Ad will collapse in seconds CLOSE May 21, 2017 05/21/2017 6:45 pm By Jesse Singal Share Everyone says this necklace looks tremendous. Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images
To understand why Donald Trumps speech in Riyadh on Sunday was such a profound abandonment of his stated or at least strongly implied principles on the fight against terrorism, its helpful to quickly remember how his two most recent predecessors approached the problem rhetorically. For all their foreign-policy differences, after all, former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush sounded fairly similar notes in how they talked about terrorism. Both emphasized that the U.S. is not at war with Islam. Both made it clear that they viewed religiously inspired terror attacks perpetrated by Muslims to be perversions of the faith, not a reflection of its true values. And both touted the importance of building fruitful alliances with the Muslim world, particularly on matters of terrorism and security.
During Obamas two terms in office, he received a huge amount of criticism for sticking to this approach. Critics accused him of refusing to use the term Islamic extremism, of downplaying the threat of terrorism, and of being politically correct in his refusal to acknowledge the role of the faith itself in the security challenges facing so much of the world. Some of these critiques came from mainstream Republicans. Other, more vociferous and spittle-flecked iterations came from members of the far-right anti-Muslim counter-jihadist movement centered around organizations like Frank Gaffneys Center for Security Policy. This group, which includes David Horowitz, Debbie Schlussel, and others, believes America is, in fact, at war with the Muslim faith itself (though, in their view, the mainstream is in denial about this). As Voxs Zach Beauchamp put it in his indispensable article on the subject, these figures comprise a vast and growing ecosystem that exists just out of sight of most Americans one that has spent years pushing the notion that there is a creeping, quiet plot to take over America from within. Muslims are inherently warlike, argue the Gaffneys of the world, will never assimilate, and deep down, no matter what else they want to claim, are hoping to run roughshod over the democratic West, replacing its norms and institutions with Sharia law.
This toxic and bigoted view has spread far and wide, helped along by the explosion of far-right outlets like Breitbart and its (even) less rigorous and fair-minded cousins in recent years. Which is why so many people were disturbed to see Trump appoint Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller, and Sebastian Gorka, all of whom subscribe to these views, to prominent positions within his administration (Bannon has called Gaffney, who has spread some truly unhinged conspiracy theories about the Obama administrations supposed connection to terror groups, one of the senior thought leaders and men of action in this whole war against Islamic radical jihad.) On the other hand, Trump has also appointed more orthodox foreign-policy figures like James Mattis and H.R. McMaster, and whatever one thinks of them and their records, they are not counter-jihadists. In fact, they likely view Gaffneyesque hysteria as a hindrance to truly understanding and fighting back against terrorism (thats the near-consensus among other members of their intellectual community, at least).
So there has always been an ideological battle raging within the administration. And if you take Trumps remarks today at anything like face value an admittedly fraught exercise given his tendency to hurl himself violently off-script at any moment the McMaster cohort has routed the opposition.
As you read the following transcript of those remarks, remember that they were delivered by a president who railed at Hillary Clinton for not using the term Islamic to describe the threat of terrorism; who proposed a ban on all Muslims entering the U.S.; who later signed an executive order banning refugees and citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries, a move that foreign-policy experts agreed served no useful security purpose; who criticized the apology tour Obama ostensibly conducted early in his first term; who has called for the murder of ISIS members families; and who appointed the aforementioned counter-jihadists to positions of power. Yet this is what Trump said in Riyadh:
Whats remarkable about these excerpts is how closely they track with Obamas rhetoric, and progressive rhetoric on this subject more generally. His observation that terrorists (meaning ISIS in this case) kill more Muslims than anyone else is a frequent liberal rebuttal to the Gaffneyesque view that Muslims themselves are the problem. The word Islamic, meanwhile, was uttered by Trump three times, but not once was it followed by extremism or terrorism.
Now, to be fair, there were also elements of the speech that had a bit of a Trumpian flair to them naturally, Trump bestowed upon the Middle East the responsibility to drive out terrorists without acknowledging just how many of those terrorists have been created by past U.S. foreign-policy blunders. And Trump didnt take the usual tack of referencing the golden age of Islamic thought and culture, seeming instead to reference a disproportionate number of historical wonders Giza, Luxor and Alexandria that predated the faiths rise in the Middle East. So it might be the case that Trumps most ardent supporters can squint, spin around a few times to dizzy themselves, and claim to see in his remarks coded references to his once-muscular-sounding approach to fighting extremism. (Many counter-jihadists like Gaffney believe that everyday Muslims practice taqiyya the practice, almost entirely fictional and based on misreadings of Islamic law, of lying about their real-world intentions to advance the goals of jihad and Shariah. Maybe Gaffney can justify Trumps remarks to himself by claiming Trump is engaging in an American version of taqiyya to appease all those damn p.c. liberals.)
Theres a broader policy context here, too, of course, that its important to not lose sight of. During the speech, Trump touted a $110 billion arms deal he just signed with the Saudis at a time when Saudi Arabia has been accused by many rights organizations of the near-indiscriminate bombing and killing civilians as part of an ongoing fight against Houthi rebels in Yemen. In fact, one of the Obama administrations final significant foreign-policy acts was to block the sale of some weapons to the Saudis specifically because of the Kingdoms conduct in Yemen. For Trump to have signed this agreement and to have done so as he explicitly signaled a lack of desire to make any demands of our Saudi allies with regard to their human-rights abuses is a serious moral failure. The Yemenis living in fear of American-supplied weaponry probably arent all that interested in whether or not Trumps rhetoric is Islamophobic. (Trump to Reward Saudi War Crimes With Weapons went the headline of an article by a Human Rights Watch researcher.)
But still: Words and framing do matter in the long run, especially when it comes to a subject like terrorism in which the words politicians do and dont use have taken on such a heightened political potency. And overall its hard to read Trumps speech and not view it as a forceful rebuke to the worldview advanced by Miller and Bannon. Which is particularly odd given that it was supposedly written by Miller himself. This sort of incoherence and short-term flip-flopping isnt new to Trump, of course, but think about all the people who supported him because of his supposed toughness on the questions of terror and jihad. He just gave a speech extolling Islam, extolling the Saudis themselves, and specifically denouncing the idea of an inherent link between terrorism committed in the name of Islam and the faith itself. Even if, as all the evidence suggests, were in a new political world where nothing matters and everything is crazy and even if tomorrow Trump returns to his more explicit anti-Muslim rhetoric this is a shocking turnaround.
Watch Cline Dion Sing My Heart Will Go On 20 Years Later in BBMAs Titanic Tribute
The Emancipation of the MILF
Stephen Colbert: Trump Is a Redolent Turd Who Will Probably Quit
Lets Talk About the Twin Peaks Premiere
Sasheer Zamata Is Leaving Saturday Night Live
Nicki Minaj Has Been Quietly Donating Money to a Village in India for Years
Billy Bush Opens Up About the Trump Access Hollywood Tape That Got Him Fired
Charlie Brooker Reveals the San Junipero Scene That Was Too Sad To Air
The Best, Worst, and Nest-iest Hats From Pippa Middletons Wedding
Kevin Bacon Didnt Have Enough Coke to Pick Up Women at Studio 54
Most Popular Video On Daily Intelligencer
Trumps former national security adviser will invoke his Fifth Amendment right to silence on Monday and refuse to honor the Senates subpoenas.
Wilbur Ross gushes over Saudi Arabias ability to suppress dissent.
We just got back from the Middle East, Trump informed the Israelis.
Making sense of the flurry of developments from the last week.
The former House speaker was called in to convince Trump not to veto the spending bill.
Trump glossed over human-rights abuses and did everything hed criticized Obama for.
Brace Belden, back from Syria and readjusting to life in the Bay Area, has a new Twitter handle.
The criminal liability of presidents is a difficult and unsettled area of constitutional law.
Compared to his campaigning, it was a blatant flip-flop. Will his supporters who bashed Hillary Clinton for being soft on terrorism forgive him?
The controversial Milwaukee sheriff, who says he was tapped to join the Department of Homeland Security, denies the CNN report.
The members of WeStaNDFor werent having it.
In Saudi Arabia, Trump describes a battle of good versus evil, and calls on his audience to take the lead in stamping out terrorism.
It was almost identical to the North Korean missile fired off in February in the countrys first weapons test during the Trump administration.
On Friday, Trumps nominee for deputy Treasury secretary suddenly realized that he needs more family time than a White House job would allow.
Iranians rejected a right-wing nationalist challenger and reaffirmed their desire for greater social freedom and international co-operation.
The Trump Organization promised not to make any new foreign deals while Donald Trump was president. Its friends in the UAE dont seem to buy that.
Trump spent most of last year demonizing the Saudis and their faith. And Riyadh already likes him better than Obama. Heres why.
Hes taken a real beating of late. But former FBI director James Comey will have his day in the Senate, and in the court of public opinion, very soon.
Signs are growing that House Republicans, including some very senior members, could be in trouble next year.
He doesnt realize the implications of what he was doing or what he was saying or how it could be interpreted.
Read this article:
Trump's Speech in Saudi Arabia Was More Obama Than Bannon - New York Magazine