Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

What COVID-19 Revealed About the Internet – The Atlantic

All these developments have taken place under pressure from Washington and Brussels. In hearings over the past few years, Congress has criticized the companiesnot always in consistent waysfor allowing harmful speech. In 2018, Congress amended the previously untouchable Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to subject the platforms to the same liability that nondigital outlets face for enabling illegal sex trafficking. Additional amendments to Section 230 are now in the offing, as are various other threats to regulate digital speech. In March 2019, Zuckerberg invited the government to regulate harmful content on his platform. In a speech seven months later defending Americas First Amendment values, he boasted about his team of thousands of people and [artificial-intelligence] systems that monitors for fake accounts. Even Zuckerbergs defiant ideal of free expression is an extensively policed space.

Against this background, the tech firms downgrading and outright censorship of speech related to COVID-19 are not large steps. Facebook is using computer algorithms more aggressively, mainly because concerns about the privacy of users prevent human censors from working on these issues from home during forced isolation. As it has done with Russian misinformation, Facebook will notify users when articles that they have liked are later deemed to have included health-related misinformation.

But the basic approach to identifying and redressing speech judged to be misinformation or to present an imminent risk of physical harm hasnt changed, according to Monika Bickert, Facebooks head of global policy management. As in other contexts, Facebook relies on fact-checking organizations and authorities (from the World Health Organization to the governments of U.S. states) to ascertain which content to downgrade or remove.

Read: How to misinform yourself about the coronavirus

What is different about speech regulation related to COVID-19 is the context: The problem is huge and the stakes are very high. But when the crisis is gone, there is no unregulated normal to return to. We liveand for several years, we have been livingin a world of serious and growing harms resulting from digital speech. Governments will not stop worrying about these harms. And private platforms will continue to expand their definition of offensive content, and will use algorithms to regulate it ever more closely. The general trend toward more speech control will not abate.

Over the past decade, network surveillance has grown in roughly the same proportion as speech control. Indeed, on many platforms, ubiquitous surveillance is a prerequisite to speech control.

The public has been told over and over that the hundreds of computers we interact with dailysmartphones, laptops, desktops, automobiles, cameras, audio recorders, payment mechanisms, and morecollect, emit, and analyze data about us that are, in turn, packaged and exploited in various ways to influence and control our lives. We have also learned a lotbut surely not the whole pictureabout the extent to which governments exploit this gargantuan pool of data.

See original here:
What COVID-19 Revealed About the Internet - The Atlantic

Battle for the control of rugby union: How World Rugby’s chairman vote could change the face of the game – iNews

SportRugby UnionHow the vote works, who the candidates are and why it matters so much to the sport

Friday, 24th April 2020, 6:16 pm

World Rugby will elect its chairman for the next four years in an online vote on Sunday, with the result declared on 12 May.

It is a straight fight between the incumbent Sir Bill Beaumont, standing for a second term, and Agustin Pichot, who has been Beaumonts vice-chairman since 2016.

How the vote will be carried out

i's fantasy football tipsnewsletter: get ahead

i's fantasy football tipsnewsletter: get ahead

There are 51 votes, made up of three each for England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, France, Italy, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, Argentina; two each for the regions of Africa, Asia, Europe, North/Central America, South America, Oceania; and an additional two each for Japan and one each for Romania, Georgia, Uruguay, USA, Canada, Samoa, Fiji.

One estimate is Beaumont will win with at least 26 votes from the Six Nations, Japan, Europe, Africa, Canada and Fiji but predictions are precarious and Pichot has been a media-savvy electioneer.

Bill Beaumont, 68

Played all his rugby as a lock in the amateur era, captaining England 21 times and the British & Irish Lions in apartheid-era South Africa in 1980. Has since been one of his sports most prominent administrators, as chair of the Rugby Football Union and then World Rugby, while holding down the day job, running a successful family textiles company.

There is nothing Sir Bill, aka Bo-Bo to his mates, does not know about schmoozing a rugby room, and since his days as a genial captain on BBCs A Question of Sport he has been getting things done in a collegiate manner.

He has a direct connection with the modern game through his son Josh, who plays for Sale Sharks, and his manifesto promise to review World Rugbys governance is backed up by the radical change he oversaw in 2017, when 17 female representatives were added to the Council taking it from 32 to 49, and subsequently up to the 51 who will vote tomorrow.

On the other hand (a phrase it is necessary to rehearse in rugby), the 50th and 51st Council members welcomed enthusiastically by Beaumont in 2018 included the Fiji Rugby chairman Francis Kean, who last week was stood down by his union over allegations of homophobia and violence in his role in charge of his countrys prisons. And the seven candidates for the seven vacant positions on World Rugbys powerful executive committee are all men.

So would it be fair to describe Beaumont as male, stale and pale? While the outwardly avuncular Lancastrian presided over last years hugely well-received mens World Cup in Japan, the decision to take it there was made back in 2009. And it was a previous World Rugby chairman, Bernard Lapasset, who did most to achieve the sports return to the Olympic Games. Similarly, the welcome surge in the womens game in recent years is only partly Beaumonts baby.

He can point to much-needed medical and injury initiatives, and he is promising a central voice for players but everyone says that, always. On the eternal question of who pays for what, Beaumont would advocate growing the overall pie more than taking a slice out of the Six Nations.

Beaumont also has a running mate, Bernard Laporte, the chairman of the French Rugby Union, whose country is hosting the next mens World Cup in 2023, having unexpectedly won the rights ahead of South Africa. And here is political murk: when you ask Council members if Laporte will work under Pichot if Beaumont loses, some say yes while others expect the Frenchman to step aside.

Agustin Pichot, 45

To those of us who remember meeting Pichot when he was a newly-capped scrum-half in Buenos Aires in 1997, the Argentinian has hardly changed the flowing black hair has shortened a little, but he remains a fast-talking polyglot who wears white trainers to black-tie dinners and answers a question about promotion and relegation in the Six Nations with a plea for the world to engage with his philosophy.

As World Rugbys Americas North rep Dennis Dwyer told this newspaper last week, Gus Pichot wants change now, if not sooner, and this election is a battle of personalities as much as it is of two broadly similar manifestoes.

Pichot is more aggressively progressive than Beaumont, and if it means speaking out against a policy he helped agree as World Rugbys vice-chairman, he will do it. His modus operandi can be unsettling. One Council member told i that half of World Rugbys staff would walk out if the 71-times capped Puma becomes top dog.

Both Pichot and Bill Beaumont say World Rugbys finances are not transparent enough. Where Pichot would differ is how the cash is doled out.

He is a businessman who has apparently softened on the idea of private equity taking a stake in rugby and, as long as everyone gains, he will put more pressure on the rich to help the poor. And as i understands that the regional federation of Africa, for instance, receives around 2 million a year in central surpluses compared with 7m for England, the scale of the challenge is clear.

Pichot has played all his rugby in the open era, for clubs in France and England, and in an Argentina team who turned over the French and the English in their back yards. He then helped persuade club owners in France to release Argentina players for the Rugby Championship, and he says he will reach out to the owners in England too.

Pichot does not fancy a world in which international rugby is second-best, and he was frustrated when a new Nations Championship to create an annual global Test competition stalled last year. He feels Beaumont should have pushed harder for it. Yet Pichot is more rigid on the question players representing one country and sticking to it.

Whichever of them is chair faces the thorny task of pulling a bunch of conflicting interests in the same direction: the Six Nations, the Rugby Championship, the Lions and the big club leagues in England, France and Japan.

Read this article:
Battle for the control of rugby union: How World Rugby's chairman vote could change the face of the game - iNews

Selena Gomez remembers when the media coverage of his life is ‘out of control’: ‘Nothing is true’ – Matzav Review

Selena Gomez is on the cover of the new issue of Interview magazine, and in an interview with Amy Schumer, which is published on Monday (13 may), the singer talked about his career, his purpose in life and trying to change the image that the media has created about her by being more open about his personal life.

You cant cough without the turn to news, it was given to the player at the beginning of the chat. The sad thing is, I dont recall a time when that was not so. The one that keeps me well, I know that eventually its going to be with the other person, and I dont mean this in a negative wayreassured her by explaining that, in spite of the hand is difficult, the exposure has also brought benefits.

At times it has been bad for my career, but it was, like, now I can talk to about things like my depression, my anxiety, the things which I have passed, and Im totally open to it, because, I believe, in the search for help. On top of that, the one that keeps me down-to-earth it is that I do my best to keep this from happening. Its not like I want to live my life.said the singer.

Selena explained that it was a fake image of her created by the media, which lead her to be more open about his personal life. My intention was never to turn into a tabloid. Then, when all the things in the middle, which took place in this way, it was out of control. And then I was like, For none of this is realrecalled to the star.

The way the media tried to explain some of the things that sometimes made them sound like they really, really, bad, when, in fact, there is nothing wrong with the fact that I had to tear myself away and I fell in love with. I had to get myself to open it because people were taking my story to me, and it was killing me. Im so new, Im going to continue to change, and no one has the right to tell me how my life is goingsaid she, decisively. Which is most certain, is it?

In spite of the difficult times through which it passed, in a relationship, and ending a very public, such as Justin Bieber, with a kidney transplant, Service has ensured that people do not need to worry about it. For the sake of those moments, like I have, or is not, a picture has been painted of my life. It was scary because I didnt want to [minha vida pessoal] to interfere with my career, vented.

Out-of-control that I had when I was younger. I think I showed people that I was weak at times, and I had no problems. Some people would make the best building, the people, and then trying to lower them.he lamented to herself, giving more details of what I wanted to say to you. People care about me, because Ive had problems in the past. And it is a kind gesture. But Ill be all right. I have read that I have to deal with, and I feel like Im having a bad week, or if you dont want to do something about it, I didnt do., he said.

In the end, Selena replied, if he believed that his calling in life was to help other people. I dont know if it was supposed to be my job, but I love the people. I care about you very much. I have been through many medical issues and I know that I can reach out to people who are going through things that are equally scary, whether it is an organ transplant, or to dialysis, or you have to take time off for treatmentyou described her.

A big part of the reason why I have to have a platform to help others. It is for this reason that I think that Im okay with the size. I mean, Im not really okay with it, but Im going to say yes, because its worth it. I know what Im doing, someone, somewhere, feel better, or to feel understood and heard, and its well worth it to me he told her. Super cute!

See the article here:
Selena Gomez remembers when the media coverage of his life is 'out of control': 'Nothing is true' - Matzav Review

FDA Provides Updates on Adverse Event Reports and Postmarket Activities Associated with Essure – FDA.gov

For Immediate Release: April 24, 2020

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a letter to Bayer outlining conditions for submitting additional postmarket information to the agency about Essurea permanent birth control device Bayer sold in the U.S. until 2018. The letter applies to reportable adverse events Bayer is or becomes aware of from social media information received in relation to ongoing litigation regarding Essure.

Because of the anticipated volume and nature of this information, the FDA granted Bayers request for a variance from some medical device reporting requirements but imposed conditions for reporting to ensure protection of the public health. Under the conditions, Bayer is required to start providing reportable adverse events to the FDA in July 2020 and continue submitting additional reportable events identified through review of the information on a monthly basis. The FDA will make these events publicly available on its Problems Reported with Essure webpage. The conditions the FDA developed for this particular variance also require Bayer to submit summaries of the reportable events that include information such as the type of event (death, serious injury or malfunction), a description of the reported patient events or device problems, and patient demographics. These summaries will be accessible through the FDAs Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. The FDA continues to require that Bayer submit Essure-associated reportable events, outside of the events specifically covered in this variance, in accordance with current medical device reporting requirements.

This variance will expire after one year, unless the FDA grants an extension, at which time, Bayer will be required to follow the regular adverse event reporting requirements for all Essure-associated reportable events.

Even though the device is no longer being manufactured or distributed, and hasnt for some time, the FDA continues its engagement with Bayer on postmarket safety monitoring of Essure, said Terri L. Cornelison, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDAs Health of Women Program in the Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Bayer alerted us to the social media information it received in connection with litigation. We are committed to ensuring that all reportable adverse events identified from this information are submitted to the agency and that they are made publicly available.

In addition to providing summary information that will be available in MAUDE, Bayer is required to provide quarterly and final analysis reports evaluating the events reported under the variance and how the information compares to other medical device reports (MDRs) for Essure. Bayer will make each analysis report publicly available.

Today, the FDA is also updating the Problems Reported with Essure web page to include updated information on the MDRs the agency has received on the device since its approval. This update includes MDRs received in 2019. While the number of MDRs received in 2019 is the largest received for a single year, due to the continued volume of reports citing litigation and using terms related to device removal, the source and nature of the reports are consistent with recent years.

In addition, Bayer has reported to the agency that all unused Essure devices of which Bayer is aware have been returned to the company, and there should be no devices available for implantation in the U.S. Bayer voluntarily stopped selling and distributing Essure in the U.S. on December 31, 2018. In 2019, the agency reminded health care professionals and facilities to return unused Essure devices to Bayer by the end of that year.

Bayer has also submitted the most recent postmarket (522) study report for Essure to the FDA. The FDA will post the interim study results once its review of the data is completed. The FDA believes clinical data from the study will help patients, health care providers and the agency to better understand certain complications that women who have Essure permanent birth control may experience when compared to women who undergo tubal ligation. Findings from the study may serve to inform future FDA actions.

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nations food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.

###

04/24/2020

Read the original post:
FDA Provides Updates on Adverse Event Reports and Postmarket Activities Associated with Essure - FDA.gov

The coronavirus pandemic is the breakthrough Xi Jinping has been waiting for – Maclean’s

The plague that broke out in the Chinese city of Wuhan last December has now spread to the four corners of the earth, and its coming ravages can only be glimpsed in the limited forecasting capacities of epidemiology. Its a science that relies on predictive analytics and models that can be skewed by any number of confounding variables, so theres little certainty about whats in store for us all.

As the geopolitical upheavals set off by the pandemic shudder with a force without precedent since the Second World War, some things, however, are clear and plain. Chinas most draconian lockdowns have been lifted. Beijing is claiming victory over the plague. And the Chinese Communist Party is seizing what its senior officials are calling the opportunity of the pandemic to realize the partys long-game objective of fully eclipsing North America and Europe in the global order.

Battered by the worst first-quarter economic performance since 1976, the Chinese economy is now being shifted into hyperdrive. Production is already back on track to achieve Beijings goal of making 2020 the year the countrys annual Gross Domestic Product doubles in size from 2010 to $13.1 trillion. But Beijing isnt just doubling down on its usual methods, which involve constraining access to Chinas growing markets while securing technological and global supply-chain dominance in critical trade sectors, and otherwise resorting to crude foreign-policy strong-arm tactics to get its way.

READ:China kidnapped two Canadians. What will it take to free them?

Whats new is that the Chinese state is committing vast resources to a hybrid strategy of intensified propaganda and information control in lockstep with an aggressive Russian-style disinformation effort. Aimed almost entirely at western audiences, the effort takes its cues from several Kremlin-backed operations, most obviously the barrage of fabricated news unleashed on behalf of the Donald Trump campaign during the 2016 U.S. presidential elections.

Experts in the field say Beijing isnt just selling a narrative anymore. The new strategy is intended to spread chaos and confusion and incite mistrust of governments in democratic countries. According to an analysis undertaken by the Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a project of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, Beijing is adopting increasingly aggressive tactics and techniques and rapidly ramping up its messaging on social media platforms, often cross-pollinating with Russian and Iranian disinformation efforts and amplifying conspiracy theories from fringe third-party websites.

Chinas more confrontational posture on COVID-19 represents a clear departure from its past behavior, the ASD analysis concludes. We have been able to see, in near-real time, Chinese state-backed media and government interlocutors borrowing a page from the Russian playbook in an attempt to influence global public opinion.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is the breakthrough Xi Jinping, Chinas all-powerful paramount leader, has been waiting for. And hes making his move.

While the Chinese governments internal statistics are routinely questioned by outside analysts, Chinas Ministry of Industry and Information Technology credibly reports that roughly 75 per cent of small and medium-sized businesses across the country have already resumed production. According to MIIT deputy minister Xin Guobin, even Hubei province, which had been hit hardest by the COVID-19 outbreak, is already back up and running. Roughly 95 percent of companies with annual industrial revenues of at least $4 million have resumed production.

Meanwhile, most of the worlds advanced economies are being sequestered in a state of suspended animation that is expected to last at least several months, or until a vaccine for the COVID-19 disease is developed, which is expected to take at least a year.

READ:Coronavirus in China: My travels through a land in lockdown

The worlds liberal democracies are scrambling to plank the curvea necessary public-health strategy to flatten and drive down the rate of infections so that hospitals are not overwhelmed to the point of collapse. In order to enforce and maintain the social and physical isolation the curve-planking strategy requires, most western governments are devoting hitherto unimaginable resources to the building of economic life-support systems.

The House of Commons has authorized $107 billion in emergency aid and economic stimulus, and cabinet has been granted the authority to borrow up to $350 billion to cope with the pandemic. The White House signed off on a US$2 trillion relief bill. France has committed 350 billion ($547 billion) in direct relief, tax refunds and bank loan guarantees. The United Kingdoms bailouts, wage guarantees and tax deferrals rack up to 458 billion ($812 billion).

According to an analysis by Horizon Advisory, a consultancy that investigates Chinese policy on behalf of corporations, investors and government agencies in the U.S., Chinas central planners are taking every advantage of the democratic worlds predicament. Beijing intends to use the global dislocation and downturn to attract foreign investment, to seize strategic market share and resourcesespecially those that force dependence, and to proliferate global information systems, the Horizon Advisory analysts conclude.

Beijing used the opening presented by the 2008 economic downturn to reach parity; to position itself as an alternative world leader. In COVID-19, Beijing sees the chance to win.

With a GDP still at least 25 percent larger than Chinas, the United States is still the worlds preeminent superpower, but the COVID-19 crisis accelerates the process that Beijing has put in place to overtake the U.S.it will allow China to claim market share across the globe and across strategic sectors as the rest of the world shuts down.

A key focus of Beijings strategy for global dominance is an information technology infrastructure that is already being exported around the world, mostly through Huawei Technologies, Chinas national champion telecom giant.

So far the Five Eyes security partnership of the U.S., the U.K., Australia, New Zealand and Canada has mostly resisted Beijings moves to assert dominance in fifth-generation (5G) technology infrastructure. But just barely. The U.S., Australia and New Zealand have barred Huawei from their 5G internet connectivity systems and the U.K. has tentatively decided to allow Huawei to take up only a third of its 5G outer edges. But Canada remains paralyzed.

READ:Criticism of the Chinese governments handling of coronavirus is not racism

A decision was supposed to be forthcoming from Ottawa before the last federal election. But Beijings hostage-diplomacy imprisonment of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, to punish Canada for acting on a U.S. extradition warrant and detaining Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou, daughter of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei, has left Ottawa fearful of Beijings wrath.

And now, Beijing is planning an end-run around the Five Eyes alliance altogether.

Chinas Communist Party leadership and Huawei have teamed up to effectively take over the architecture of the global internet with a proposal to the International Telecommunications Union, one of four major UN agencies that China now controls. Backed by Russia, and with support anticipated from several African countries that have benefited from Huaweis largesse, the Huawei plan is co-sponsored by two of Chinas state-owned telecom corporations and Chinas Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.

The proposed new system would be more centralized, top-down and readily controlled by authoritarian UN member states, according to an analysis prepared for NATO by the cyber security company Oxford Information Labs. Obtained by the Financial Times, the analysis warns that the Huawei plan poses grave threats to national security and raises human-rights implications for all internet users. Beijing hopes to push the restructuring through at the ITU, currently headed up by Chinese telecommunications engineer Houlin Zhao, by November.

In the meantime, Beijing is relying on its multi-pronged, multimedia propaganda and disinformation campaign to achieve two immediate purposes. The first is to dismiss, deny and deflect away from the irrefutable evidence of the Communist Partys catastrophic mishandling of the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. The second is to portray China, in contrast to Donald Trumps divided and dysfunctional United States, as the worlds saviour, rushing to the rescue of plague-afflicted countries with expertise, money and medical equipment.

It has been widely reported that on March 12, Zhao Lijian, a senior spokesperson for Chinas foreign ministry, began circulating an insinuation that the U.S. military somehow smuggled the coronavirus into Wuhan. In subsequent posts, Zhao directed his Twitter followers to Montreals Centre for Research on Globalizationa crank website notorious for trafficking in outlandish anti-imperialist conspiracy theorieswhich had been circulating the claim. The ministrys senior spokesperson, Hua Chunying, followed suit, as did several Chinese news organizations and diplomats.

But less widely noticed is the origin of President Trumps scandalously reckless claim during a February 26 press briefing that COVID-19 is comparable to the common flu, and well essentially have a flu shot for this in a fairly quick manner. This is the deadliest piece of disinformation about the coronavirus in circulation. It was given its earliest boost on February 3 at a formal press briefing in Beijing convened by the Chinese foreign ministrys Hua Chunying.

Hua made the claim that day in the course of praising Canada for allowing flights from China to continue arriving at Canadian airports. Hua singled out Health Minister Patty Hajdu for breaking with the U.S., which had shut down air traffic from China the day before, as had several other countries. Canada believes the ban of entry has no basis, which is a sharp contrast to the U.S. behaviours, Hua said, citing statistics intended to illustrate that the U.S. flu was far more lethal than COVID-19.

Trump repeated what might have been the single most devastating piece of disinformation on coronavirus: that it is comparable to the common flu (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

On Feb. 6, Hua continued to downplay the presence of a lethal virus in Wuhan, claiming that the current pneumonia outbreak in China was nowhere near as serious as the seasonal influenza in the U.S., and that travel bans were unnecessary, and opposed by the World Health Organization. The travel bans had sowed panic among the public and gravely disrupted normal personnel exchanges, international cooperation and order of the international market of air transportation.

It was in these first two weeks of Februarywhen China was still circulating disinformation to the effect that COVID-19 was comparable to the seasonal fluthat Canada dug in its heels, insisting that there was no cause to stop incoming fights from China. For being so agreeable, Health Minister Patty Hajdu and Foreign Affairs Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne were treated to a flurry of flattering commentary in the Chinese state media and in Beijings official foreign ministry statements.

The role of the World Health Organization in recirculating Beijings self-exculpating propaganda has come under particular scrutiny. WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has lavished praise on Beijings handling of the outbreak, going out of his way to support Xi Jinpings insistence that any precautionary travel restrictions would be an unacceptable encumbrance to Chinas economy. John Mackenzie, a member of the WHOs emergency committee, has called Chinas conductits delays, its suppression of datareprehensible.

The WHOs disinformation deference to Beijing went to such absurd extremes that its own official guidance against resorting to traditional herbal remedies to treat COVID-19 was quietly ditched to assuage Xi Jinping, who had been instructing Chinese health officials to speed up tests of drugs that combine Chinese traditional herbal medicine with western medicine. The Chinese version of the WHOs list of ineffective remedies was amended to cut references to traditional medicine, while the English version remained intact and later, reference to traditional medicine was struck from the English list as well. An online petition calling on Tedros to resign has gathered 702,498 signatures.

Canada also went to some extremes. In a Xinhua news service account of his February 14 meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the Munich Security Conference, Champagne is quoted as saying that Canada would stand firmly with the Chinese people in the fight against the novel coronavirus pneumonia epidemic, and this: Unlike some other countries, Canada has never stopped normal exchanges with China and opposes any discriminatory practice.

RELATED:Beijings credibility deficit makes the coronavirus crisis much worse

In return, Wang Yi praised Canadas rational, calm and scientific attitude and promised better days to come in the fractured Canada-China diplomatic relationship. China is willing to take this opportunity to enhance communication with the Canadian side and jointly solve existing bilateral problems so as to bring China-Canada relations and cooperation in various fields back onto the track for sound and stable development at an early date, Wang pledged.

Early on, Champagne was upbeat about Beijings polite tone. There was some healthy diplomacy in play, Champagne said. Canada was raising the matter of Kovrig and Spavor, and China was raising the business about Meng Wanzhou. At least it allows us to talk more often.

Nothing has come of it. Canada had served Beijings propaganda purposes. Canada attempted to impose effective screening measures at Canadas airports, but they consisted mostly of requesting voluntary declarations from travellers about where they were coming from and how they were feeling, and having Canadian Border Services Agency keep an eye out for anyone who looked ill. Canada did not join 80 other countries in banning travel from China until a blanket ban on almost all foreign arrivals was imposed March 16.

But while Champagne and Wang were exchanging pleasantries, a massive new propaganda machine involving at least 10,000 Twitter accounts kicked into gear. Most of them are fake. Many of them are hacked accounts. All of them have ties to the Chinese government. And all of them are devoted to spreading the word about Beijings gallant struggle with the coronavirus, and Beijings generosity and solidarity with all those countries that had been waiting in vain for leadership from Trumps America.

The machine was brought to light last week in a lengthy investigation undertaken by the independent American journalists consortium ProPublica. The machine had been assembled last year to do Beijings propaganda bidding during the mass uprising in Hong Kong, but on January 29, the network shifted its focus to propaganda and disinformation about COVID-19.

It was the Wall Street Journal that first reported the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. That was January 7, two days before Chinese authorities publicly confirmed it. An estimated five million people left Wuhan after the virus first appeared in December, and before Wuhan was locked down January 23.

China revoked the press credentials of three Wall Street Journal reporters on February 19, on the pretext that the Communist Party leadership had taken offence at an opinion essay the newspaper had published. A month later, Beijing announced that it was revoking the credentials of journalists with the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post and the New York Timesthe largest expulsion of foreign journalists since the days of Mao Zedong. The pretext was the Trump administrations payroll cap on four Chinese state-owned media platforms in the U.S., reducing their staff from 160 to 100.

RELATED:When will the Chinese government be held accountable for the spread of coronavirus

The Chinese Human Rights Defenders Organization has documented 452 cases of citizen journalists punished for spreading rumours about the coronavirus. The CHRD reports that by February 21, the feared Ministry of Public Security had handled 5,511 cases involving fabricating and deliberately disseminating false and harmful information.

During an hour-long interview on the program Fox & Friends on Monday, President Trump said he wasnt at all worried about the Chinese, Russian and Iranian disinformation circulating in the United States. Every country does it. They do it, and we do it. And we call them different things. . . Hey, every country does it.

Ottawa doesnt seem to worry much, either. The job of paying attention to online disinformation in the Canadian context falls to Dominic LeBlanc, president of the Privy Council. LeBlanc is supposed to be working with Bardish Chagger, Minister of Diversity and Inclusion and Youth, to keep an eye on things. The file is apparently dormant.

Canadians are now moving through a wholly unfamiliar landscape. We may be stumbling headlong into an uncharted realm of social breakdown and mass graves. We could be destined for something else, somewhere dark and foreboding, where Xi Jinping calls all the shots. Or we might be traversing an excruciating social and economic terra incognita towards some eventual semblance of normalcy.

The models the epidemiologists look at cant tell us.

We just dont know.

Read more:
The coronavirus pandemic is the breakthrough Xi Jinping has been waiting for - Maclean's