Archive for the ‘NSA’ Category

NSA lays out its reforms post-Snowden (they can fit on back of a stamp)

The NSA has published its first "report" on signals intelligence "reform" in the US. If you were hoping for sweeping changes in the wake of Ed Snowden's whistleblowing, you're in for disappointment.

The factsheet, covering the year to date, was written up after some prodding and tutting by President Obama in January 2014.

It shows some minor tweaks in how Uncle Sam's agencies collect and processes information on people's everyday lives. We're told mass surveillance is still allowed:

Information obtained en masse from emails, phone calls, internet snooping, and so on, by spies using Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) will now be more closely scrutinized rather than slung into a bottomless bit well: any material deemed to not be of national importance will be deleted as soon as it is found, it's claimed.

Data which could be useful will be kept for five years before deletion, unless it's stuff the NSA really wants to keep for national security purposes in which case, it's indefinite.

The rules on whistleblowing have also been amended to allow staff to report illegal activity by their peers without fear of professional sanction. If, like Edward Snowden, you're a contractor, there are still no legal protections for whistleblowing, and you can expect to be prosecuted if you speak out.

The use of secret National Security Letters by the FBI and others has been changed, the NSA notes. These letters allow investigators to trawl through corporate databases but deny the businesses concerned the right to tell anyone about it. These gagging orders will now expire after three years.

The NSA report states:

In his January 17, 2014 remarks, the President directed the Attorney General to amend how we use National Security Letters so that [their] secrecy will not be indefinite, and will terminate within a fixed time unless the government demonstrates a real need for further secrecy.

In response to the Presidents new direction, the FBI will now presumptively terminate National Security Letter nondisclosure orders at the earlier of three years after the opening of a fully predicated investigation or the investigations close.

Read this article:
NSA lays out its reforms post-Snowden (they can fit on back of a stamp)

Hi to Annunaki and NSA – Video


Hi to Annunaki and NSA
Saying Hi to the Annunaki regime here as well as their NSA.

By: Jay Arae Essex

Read this article:
Hi to Annunaki and NSA - Video

Throw sum mo nicki minaj ft rae sremmurd ,Bbe ,nsa – Video


Throw sum mo nicki minaj ft rae sremmurd ,Bbe ,nsa
Bbe challenge ,nsa challenge, twerk.

By: Kim E

Continued here:
Throw sum mo nicki minaj ft rae sremmurd ,Bbe ,nsa - Video

White House allows NSA's bulk data collection to continue

The Obama administration has announced a series of modest changes in the use of private data collected for intelligence purposes, a move that underscores how little the Edward Snowden revelations have impeded the National Security Agency's exploitation of global Internet communications.

Eighteen months after the first Snowden-fueled news story and one year after President Obama delivered a major speech calling for changes to NSA data collection, the White House on Tuesday said it had tightened rules governing how the FBI, CIA and other intelligence agencies use Internet and phone communications of foreigners collected by the NSA. But the bulk collection would continue as robustly as ever, the announcement made clear.

Where once the data could be used for any reason and held forever, now it must fall into six specific threat categories and irrelevant data is to be purged after five years. But the categories are broad enough that an intelligence officer could find justification to use a piece of information on a foreigner if he or she feels the need. The information need only have some relevance to counter-espionage, counterterrorism, counter-proliferation, cybersecurity, countering threats to U.S. or allied armed forces or personnel; and combating transnational criminal threats.

The new policy also imposed more supervision over how intelligence agencies use the communications of Americans they acquire without individual warrants, making clear, for example, that such data may only be used to prosecute someone for "serious crimes" such as a murder or kidnapping, or national security crimes.

But the changes stopped well short of the recommendations of a presidential task force, including one that data collected by the NSA without warrants should never be used against an American in court, and another that such data should only be searched using the name of an American with a specific court order naming that person. Robert Litt, general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, said in a conference call with reporters that those ideas were deemed too restrictive.

The result is that the private communications of Americans collected without warrants are still circulating around the government.

Moreover, Mr. Obama's most significant proposal in response to the Snowden leaks - to end the NSA's bulk collection of domestic calling records - has not been enacted. The president wants Congress to pass a law, and Congress has balked. The NSA is still collecting the records, even though Mr. Obama could stop the practice on his own.

"There's pressure to say we're doing something, and that leads to some symbolic changes or tweaks, but there would be a great reluctance to forswear access to intelligence like this," said Richard Betts, a professor at Columbia's School of International & Public Affairs and a former staffer in the 1970s congressional investigations of intelligence agencies.

"The reforms are far from sufficient and they really do tinker around the edges," said Neema Singh Guliani, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "It's clear the administration is going to continue to stand by a lot of the mass surveillance policies."

In a statement, White House counter terrorism adviser Lisa Monaco said U.S. digital spying "must take into account that all persons have legitimate privacy interests in the handling of their personal information. At the same time, we must ensure that our Intelligence Community has the resources and authorities necessary for the United States to advance its national security and foreign policy interests and to protect its citizens and the citizens of its allies and partners from harm."

Continue reading here:
White House allows NSA's bulk data collection to continue

As Obama tightens surveillance guidelines, uncertainty lingers on NSA program

The Obama administration on Tuesday announced a series of modest steps to strengthen privacy protections for Americans and foreigners in U.S. intelligence-gathering, including an end to the indefinite gag order on certain subpoenas issued to companies for customers personal data.

At the same time, U.S. intelligence officials said they were still hoping to fulfill a goal President Obama set a year ago: ending the National Security Agencys collection of millions of Americans phone records.

It was the revelation of that NSA program in June 2013 by former agency contractor Edward Snowden that set off a controversy over the scope of the governments surveillance powers and that led Obama in a speech last year to announce a number of reforms to intelligence-gathering practices.

The centerpiece of that speech was his call for an end to the NSAs bulk phone records collection, with the aim of devising an alternative approach that would preserve the agencys access to the data for counterterrorism purposes. But Congress failed last year to pass legislation to achieve that.

The underlying authority for the collection will expire June 1. The administration fears the expiration would end not only the program but also the FBIs ability to obtain a broad range of information on a standard much lower than probable cause.

While privacy advocates believe the White House could unilaterally end the NSA program, administration officials are calling on Congress to pass legislation to do so.

Im hopeful that in the four months we have until this expires, well be able to get legislation passed, Robert S. Litt, the general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, said in a phone call with reporters. Officials are not yet making contingency plans in the event it doesnt, he said.

The steps announced Tuesday by the administration are aimed at increasing transparency and privacy in an effort to rebuild public trust that was eroded in the wake of the Snowden disclosures. At the same time, Litt said, officials want to maintain operational capabilities needed to protect the nation and its allies.

Under the new measures, the FBI will lift indefinite gag orders on companies that receive administrative subpoenas, known as national security letters. NSLs are issued by a senior law enforcement official without a judges sign-off and require the recipient to turn over data such as a customers credit-card transactions, billing records and data on when and to whom an e-mail was sent or a phone call made. The gag order will now be dropped after three years or when an investigation ends, whichever comes first.

The three-year limit on NSL gag orders is a significant concession by the FBI, but it does not meet the constitutional standard, said Gregory Nojeim, senior counsel for the Center for Democracy & Technology. Instead, the FBI should have to go to court and prove a likelihood of harm if disclosure was allowed from the start.

Excerpt from:
As Obama tightens surveillance guidelines, uncertainty lingers on NSA program