Mediaboss Marketing

Sick and tired of seated all around exhausted? Lets wake one another up! (New Jersey, NJ) Hello there there I am on here merely seeking a gentleman who honestly appreciates the best time. Once and I'm feeling brave....its spur of the moment I know but if youve got a spare evening use me to fill it you wont be dissapointed ~wink~I am really quiet adventerous in bed nsa personals long as its sane then Im up for it..haha i wanna meet tonight because I actually have some time to myself for. Email me rear and Allows discuss.

Discuss Unclean? (New Jersey, NJ) Its hard to consider things to say in these posts, since i have am kind of bashful. I like it rough, but only if I tell you... otherwise be gentle. I am just seeking a fantastic guy who are able to be my friend in nsa personals some. A girlfriend of my own published on on this page and had a thrilling time together with the gentleman she met. Ok this girl isn't looking for a hookup with different guys, but one guy for multiple hookups would be cool. Dirty replies are great just don't creep me out, thank you.

Could we have jointly with an 60 minutes around this night time? (New Jersey, NJ) I really do not really desire to invest the entire nite in a bar. I simply wish for a simple NSA gathering. Perhaps require a window of wine but commit usually on the inside mattress or upon the sofa or home counter-top? looking for sex operates. I simply want to get fucked and have a fantastic timewith no significant discussions. Not too a lot of concerns. If that's okay along with you allow us to do this. At nighttime generally is perfect for me.

Yo (New Jersey, NJ) I'm posting on this page, in order to visualize what I'm interested in. I'm one, 32 years of age. I'm in the dense part: 174 lbs. Merged nsa singles background. CL has a way of blocking content SPECIFICALLY on the women for men's page, though i'd love to go into more detail about what I'm interested in. I won't be able to get back to any responses until after work, but I would like to have a little fun later tonight if possible. Not searching for nearly anything long-term.

ME U = changing your drenched sheets (New Jersey, NJ) Just a typical fashionable seeking to benefit from the little bit of time i have to myself personally this evening...In between school and work i dont any have enough time to do what standard 22yr olds do...Searching for a gentleman with the right feel...your house only too...pic is essential and i also will come back the prefer...despite nsa personals fact that looks are not extremely important for me... I have almost no time for video games people...So tell me a lil about yourself and we should go from that point.

I'm ready and waiting (New Jersey, NJ) Do you like a girl who can't get an adequate amount of her person? I have got numerous warm fantasies and simply need a gentleman who would like to pay attention to them. I love a guy who understands how to deal with his female making her feel definitely desired. I like a person having a lovely body, someone I will really like getting out on the party floor with. Get in touch if you would love to get dirty with me no strings attached dating the bedroom. Present me whatever you received, I am going to be waiting.

Pet me/heart stroke me (New Jersey, NJ)

Hey there horny men and women! ! I guess I'm quite inside a weird way. Whips and chains not really so much, although i like food fetishes. Otherwise I think I am real open to things, though i don't like anything that is going to leave a mark or tell a story and possibly wreck no strings in my professional life. I don't have much more to truly include. Fairly easy, I guess. I don't want to hand out Almost everything. Excitement are great as well.

A naughty laugh states all this (New Jersey, NJ) Now I am freshly single I want to go out and possess the very best time of my life. nsa personals terms of gentlemen I want person who loves gender just as much as I really do. I'd love a guy who is pleased shelling out all the time getting romantic as is possible. I need a guy you never know what foreplay is, I don't want any wham bam thanks mames. If you need a opportunity with me you should absolutely love having sex as much as possible. Are you able to produce things i need to have? Prove it.

Visit link:
nsa personals New Jersey, NJ

With the provisions of the Patriot Act which allow the National Security Administration to collect data on Americans' phone calls newly expired, a new CNN/ORC poll finds 61% of Americans think the law ought to be renewed, including majorities across party lines, while 36% say it should not be reinstated.

Republican leaders in the Senate are working to pass a bill to reinstate the law, after delays led by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), whose presidential campaign has been noted for its appeal to independent voters and younger Republicans, and other surveillance opponents led to the law's expiration at 12:01 a.m. Monday. But Paul's stance on the issue is unlikely to bring him many fans within his own party.

Support for renewal peaks among Republicans, 73% of whom back the law. Democrats largely agree, with 63% saying the law should be renewed. Independents are least apt to back it, with 55% saying renew it and 42% let it expire. Liberals, regardless of partisan affiliation, are most likely to say the law should not be renewed, 50% say so while 48% want to see it renewed.

About half of Americans, 52%, say that if the law is not renewed, the risk of terrorism here in the U.S. would remain about the same. Still, a sizable 44% minority feel that without the law, the risk of terrorism will rise. Just 3% feel it would decrease.

RELATED: Rand Paul vs. the GOP field on NSA

The sense that the risk will rise is greatest among Republicans, 61% of whom say the risk of terrorism will climb if the NSA is unable to collect this data. Among Democrats and independents, less than half feel the risk of terrorism would increase if the program ended.

The poll reveals a steep generational divide on the data collection program. Among those under age 35, just 25% say the risk of terrorism would increase without NSA data collection. That more than doubles to 60% among those age 65 or older. Those under age 35 are also split on whether the law should be renewed at all, 50% say it should be renewed while 49% say it should not. Among those age 35 or older, 65% back renewal of the law.

President Barack Obama's reviews for handling government surveillance of U.S. citizens have worsened since June 2013 when the NSA data collection program was first revealed. Overall, 67% say they disapprove of the president's handling of government surveillance of U.S. citizens, up from 61% in June 2013.

Much of that decline comes among his fellow partisans. In June 2013, 61% of Democrats approved of the president's handling of surveillance issues, that has fallen to 49% in the new poll.

Obama fares better on his handling of terrorism generally, 45% approve and 51% disapprove.

See the original post:
Poll: 6 in 10 Back Renewal of NSA Data Collection ...

The developments, coming in a rare overnight session, leave in doubt the ability of Congress to keep alive the Patriot Act program that many feel is critical to national security but has also alarmed privacy advocates for its sweeping nature.

First, the Senate blocked two separate measures. The first, a House-passed bill that would shift responsibility for holding data from the government to telecommunications companies, while also imposing stricter limitations on how authorities could access the information, failed in a 57-42 vote. The second measure was a two-month extension beyond the current law's June 1 expiration date, which was voted down 54-45.

RELATED: Everything you need to know about the Patriot Act debate

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul, who's also seeking his party's nomination for President, led the charge against the program, repeatedly objecting to requests from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to extend it by just a few days.

"We have entered into a momentous debate," said Paul, who said he objected because his request for a guarantee of two amendments on a future bill dealing with the NSA program was denied. "This is a debate about whether a warrant with a single name of a single company can be used to collect all of the phone records of all of the people in our country with a single warrant. Our forefathers would be aghast."

Later, standing on the floor in the hushed chamber, McConnell made repeated attempts to keep the law alive. The first was to extend the NSA's authority to June 8, which was objected to by Paul. McConnell's next attempt was to extend to June 5, which was objected to by Oregon Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden, an ally of Paul on the issue. An attempt by McConnell at a June 3 deadline was denied by Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-New Mexico. Finally, McConnell requested the program be extended until June 2, just one day after the law is set to expire, and Paul objected again.

Senators, who throughout the week generally thought a short-term extension would eventually be approved, appeared stunned by the swift exchanges between McConnell and the three opponents of the program. Gasps were audible.

An exasperated McConnell then took off his microphone and huddled with his leadership colleagues, searching for what to do next. After a few minutes, he returned to the podium and announced the Senate would adjourn and return to work a week from Sunday and try to find a way to keep the law in existence.

"We'll be back on Sunday, May 31, one more opportunity to act responsibly to not allow this program to expire," he said around 1:30 a.m. "This is a high-threat period. We know what's going on overseas. We know what's been tried here at home. My colleagues, do we really want this law to expire?"

By the time McConnell spoke, the visitors' gallery was largely empty. But a small group of people, wearing brightly-colored "Stand with Rand" T-shirts, remained.

Read more:
Senate blocks measures to extend NSA - CNNPolitics.com

The Kentucky senator's latest filibuster-style stand against government surveillance positions him as the bane of Big Brother and puts him at the center of a high-profile national security debate as support for the post-9/11 security state seems to be fraying.

Paul's maneuvering is not without risks. Critics, including rivals in the 2016 GOP nominating race, warn his grandstanding is dangerous and is sowing chaos in the Senate that could result in a key spying program going dark at the same time that ISIS is rising, stoking Americans' fears.

READ: Rand Paul wraps 10-hour 'filibuster' over NSA surveillance program

Still, Paul certainly saw as many political opportunities as costs when he spent more than 10 hours Wednesday standing on the Senate floor, shod in sneakers for comfort, railing against the National Security Agency's bulk data collection.

Paul claimed political stardom in the Republican Party by standing up to Big Government and remains wildly popular among his young, libertarian slice of the conservative movement for his ideological convictions.

But he is looking to widen his constituency beyond his traditional base -- and the Republican Party's as well -- and Americans' skepticism over the NSA may help him do just that. Given that he appears to have stalled behind front-runners like Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush in most polls of the Republican race, Paul's White House hopes could certainly benefit from a boost.

At the heart of Paul's case is a claim that the NSA is violating the constitutional rights of Americans by sweeping up vast troves of telephone records in a dragnet designed to allow it to later make connections between potential terrorist suspects.

Authority to conduct the programs, exposed by former government contractor Edward Snowden, is set to expire on June 1 if Congress does not pass new legislation.

The House has already overwhelmingly approved a bill to reform the Patriot Act -- which would curtail but not end the NSA program -- so the notion of reining in government snooping isn't an outlier, even in GOP circles.

But Paul is pushing for more reforms in the Senate version -- and he's willing to let NSA authorities sunset altogether if he can't get the overhaul he is after.

Continue reading here:
Rand Paul seizes political moment with NSA protest ...

The government has argued it has the power to carry forward with the program under a section of the Patriot Act, which expires in June. Lawmakers are locked in a debate on whether or how to renew the authority, which was first passed shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington, but has been renewed by both Presidents Bush and Obama in the intervening years.

Documents confirming the program's existence were first revealed in June of 2013 with the leaks by former government contractor Edward Snowden.

The decision by a three-judge panel that the phone record collection program, which was mostly secret for nearly a decade, is not supported by the current version of the law, will certainly enter into the brewing political debate over renewing it.

RELATED: Why the NSA decision matters

Judge Gerard E. Lynch, writing for a three judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, said the program "exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized."

Lynch wrote that the text of the Patriot Act "cannot bear the weight the government asks us to assign to it, and that it does not authorize the telephone metadata program."

The Court did not address the larger question of whether the program is constitutional and sent the case back down to a lower court for further proceedings. It noted that the section of the Patriot Act that the government said authorized the law - Section 215 - is set to expire in early June.

"In light of the asserted national security interests at stake, we deem it prudent to pause to allow an opportunity for debate in Congress that may (or may not) profoundly alter the legal landscape," Lynch wrote.

He was clearly concerned with the scope of the program. He wrote the "sheer volume of information sought is staggering."

Sen. Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican who is also running for president, defended the NSA program on the Senate floor shortly after the court decision was made public.

View original post here:
Court rules NSA program illegal - CNNPolitics.com