Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Scarborough: Obama controlling Trump with ‘Jedi mind tricks’ – The Hill (blog)

MSNBCs Joe Scarborough mocked President Trump during "Morning Joe" on Monday with a reference to the Star Wars movies, saying former President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaMichelle Obama surprises Chance the Rapper with BET Awards video Former Obama aide: We followed the book in response to Russian meddling Scarborough: Obama controlling Trump with 'Jedi mind tricks' MORE is controlling Trump with Jedi mind tricks.

Scarborough joked that after Obama left office, he traveled to the fictional island where Star Wars character Luke Skywalker trained to become a Jedi, after which Obama [came] back with these extraordinary Jedi mind tricks.

Everybodys been trying to get [Trump] to admit that the Russians meddled with our elections, Scarborough said. And Barack Obama comes back and says, the Russians meddled with our elections and [Trump] writes a tweet the Russians meddled with our elections.

Scarborough noted that Trump admitted to calling the GOP healthcare bill mean in a private meeting after Obama hit the bills fundamental meanness last week.

Its unbelievable, Scarborough said. Republican senators and House members are fighting for their political lives and just because Donald TrumpDonald TrumpUS, South Korea can bury the trade barrier hatchet this week OPINION: Trump's right GOP health bill is mean, mean, mean Pelosi on criticism of leadership: 'This is such a small item, it isn't about me' MORE is so crazy and so jealous of Barack Obama, [Obama] gets him to admit that the healthcare bill is mean.

In an interview on Fox Newss Fox & Friends over the weekend, Trump took credit for calling the bill "mean" and said Obama used his term.

Well he used my term, mean, Trump said. That was my term because I want to see and I speak from the heart, thats what I want to see. I want to see a bill with heart.

Original post:
Scarborough: Obama controlling Trump with 'Jedi mind tricks' - The Hill (blog)

Without Clinton or Obama, Pelosi Becomes GOP’s Top Target – Roll Call

WhenNancy Pelosi boasted last week she was worth the trouble, even when congressional candidates were negatively tied to her, the National Republican CongressionalCommittee ironically sang its own praises for the House minority leader.

We couldnt agree more! was all an email blast read that included a clip of Pelosispoint of view.

That came the same day President Donald Trump tweetedhe hoped Democrats do not force Nancy P out because it would be very bad for the Republican Party.

The notion of GOPcampaigns using Pelosis unpopularity to motivatetheirbase and, as a result, thanking her for helping them win elections is a tactic that has developedover a decade and half of her being in congressional leadership.

But for the first time in a decade, there is no Hillary Clinton in the spotlight or a Barack Obama White House, leaving Pelosi as one of the most well-known members of the party with unobstructed exposure to negative campaign rhetoric going into 2018 midterms.

Without a Democratin the White House to be at the center of the GOPs ire, Pelosihas already been used in political ads in at least two of this years four special elections for Republican-held seats.

Also on the same day as Pelosis comments last week, the NRCC launched a video it dubbedThank you, Nancy Pelosi in which thevoiceover boasts of Democrats losing those four races. (A fifth special election, to replace California Democrat Xavier Becerra, yielded a Democratic victory when Jimmy Gomez won that contest.)

Thank you for your support of failed candidates, thead saysin an upbeat tone. Thank you for continuing to fail as your partys leader.

A senior aide for Pelosi, Drew Hammill, said the tactic to tie the California Democratto candidates represents more of the same from several years past and that other Democratic congressional leaders have received the same treatment.

This is what their strategy is, Hammill said, adding that instead of policy, Republicans use an anti-Pelosi messageto focus on personal destruction.

But Pelosi also faces discord among at least a dozen members of her own caucus itching for a change in leadership after failing to gain achamber majority in four straight national elections.

None of that seemed to faze Pelosi. Instead, she welcomed the challenge, highlightedher accomplishments, and defended why she ought to stay in her post.

So you want me to sing my praises, is that what youre saying? Pelosi said with a laugh about staying on as leader. Im a master legislator. I am a strategic, politically astute leader. My leadership is recognized by many around the country and that is why I am able to attract the support that I do.

She even defended her appearance in negative ads that tie her to congressional Democratic candidates.

In one ad, Jon Ossoff, the unsuccessful Democratic candidate in the Georgia special election last week, was depicted as being on her side. The video encouraged people to vote Republican and say no to Pelosis yes man.

Whoever the leader is, is going to be their target if the leader is effective, Pelosi said.

Members of the Democratic caucus agree that Pelosi will have less cover going into 2018. Still, they are hesitant to turn the caucus on itself over her leadership.

No question about it, said Arizona Rep. Ral M. Grijalva about the focus on Pelosiin campaign ads. Shes the highest-profile Democrat.

Grijalva, who co-chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said Democrats strategy should be focused onattacking the Republican agenda in return, not at creating our own little soap opera here.

Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan, who ran against Pelosi for her leadership post in November, said he once had a political ad on a billboard targeting him in his district that featured Obama, Pelosi and former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid with me as a dog with a leash around my neck.

Clearly with President Obama gone, she becomes the sole focus, Ryan said.

NRCC Chairman Steve Stivers said there wasnt a particular concerted effort to usePelosi to the GOPs advantage, though ads in Montana and Georgia featured the California Democrat this year.

The Pelosi attack ads were mostly funded by the Congressional Leadership Fund, a super PAC tied to House GOP leadership.

Elections are choices and voters need to be informed about what direction those choices mean for the country, for their area, Stivers said. Our ads in Georgia were intended to make sure our voters got out and voted and they did.

Rep. Cedric L. Richmond, who attended a meeting last week of Democratic members who discussed how to replacePelosi, said one way to combat the negativity is to actually defend her.

We cant run from the fact that shes our leader. We cant run from her record, said the Louisiana Democrat, who chairs the Congressional Black Caucus. Maybe instead of just completely running, maybe we turn around and fight.

Ohio Democrat Marcia L. Fudge, who supported Ryans bidfor Democratic leader, said what she is seeing is more of the same.

She was the top target with a Clinton and Obama, Fudge said. I dont think that theres anything changed. I think what has changed is the political climate in this country and it is much more negative and nasty.

Pelosi, for now, does not appear to be going anywhere though she told reporters earlier this year she would have ended her career in Congress had Clinton won the presidency.

Pelosi also blew off her dissenters calling for her to step down to allow for new leadership.

My decision about how long I stay is not up to them, shesaid.

Contact Rahman atremarahman@cqrollcall.comor follow her on Twitter at@remawriter

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.

Originally posted here:
Without Clinton or Obama, Pelosi Becomes GOP's Top Target - Roll Call

Obama holdover: Trump style ‘quicker, more decisive’ – Washington Examiner

Veterans Affairs Secretary David J. Shulkin is a rare bird in the Trump administration, having been a top Obama pick when he was the department's undersecretary for health through the 2016 election.

So, we asked him how things have changed under Trump, and he said it is all for the good.

"I have found that mandate from him, to get this organization fixed and the support and freedom to go out and challenge old assumptions, as exactly what the VA needs right now," Shulkin said.

"I think the organization feels more empowered to fix problems than they have in the past, and my hope is that we will be able to set the path so that the organization is earning back that trust that it needs," he added.

Shulkin, who has won kudos for his management acumen, said that the president is using a businessman's sense to fix government.

"The president very much looks at this organization like running a business. And he understands that you need to allow the manager of the business to have the freedom to go out and to challenge assumptions and to make decisions," said the secretary during a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.

And that's a good thing?

"Slow, incremental change isn't what this organization needs," he said. "He did not come in to make incremental change; he came in to set a fundamental different course in direction when it comes to providing services to veterans," Shulkin said. "Acting quicker and more decisively is part of that management style."

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com

Read the rest here:
Obama holdover: Trump style 'quicker, more decisive' - Washington Examiner

Trump lashes out at Obama over latest report on Russian election meddling – Washington Post

President Trump on Saturday called out Obama administration officials for not taking stronger actions against Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, contradicting his past statements and suggesting without proof that they were trying tohelpDemocratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Histweets came after The Post revealed Friday that the Obama White House had received reports as early asAugust 2016 regardingRussian President Vladimir Putins direct involvement in thecyber campaignwith instructions to defeat or damage Clinton and help to elect Trump, according to sourcing deep inside the Russian government.

The Washington Post's national security reporters unveil the deep divisions inside the Obama White House over how to respond to Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election. (Whitney Leaming,Osman Malik/The Washington Post)

The Obama administration would not publicly say Russia was attempting to interfere with the election until Oct. 7, and the news ofPutins attempts to aid Trump would not surface until after the election.

Trump has long disputed that the Russians interfered with the election, calling itall a big Dem HOAX just this week.

But on Friday evening, after the publication of The Posts article, Trump demanded to know why Obama hadnt done more to stop the meddling.

He followed up with more tweets on Saturday, attempting to put the focus on Obamas inaction.

The Posts article explains in detail why Obama, who reportedly was gravely concerned by an August CIA report about the hacking, managed to approve only largely symbolic sanctions before he left office.

Those reasons included partisan squabbling among members of Congress, initial skepticism by other intelligence agencies about the CIAs findings, and an assumption that Clinton would win the election and follow up.

We made the judgment that we had ample time after the election, regardless of outcome, for punitive measures, a senior administration official said in the article.

Trump, however, raised his own theories.

He provided no explanation or evidence forwhy this wouldhave helped Clinton.

The Post article recounts how Obama learned about the Russian intrusions and the administrations attempts to find support to make the information public.

According to the article, less than a month after 20,000 stolen Democratic Party emails were leakedto the public, a CIA memo warned Obama that the hack had beenordered by Putin in an attempt to defeat or at least damage the Democratic nominee.

Interviews with administration officials revealed that Obama directly confronted Putin over the allegations during a meeting of world leaders in China. He also ordered his deputies to safeguard the election and seekbipartisansupport from congressional leaders tocondemn Russias actions.

The administration encountered obstacles at every turn, writeGreg Miller, Ellen Nakashima and Adam Entous.

Complacency mayhave also undercut the administrations efforts to punish Russia. Like many polls suggested, it believed Clinton would win despite the hacks.

By his final weeks, aside from warnings and rhetoric, Obama had approved only narrowsanctions and a planto plant cyberweapons in Russias infrastructure if the next president so chose.

As one senior Obama official told The Post, I feel like we sort of choked, which Trump would quote in his tweet.

As he has with other newsmaking events, Trump used the article to argue that a months-long focus by the media, Congress and federal investigators on his campaigns alleged ties to Russia has beenmisdirected.

Focus on them, not T! he tweetedSaturday afternoon.

For some Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, the bombshell report affirmed what they said they had long suspected.

Nothing like the extensive hacking effort and manipulation effort could occur without involvement, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) told CNN. Now we actually know: Yes, Putin directed it. He had a specific goal to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Some Republicans expressed concern about another country threatening democracy in the United States.

The reality is, in two or four years, it will serve Vladimir Putins interest to take down the Republican Party, Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) told CNN. If we werent upset about it, we have no right to complain in the future.

Excerpt from:
Trump lashes out at Obama over latest report on Russian election meddling - Washington Post

Trump again faults Obama for Russian election meddling – Los Angeles Times

For the second time in as many days, President Trump took aim at his predecessor, former President Obama, for what Trump said was a failure to act on intelligence that Russia was meddlingin the 2016 election.

Trump appeared to quote from a Washington Post report detailing the Obama administration's struggle to decide how to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the U.S. presidential election. I feel like we sort of choked, a former Obama administration official told the paper in describing those deliberations.

The Post report stated that the CIA informed Obama in August that Russian President Vladimir Putin was directly involved in a hacking campaign to disrupt theelection by defeating Hillary Clinton and helping to elect Trump.

The Obama administration responded by issuing a series of warnings to Russia and later approved a package of punitive measures that included economic sanctions. Obama also authorized the planting of cyberweapons in Russia's infrastructure in a measure that was still in its planning stages when he left office, according to the Post report.

The Obama administration firstpublicly announced Russia's alleged election meddling on Oct. 7 but stopped short of saying that the efforts were aimed at helping Trump win.

See the article here:
Trump again faults Obama for Russian election meddling - Los Angeles Times