Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

Obama Is Returning To Politics This Fall, And Trump Isn’t Going To Like It – Newsweek

The time has finally come:Barack Obama is about to publicly get back into politics.

The former president may have spent the beginning of this year on vacation, but he and his aides are planning his return to the Democratic Party this fall,The Hill reported Friday.And even though many of his efforts will center on fundraising and campaigning for people like Virginia gubernatorial candidate Ralph Northam, experts say Obama needs to be careful with Donald Trump.

Related: Is Trump really more popular than Obama? President sparks debate by retweeting favorable Twitter poll

Daily Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

"He would be the target against which Trump would direct his fury," Southern Methodist University political science professorCal Jillson told The Hill. "From Trumps perspective, nothing better could happen."

Indeed, Trump is not likely to welcome Obama's comeback. The current commander in chief can't stop talking about his predecessor. Earlier this week, after a Washington Post report indicated North Korea was expanding its nuclear capabilities, Trump retweeted a message from former U.S. ambassador John Bolton saying that "our country & civilians are vulnerable today because @BarackObama did not believe in national missile defense. Let's never forget that." He also retweeted an unofficial poll asking who was a better president.

"This president has a very unusual obsession with his predecessor and constantly comparing himself to President Obama," Obama-era Assistant Defense Secretary Derek Chollet told CNN. "This is not a president who seems to be singularly focused on what is a genuinely a global security threat in North Korea."

Part of this may have to do with Trump's poll numbers. His approval ratings have been slipping for months, recently hitting 37 percent. Obama left office at 59 percent, according to Gallup.

Since he moved out of the White House, Obama has spoken out a couple of times against Trump and his policies. In January, for example, a spokesman for the ex-presidentissued a statement opposing Trump's travel ban. In June, Obamadenounced Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.

Nobody quite knows what Obama will do going forward to help the Democratic Party, which suffered from division during the primaries before losing the general election last year. The former president has reportedly been taking meetings with lawmakers in the House and Senate, as well as Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez, but he's previously said he wants to help develop "a whole new generation of talent" that could revitalize the group.

"There are such incredible young people who not only worked on my campaignbut I've seen in advocacy groups," Obama told NPR in December. "I've seen [them be] passionate about issues like climate change, or conservation, criminal justice reform. You know, campaigns tofor a livable wage, or health insurance. And making sure that whatever resources, credibility, spotlight that I can bring to help them rise up. That's something that I think I can do well, I think Michelle [Obama] can do well."

See the article here:
Obama Is Returning To Politics This Fall, And Trump Isn't Going To Like It - Newsweek

Barack Obama, invisible president: To truly see him requires white Americans to see themselves – Salon

Barack Obama was the invisible president. He was invisible simply because people refused to see him. Just as Ralph Ellisons unnamed narrator explained about his curious existence of permanent placement in the optical shadows, paranoiacs see him as a figure in a nightmare which the sleeper tries with all his strength to destroy. Meanwhile, the mind best at dilution, and absent the intellectual equipment to deal with the complexity of humanity, reduces Obama to a symbol. He becomes a statue, but unlike a stone construction with a face locked into hospitable expression, he has the capability to challenge the onlooker and uplift the observer, just as he has the potential to disappoint the viewer.

The protagonist of Invisible Man diagnoses those whose minds erase his human features and characteristics as suffering from a peculiar disposition of the eyes the inner eyes with which they look through their physical eyes upon reality. Psychologists would call the inner eyes consciousness. An individuated consciousness frames the focus of all experience, and instructs and guides, sometimes with the inscrutable properties of the best mystery, the individual how to receive and perceive everything. The election of Barack Obama a black man with an Arabic-rooted name after slavery and segregation, and at the height of cultural anxiety over Islam collided with the consciousness of many white Americans. Among the wreckage and in the casualty count, was the vision of the American public, and the capacity to rationally observe, absorb and interpret the president.

The beautiful and brutal story of American development, always in progress and often moving backward, differs from the Shakespearean statement of existential despair. It is not, as Macbeth understood life, a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The linearity of American history is traceable only according to the expansion of freedom and the enlargement of liberty. In 1776, only white men who owned property could vote, the indigenous wore a target for expulsion and exploitation, and men who looked like Barack Obama qualified only for chains. Before Americans can pop champagne bottles in a celebration of themselves, they must realize that every inch of conquest for liberty and justice required a bitter and bloody war of collision. Whenever a group of Americans black, gay, female demand inclusion in the American experiment of self-governance, they face violent and vicious opposition.

The struggle of American history pitting the outsider, the underdog, the underclass against the powerful, wealthy, and often elected is the tale told, not by an idiot, but often to idiots idiots who make themselves ignorant with their refusal to open their eyes and see. The blindfold over the inner eyes is much too thick for the outer eyes to function properly. For millions of voluntarily blind Americans, the act of witnessing Barack Obama deliver his victory speech on November 4, 2008, shortly after the concession of an elderly, white war hero, caused post-traumatic stress disorder. They could no longer function as adults with clear eyes and clear thoughts. They would spend the next eight years speaking and acting as if they were habitual users of hallucinatory drugs seeing the ominous signs of conspiracy, destruction, and subversion in every wink, grin, and gesture of the alien occupying the Oval Office. They believed and propagated the idea that Obama was an agent acting to undermine America, and in some ways but not how they thought they were correct. Regardless of policy, and his policies were not outside the mainstream, Obama undermined the mythic America of perfection the shining city on the hill that Ronald Reagan, Americas greatest contemporary mythmaker, boasted of by framing focus on reality; a reality that, despite its tragic and traumatic dimensions, maintains greater beauty and inspiration than the myth. Barack Obamas election was only unprecedented, and for many, unpredictable, because of Americas history of bigotry and oppression. To the Americans who tacitly approve of oppression, or choose to act as if it does not exist, Obamas victory sent a signal: Your story is not relevant.Your fantasy is no longer a believable story. It is not that America is or is not great, but that America must always strive to become great. The election of a black man, who would not have been able to vote just decades earlier, to the presidency is a significant hammer in the nail in the construction of greatness.

Many other Americans, while not as deranged and demented as those who saw in Obama a monstrous force of evil and subversion, diminished Obama as person, dispossessed him as president, and deracinated him into symbol. Because his mere victory was a revolutionary act of symbolic transformation at the height of American power, many voters believed that his presidency would possess revolutionary potential of equal power. Any imperfection in policy or rhetoric from President Obama would undermine this unrealistic faith claim, and expose him, in the debilitated inner eyes, as a fraud. To the sympathetic, but delusional, white liberal, Obama was not a normal human being. He was a blank screen waiting for them to project their fondest fantasies and deepest wishes. Any blemish on that screen would result in its destruction. Fallibility is intolerable to those searching for a messiah. Unrealistic expectations, due to an overinvestment in Obamas symbolic power, created conditions conducive to the eventual erasure of Obamas identity and achievements. A statue does not speak. So, it certainly will not utter words unfriendly to the desires of the onlooker. A statue does not move. It cannot walk in a direction unfamiliar to the observer.

Simultaneous with the reduction of Obama into symbol was the refusal of many voters and critics to acknowledge the value of symbol, and the power of the symbolic alteration of the American image Obama authored. What would it mean for black children to have their formative experiences as citizens with a black man as national leader, chief executive, and commander? What would it mean for white children? What would it mean for the Muslim and non-Muslim immigrants and natural born Americans who had names like Barack and Hussein? What would it mean for all of the adults in interracial marriages, and more consequentially, the children conceived within those unions?

These important questions hung in the air like a thick fog on a city street. Americans, risking an emotional crash, drove through with abandon, foot on the gas and hands steady on the steering wheel. White America had grown so accustomed to, and physically and spiritually invested in, white leadership of American institutions that it could not fully grasp the black hue of the White House. Obama shattered the ultimate glass ceiling, and among the shards of glass, were the broken fragments of white illusion. White superiority, and perhaps more importantly, white authority could no longer be taken for granted. While symbolism is insufficient for the task of political improvement, it is through symbol that human beings develop an understanding of their own stories.

When Obama took the oath of office, he shattered a symbol that, for many white Americans, was essential to their story, and replaced it with something from an area of American history previously kept undercover. That high level act has a low level application. It moves from pathos to the pavement. When I developed into adolescence and then early adulthood, it seemed entirely natural that the president, along with the mayor and the governor, always looked like my father, or my uncle, or like a much older version of myself. Michele Wallace, a black writer and professor, recalls the opposite experience as a school child in 1960s New York. She writes that she can still remember the stricken look on her teachers face when she announced that she wanted to become president when she grew up. For much of its history, the subtext of the adjective, American, was white. White is normal and universal, while other races and ethnicities require their own special days on the calendar, television networks, subgenres of literature, and university departments. Obamas ascension to the mountaintop of imperial and cultural command demolished all the natural assumptions of the American order. On night one, Obamas impact created too large of a crater in the collective consciousness of the citizenry for him to enjoy a normal presidency. The right wing, in their distortion of him into a monster, set him up to fail, but so did the left wing, in their hopes of him as a messiah. The moderates in the middle often seemed disconnected from the essence and existence of Obama, having arguments about the man they treated as a pedestrian on a crosswalk during an afternoon stroll.

An interesting and revealing criticism of President Obama grew increasingly popular among conservative commentators at around the midway point of the presidency. National Review, Fox News, and other familiar sources of right wing reportage began to brand and bash Obama as lazy and absentee for his reportedly unprecedented and excessive vacation and golf getaways. Those same outlets soon issued a similar indictment of Obamas refusal to host press conferences. Eventually, the mainstream media channeled the same story through their own, much louder amplifier, and the idea of Obama as a reclusive president has shaped public perception of his performance, with many Americans often commenting how they never saw him.

It turns out that Obama had taken fewer vacation days than any president since Jimmy Carter, and that he averaged two press conferences a month more than Reagan, Carter, Ford and Nixon, the same as Clinton, and slightly less than both George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. The attack on Obamas absenteeism read like much more than mere partisan insult. In addition to playing on old stereotypes against black men, it also demonstrated the blindness of those who say it and believe it. They actually could not see Barack Obama. He was in the White House not on vacation and he was speaking to the press, but millions of Americans believed otherwise. They do not see him, because they cannot see him. They see only what their imaginations allow them to see, and from the vantage point of that odd and obstructed view, a postmodern mystery of politics emerges to haunt America in the 21st century: Does President Barack Obama exist?

Is the former President not the monster, messiah, or statue real? If so, who is he? What has he accomplished? What are his failures? What is his influence? How does he operate as symbol, and what is the substance of the man?

* * *

In the 21st century, America remains a riddle few people can figure out. Never a country with a clear or definitive character, it is the battleground for people attempting to negotiate and navigate the collision between two equally powerful and real stories of America. It is the story of domination and democracy. It is the story of repression and revolution. It is the story of exploitation and equality. It is the story of dogma and dialogue. It is the immigrant arriving at American shores with dreams of liberty and independence fueling him down the superhighways of commerce and bureaucracy. It is the American plane dropping bombs that decimates the city of that immigrants birth. As president, Obama contributed to both sides of the story. As a liberal reformer, he advanced the democratic and egalitarian side, always with an interest, even when it hurt him, in dialogue. As the commander-in-chief of an imperial military in the last gasp of empire, and as the face of political power, he also maintained the American tradition of dominion in foreign affairs. It is far too early to evaluate Obamas influence on the at once mighty and filigreed psyche of America. The ink of the tattoo hes made on American skin is not yet dry, and is not yet fully open to interpretation.

One of the few things that is certain is that the election of a living and breathing monument of multiculturalism, and a man who makes cheap puffery about diversity into magnificent reality a black, white, African, American is a triumph of the American story Walt Whitman put to poetry long before many others could develop the maturity and imagination to understand its wisdom. In Dreams from My Father, thirteen years before he would become president-elect, Barack Obama, articulated and advanced his own rendition of Whitmans anthemic song, the voice of democracy.

We hold these truths to be self-evident. In those words, I hear the spirit of Douglass and Delany, as well as Jefferson and Lincoln; the struggles of Martin and Malcolm and unheralded marchers to bring these words to life. I hear the voices of Japanese families interned behind barbed wire; young Russian Jews cutting patterns in Lower East Side sweatshops; dust bowl farmers loading up their trucks with the remains of shattered lives. I hear the voices of the people in Altgeld Gardens, and the voices of those who stand outside this countrys borders, the weary, hungry bands crossing the Rio Grande. I hear all of these voices clamoring for recognition, all of them asking the very same questions that have come to shape my life In the conversation itself, in the joining of voices, I find myself modestly encouraged, believing that so long as the questions are still being asked, what binds us together might somehow, ultimately, prevail.

The presidency of Obama irrespective of its policies and by the measure of its existence amplified the voice of democracy, and underscored the promise of its victory. There does exist the dream of the ties that bind withstanding the tornadic pull of ignorance and tribal hatred. The terms of unity often land with the thud of clich, but it is a clich worthy of faith. It is the clich that Obama elevated into poetry when he aced his national audition giving the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, and it is the clich he embodied behind the presidential seal at the most prominent pulpit in the world. Millions of people on the political right and left could not accurately see Obama, because they cannot actually see America. It is a land of too much complexity and too many contradictions. Obama, like a literary invention Ellison could imagine, has become an archetypal representation of all of those contradictions a characterized capsule busting at the edges.

The election of Donald Trump signals to the world that many Americans are not yet prepared for the full implications of America. Walt Whitman sold precious few books in his lifetime. In his essay, Democratic Vistas, he worried that genuine belief had left American culture. In its place existed only the cold and quixotic comfort of career advancement and material advantage. Over a century later, America has transitioned from Barack Obama a learned, aspirational leader to a man who presents America as nothing more than career advancement and material advantage. It is important, now more than ever, to consider the possibility that the idea of America is too radical even for most Americans.

President Obama, not always politically, but culturally, more thoroughly captured the idea of America than any other modern president. Of all the unanswerable and intractable questions that surround the Obama presidency and legacy, one conclusion is unavoidable for anyone with the intellectual honesty to look into the dark corridors of a personal and political belonging to a nation with an identity in constant flux and turmoil. It is the same conclusion Ellisons narrator reached when he wrote, Our fate is to become one, and yet many This is not prophecy, but description. Thus one of the greatest jokes in the world is the spectacle of whites busy escaping blackness and becoming blacker every day, and the blacks striving toward whiteness, becoming quite dull and gray. None of us seems to know who he is or where hes going.

Barack Obama is invisible, because to see him would require that we all see ourselves. It would demand that we finally unmask the face we wear that is at once full of breathtaking beauty, but also irredeemably ugly.

See the rest here:
Barack Obama, invisible president: To truly see him requires white Americans to see themselves - Salon

Obama to re-emerge in ‘delicate dance’ with Dems – The Hill

Former President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaBiden endorses Dem in Alabama Senate primary Rice: US has failed in denuclearization of North Korea Trump threatens McConnell MORE will re-emerge on the national scene this fall, though Democrats expect him to do so with caution.

One aide describes the beginning of a delicate dance that aims to put Obama in the Democratic fray but prevents him from remaining the face of the party.

Aides will huddle with Obama in the coming weeks to plot out what shape the former president's fall schedule will take. Advisers close to him say that while he will play an active role in helping his party rebuild, much of his work will be behind the scenes.

In recent months, Obama has played a larger behind-the-scenes role than was publicly known.

The Hill reported in July that he met with DNC Chairman Tom Perez as well as lawmakers at his office to give his guidance on a number of issues.

But advisers to the former president acknowledge he also doesnt want to be a foil as one top ally put it for President Trump and the Republican leadership.

In recent months, Trump blamed Obama for doing nothing about Russias involvement in the 2016 presidential election. He also taunted him for never coming to a Boy Scout jamboree and went after his policies on everything from healthcare to Cuba and North Korea.

Obama has chosen to remain silent. And even during the recent healthcare fight over his signature legislation, for example, he sought to keep a low profile.

He has to be careful, said Julian Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. At a moment when President Trumps approval is falling so fast including with his base there is a risk for Obama taking center stage and triggering the energy that many Republicans currently lack.

He would be the target against which Trump would direct his fury, saidCal Jillson, a professor of political science at Southern Methodist University. From Trumps perspective nothing better could happen.

Jillson said that a light Obama footprint on the national stage could allow breathing room for future Democratic leaders to emerge.

Hell tread lightly because he is not going to be the face of the party when it actually counts in 2020 and 2024, Jillson said. So the extent to which he would emerge and speak to a wide range of issues would preclude the emergence of someone else. They must find a standard-bearer for future elections, and I think he can at least in the short term suck up all the available oxygen.

To that point, Democrats have also worried about Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonJudge orders new search for Hillary Clinton's Benghazi emails Chance the Rapper: 'I have a bigger voice than Donald Trump' Bill and Hillary Clinton to take questions at joint Dallas appearance MOREs presence on the national stage.

Clinton is slated to release a book this fall titled What Happened in which she is promising to provide candid details on why she thinks she lost the 2016 presidential election.

Democrats are feeling angst about Clintons re-emergence, worrying that it will point to a party looking backward instead of forward.

Its wise for both Clinton and Obama to hang back at this point, one Democratic strategist said. Otherwise our party will have an even harder time rebounding.

We already lack a party leader, we lack a vision, we lack an identity, the strategist said bluntly. We cant remain stuck in the past.

Since leaving office, Obamas approval rating remains high at 63 percent, according to a Gallup survey conducted in June.

President Obama has amongst the highest Q-rating in the world exceeding LaBron [James], [Lionel] Messi and George Clooney and is most certainly the most popular active political figure in the U.S., said Democratic strategist Chris Lehane. [He] is incredibly popular with base Democratic voters who are critical cohorts in the midterms from a turnout perspective."

Democratic strategist David Wade added that its a great moment for President Obama to emerge.

"Unlike many of his recent predecessors, he left office without scandal and with high approval ratings, Wade said. And with the incumbent president in the White House bogged down by investigation and deep unpopularity, the contrast is helpful.

Pundits are always going to overthink and overanalyze the pros and cons of having a former president on the campaign trail, but the truth is, theres little downside. He has unique convening powers to draw a crowd, energize Democrats, make a closing argument, and then it is up to candidates to close the deal.

Obama has already committed to campaign for Ralph Northam, the Democrat running for governor of Virginia. And he is expected to help other candidates running in races in November.

Aides to Obama would not detail how many requests theyve received from Democratic candidates hoping to have the former president appear alongside them at campaign events. And they would not detail how many appearances Obama would make in the fall.

It remains to be seen, one aide said.

Go here to read the rest:
Obama to re-emerge in 'delicate dance' with Dems - The Hill

Poll: Most say time to end effort to repeal Obama health law – ABC News

Message to President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans: Stop trying to scuttle the Obama health care law, and start trying to make it more effective.

That's the resounding word from a national poll released Friday by the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. The survey was taken following last month's Senate derailment of the GOP drive to supplant much of President Barack Obama's statute with a diminished federal role in health care.

Around 4 in 5 want the Trump administration to take actions that help Obama's law function properly, rather than trying to undermine it. Trump has suggested steps like halting subsidies to insurers who reduce out-of-pockets health costs for millions of consumers. His administration has discussed other moves like curbing outreach programs that persuade people to buy coverage and not enforcing the tax penalty the statute imposes on those who remain uninsured.

Just 3 in 10 want Trump and Republicans to continue their drive to repeal and replace the statute. Most prefer that they instead move to shore up the law's marketplaces, which are seeing rising premiums and in some areas few insurers willing to sell policies.

Flying in the face of that, hard-line conservatives launched an uphill bid Friday to force a fresh House vote to revoke Obama's law without an immediate replacement. The House Freedom Caucus filed a petition to force a vote if it is signed by 218 lawmakers, which seems unlikely because of GOP divisions and Democratic opposition.

Ominously for the GOP, 6 in 10 say Trump and congressional Republicans are responsible for any upcoming health care problems since they control government. That could be a bad sign for Republicans as they prepare to defend their House and Senate majorities in the 2018 elections.

And by nearly 2-to-1, most say it's good that the Senate rejected the GOP repeal-and-replace bill last month.

Trump has been publicly browbeating Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to continue trying to pass legislation tearing down Obama's 2010 overhaul. After using Twitter to blame McConnell for last month's Senate failure despite years of GOP vows to repeal it, Trump suggested Thursday that McConnell should perhaps step aside if he can't push that and other legislation through his chamber.

On three separate attempts in late July, McConnell fell short of the 50 GOP votes he needed to pass legislation scrapping Obama's law. With a 52-48 GOP majority and Vice President Mike Pence available to cast a tie-breaking vote, McConnell has said he's moving onto other matters unless "people can show me 50 votes for anything that would make progress."

With the Kaiser survey consistently showing clear overall public support for retaining Obama's law, the numbers help explain why some centrist Republicans who rely on moderate voters' support opposed repeal or backed it only after winning some concessions.

Strikingly, while large majorities of Democrats and independents back efforts to sustain the statute, even Republicans and Trump supporters lean toward saying the administration should try making the law work, not take steps to hinder it.

But in other instances, Republicans and Trump supporters part company with Democrats and independents and strongly back the president's views. For a White House that often seems more concerned with cementing support from Trump's loyalists than embracing the political center, that might help explain the president's persistence on the issue.

For example, 6 in 10 Republicans and Trump backers want the GOP to continue its repeal and replace drive in Congress.

And around two-thirds from those groups want Trump to stop enforcing the tax penalty Obama's law levies on people who don't buy coverage. Analysts say that would roil insurance markets because fewer healthy people would buy policies, leaving them with greater proportions of expensive, seriously ill customers.

Trump has frequently tried pressuring Democrats to negotiate on health care by threatening to halt federal subsidies to insurers. While around 6 in 10 overall say Trump should not use such disruptive tactics, a majority of Republicans back that approach.

The companies use the money to trim out-of-pocket costs for deductibles and copayments for around 7 million low- and middle-income people. Since insurers are legally required to reduce those costs, they say blocking the subsidies would force them to increase premiums for millions who buy private insurance, including those whose expenses aren't being reduced.

The poll found that 52 percent have a positive view of Obama's law, a 9 percentage point increase since Trump was elected last November.

The Kaiser Health Tracking Poll was conducted Aug. 1-6 and involved random calls to the cellphones and landlines of 1,211 adults. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

See the article here:
Poll: Most say time to end effort to repeal Obama health law - ABC News

Obama begins to plot his political comeback – Axios

As a group of shareholders of Uber Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") we were surprised and distressed to learn through the media of the lawsuit brought by your firm against the Company, and its founder and former Chief Executive Officer Travis Kalanick.

Naturally, we share your concerns about the problems that the Company has

confronted in recent months, but we are greatly concerned about the tactics employed by

Benchmark to address them, which strike us as ethically dubious and, critically, value-destructive

rather than value enhancing.

Specifically, we do not feel it was either prudent or necessary from the standpoint

of shareholder value, to hold the company hostage to a public relations disaster by demanding

weeks of a personal tragedy, under threat of public scandal. Even less so your escalation of this

fratricidal course notwithstanding Mr. Kalanick's resignation through your recent lawsuit,

which we fear will cost the company public goodwill, interfere with fundraising and impede the

critical search for a new, world-class Chief Executive Officer. Benchmark has used false

allegations from lawsuits like Waymo as a matter of fact and this and many actions has crossed

the fiduciary line.

the founder, the company and the employees who worked so hard to create such unprecedented

value. We ask you to please consider the lives of these employees and allow them to continue to

grow this company in peace and make it thrive. These actions do the opposite.

full potential by allowing the necessary work to be done in the Board Room rather than the

Courtroom. To this end, at this point, in light of your suit against the Company, we believe it

would be best, and hereby request, that Benchmark remove its representative from the

Company's Board and move promptly to divest itself of enough shares in the Company so as to

cease to have Board appointment rights. We have investors ready to acquire these shares as soon

as we receive communication from Benchmark that they are willing to withdraw their lawsuit

and sell a minimum of 75% of their holdings.

today's Board meeting to show how the Board of Directors stands on this lawsuit brought against

the company, its founder and the 15,000 employees of Uber who have all worked so hard in

concert to create the fastest growing company in history.

Shervin Pishevar Personal Investor, Advisor and Former Uber Board Observer (2011-2015) Coordinator, Uber Shareholder Alliance

Ron Burkle Chairman Yucaipa Companies

Adam LeberPartner, Maverick

The rest is here:
Obama begins to plot his political comeback - Axios