Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

"Taking Swift Action":Google On AI Overview Falsely Claiming Obama A Muslim – NDTV

With its new artificial intelligence search tools, Google promised to"do the work for you"and make the search engine faster and smoother. However, it seems the global tech giant is facing problems within weeks after its launch.

Earlier this month,the US-based company unveiled an AI-generated search results overview tool.This one-of-its-kind toolis capable of summarisingsearch results for the users, so theydon'thave to click through multiple links to look for quick answers.

This unique feature has landed the company in trouble after it reportedly provided false or misleading information to some questions, CNN reported.

To back this claim, several users on the social mediaplatform,X,posted how the techgiant'sAI summary stated that former US President Barack Obama is Muslim -- a common misconception about him.

Thisis not the only misleading information provided to users.Another one claimed that a Google AI summary statedthatnone ofAfrica's54 recognised countries start with the letterK'.This, too, is incorrect as it forgot Kenya.

In this regard, the company on Fridaysaid the AI overviews for both queries havebeen removedfor violating its policies.

In a statement, Google spokesperson Colette Garcia said thatthe vast majority ofAI Overviews provide high-quality information, with links to dig deeper on the web.

Ms Garcia noted that several examplesseenhave been"uncommon queries",while the company has also seen examples that were"doctored or that wecouldn'treproduce".

We conducted extensive testing before launching this new experience, and as with other featureswe'velaunched in Search, we appreciate the feedback.We'retaking swift action where appropriate under our content policies,"the official noted.

At the bottom, every Google AI search overview acknowledges that thegenerative AI is experimental.The tech giant has stated that it conducts testing designed to imitate potential bad actorsas part of its effortsto prevent false or low-quality results from coming up in the AI summaries.

These search overviews are part ofGoogle'smajorplan to incorporate the Gemini AI technology acrossall ofits products as it prepares to compete with rivals like Meta and OpenAI.

However, this was not the first time the companywas forcedto walk back the capabilities of its AI tools due to the issues faced by users.In February this year, Googlehad to pauseits Gemini AI image generation feature afterit offeredinaccuraciesin historical pictures.

See the original post:
"Taking Swift Action":Google On AI Overview Falsely Claiming Obama A Muslim - NDTV

‘Bodkin’: Behind the Scenes of Michelle and Barack Obama’s First Scripted Drama Series – Entertainment Tonight

Up Next'Selling the OC' Season 3: Austin Victoria Reacts to Sean Palmieri Drama (Exclusive) Latest Watch Paul McCartney Respond to Beatles Fan's Shout-Out From 60 Years Ago

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

Show More

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 1,2024

MAY 1,2024

APR 29,2024

APR 29,2024

APR 28,2024

APR 24,2024

APR 23,2024

APR 22,2024

APR 22,2024

APR 22,2024

APR 22,2024

APR 22,2024

APR 15,2024

APR 15,2024

APR 12,2024

APR 11,2024

APR 10,2024

Show More

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

Show More

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 1,2024

MAY 1,2024

MAY 1,2024

APR 30,2024

APR 30,2024

APR 30,2024

APR 30,2024

APR 30,2024

APR 30,2024

APR 30,2024

APR 29,2024

Show More

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 3,2024

MAY 2,2024

MAY 2,2024

Read the original:
'Bodkin': Behind the Scenes of Michelle and Barack Obama's First Scripted Drama Series - Entertainment Tonight

How The Obama Sisters Have Transformed Since Leaving The White House – Women.com

It's normal for siblings to drift apart a little after leaving the parental home, but that wasn't the case for Malia Obama and Sasha Obama. In fact, even though they attended college in different states, the sisters found themselves back together in California.

Advertisement

Following a few years of studying atUniversity of Michigan,Sasha ended up transferring to the University of Southern California to complete her final college year, putting her closer to her sister, who moved to LA after graduating from Harvard in 2021. In fact, they were roommates.

Michelle Obama told People in 2022 the two had moved in together, revealing her reaction was, "Okay, well that's interesting that you guys are going to try living together. We'll see how it goes." But, jokes aside, Michelle admitted that she was happy to see her children getting along so well. She told Peoplethat same month that she'd been over to see her girls' place, which she described as a pleasant visit that included sipping on martinis. "To see them in that place where they're one another's support systems and they've got each other's backs, is just it's the thing that a mother would want," the former First Lady gushed.

Advertisement

Original post:
How The Obama Sisters Have Transformed Since Leaving The White House - Women.com

Nielsen’s Input on ACA Recognized in Obama Presidency Oral History – Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical … – Jacobs School of Medicine and…

Growing up in Elkins, West Virginia, (current population 6,800), Nancy H. Nielsen, MD 76, PhD, could not have fathomed that she would one day not only meet the president of the United States, but work with his administration to completely transform health care in America.

Now her work and that of many others on the Affordable Care Act, from advocacy to implementation, has been documented for posterity in the Obama Presidency Oral History.

Nielsen, senior associate dean for health policy in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, is one of the extraordinary people from all walks of life invited to participate in the Obama Presidency Oral History project. Compiled by Columbia University, the history is based on more than 1,000 hours of interviews with hundreds of people.

Just being invited to do the interview was an incredible honor, Nielsen says. It also gave her a chance to review how she came to take part in one of the most significant health care reforms the U.S. has ever seen.

In 1973, with a doctoral degree in microbiology and a faculty position at the Jacobs School, Nielsen was accepted to the UB medical school. She was a nontraditional student, since she already had a faculty position and was also raising five small children. She was one of just 30 women in her class of 135.

After graduating and serving as the first woman chief resident in internal medicine at Buffalo General, Nielsen was board-certified as an internist. In addition to running a busy private practice, she was drawn to the policy side of medicine. She served as president of the Erie County Medical Society, became involved with the state medical society and started working at the national level.

She served four consecutive terms as speaker of the American Medical Association House of Delegates and in 2008 was elected AMA president, a term that coincided with the intensifying national health care debate.

While Nielsen was president-elect, the AMA launched its Voice for the Uninsured campaign, advocating for health care reforms that would extend health insurance coverage to Americans who didnt have it.

In preparing for the campaign, the AMA media relations staff asked if Nielsen had any patients who were uninsured.

Nancy H. Nielsen, MD 76, PhD, with her extended family after receiving the Jacobs Schools Distinguished Alumni Award in the fall 2023.

Thats when Nielsen revealed she had also been uninsured. During graduate school, I delivered two babies when I was uninsured, she says, and that became the cause of my life: to make sure all Americans got health insurance.

She recalls that at the time the Affordable Care Act was passed, 19% of the U.S. population had no health insurance.

It really was a national scandal, to tell you the truth, and there were places where it was even worse than that, she says. There is nothing good about being uninsured. That was the whole point of the Voice for the Uninsured. They didnt have a voice. So we became that voice.

Once implemented, the Affordable Care Act cut the uninsured rate in the U.S. to 9% from 19%. It would have cut it even more, Nielsen explains, but the Supreme Court intervened and said the expansion of Medicaid, which was supposed to insure millions, was a states rights issue.

Since then, more states have come on board. Nielsen says its now down to about 10 states that havent expanded Medicaid, about half of which are considering it or are about to expand.

Nielsen, then president of the American Medical Association, welcomed President Barack Obama to the AMA House of Delegates annual meeting in Chicago on June 15, 2009. Photo courtesy of the American Medical Association

A few months after Nielsen finished her term as immediate past president of the AMA, she got a call from the White House. She was asked to come work at the newly established Center for Innovation in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the Department of Health and Human Services.

It was a brand-new part of HHS, and they said they needed me to come to bring the physician voice, as they were implementing this new part of the government, Nielsen says.

As senior adviser for stakeholder engagement, she would be on loan from UB to the federal government, a stint that would last two years. Her role was to interact with, and share the concerns of, clinicians throughout the health care system.

The Innovation Center is unique in government, Nielsen notes. It was enshrined in the ACA law, so that instead of making a big policy change and then having unintended consequences, the Innovation Center would do pilots and actually evaluate whether the care was improved and whether there were savings. That was the purpose. There was no place else in government where there was the flexibility to try something to see if it worked.

She assumed additional responsibilities working with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, advising on policy and sometimes attending events when the secretary could not.

It was just an extraordinarily exciting time and I loved it, Nielsen remembers.

She admits that working in Washington was seductive, but she always intended to return to UB.

I owe my career to UB, she says simply. I always wanted to be a physician. I didnt have money. After my fifth child was born, I finally applied. I was 29 when I started medical school and my fifth child was 2 months old.

So UB gave me a chance. I was lucky that the admissions committee let me in, and I will never forget it. My whole career has been here and Ive just been very fortunate. I owe it all to UB.

Now shes passing her passion for policy on to the next generation of physicians. Nielsen was recently asked to be faculty adviser to a group of Jacobs School students who want to develop a policy elective.

Why is policy important? she asks. Policy is the road map that we use to get to the society we want. For me, it meant getting affordable health insurance for every American. I tell the students, Your cause will be different. My role here is to help the students change the world, whatever that means to them.

Go here to see the original:
Nielsen's Input on ACA Recognized in Obama Presidency Oral History - Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical ... - Jacobs School of Medicine and...

Is this the year that no one watches political spots? – Roll Call

Little more than a decade ago, campaign finance reform was one of the hottest issues animating Democrats. Now it seems as irrelevant as a national drive to make Esperanto Americas second language.

Barack Obama, in his 2010 State of the Union address, predicted that the Supreme Courts Citizens United decision will open the floodgates for special interests. The TV cameras caught Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. angrily shaking his head as he mouthed, Not true.

Obama was, of course, right.

Super PACs, created in the wake of Citizens United, are fast dominating politics. The arithmetic is irresistible: Candidates can urge the super wealthy to donate $3,300 (the legal maximum) to their general election campaigns or they can encourage them to make a seven-figure donation to a friendly super PAC.

As late as 2016, Hillary Clinton gave lip service to the cause in her convention acceptance speech: We need to appoint Supreme Court justices who will get money out of politics and well pass a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.

But that was about the time when the Democrats discovered they could more than match the Republicans in super PAC largesse. And suddenly the issue faded like an Obama bumper sticker.

For a while, Democrats were apologetic as they explained that they couldnt practice unilateral disarmament in the battle against the Republicans. Then, faced with the never-ending threat from Donald Trump, Democrats unapologetically adopted the GOPs philosophy that anything goes in politics.

Roughly $8 billion was spent in 2020 on campaigns for federal office. And, with another bitterly fought presidential race and close battles for Congress, that number is likely to rise this year as fast as college tuition.

Early this month, Politico estimated that super PAC spending on federal races had more than doubled compared with the numbers from a similar period in 2020.

As super PACs play a larger role in politics, congressional candidates in both parties are fast losing control of their own campaigns. While the rules barring coordination between a super PAC and a candidate are increasingly porous, there can be sharp differences over what is the best political message.

An illustrative example is the collapse of Never Back Down, the super PAC that spent a jaw-dropping $158 million in 2023 supposedly boosting Ron DeSantis presidential campaign. Instead of powering the Florida governor to victory, the super PAC imploded with staff resignations and acrimony with the official DeSantis campaign before the Iowa caucuses.

Part of the problem is that there is so much money sloshing around politics in 2024 that greed becomes entwined with electoral strategies. All it takes is one smooth-talking political consultant and one gullible billionaire and, voil, you have a new super PAC.

The result is that many TV ads from super PACs and cause groups are designed to appeal to one key constituency: politically naive donors. The spots may be off message for the candidate they are promoting, but they attract money to fund new ads and, of course, lucrative fees for the consultant.

This may also be the year when the TV ad (a staple of politics since I Like Ike cartoons in 1952) may finally lose its luster.

Three trends are colliding: The 2024 presidential race promises to be the most expensive in history. The campaign is expected to pivot around just six or seven swing states (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia and maybe North Carolina). And, thirdly, because of cord-cutting, 50 percent of households barely see any TV ads at all.

Pity the more than 30 million voters in those seven battleground states. Not only will they be thumped with nonstop political commercials, but their phones will also constantly beep with text messages from candidates. And these swing-state voters will only venture onto social media at their own peril.

Probably, at this very moment, both presidential campaigns are working on ways that a hologram of President Joe Biden or Trump can greet swing voters at their breakfast table each morning.

Amid the torrent of ads in every place except inside bottles of laundry detergent, congressional candidates will face a daunting challenge on how to break through the clutter.

Four Senate races and 14 up-for-grabs House seats are in those seven swing states. Throw in two other hotly contested House races in Nebraska and Maine, where electoral votes are awarded by congressional district.

When voters are savvy enough to recognize a negative TV spot as soon as they glimpse the first grainy photograph or hear the initial words of voice-of-doom narration, how can a House candidate, without an unlimited budget, ever communicate? And even Senate candidates will play second fiddle to the high-intensity presidential race.

Maybe the result in these swing states will be even more party-line voting than ever before. When the congressional and Senate races become a blur, regardless of the merits of individual candidates, it will be hard to motivate voters to split their tickets.

Obviously, there is no current constituency in Congress pressing to write legislation to regulate the cacophony of political ads. But at some point, maybe, legislators in both parties will come to the conclusion that the only people benefiting from the current system are (surprise) political consultants.

Granted, it is hard to shake the inbred belief in politics that a few million dollars more or one killer TV ad will make all the difference. But the sad truth is that in this politically saturated year, almost nobody is listening.

View post:
Is this the year that no one watches political spots? - Roll Call