Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

House Republicans to miss budget deadline as defense hawks clash with fiscal conservatives – Washington Times

House Republicans emerged from a closed-door meeting Tuesday signaling that they will miss another self-imposed target to vote on a budget this week, as long-running disputes between conservative budget hawks and powerful committee chairmen leave the party politically crippled.

Defense hawks are demanding tens of billions of dollars more for the Pentagon, and other top lawmakers are protecting their turf. That leaves budget writers struggling to deliver enough cash to meet all those needs while finding enough room to cut the top number.

Budget Committee Chairwoman Diane Black, Tennessee Republican, said she sees a path to writing a 2018 spending plan but added that it will take more time.

My goal is to get a budget this year, and we are working hard at it and we are very close, she said. We have a majority here. We need to pass a budget.

Some had hoped her committee would hold votes on a budget this week. Republicans already have broken the April 15 deadline set in law for passing a budget.

Instead, the spending committees have begun to work on the annual appropriations bills without a budget.

Mrs. Black is looking at a basic division that would give domestic programs $511 billion in discretionary spending and reserve $621 billion for defense. Many lawmakers appear comfortable with those numbers.

But House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry, Texas Republican, said the Pentagon will need at least $640 billion higher than Mrs. Blacks figure and far more than President Trumps request of $603 billion.

Mr. Thornberry and other defense hawks say the Defense Department has been crippled by years of belt-tightening and needs the infusion to stay ahead of enemies.

I would like to see [a] $640 billion top line for base budget, Rep. Trent Franks, Arizona Republican, told The Washington Times. I believe thats whats needed.

Im not sure everybodys with me on that, he said.

Even Mr. Trumps $603 billion figure would blow through a $549 billion defense spending cap that lawmakers agreed to as part of a 2011 law that triggers automatic across-the-board cuts, or sequesters, if the caps are breached.

Congress has voted to raise the caps in the past, but doing so requires at least 60 votes in the Senate to avert a filibuster. Democrats, who control 48 seats in the upper chamber, would need to sign off on the terms of any increase.

I think the interesting thing is were appropriating and yet we dont have an agreement with the Senate, said Rep. Mark Meadows, North Carolina Republican and chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus. And so I think its critically important that we have some bicameral discussions on what those numbers should be.

More money at the Pentagon means less elsewhere in the budget, and lawmakers are struggling to find places to cut.

Rep. Michael K. Conaway, Texas Republican and chairman of the Agriculture Committee, said the fight isnt so much over defense spending but over what gets cut to clear the way for a $621 billion figure.

The food stamps program, where Mr. Trump has suggested deep cuts, falls under his jurisdiction.

Part of being on the team is you fight your fight as hard as you can, you make your positions known as hard as you can, then when the positions made you soldier on and get it done, Mr. Conaway said.

The spending debate is particularly sensitive this year because its tied directly to tax reform, one of the Republicans defining agenda items for the rest of the year.

Republicans need to write a 2018 budget in order to set up the reconciliation process that would allow them to overhaul the tax code without having to face a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. Its the same process they are using to try to repeal Obamacare, based on the 2017 budget.

But passing a budget is always tough because it demands limits to spending.

If lawmakers cut too deeply from nondefense programs in the pursuit of cutting taxes, then the political ads practically write themselves, said Rep. Charles W. Dent, Pennsylvania Republican.

You run the risk of the very simple political attack. Were cutting taxes, business taxes, and then were [at] the same time potentially weakening safety net programs for lower-income people, he said.

House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat, said the Republican delay pushes Congress closer to a government shutdown, which could happen if lawmakers cant agree on spending bills by the end of September.

It is deeply concerning that Republicans seem more focused on the budget process merely as a vehicle for enacting partisan tax reform through reconciliation rather than because budgets are how Congress sets priorities for our nation, Mr. Hoyer said.

See the rest here:
House Republicans to miss budget deadline as defense hawks clash with fiscal conservatives - Washington Times

Republican tax code revamp hits House budget obstacle – Reuters

By David Morgan | WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON Republican efforts to overhaul the U.S. tax code have hit a snag in the House of Representatives, where infighting over spending cuts is delaying adoption of a legislative tool they need to move a tax bill forward.

The House Budget Committee canceled plans to send a budget resolution for fiscal 2018 to the floor this week, lawmakers said on Tuesday, as conservative Republicans pushed to add hundreds of billions of dollars in mandatory spending cuts to the blueprint.

House and Senate passage of a budget resolution is vital to President Donald Trump's pledge to deliver on tax reform this year because the document would free Republicans to circumvent Democratic opposition in the Senate. But the push to cut programs including Medicaid and food stamps, which benefit the poor, could lead to a stalemate.

Trump administration officials and Republican leaders in Congress are working separately to agree on a tax bill that can be unveiled in September.

"No budget, no tax reform," said Representative Mark Walker, who chairs the Republican Study Committee, a group of more than 150 conservative lawmakers. "That's why there should be a sense of urgency to get this done pretty quick."

Their aim is to cut mandatory programs that are required by law and viewed as principle drivers of deficit spending. The result could be legislation containing lower taxes for the wealthy and corporations alongside reduced benefits for the poor.

Lawmakers say there is Republican agreement on topline discretionary spending levels of $621.5 billion for defense and $511 billion for non-defense programs.

Representative Jim Jordan, a leading member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, is pushing to cut as much as $400 billion over a decade from a range of programs that benefit the poor. Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows said he wanted another $295 billion in cuts on top of that.

"It has to be linked to tax reform, because we believe tax reform is going to happen," Jordan said in an interview.

The budget committee canceled its plans this week after the chairmen of several other panels pushed back against efforts to include $250 billion in spending cuts.

"The end game is to get a budget out of the committee," House Budget Committee Chairwoman Diane Black told reporters. "I do see a viable path. And I am going to continue to push."

(Reporting by David Morgan; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Andrew Hay)

WASHINGTON Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta, on Tuesday appeared before the U.S. House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, which has begun interviewing witnesses in its probe of how Russia may have influenced the 2016 election.

BEIJING Newly appointed U.S. Ambassador to China Terry Branstad said on Wednesday the United States would like to see Nobel Peace Prize-winning activist Liu Xiaobo treated elsewhere for cancer, and that the two countries must work together on human rights.

Read more here:
Republican tax code revamp hits House budget obstacle - Reuters

Tax cuts in the Republican health care plan are the ‘central’ issue – MSNBC


MSNBC
Tax cuts in the Republican health care plan are the 'central' issue
MSNBC
If Republicans were serious about identifying and addressing the Affordable Care Act's real shortcomings, they could work out a deal with Democrats, stabilize the marketplaces, offer incentives to insurers, and make meaningful improvements to the system.

and more »

Visit link:
Tax cuts in the Republican health care plan are the 'central' issue - MSNBC

GOP health care bill in peril with at least 5 Republican senators in opposition – ABC News

At least five Republican senators all say they will oppose a key procedural vote expected this week on the GOP health care plan that will repeal and replace Obamacare -- a move that would effectively block the GOP health care bill from reaching the floor.

Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Dean Heller of Nevada, Mike Lee of Utah and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin have signaled they will vote no, or plan to vote no, if there are no changes made to the legislation ahead of the vote, expected Tuesday or Wednesday.

With only 52 seats in the Senate, Republicans can only afford two defections and still advance the health care bill.

This news comes on the heels of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report released Monday that estimates that 22 million more Americans will be uninsured by the end of the next 10 years under the Senate Republican health care plan than under current law, with 15 million more uninsured persons in the next year alone.

Sen. Collins, who earlier today had been uncommitted on advancing the health care measure, tweeted tonight: I want to work w/ my GOP & Dem colleagues to fix the flaws in ACA. CBO analysis shows Senate bill won't do it. I will vote no on mtp. MTP refers to Motion to Proceed, the procedural vote that brings up a bill on the floor for consideration.

Before the Senate can begin debate on most legislation, the senators must either unanimously agree to consider it or the majority leader must offer a motion to proceed to consideration of that bill.

The 22 million figure, which is only a slight improvement from the CBO's estimate of the health care bill passed by the House of Representatives in May, comes in the office's analysis of the Better Care Reconciliation Act, a draft of which was released last week.

The act, which faces staunch opposition from Democrats, could further result in a reduction of the cumulative federal deficit by $321 billion by 2026, largely due to cuts in Medicaid spending, according to the CBO's report.

I wont vote to proceed unless the bill changes, Sen. Paul told reporters Monday. He wants the GOP legislation to go even further in rolling back certain Obamacare measures.

Paul said he spoke with President Trump Sunday evening, but lamented over the lack of communication he has received from GOP leadership.

I had a long conversation with the president last night and I think he's open to negotiations, but we have not had any word from anyone in Senate leadership, he said.

No one from leadership has reached out to us, he added. "I would highly doubt I would support it, Sen. Ron Johnson told reporters of the motion to proceed. Johnson has been adamant in recent days to hold off on a vote on the bill, which leadership is pushing to happen before the July 4 recess.

Sen. Lee through a spokesman confirmed to ABC News that he also intends to vote "no" on the procedural vote unless changes are made.

On Friday, Sen. Dean Heller said he would not support the bill as it is during a press conference with the Nevada governor.

Moments after the CBO score was released Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-South Carolina, said the vote was getting tougher by the minute.

How you put all this together and get to 50 is going to be very tough and the CBO score doesn't help any. If you had problems with the bill before, you're probably going to have more problems now, he said.

Graham said if senators are considering voting no because of how it will affect their states, then stick to it and vote no.

I don't believe in this running off a cliff like our Democratic friends did. They got this herd mentality where we gotta pass this bill or else, he said.

Graham is still leaning yes on voting in support of the bill.

ABCs MaryAlice Parks and Adam Kelsey contributed to this report.

See original here:
GOP health care bill in peril with at least 5 Republican senators in opposition - ABC News

Seth Meyers: The Republican Healthcare Bill Is Cartoonishly Evil – Slate Magazine (blog)

In an uncivil and unproductive move, Seth Meyers called the Senate version of the Republican healthcare bill cartoonishly evil on Monday, saying that the only way it could be worse is if it mandated tying damsels in distress to railroad tracks. Never mind that the bill is terrible for everyone; our nations wheels are greased by a great unwillingness to call murder murder, whether its committed by cops or drones or laws. How are Republicans supposed to feel if Meyers points out on national TV that their signature policy goal is, in his words, a giant tax cut for the wealthy paid for with Medicaid cuts? Should right-wing parents have to explain to their kids what Meyers means when he says the secret Republican bill is, like a Slipknot tramp stamp: you definitely want to hide it, and the people whove seen it are terrible people? How long are we going to shame Trump voters for letting a bunch of rambling old men take a meat axe to health care?

The answers to these questions are, respectively: Republicans should feel fucking terrible, right-wing parents should have to constantly explain Republican savagery to their children, and no one who voted for Donald J. Trump to be President of the United States should be able to watch television without being insulted for at least a decade. That said, Meyers should maybe stop irresponsibly throwing around phrases likecartoonishly evil. Cartoons are funny.

Read more here:
Seth Meyers: The Republican Healthcare Bill Is Cartoonishly Evil - Slate Magazine (blog)