs leaders want the group to function like a hybrid think tank and civic participation club, releasing in-depth policy analysis and helping women get involved in politics as advocates or candidates. On top of the list of role models for the group are Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, both Republican women whove recently opposed their party in votes on Planned Parenthood funding and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos confirmation. The leaders of RWFP believe that if there were more Murkowskis and Collinses in office willing to criticize or break with their own party, the GOP might not have ended up with candidate Trump.

On top of the list of role models for the group are Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine.

Eventually, RWFP intends to form a political action committee and train would-be candidates themselves. The group is building on an existing network of 10 state chapters left over from pre-election organizing as Republican Women for Hillary, a group Lim started in May 2016, after Trump became the GOPs presumptive nominee. She was motivated in large part by his history of misogynist treatment of women. At the time, Lim was working as director of health policy for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and assumed her side gig would only last through the election, no matter who won. But what we learned through the campaign was there were so many Republican women who felt the same way as us, who felt so disconnected from the party and didnt agree with the direction the party was going, Lim says.

Tracy Russo

She earned a speaking slot at the Democratic National Convention and, with Milloy, organized fellow Republican Hillary supporters in the groups state chapters to join local get-out-the-vote efforts. The group wanted to give cover to other Republicans, especially Republican women, who might be wary of publicly rebuking Trump on their own. They held coming-out parties for lifelong Republicans who had to break it to their parents or significant others that theyd be casting votes for a Democrat. They also met older Republican women who kept their misgivings about Trump to themselves because they were raised to think it was gauche for women to talk politics. Some said they wanted to vote for Clinton, but their husbands wouldnt let them or even filled out their absentee ballots on their behalf. We were like, Oh my gosh, what?! Are you in the voting booth together? Just do what you want, Milloy says. Thats our target, to empower [women]. Dont let your husband, or anyone, tell you what you need to be thinking or feeling or voting.

Lim, Milloy, and Hill-Davis spent election night at what was supposed to be a victory party they held with a like-minded organization called Never Trump. I was an absolute mess, Hill-Davis recalls of that night. It was really eye-opening for me, she says, to realize where our country actually is in terms of how we view strong women. I work in a mans world, and Im used to interacting with men, so seeing a really strong woman get torn down for all the things we elevate and praise in men was brutal.

The Republican Party generally abhors anything that smacks of identity politics when the identities arent white and male, and that would include initiatives such as RWFP that strive to help a particular demographic get a leg up. RWFP members believe that the Republican Party, at its best, stands for equal opportunity but not necessarily equal outcomes. This election cycle reinforced their suspicion that equal opportunity for women in politics is a myth. It fundamentally changed my understanding of the country, Hill-Davis says, to see misogyny, among other forces of hate, keep a pre-eminently capable candidate from besting the least-qualified candidate the U.S. had ever seen.

Part of RWFPs goal is pushing more women to run in general, Hill-Davis says. But the other part is carving out a safe space to be a Republican thats not toeing the current party line. Ive been called a RINO since I got to D.C. But from my perspective, things like LGBT rights and access to reproductive health care for womenthose are actually small-government issues, in that they protect peoples rights to make their own decisions about their bodies and lives. Other RWFP leaders are chagrined by Republican state legislators obsession with anti-transgender bathroom laws and Attorney General Jeff Sessions crusade for tougher prosecution of minor drug offenses. The group prides itself on accepting supporters who hold a variety of political viewpoints. For instance, some women of RWFP stayed home from the Womens March on Washington because of its exclusion of anti-abortion groups, but Lim staffed a hospitality suite for marching RWFP supporters in a friends D.C. apartment near the march route.

Milloy cringes at the memory of Vice President Mike Pences viral photo of his health care meeting with the House Freedom Caucus, capturing more than two dozen attendees with not a woman visible among them. At the very least, she wondered, didnt anyone in the roomall members of a party thats regularly criticized for its treatment of womenthink about the crappy optics of that meeting? After Mitt Romneys defeat in the 2012 election, the Republican National Committees autopsy concluded that women represent more than half the voting population in the country, and our inability to win their votes is losing us elections. Then, oddly enough, they went ahead and nominated Donald Trump. Odder still, he won. Right now I think a lot of Republicans in the party think, Well, we won. We own the whole government, so were kind of winning right now. Why would we go back and look at things that might not be working? says Lim.

The women of RWFP are hanging their hopes for a GOP reckoning on the 2018 midterm elections, when they hope big Republican losses will force party leadership to shift course toward the center. I dont think I have it in me to be a Democrat, says Hill-Davis, due to her commitment to fiscal conservatism. But since the Republican Party is currently full of people putting party before country, she says, RWFP plans to build its own activist infrastructure and candidate pipeline outside party bounds.

RWFP plans to build its own activist infrastructure and candidate pipeline outside party bounds.

Democratic women have a formidable roster of role models in state and national politics, plus a zillion organizations that can help them run for office, but there are comparatively few bipartisan candidate-training groups for women and barely any that focus on Republicans. Most of the ones that do exist are closely tied to the national party and led by people like Carrie Almond, president of the National Federation of Republican Women, who told me in January that she was blown away with the excitement and enthusiasm of conservative women in support of a President Trump. Republican women dismayed by Trumps victoryand by the national party leadership that boosted Trump and some of the far-right obstructionists in Congress into officedont mesh with that crowd.

But those same disaffected Republicans wouldnt feel at home with Democrats, either. The women of RWFP maintain that they can have a bigger influence on the countrys direction by forcing the party to change rather than giving up and registering as independents. Part of their loyalty to the GOP is cultural: Lim says the Republican Party inspires a tribal mentality in members. Thats useful when it comes to voter turnout but not when it delivers victory to candidates who will sour voters on the party in the long term.

Even for Lim, tribal allegiance can only go so far. If Trump is elected a second time, that would make it pretty hard to think we could bring the Republican Party back to where RWFP wants it to be, she says. If the GOP accepts Trumpism as the new norm, Lim might leave the party to which shes staked her professional name. You do have to draw a line somewhere, she says. Its hard to even know where that line is these days.

Read the original post:
Pro-Women. Pro-Republican. Anti-Trump. - Slate Magazine

On Wednesday night, The Post reported that special counsel Robert Mueller, appointed to investigate attempts by Russia to meddle in the 2016 election, had expanded that investigation to include possible obstruction of justice by President Trump.

The move by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to investigate Trumps conduct, we wrote, marks a major turning point in the nearly year-old FBI investigation, which until recently focused on Russian meddling during the presidential campaign and on whether there was any coordination between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Investigators have also been looking for any evidence of possible financial crimes among Trump associates, officials said.

In response to that report, the Republican Party issued a set of talking points, meant to guide allies of Trumps in rebutting the claims made in our article. Those talking points are below, annotated by The Post with notes clarifying or correcting the arguments being made.

The special counsel overseeing the investigation into Russia's role in the 2016 election is interviewing senior intelligence officials to determine whether President Trump attempted to obstruct justice, officials said. (Patrick Martin,McKenna Ewen/The Washington Post)

View original post here:
The Republican response to reports of an investigation into Trump, annotated - Washington Post