Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Harsh response to whistle-blowers took root under Obama – The Boston Globe

While retired federal judge Nancy Gertner made some excellent points in her op-ed regarding the admittedly invaluable contributions of whistle-blowers (Leaker or whistle-blower? Aug. 10), she seems to suggest inaccurately that the current administration is solely responsible for stifling whistle-blowers. Gertner overlooks that the ironic imbalance between whistle-blower protection in the private vs. public sector actually began in earnest during the Obama administration.

There is no question that in corporate America, whistle-blower protection has skyrocketed during the last 10 years, fueled by new laws such as Dodd-Frank, enhanced and stepped-up regulatory initiatives at the Department of Labor and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and court rulings expanding rights and remedies for whistle-blowers. Companies have responded, as evidenced by a recent survey by leading compliance solutions provider NAVEX Global that shows that average closure times for whistle-blower cases dropped nearly 10 percent from 2015 to 2016.

Advertisement

By contrast, those who blow the whistle in the public sector are branded as leakers (Edward Snowden) or, worse, thrown in jail (Chelsea Manning, Reality Winner). Indeed, during the Obama administration, the government criminally prosecuted nine people on charges related to whistle-blowing or leaks, compared with three such prosecutions in all the prior administrations combined.

While the current president may indeed be obsessed with leaks and intent on stifling would-be whistleblowers, the reality is that the seeds of such stifling took root before he took office.

Gregory Keating

Boston

The writer is an attorney and is co-author of Whistleblowing & Retaliation.

More:
Harsh response to whistle-blowers took root under Obama - The Boston Globe

East Idaho rep. says it’s ‘plausible’ Obama staged Charlottesville riots – Idaho Statesman


Idaho Statesman
East Idaho rep. says it's 'plausible' Obama staged Charlottesville riots
Idaho Statesman
The post begins by reciting a claim that Obama set up a war room in his D.C. home to plan and execute resistance to the Trump administration. That claim, widely debunked by fact checkers but widely circulated by far-right news outlets, stems from an ...

and more »

See the original post:
East Idaho rep. says it's 'plausible' Obama staged Charlottesville riots - Idaho Statesman

New animated sitcom would chronicle crime-fighting Biden and Obama – The Hill (blog)

A new animated series by director and writer Adam Reid would bring back the bromance between former President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaCongress needs to assert the war power against a dangerous president CNN's Don Lemon: Anyone supporting Trump complicit' in racism DOJ warrant of Trump resistance site triggers alarm MORE and former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenMoore, Strange advance in Alabama GOP primary Alabama GOP Senate primary: live results White House clarifies: We condemn all violence MORE if it ever gets off the ground.

A Kickstarter page running through the end of August is seeking $100,000 to launch "Barry & Joe - The Animated Series," a crime-fighting animation starring the duo.

The post doesn't describe what format the final product would look like, but in the post Reed says he wants to produce a pilot episode starring Jordan Peele as Obama, Chris Pratt as Biden, and Hayden Planetarium director Neil DeGrasse Tyson as himself, serving as the crime-fighting team's guide.

"[It's] an adult animated sci-fi sitcom. A parody of Quantum Leap and countless other 80's TV classics," Reid writes.

"Every episode will follow Barack and Joe as they leap into the past and change a part of history," he adds. "[It's for] people who miss Obama and Biden as much as we do."

"Anyone on the left side of the political spectrum who isnt afraid to question everything they know about America."

The Kickstarter has a steep hill to climb to fund the pilot episode of the series, which Reid says will cost $100,000 for "storyboards, recording, animation and sound design."

Just $26,000 has been raised so far.

Read more here:
New animated sitcom would chronicle crime-fighting Biden and Obama - The Hill (blog)

Barack Obama declining to engage Trump reflects ex-president balancing act – CNN

When he chose this week to respond to violent white nationalist protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, however, Obama used someone else's words instead of his own.

"'People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love,'" read the subsequent dispatches. "'For love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.'"

Obama's tweet was paired with a photo of the former president smiling at a group of children in a window, taken near his youngest daughter's school in 2011.

The viral reach of Obama's message was a reminder of his popularity among Americans nostalgic for the type of reasoned emotion he often brought after national trauma.

But the measured response also reflected the balance all former presidents face when confronted with divisive or charged moments. Ex-presidents often keep their distance from such matters, especially during their successor's first year in office. Offering frequent public comments about a new president's actions can be seen as overly meddlesome and a hindrance to a new White House's ability to function.

"I cannot imagine just how upset both he and (first lady) Michelle Obama are. We know their character, we know their history," said Michael Nutter, the former Democratic mayor of Philadelphia.

"I am sure President Obama would like to say more," Nutter said. "He recognizes, though, where he is in these moments, and his proximity to having just been a president. So he's going to be careful. But those of us who do know him a little bit know where his head and heart is. He'll continue to express himself but it will continue to be in his terms and in his time."

A senior Obama adviser said this week that the former President was unlikely to weigh in directly on Trump's comments, which have drawn widespread condemnation from Republicans, corporate executives, and military leaders.

For Obama, who remains the object of frequent criticism from Trump and his allies in the right-wing media, speaking out overtly could also further galvanize the political base to which Trump is appealing.

As Trump offered a series of equivocal statements on the Charlottesville violence this week, it became clear that condemnation would be swift even from members of his own party, who have rebuked the President with varying degrees of severity.

Those critiquing Trump at least implicitly included the two most recent Republican presidents, who said the country must always clearly denounce the types of ideologies that Trump initially avoided criticizing.

"America must always reject racial bigotry, anti-Semitism, and hatred in all forms," wrote Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush in a statement Wednesday. "As we pray for Charlottesville, we are reminded of the fundamental truths recorded by that city's most prominent citizen in the Declaration of Independence: we are all created equal and endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights."

"We know these truths to be everlasting because we have seen the decency and greatness of our country," the Bushes wrote.

During his own presidency, Obama confronted racially charged matters in different ways. His comments usually sought to acknowledge the country's painful history with race while encouraging reconciliation.

"The flag has always represented more than just ancestral pride," he said. "For many, black and white, that flag was a reminder of systemic oppression and racial subjugation. We see that now."

Since January, however, Obama hasn't spoken publicly about race. Obama, along with first lady Michelle Obama, has spent the last several months appearing sporadically at a mix of paid and unpaid speeches. They've both been at work on book projects, and next week their oldest daughter begins college at Harvard.

This fall, he's due to campaign for the Democratic gubernatorial candidate in Virginia, though specific dates for his appearances haven't been set. The protests in Charlottesville, which left three people dead, are expected to upend the race.

Two days before he left office in January, Obama laid out the parameters for his post-presidential life.

"I want to be quiet a little bit and not hear myself talk so darn much. I want to spend precious time with my girls," he said during his final news conference at the White House, before adding that he would make his voice heard when political debates escalated beyond day-to-day matters.

"There's a difference between that normal functioning of politics and certain issues or certain moments where I think our core values may be at stake," he said.

Some of Obama's supporters say the current strife may rise to that level.

"Personally I always want to hear President Obama. We know that if this had taken place a year ago, the country would be in a very very different place," Nutter said. "I'm not asking President Obama to say anything. He can conduct his own affairs. But we know that it would be healing, it would bring this country together."

CNN's Allie Malloy contributed to this report.

See the original post:
Barack Obama declining to engage Trump reflects ex-president balancing act - CNN

Obama vet cheers Trump’s assault on the red-tape Blob – New York Post

Obscured by the tumult surrounding President Trumps horrendous response to the violence in Charlottesville, Va., the White House managed to take a significant positive step this week: issuing an executive order designed to lower regulatory barriers to infrastructure projects, and to speed up and simplify the process for obtaining necessary permits and clearances.

It wasnt the first White House to try. When I worked there in 2009, I called a meeting of agency officials, asking them to explore how we might streamline the permitting process for both individuals and companies.

About halfway into the one-hour meeting, I realized that none of the officials had offered even a single word in response to my question. Instead, they explained why nothing could be done as if the purpose of the meeting was to demonstrate that the status quo was great, and that it would be impossible to change it.

The status quo is not great. Its ridiculous. If the permitting bureaucracy were a supervillain, it would be the Blob. It can take several years, and millions of dollars, to obtain environmental clearance for construction permits, even if the goal is to develop green infrastructure and to improve the environment.

Significant reforms are needed in three areas.

The first involves the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to catalogue and consider environmental effects before they can proceed with actions that might hurt the environment. Its a well-intended law with an important goal, but in some respects its also a case study in unintended consequences.

Under the law, developers often have to navigate an expensive and costly approval process, potentially including draft environmental impact statements, comments on environmental-impact statements, nasty public hearings and final environmental-impact statements. If they manage to get through all that, they might well face a lawsuit from an environmental organization, maybe from community groups, and maybe from self-interested companies who just dont want the competition.

Environmental-impact statements can run to hundreds of pages. The review process can easily take three years or more, so agencies and developers sometimes just give up.

The second problem involves the number of entities with veto power. If you want to improve an airport, build a new highway or increase sources of renewable energy, you might have to deal with several state agencies, local officials and two or more federal agencies as well as an assortment of private organizations with economic or environmental concerns.

If even one of those agencies wants a delay, or has some kind of bee in its bonnet, it can stop the project in its tracks. For countless people (including small businesses and even individuals), its something out of Kafka: No ones in charge.

The third problem involves bureaucratic culture. For many permitting authorities, the incentive is to delay, to require more documentation or to just say no.

If an agency maintains the status quo, it will avoid negative public attention, noisy complaints from interest groups and potentially serious risks (environmental or otherwise). It might even look like a hero. It wont bear the costs of refusing to allow a project to go forward, even if they turn out to be very high for the American people.

Alert to these problems, the Obama administration issued some significant reforms, which included greater transparency, coordination and accountability. But more streamlining needs to be done.

Trumps executive order calls for tracking every major infrastructure project, with public disclosure of deadlines and of whether theyve been met, alongside potential penalties for poor performance. Importantly, it also requires measurement of the costs of environmental reviews.

One of its best provisions calls for one federal decision, meaning there will be a lead agency for every major infrastructure project with the responsibility for navigating the project through the federal environmental review and authorization process.

The order also imposes new obligations on the Department of the Interior, the Office of Management and Budget and the Council on Environmental Quality requiring them to reduce burdens and simplify the process.

For Trumps order to work, everything will depend, of course, on implementation. As President Harry Truman said of his Army-trained successor, Gen. Dwight Eisenhower: Hell sit here and hell say, Do this! Do that! And nothing will happen. Poor Ike it wont be a bit like the Army.

Defeating the Blob will require sustained follow-through from the executive branch, and both dedication and toughness on the part of its leadership. But lets give credit where its due: This weeks executive order provides an excellent foundation for achieving that goal.

Cass Sunstein is a Bloomberg View columnist.

2017, Bloomberg View

Read the rest here:
Obama vet cheers Trump's assault on the red-tape Blob - New York Post