Archive for the ‘Migrant Crisis’ Category

6 ‘Dystopian’ Ideas the UK Has Actually Considered to Stop Refugee Boats Arriving – Global Citizen

From water cannons in the English channel to a processing centre in Rwanda.

Over the course of the last year, the UK Home Office has been brainstorming ways to deal with the refugee crisis and it looks like almost everything is on the table.

But instead of working on how to better offer sanctuary, save lives, or successfully integrate refugees into British life, the government department led by Priti Patel has instead been plotting prison islands, containment ships, and weapons to deter migrant dinghies.

Reports have been circling since August 2020 of ideas to make the English Channel an unviable route for asylum seekers, some condemned as unlawful, reckless, and dangerous.

And on Monday, Patel was making headlines once more as news broke of her plan to set up a processing facility for asylum seekers arriving in Britain based thousands of miles away in Rwanda.

This is where we are. Despite the global refugee crisis, it is a myth to suggest that there is a refugee crisis in the UK. There are not many refugees in the UK just 0.2% of the total population as of 2019 and the UK receives far fewer asylum applications than its neighbours.

According to UNHCR, the United Nations refugee agency, the UK received 31,752 asylum applications in the year ending September 2020, almost five times less than Germany (155,295), and much less than France (129,480) and Spain (128,520) too.

However Britain, instead of taking its fair share of refugees, has been coming up with ways to avoid responsibility. Here are some of the grotesquely inhumane ideas that the Home Office has genuinely been considering in just the last year alone.

Next week, Patel willreportedlybring aNationality and Borders Bill to parliament.

In the event such legislation is passed into law, it would allow her to set up an offshore processing centre to hold asylum seekers in Rwanda.Its thought that the processing centre will be shared with Denmark, another countryrecently condemned for being the first European country to revoke refugee status for 200 Syrians, including teenagers who had been in Denmark for many years, arguing that their war-torn home country was now safe to return to.

Australiahas implemented "offshore processing" since 2012 where refugees arriving by boat are intercepted and told to turn back, or be taken to a third country, namely Nauruor Manus Island in Papua New Guinea, while their claim for asylum is processed.

The UK plan has been described as barbaric and cowardly by Tim Naor Hilton, chief executive at Refugee Action, while the Refugee Council called it an act of cruel and brutal hostility. It was widely condemned as dystopian, with Alistair Carmichael, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesperson, saying it would be an appalling and inhumane way to treat some of the worlds most vulnerable people.

Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council charity, said: Offshore processing is an act of cruel and brutal hostility towards vulnerable people who through no fault of their own have had to flee war, oppression, and terror.

The idea was to buy retired ferries and convert them into floating processing centres.

The ships, moored off the English coast, would hold asylum seekers while they waited for their applications to be dealt with. Along a similar vein, another thought was that migrants could be processed on decommissioned oil platforms in the North Sea, according to the Times.

Eventually it was deemed a no go after being discussed in a Whitehall brainstorming session.

But as were about to find out, not all binned ideas find themselves banished for eternity

The Rwanda centre is merely the latest iteration of an idea that was pitched, and scrapped, between September and October 2020.

Initially, "detailed plans were drawn up to build detention camps on either Ascension Island or Saint Helena, British Overseas Territories based just off the western coast of Africa. Islands around Moldova, Morocco, and Papua New Guinea were also considered.

But there was a huge public backlash. The idea was described as entirely immoral and inhumane by campaigners. Eventually, the plan was shelved for nine months, at least.

The governments speculative plans to round up human beings and confine them to prison boats or camps on remote islands are inhumane and morally bankrupt, said Stephen Hale, chief executive of Refugee Action. Britain is better than this.

Hale added: We need a fair and effective asylum system, based on compassion, safety, and the rule of law.

A leaked document from last summer showed that the Home Office reached out to Maritime UK, a trade body, asking for tips on how to build temporary "marine fencing" in the English Channel.

The Financial Times first broke the story, reporting that they had seen an email requesting advice on how to "prevent a slow-moving, heavily overloaded migrant boat from making progress". But Maritime UK said that the idea was "not legally possible" under terms set out in the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea.

Apparently the barriers would be set up "on the median line" between British and French waters, with technology that was "rapidly deployable and rapidly removable."

In the news around the Rwanda processing centre, the statistics around migrants arriving in the UK on small boats approximately 5,700 in 2021 so far have been put forward as something Prime Minister Boris Johnson is actively concerned about.

As weve already established, this is a miniscule proportion of the number of asylum applications made to other countries. But in 2018, it led to former home secretary Sajid Javid declaring a major incident. It has since frequently been portrayed as an escalating emergency.

Last year, the BBC and Sky were accused of "voyeurism" after they sent reporters to chase some of these dinghies in their own boats, described by one MP as like "grotesque reality TV". To further add to the hysteria, government rhetoric has grown increasingly bombastic.

Which led to this idea: water cannons in the English Channel to create actual waves that might repel migrant boats before they can land in the UK. Seriously.

Last but not least, there was the whole warship debacle.

In August 2020, Patel requested support from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to prevent migrants crossing the English Channel, and appointed an ex-royal marine as a "clandestine channel threat commander."

Among the critics of the idea to send in the military to deal with migrants were people within the MoD itself, with one source reportedly calling it a completely inappropriate and disproportionate approach to take."

In the end, navy ships werent called in. But judging by the return of the Rwanda processing centre, it might be naive to believe the idea may never come back.

View original post here:
6 'Dystopian' Ideas the UK Has Actually Considered to Stop Refugee Boats Arriving - Global Citizen

The Irony of Being Undocumented – The Atlantic

The last time a Democrat lived in the White House, I was nearly detained outside of its gates. It should have been obvious to me, an undocumented immigrant, that giving my blank passport to a Secret Service agent could get me in trouble.

But I, along with a classmate, had been asked to be there for a meeting about college access hosted by first lady Michelle Obamas higher-education initiative, and my security form had cleared the night before. And this was America, where immigrants supposedly could do such things as become senators and secretaries of state, and get invited to meetings at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, within the White House complex.

Predictably, the Secret Service agent told me that I was not on the list and that I should reach out to my point of contact inside. Ill catch up with you, I told my friend, knowing that I wouldnt. After about an hour of waiting, one of the hosts appeared, and told me that he was so sorry and that he would call me later. You didnt tell me you were undocumented! he said, stunned, over the phone.

I took my burgundy Venezuelan passport and walked away, breathing in the peculiar blend of hope for Hillary Clinton and trepidation about Donald Trump that already filled the D.C. air in March 2016. The Secret Service that protected the man who lived in the White Housewho often used his ancestors immigrant stories to wax poetic about this countrycould have just as easily sent me to detention that day.

The current White House occupant also claims to be on immigrants side, decrying in his inaugural address the racism, nativism, fear, and demonization that have long torn us apart. The presidency of Joe Biden has brought, as promised, a clean break from some of Trumps pernicious policies, such as the travel ban and the assault on the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. On his first day in office, Biden sent an immigration bill to Congress that expanded temporary status protections and provided a path to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants. The House of Representatives subsequently passed a pair of narrower bills that would protect about 2.5 million Dreamers, as well as farmworkers.

The real bargaining over our lives, in the Senate, is yet to come. As groundbreaking as Bidens sweeping immigration-reform proposal looks, I have seen bills like it get killed in the Senate, revived as amendments to some military-spending bill, then killed again, more times than I can count. Even if immigration relief efforts are broken up piece by piece, which some have suggested Biden is open to doing, each morsel that does get through Congress will likely come with the bitter pill of increased deportations or border militarization. And, in the meantime, the Biden administration continues housing unaccompanied migrant children in border facilities and deporting individuals under Title 42, a public-health law.

Adam Serwer: The sinister logic of Trumps immigration freeze

The end of the Trump presidency may create the impression that Americas immigration cruelty is a thing of the past. In truth, those of us who were undocumented before Trump know the inhumanity of that precarious normalcy.

To immigrants, papers are everything. They can also mean nothing.

For how often my community gets called undocumented, perhaps no one in this country possesses more documents, or clings to them more fiercely to prove their existence, than we do. Practically every immigrant family in this country has a thick folder padded with their most valued documentssome put them in a safe box; others make virtual copies that they upload to encrypted cloud servers. Even vaccination charts or a spelling-bee certificate can prove something. I keep my papers in a yellow manila envelope.

For most of the pandemic, the folded-up piece of paper that allows me to board a plane and travel domestically resided in the inside pocket of a green coat I bought in college. That paper is a press release from the State Department, on which I conveniently highlighted the sentence that keeps an immigration agent at an airport from whisking me away: Venezuelan passport holders who have been issued a passport extension will have the validity period extended by five years from the expiration date.

Most Venezuelans who live in the United States have not been able to get a new passport since the Maduro regime stopped issuing them to those living abroad in 2017 (though extensions were possible), and this press release was, until recently, the only thing that kept undocumented Venezuelans from being rendered functional exiles without a country.

When I fly to see family, I tuck this press release, along with my boarding pass, into my passport, as if to say, I know its expired. Its all I have. I hand this apology to the TSA agent, who decides whether to ask about my immigration status, or, as usually happens, wave me through.

Recently, I arrived at Reagan National Airport for my first flight since the pandemic began. I began to worry as soon as I turned a corner and saw that the TSA line was empty; behind plexiglass was a woman who had the power to decide whether I would get to see my family. Noticing that my passport had expired, she asked whether I had an extension. I awkwardly unfolded the press release, my voice shaking as I tried to explain State Department policy over her evident frustration. She seemed to study every comma. Finally she said, Let me see your face. My two masks chafed my ears as I pulled them down. She slid the paper and the passport back to me in silence, and I somehow got out a relieved Have a good one, before rushing to the conveyor belts.

Most of my other papersbank statements, school transcripts, a copy of my birth certificateare in the manila envelope. Even papers with no legal value at all are beloved, such as the birthday card I got from a scholarship foundation years ago, or the expired Capitol Hill press pass from my days as a news intern.

But for all the papers I could produce to show my contributions, none of them could secure a stable life. As anyone who has tried to come to the United States knows, its immigration system is arbitrary and often contradictory; being legal or documented depends not on the number of papers you possess, but on which ones you have. The Obama administration, when creating DACA, required applicants to have lived in the United States since June 15, 2007, to qualify; I arrived from Venezuela in 2011, so DACA did nothing for me. I could not be employed; could not legally drive in Florida, where I lived; and could not apply for federal or state financial aid to attend college. Theres no apparent justification for this date. I remember watching President Barack Obama announce on television in November 2014, around the time that I was applying to college, that he would expand DACAand that immigrants could apply if they had lived here since January 1, 2010. I had missed that cutoff, again, by a little over a year. I cried.

From the April 2019 issue: If liberals wont enforce borders, fascists will

With DACA out of reach, I believed that I had three options to obtain legal status, none of them viable. If I were to be the victim of certain crimes, such as sexual assault or human trafficking, I could opt for a U visa. (Quite obviously, I did not want to be the victim of such a crime, nor was it up to me anyway.) Alternatively, if the U.S. government deemed the crisis in Venezuela bad enough, I could qualify for temporary forms of relief such as Temporary Protected Status or Deferred Enforced Departure. Or there was always the possibility of marrying a U.S. citizen. This is doubtless the most pragmatic approach, and one that many immigrants successfully take. As the child of separated parents, though, I was waryterrified, honestlyof hinging my future on the unpredictable whims of a partner. (The naturalization process dictates that a couple be married for at least three years before the immigrant spouse can receive permanent residence.)

I suppose that waiting for a government response that may never come is choosing a more perverse kind of ghosting. Every visa program forces immigrants to fit into arbitrary but neatly delineated categories. Years of bipartisan collaboration have spawned a byzantine system that assigns such great weight to something so weightless as paper, betraying any understanding of the reasons people migrate or become undocumented. Inaction had already begotten this structure before Trump came to power.

I landed in Miami on July 3, 2011, when I was 14 years old, without knowing that I would stay. That was the summer when Mitt Romney launched his presidential run, Casey Anthony was acquitted of murder, and Janet Napolitano, then Obamas secretary of homeland security, announced that the administration would shift its deportation priorities to target criminals and people who otherwise posed a threat to national security or public safety. The journalist Jose Antonio Vargas had just come out as undocumented in a New York Times Magazine feature two Wednesdays before I arrived.

My father had moved to Orlando, Florida, with his wife and their two children two years earlier, fleeing death threats and crime in Venezuela. He had been able to secure legal status through a business visa. I saw no future for myself in Venezuela, where Id been living with my mother, so, during my visit, I told my father that I wanted to go to college in the United States. He took me to meet a family friend whose son was a student at Florida State University at the time, and I remember his exact advice: Now would be the best time to stay. I was about to start my freshman year of high school. I asked my father to call my motherI didnt have the heart to tell her that her son was not coming back home. Because of a 1982 Supreme Court decision that guarantees access to public education to all children, regardless of immigrant status, I started high school in Florida that August, gaining legal status under my fathers visa as a family member.

Otherwise, this countrys laws soon dashed our hopes. When my father tried to apply for green cards, the Department of Homeland Security determined that his role as the owner of his cellphone business was too operational and not sufficiently managerial. The application was denied. He grew desperate to deliver on a promise he had made to himself when he left Venezuela: that he would make sure we had a future.

Caitlin Dickerson: Americas immigration amnesia

Later that year, my father met a DHS agent. She spoke Spanish, worked for our gated communitys property-management company, and had attended Mass at the same Orlando church we went to. She said she could help us appeal our denied green cards. The lawyer had made some obvious mistakes, and with just a few tweaks, our immigration case would be open and shut.

Because we had had the privilege of immigrating legally, in the eyes of the law we were good immigrants. That year, the government reached a record number of deportations, having removed almost 400,000 people who presumably werent.

I still remember the muggy summer night in 2012 when, as a high-school sophomore, I held a letter with the official DHS seal saying that our appeal had been approved and our green cards would arrive within 45 to 120 days. The evidence submitted with your Application on December 29, 2011 is been audited to establish your eligibility for the benefits sought, it read, awkwardly. I did not yet know enough English to recognize that the sentences grammar was wrong.

The summer days went by, and the agent stopped returning our calls. The last we heard from her, in 2013, she was going on an emergency trip to New York to take care of her sick daughter. It became obvious that the letter I translated in my parents minivan that night was fake, and that the person who gave it to us was not an immigration agent. Our visas had already expired. We were left undocumented.

We later learned that this person had stolen tens of thousands of dollars from at least 10 different families in the Orlando area. We met some of them and, one day, my father said we had to go to the Orange County Sheriffs Office to file a report. Because we had lost approximately $6,000 in this scheme, and the agent had often asked us to pay up or wed be deported, we argued that our case qualified as extortion, one of the crimes covered under the U-visa category.

I wrote pages and pages of a witness statement at the police station, until we needed scrap paper and my wrist was sore. It was my first argument for freedom.

To be able to submit our application for approval, we needed a law-enforcement official to sign a form attesting that we had been helpful in the investigation of the case. At the station, my father feared that our information would be used to deport, not help, us. We came to the wolfs mouth, I recall him saying. In a letter from May 2014, the sheriffs office wrote that although we had cooperated with the investigation, the crime committed is not a qualifying offense. No police officer ended up signing the application.

A signaturea mere scribbleis what has kept us from our peace. We had no other redress.

By the end of the Obama administrationthe old normalthe 44th president had deported more than 3 million immigrants. Holding facilities for unaccompanied children dotted the border. Blimps and drones patrolled the skies in search of crossers.

Then Trump came, exposing our immigration systems capacity for evil when used with intention. The prohibition of travel from Muslim-majority countries; the raids at workplaces such as 7-Elevens and poultry-processing plants; the wanton separation of families; the termination of Temporary Protected Status for countries mired in humanitarian crises; the delegitimization of birthright citizenship; the extreme reduction of refugee intake numbers; the since-defeated rule that an immigrant could be denied a visa based on the likelihood that they would become a public charge to the government; the attempted rescission of DACA; and the alleged coercion of detained women into receiving hysterectomies all forced activists, scholars, and even elected officials to confront the possibility that Immigration and Customs Enforcement may need to be outright abolished. Then-Senator Kamala Harris cautiously urged her colleagues to think about starting from scratch on immigration enforcement the summer before entering the Democratic presidential primary.

The bedlam of 2016 led me to become a journalist. The act of writing required no papers. If the odds that I would obtain status had become even slimmer, my bylines at least could prove that I was here. I worked internship after unpaid internship, applying to as many scholarships as I could so that I could afford to get by. I opted out of tours of the White House press room, recalling that March morning.

Like many other journalists of color, I have straddled the line of wanting to give better representation to my community but being deemed too close to the facts to be unbiased. One newsroom explicitly told me that allowing me to intern with them would pose the threat of compromising us legally and journalistically. Papers are somehow also a talisman of neutrality.

One notable advance in immigrant rights during the Trump years was the passage of state laws and local policies allowing some undocumented immigrants to acquire drivers licenses, shielding them from traffic violations that sent many to ICE detention. In 2018, fearing I might not be able to replace my passport as Venezuela slipped further into mayhem, I tried to get a D.C. ID card. In doing so, I nearly lost everything.

I have a habit of losing things: an umbrella in an Uber, my cellphone on a ride at Universal Studios, my computer and camera at a Miami mall (almost). Ive always comforted myself with the convenient truth that material possessions are, at the end of the day, always replaceable. But not all papers are.

After my third failed attempt (the D.C. DMV kept insisting that my time living on campus could not fulfill the six-month residency requirement), I went into a Peets Coffee to call the universitys undocumented-student-services director, whod been helping me with the process. Two days later, after likely hundreds of customers had passed through the shop, I jolted awake, realizing that I hadnt brought my envelope back to my dorm with me. Gone with it would be dozens of pages of documents, the only government documents I had to show that I was here, in this country, at this moment. We tend to forget that even our birth has to be certified, and I was facing the possibility that I might never be able to see that piece of paper again.

I ran back. By some miracle, somebody had returned the lost papers to the cashier, who had put them in the coffee shops basement for safekeeping. Handing the folder back to me, the manager said, You should be careful with those. I felt, for the first time, the terror of a reality that had haunted me for yearsthat one small misstep could thrust my life into chaos.

Over the following months, I resolved to study law because the law had failed me. Without a work authorization, I could not be hired full-time anywhere, and law school gave me a much-needed safety net while also allowing me to confront the ancient doctrines that deemed me alien.

I came across the case of Fong Yue Ting, a Chinese immigrant who was arrested and deported because he did not have a certificate of residence, as the Geary Act (an extension of the Chinese Exclusion Act) required. With its decision in this case, the Supreme Court in 1893 cemented the governments plenary power to expel immigrants. Deportation, the Court said, was not a punishment for crime, but merely a way of enforcing the power of Congress and the president to place conditions on immigrants continued residence here. He has not, therefore, been deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, Justice Horace Gray wrote. Equal rights, the law says, do not belong equally to us. And yet here I was, proof of the laws obsolescence.

From the May 2021 issue: America never wanted the tired, poor, huddled masses

Unbeknownst to me, a momentary reprieve was coming.

On the last full day of Trumps presidency, with less than 24 hours of his term left, Trump decided to grant Venezuelans work permits and protection from deportation through Deferred Enforced Departure, citing the deteriorative condition of Venezuela caused by the autocratic government of Nicolas Maduro. That the most virulently anti-immigrant administration in recent memory would be the one to release me from the constant anxiety of being alien in the eyes of the law tasted of a bittersweet irony immigrants know well, in our worlds of contradiction.

I knew that reality would change little. For days before the memorandum came out, my corner of D.C. had been overrun by armored vehicles, soldiers, local cops, and even Border Patrol agents, following the insurrection at the Capitol. Crossing the street meant having to decide whether acknowledging or ignoring the officers would raise fewer questions. I stopped walking the dog alone.

Id learned to temper any high hopes I had for the government. Despite whatever mercy Trump may have thought he was showing at the eleventh hour, my rights were still subject to the whims of any federal agent until I had the proper papers in my hand. Trumps DHS never published any guidance on how to apply for this temporary status, so it helped nobody.

But on March 8, Biden actually delivered a long-awaited reprieve to undocumented Venezuelans. Fresh off the Senates approval of the stimulus bill, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas announced that he would be extending Temporary Protected Status to Venezuelans who already lived here while their home country seeks to right itself out of the current crises. The formal guidance came out the next day. For Haitians, who have also been battling a humanitarian crisis and this administrations own deportations, TPS relief did not come until May 22, after months of advocacy.

That Monday, the happy result of Washingtons political game was another press release that granted me rights slightly more permanently, until September 2022 for now.

In a few months, Ill have status. But who wont? And why me?

See original here:
The Irony of Being Undocumented - The Atlantic

Who is looking out for migrant workers during the Covid-19 crisis? – The Times of India Blog

A day in the life of a volunteer at a collective that is providing relief and advocating for systemic change for migrant workers.

My name is Gayatri Sahgal and I am a PhD student at Wolfson College, University of Oxford. Last year, when the first few lockdowns were imposed globally to contain the spread of Covid-19, I was unable to travel back to the United Kingdom and had to stay back in India. While looking for ways to help the situation here, a close friend of mineAnindita Adhikarisuggested I join theStranded Workers Action Network(SWAN).

SWAN was set up in March 2020, when Anindita, Seema Mundoli, Rajendran Narayan, and many others came together to form a collective of volunteers to organise relief for workers stranded in cities due to the national lockdown.

At SWAN, I manage the needs assessment team with another colleague. This team works across four zonesnorth, south, east, and westand comprises volunteers and zonal coordinators. The volunteers are responsible for managing calls, while the coordinators oversee operations and day-to-day collation of incoming data.

Related article: Envisioning equitable access to justice for migrant workers in India

8:00 AM:Since Ive started working with SWAN, I always wake up to a steady stream of messages being exchanged between team members.Over the past few weeks, weve worked on decentralising the process of managing calls that we receive from workers. Initially, we were directly getting calls on our numbers, which were being circulated. Now, weve set up helpline numbers that are manned by volunteers. When somebody calls the helpline, they are directed to a volunteer who takes note of their requirements and assessestheir needs by asking them certain questions using a standardised needs assessment form.

While I usually dont take calls directly anymore, today I woke up to a call from a worker who Id spoken to in April. I had helped him secure rations by connecting him to a nonprofit that was distributing rations in his area, in Jharkhand. This morning, however, he called to ask if SWAN can arrange some money for his family of four. Upon checking our records, I realise that we have already made three micro-transfers to him, which is where we tend to cap it. But as he seems to be in need of some immediate funds, I decide to forward his call to the money transfer team to do the needful.

9:00 AM:After a quick breakfast, I spend a few hours on my PhD work. My research focuses on the political economy of fragile contexts, specifically in the Horn of Africa region. It takes me a while to completely switch off and concentrate on my researchthe devastating situation at hand is always playing at the back of my mind.

Once I wrap up my research work, I get ready for a day of meetings and calls.

11:30 AM:I log on for a meeting with SWANs content team that is working on messaging around vaccine hesitancy and precautions for COVID-19. Compared to last year, in 2021 we have also been focussing on collecting data and gathering feedback from workers on the actual situation on the ground. This helps the team plan campaigns better. Simultaneously, the content team also works with a network of nonprofits that are developing vaccine awareness campaigns.

During the meeting, the needs assessment team shares the feedback they have received from the workers. Drawing on this information, we discuss the messaging that needs to be crafted to be shared with our database of workers.

Related article: The issue is exploitation, not migration

1:00 PM:I sit down to finish drafting a section of a report that captures the impact of the second wave on workers.

Since the first lockdown was imposed, we have gathered a lot of data through the calls we have received. However, with this report, our objective is to go beyond the numbers and the data collected. We want to present the lived experiences of workers who, in less than a year, have had to face two successive crises of livelihoods that have dented their savings and income.

We have also observed certain patterns across the calls weve been receiving and realised that the nature of calls has evolved over the course of the year. These days the workers are very disheartened, even more so than last year. Nobody really cares about us. They dont really take us into consideration when they make policies, is a common refrain across calls. Which is why, in the report, we have decided that we want to capture their messages, the pictures they send in, and other material that can be used to effectively communicate the larger story of the crisis.

Covid-19 has revealed a massive systematic problem. Through this report, SWAN is also trying to make this appeal that more needs to be done, because what has been done until now has just been completely insufficient.

4:00 PM:I join the weekly core group meeting. These meetings have become even more important as the situation is evolving daily. SWANs core group comprises members who oversee the daily operations of different teams. These meetings are usually more strategic, with the agenda laid out in advance. Some action points for today include discussing the status of the report, the feedback shared by our volunteers at our last all-volunteer meet, and how we can engage better with the government machinery to advocate for change on the ground.

We start by going over the report in detaildiscussing which parts to keep, and which can be left out to be used as stand-alone pieces, so on and so forth.

While providing immediate relief to workers is central to what we do at SWAN, this year we have gone a step further and worked on advocacy. The report is one part of our advocacy agenda. Another aspect of it is holding governments accountable for the relief measures that they have announced. For example, in April 2021, when the second wave had hit its peak in New Delhi, we started receiving a barrage of calls from the capital. Upon investigating further, we came to know that the Delhi government had announced some steps to manage the situation on ground, such as a labour helpline and an information desk. Upon calling the labour helpline, we found that it was meant for employers and not for workers. The other helpline that was supposed to be for ration distribution was only coordinating the distribution of cooked food, and even the operators themselves seemed to be uninformed. Based on our findings, we drafted a letter to the Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister. We followed this up with a Twitter campaign asking them for a status on all the points raised in the letter. Eventually, the Delhi government announced that they were arranging for ration to be distributed.

To pick out any such similar patterns in the calls we have been receiving, we go over the feedback we have collected from various teams during our meeting.We discuss the need to engage with the official machinery further and steps we can take to raise our concerns, while proactively working with them on solutions.

Another important aspect we discuss is the SWAN fellowship programme, which allows SWANs work to continue beyond its current structure. As a part of the fellowship, six migrant workers, who have been selected as SWAN fellows, get a platform to record and document their experiences and help other migrant workers get access to government schemes. These fellows can then further mobilise other networks of migrant workers, and collect data from them in order to amplify their collective appeals to the government.

When SWAN was set up, the intention was to fill gaps in the system and not do the work that the governments were supposed to or what the nonprofits were already doing. As we discuss the decreasing volume of calls and wrapping up operations for SWAN during the meeting, we also talk about ways in which we can strengthen the SWAN fellowship programme to enable our fellows to keep the momentum going.The meeting goes on for three hours.

8:00 PM:After a quick dinner, I go over all the action points for work tomorrow. Before calling it a night, I check in with all the zonal managers to see if they had any issues during their workday or came across any case that needs urgent attention.

As told to IDR.

This article was originally published on India Development Review.

Views expressed above are the author's own.

END OF ARTICLE

Go here to see the original:
Who is looking out for migrant workers during the Covid-19 crisis? - The Times of India Blog

Ohio makes it six states sending military and police to respond to Biden border crisis – Yahoo News

Ohio will send National Guard members to the U.S.-Mexico border to help federal and local law enforcement respond to sustained high levels of illegal immigration.

The announcement over the weekend from Republican Gov. Mike DeWine makes it the sixth state that has volunteered its police officers or National Guard following a request from Republican Govs. Greg Abbott of Texas and Doug Ducey of Arizona in June. All six volunteering states have Republican governors.

Ohio will send 185 members of its Army National Guard to the southern border, joining the ranks of Arkansas and South Dakota, which each opted to send Guard members instead of law enforcement.

Florida was the first state to send its police officers from a dozen departments statewide to help their counterparts in border states. Gov. Ron DeSantis said the prevalence of fentanyl in the northern part of the state had risen since January as the result of more coming into the United State from Mexico.

"You have a governor who is saying we'll step up to protect Floridians. This is what real leadership looks like. Leadership is not sending someone down there to beg people not to come," Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody said at the press conference, referring to Vice President Kamala Harris's previous statements telling migrants not to travel to the border. "When you have chaos versus order, crime versus safety, you develop strategic enforcement actions, and you bring peace and protection to your people. That's what a leader does.

BIDEN PROTOCOLS PUT MIGRANT CHILDREN AT RISK OF TRAFFICKERS, TOP REPUBLICAN WARNS

Nebraska is sending two dozen state troopers to Texas in what Gov. Pete Ricketts said was a response to the disastrous policies of the Biden administration.

While the federal government has fallen short in its response, Nebraska is happy to step up to provide assistance to Texas as they work to protect their communities and keep people safe, Ricketts said in a statement.

Story continues

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds said in June that up to 30 state troopers will go down to the border for an indefinite duration. Iowa Department of Public Safetys Sarah Jennings told the Daily Iowan that sending law enforcement out of state would not compromise public safety, but governors in other states are concerned that could be the case and chose instead to send military troops.

Gov. Kristi Noem of South Dakota pledged up to 50 state National Guard troops from a duration of 30 to 60 days. The South Dakota deployment is being funded by a private donation. Republican megadonors Willis and Reba Johnson made an unspecified gift to the state through their foundation. Willis Johnson made his billions of dollars through Copart, an automotive salvage and auction company.

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson will send 40 National Guard troops to the border for 90 days, stating, Border states have requested help, and we are answering the call.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

State National Guard forces had been left out of Abbott's and Ducey's request, as they want to give active law enforcement officers broader policing authorities. Military on the border cannot make arrests and typically serve in passive roles, such as monitoring cameras and manning unfinished portions of the border wall. However, out-of-state police will have broader policing authorities and will be able to arrest noncitizens who come across the border on trespassing charges and human smuggling charges. Normally, only federal authorities such as the Border Patrol can arrest people for immigration offenses, but the two governors expanded arrest authorities by declaring a disaster and emergency.

Washington Examiner Videos

Tags: News, Iowa, Ohio, Nebraska, Florida, South Dakota, Arkansas, Texas, Border Crisis, National Guard, Military, Police, Law Enforcement, Border, Immigration

Original Author: Anna Giaritelli

Original Location: Ohio makes it six states sending military and police to respond to Biden border crisis

Read the original here:
Ohio makes it six states sending military and police to respond to Biden border crisis - Yahoo News

Syria: What is the international community’s long term plan? – Cherwell Online

CW: References to violence and sexual assault.

Syria is a country filled with history. Its a middle-eastern land with rich cultural diversity, from the ruins of Palmyra to the network of towns, fortresses and panoply of lost cities that pepper the ubiquitous sun-kissed dunes. Multitudinous peoples have formed part of the rich tapestry of historical Syria. However, behind this topographical mirage of magnificence lurks a state devestated by a decade-long civil war, and bled by a malign regime headed by a dictator, Bashar al- Assad, obstinate in his desire to retain power at any expense. The expense has been grave, and, as always, has been paid by the people.

Assads iron fist and cruel totalitarianism, facilitated by the insouciant Russian states pillaring of his power, symbolise an unholy alliance that is a fundamental threat to the core values of freedom, moral decency, and the international rules-based order. This article seeks to deconstruct the evil barbarism that plagues Syria, as well as the inadequate current global approach to Syria, whilst outlining the need for a concerted international effort to liberate the Syrian people from Assads blood-soaked tyranny.

The heart-wrenching plight of Syrians at Assads hands is emblematic of the acute threat that he poses to the basic values of freedom. Just last month, the international chemical weapons watchdog (the investigative arm of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) provided a heart-rending insight into how the state machinery systematically represses the vulnerable. It said that it has reasonable grounds to believe that the elite Syria Tiger Forces Corp of the Syrian Air Force was responsible for a chlorine bomb that was dropped on a town in the rebel-controlled Idlib region in 2018, which killed 12 people. A United Nations report indicated that the Assad regime was also responsible for a bomb that was discharged on the Iqra School in the Aleppo Countryside in 2013 (one of a litany of schools bombed by Assad), killing 11 civilians, most of whom were children. Such rapid aerial assaults by the army on its own people are now lamentably common in Syria, and have been since the start of the civil war.

This is the reality on the ground in Syria despite the use of these types of weapons (chemical and incendiary) on civilian populations being illegal under humanitarian international law. But should we really be surprised? Such human rights abuses and flagrant international rule-breaking is Assads and his allies modus operandi.

Millions of refugees are afraid to return to Syria because of the Mukhabarat, or secret police, which systematically torture, rape, kidnap, and kill innocent civilians for simply voicing an opinion that may be construed as dissent, or for even for merely be suspected of harbouring anti-Assad sentiment.

The impact of one mans rapaciousness on Syria itself makes for a sobering read. As a result of Russian and Syrian air strikes and incessant artillery bombardment of cities (such as Aleppo and Homs), homes, infrastructure, and over 800 medical facilities have been reduced to rubble. Most of the more than half a million people killed have been civilians, murdered by barrel bombs and ballistic missiles, famine, sieges, and nerve gas. Not to mention the fact that the UN estimates that more than 6 million people have become refugees outside of the countrys border and another 6.7 million people internally displaced. Syrian economic output has fallen at least two-thirds since the war began which has created an impoverishment crisis. Its currency has lost 80% of its value and the UN estimates that more than 80% of the population has fallen below the poverty line with around 12.4 million Syrians food insecure, which is an increase of 4.5 million people in the last year alone and the highest number ever recorded.

The global response has been tepid at best. It is true that the US has consistently taken decisive action. For example, the Obama administration backed the Syrian rebels by attacking the Islamic State. The Trump administration launched a missile attack against Assad in 2017 in retaliation for yet another regime chemical attack. And just a month into office, the Biden administration launched a rocket attack against facilities in eastern Syria that the Pentagon said are used by Iranian-backed militia.

Moreover, a new round of US sanctions against Assads regime, and those who aid it, came into force just last year. The Caesar Act 2020 punishes all those who in any way aid the Assads, their government, army and institutions, their support networks and allies, or their business interests. The Acts main external targets are Russia and Iran, the Assad regimes external patrons, and the Iran-backed paramilitaries that spearhead its strike forces: Lebanons Hizbollah and Iraqi Shia militia. The overarching rationale for such targeting these groups has been to isolate Assad from vital strategic and military partners in order to ameliorate the impact of his armed forces domestically.

Similarly, the UK imposed its first sanctions against Syria since leaving the EU through its new Global Human Rights Sanction Regime; these so-called Magnitsky-style sanctions (in homage to the late Russian whistleblower Sergei Magnitsky) seek to target global individuals and organisations abusing human rights. In relation to Syria, UK asset freezes and travel bans to the UK were instituted for six Syrians, including the foreign minister Faisal Miqdad, Assad media adviser Luna al-Shibl, and financier to Assad, Yasser Ibrahim. Coupled with that, the UK have adopted a justly polemical rhetoric on the international stage with the UK Foreign Secretary, Dominic Raab, sniping that the Assad regime has subjected the Syrian people to a decade of brutality for the temerity of demanding peaceful reform.

However, the Magnitsky-style sanctions, as valuable and coercive as they are, seem unlikely to protect civilians on the ground who are enveloped by privation, suffering, and abuse; and the upper-echelons targeted were already under some form of restrictive international sanction. It also seems to have achieved very little in deterring Assad, and arguably, the stringency of the Caesar Act actuated the demise of the Syrian currency and therefore exacerbated the impoverishment crisis on the ground as Syrian simply can no longer afford basic foodstuffs like bread. Notwithstanding that, the repeated US military interventions from the sky seem to be distant and lacking in substantive success, whilst costing innocent lives in the process and leaving many Syrians too frightened to roam the streets. For me, there appears to be no real concerted strategy or game-plan from the West, vis--vis Syria, when there ought to be, given how acute the crisis has now become after 10 years.

The main focus of the West in relation to Syria appears to be on the management of the refugee crisis stemming from there as opposed to tackling the causes of the refugee crisis, which is tantamount to treating the symptoms, not the cause. For example, some EU countries have recently, and arbitrarily, tightened their criteria for asylum, resulting in more asylum seekers being granted subsidiary protection instead of refugee protection. Indeed this is not isolated but indicative of an alarming trend across EU countries that are implementing policies designed to discourage and deter people from seeking asylum in their countries by stripping away the benefits. However, alas, such policies are fatally flawed by myopia; it is axiomatic that this will not address the underlying cause of why people are coming, nor does it resemble a long-term solution to the refugee crisis despite a resolution being in the international interest.

As an international community, we must recognise that the reason that millions of Syrians are escaping their countries to come to the West is because they have no choice but to leave. We must imagine a world where we feel too frightened to wake up in the morning; insecure going to work or school; and denumbed with angst in our everyday environments because of the reality that we may be killed for wanting basic freedoms. Syria and Russia together have committed the cardinal sin of stripping Syrians of the ability to live. These citizens are haunted by the omnipresent realities of life in Syria: of dead friends and relatives, blood, and war. In Syria, people exist, but they do not live. It is because of that harrowing fact that they leave.

The UN as a tool of change is looking increasingly vacuous in relation to Syria. As Russia is a permanent member of the UN Security Council, it has exercised its veto repeatedly (14 times since the beginning of the war in Syria, as of March 2020) to block diplomatic efforts of accountability. That includes vetoing, alongside China, a resolution supported by 65 countries and the rest of the security council that would have referred war crimes committed in Syria to the International Criminal Court.

The only solution to assuage the refugee crisis and bestow hope and justice to Syrians is a long-term political peace settlement in Syria, where people are once more able to regain the ability to live. Working concertedly and formulating a long- term plan with broad bipartisan commitment, as an international community, to end the conflict and help rebuild Syria with united endeavour, resources, time, and treasure; it is the morally noble thing to do. It would alleviate the Syrian people of their suffering, allow Syrians to build futures for themselves at home in lieu of making the perilous journeys across migrant routes or being exploited by people smugglers, and allow Syria to be a bastion of hope and freedom in the Middle East. But it would also be beneficial for the world as it would mitigate the influx of migrants at borders (often a politically vexed issue in the West), deliver a more stable and peaceful Middle East thus reducing the risks of vacuums of power being filled by terrorists preying on the vulnerable, which more often than not culminates in a latticework of terror groups forming, and fomenting attacks globally.What is clear is that the current approach is not working, and we have a moral obligation to ramp up our efforts. The practical form of a long- term plan is complex and multi- faceted. What it cannot include is simply more sanctions, or greater humanitarian aid alone (although these do play their part). We, as an international community, must champion the values that we believe in, freedom and justice, and never in good conscience passively allow nations of people to capitulate to tyranny. In the words oft-attributed to the late great parliamentarian, Sir Edmund Burke, the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. We must do much more than nothing.

Image Credit: Chaoyue Pan / CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0

For Cherwell, maintaining editorial independence is vital. We are run entirely by and for students. To ensure independence, we receive no funding from the University and are reliant on obtaining other income, such as advertisements. Due to the current global situation, such sources are being limited significantly and we anticipate a tough time ahead for us and fellow student journalists across the country.

So, if you can, please consider donating. We really appreciate any support youre able to provide; itll all go towards helping with our running costs. Even if you can't support us monetarily, please consider sharing articles with friends, families, colleagues - it all helps!

Thank you!

See more here:
Syria: What is the international community's long term plan? - Cherwell Online