Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

Far more social distancing needed to control Sydney outbreak – News – The University of Sydney

Levels of social distancing needed to see a drop off in case numbers over time. Credit: Professor Mikhail Prokopenko.

As of July 2021, there is a continuing outbreak of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Sydney. The outbreak is of major concern as the Delta variant is estimated to have twice the reproductive number of previous variants that circulated in Australia in 2020, which is also worsened by low levels of acquired immunity in the population, said Professor Prokopenko, from the Faculty of Engineering.

Using a re-calibrated agent-basedmodel, we explored a feasible range of non-pharmaceutical interventions, in terms of both mitigation (case isolation, home quarantine) and suppression (school closures, social distancing).

Our modelling indicates that the level of social distancing currently attained in Sydney is inadequate for the outbreak control.

Our analysis suggests if, however, 80 percent of the population comply with social distancing, then at least one month will be needed for the new daily cases to reduce from their peak to below ten. A small reduction in social distancing compliance to 70 percent lengthens this period to over two months.

Continue reading here:
Far more social distancing needed to control Sydney outbreak - News - The University of Sydney

Backstory: ‘Population Control’ and ‘Information Control’ Are Part of the Same Package – The Wire

The Nazis practiced the politics of gleichschaltung, or the complete ideological packaging of political, social and lived experience.

So while, on the one hand, mores of social behaviour, including sterilisation, were forcibly prescribed by the end of Third Reich in 1945 an estimated 360,000 had been sterilised, among whom were those deemed genetically inferior or regarded as political enemies of the state on the other, there was a concerted purging of unwanted ideas, as reflected in censorship protocols and even the mass book burnings that took place shortly after the Nazis came to power in May 1933, and which was reported by the newspapers of the day as action against the un-German spirit.

The politics of gleischschailtung continues to surface in countries ruled by leaders with fascist characteristics. Indias emergency of 1975 is a case in point. Along with the censors in the newsroom that this period saw, were the white caravans on the street Salman Rushdies description of the nasbandi (sterilisation) camps that emerged at that point in his 1994 short story, The Free Radio.

The new book by Christophe Jaffrelot and Pratinav Anil, Indias First Dictatorship The Emergency, 1975-77, notes how by 1976, population control targets were set for states under the direct supervision of Sanjay Gandhi. It led to a competitive cycle of sterilisations between them, each eager to be seen as more compliant than the other. Piquant situations ensued, such as the leadership in Bihar worrying itself sick over how they were still behind their counterparts in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh despite having achieved 60% more than the number assigned to it. The argument currently being raised by Chief Minister Aditya Nath on the benefits of population control that it will ostensibly usher in a veritable Ram rajya based on sustainable development was the very one used by the Union health minister of the first emergency era, Karan Singh, and his cohorts.

Under conditions of strict censorship, it was impossible to report on what was really happening and it needed the 1977 general election, which saw the Congress Party wiped out across north India, for peoples distress to get registered. Journalists John Dayal and Ajoy Bose together wrote a neat primer of that period, For Reasons of State, recalling the mass human suffering unleashed by Indira Gandhi government.

Representative image. Photo: Reuters

The Jaffrelot-Anil book quotes their observations: Sick women carpeting the floor of the ward, stitches broken, puss oozing out, the smell of antiseptic lotion, blood, and sweat.

After the emergency was lifted, there was a fair degree of newspaper exposes on it as well as some powerful fiction which should have damned the words population control forever. Rohington Mistrys A Fine Balance with its singeing word portraits, was just one example:

A nurse hurried to the policemen with new instructions. Please slow down the supply of lady patients, she said. There is a technical problem in the tubectomy tent. A middle-aged man took the opportunity to appeal to the nurse. I beg you, he wept. Do it to me, I dont mind I have fathered three children. But my son here is only sixteen! Never married! Spare him!

How effective are evocative words in keeping memory alive? This is a question that we as journalists should be asking. How is it that those horrific images from family planning camps of the earlier era were washed away into a sea of amnesia? How is it that four decades later authoritarian state governments can propose the same solutions by citing the same Malthusian justifications?

How is it that data and arguments about India having reached replacement levels and that its population growth is on a declining trajectory even in states like Uttar Pradesh, do not seem to reach policy makers in Lucknow, Guwahati and Bengaluru?

By the way, The Wire piece, India Needs Employment Generation, Not Population Control (July 14), has one of the most comprehensible explanations of the demographic dividend that I have come across in a while.

It is here we arrive at the nub of the issue which the media seem to be pussyfooting around: the targets of family planning during the first emergency were largely extremely poor people, many of whom were Muslims; the targets in the Modi era are Muslims. Period. The UP chief minister is at great pains to deny such a framing, but he did let slip that he wishes to correct the balance between communities. His Assam counterpart is openly anxious to achieve this.

In a recent interview Himanta Biswa Sarma claimed that Muslims in his state are growing at the rate of 29% and Hindus by 10%: So, we need to bring certain measures whereby the growth of the population can be slowed down.

In any case whatever the chief ministers leave unsaid, there are always trolls to fill in the gaps. An Alt Newss fact check on an image of a Burmese Muslim man with his family in a refugee camp in Bangladesh being passed off as that of an Indian Muslimtells this story eloquently.

Rohingya refugee workers carrying bags of salt this month in a processing yard in Coxs Bazar, Bangladesh. Photo: Reuters

In her comprehensive documentation for The India Forum, historian Aprajita Sarcar perceptively points out that population control has become a rhetoric to restructure the Savarna Hindu family towards more eugenic ends and to stoke fears of Hindus being overtaken by other religious communities in garnering national resources. Even as the myth of large Muslim families remains as false as ever, political leaders affiliated to the RSS raise the slogan of Hindu khatre mein hain (Hindus are in danger of being wiped out).

The population control discourse is also low hanging electoral fruit. The Wire piece, Six Months Before Assembly Elections, Yogi Worries About Excessive Procreation (July 15) rightly observes that it is a trope close to the heart of Indias chattering classes; and one that may be trusted to deflect (from) a whole bunch of failures that beset the record of the BJP, both at the Centre and in the states that it rules.

Expand Parliament House, shrink the space for media coverage

If the legislature is one of the three pillars of democracy, the media has been designated as the fourth pillar. But while the Modi government is envisaging a large Parliament building to replace the present one, it appears that the space hitherto occupied by the Fourth Pillar is set to shrink rapidly.

As a recent letter of protest from media bodies and journalists addressed to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla pointed out, There appears to be a pattern of isolating Parliament and parliamentarians from media scrutiny, with accredited media personnel now being denied normal entry into Parliament in order to cover proceedings.

Also read: Monsoon Session: Opposition, Union Govt Likely to Face Off on Pandemic, Economic Issues

One freelance journalist who has been a regular visitor to the Press Gallery and the Central Hall thus far, and who suddenly finds such access blocked, observed to me, They are making the pandemic an excuse to keep Parliament from being the open space it once was.

A hint of the governments shrewd thinking on this emerged during Birlas recent briefing when he said that accredited media houses would be given access when actually access had always been given to all accredited journalists.

The press corps is angry and wants access along earlier lines restored before the Monsoon Session begins. In their letter, journalists underlined the fact that Media coverage, it has to be appreciated, involves daily news reporting as well as contact with leading political figures for insights and analysis. They expressed the hope that the Speaker will now take pro-active steps to restore full access for journalists, including restoring media passes for all categories and starting the process of renewal of applications for covering Parliament with immediate effect (Media Orgs Protest Denial of Normal Entry To Accredited Journalists for Parliament Coverage, July 14).

UP model of thrashing journalists

The extent of brute force that marked elections to the 476 posts of block panchayat chiefs in Uttar Pradesh recently would not have become widely known if it were not for brave mediapersons reporting it live. Chief Minister Adityanath quickly claimed a great victory for his party in those polls, but had no word to say about this display of brute power.

One of the images that emerged from that cauldron of violence was that of a television journalist Krishna Tiwari being thrashed by a helmet-wearing Chief Development Officer of Unnao, Divyanshu Patel (Editors Guild Condemns Attack on Unnao Journalist, Flags Threat to Media Rights in UP, July 13).

Clearly that Patel had taken recourse to wearing a helmet indicated his attempt to hide his identity while perpetrating all manner of abuse during the polls, including as it turns out thrashing journalists who had the effrontery to capture his deeds. Nobody in UPs power echelons is interested in inquiring too closely into the mystery of his helmet or behaviour, but they are more than delighted to smile and clap for the cameras when Patel turned up to apologise to Tiwari with a box of sweets in a bid to bury the fracas. No FIR was filed on the incident, but nothing surprising about that.

The Wire did well to interview senior journalist Ram Dutt Tripathi and former IPS officer, N.C. Asthana (Watch | Power Has Gone To Their Heads: When an IAS Officer Attacks a Journalist, July 14) on this sorry episode that presages dangerous times for honest journalists in Uttar Pradesh as the assembly elections draw closer.

Reporters as frontline workers

We know that journalists, having to report on the many dimensions of the pandemic, have paid a huge price in terms of their health, well-being, and sometimes even lives. The Delhi-based Institute of Perception Studies has put out an interesting map detailing this tragic story that remains largely unreported. Over 650 journalists are believed to have lost their lives to COVID-19 between 2020-2021 the highest such toll in any country in the world:

Readers write in

Anyone protecting media freedom?

Rakesh Raman, editor, RMN News Service and founder, RMN Foundation, New Delhi, has an important observation to make:

I am a journalist and founder of the humanitarian organisation RMN Foundation and have been observing the growing attacks on press freedom in India. I am also a victim of these attacks and the Paris-based Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India have been trying to protect me from the persecution and threats that I have been facing for my editorial work. During my struggle to protect my editorial rights, I have experienced that bodies like the Editors Guild of India (EGI) exist only as toothless outfits, repeatedly failing to protect the journalists from state repression. Their public statements are simply ignored by the authoritarian rulers who are supposed to follow them.

In fact, today there is no organisation in the world that is working effectively to protect journalists from state excesses and police brutality. Although UNESCO and other UN agencies also keep releasing loose statements and random reports about media freedom, they too have failed miserably to protect journalists in different countries. Similarly, the organisations such as RSF, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, associations of journalists, etc. that claim to be working for press freedom and protection of journalists operate only as secondary news outlets. They lift news from here and there about attacks on journalists and simply publish it under their own banners on their websites along with some customary statements of condemnation. They cannot influence and change the brutal decisions of the authorities that are unleashing terror on journalists.

Just as a point of interest, Editors Guild of India was one of the parties which had filed the plaint before the Supreme Court recently on the enormous misuse of the colonial era penal law on sedition.

Clarification

Aman Kumar writes back:

Thank you for acknowledging my comment in your last column.

I think my terse last email was misunderstood. The line, One thing is certain: public places have become more hostile towards Muslims in the last few years; not only to those who are visibly Muslim, but even to Muslims who are working hard to somehow earn a livelihood is from the article, The Hindutva Ecosystem Has a New Anti-Muslim Narrative. This Time Street Vendors Are the Target (June 28). I thought the line just quoted was irresponsibly phrased because it conveys a false opposition between those who are visibly Muslim and Muslims who are working hard.

Fake news

Mail from New Delhi-based lawyer Shakeel Abbas:

Popular Front of India (PFI) has filed a defamation suit against news channel Zee Media Corporation Limited, its CEO, and two anchors, and sought Rs one lakh as damages for maligning their reputation. In its show, Khabron ke Khiladi, it was claimed that PFI funded Rohingyas to create fake identity cards before the Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections. The suit filed by PFIs secretary of public relations, Salim Sheikh, stated: The accusation is serious in nature and further inciting the public at large by falsely portraying the plaintiff having link with Rohingya People in funding them for creating false IDs. Civil Judge Aviral Shukla issued notice to all the defendants on July 6 and posted the matter to August 12 for further hearing.

According to the complainant, two news anchors said that PFI is shifting Rohingyas to UP before the elections so that their names can be added to the voter list with the help of fake ration and pan cards, on the basis of the statement of two arrested Rohingyas during the show on June 13.

In a press conference on June 18, Prashant Kumar ADJ (law and order), Uttar Pradesh, has said that no evidence is found so far to link PFI with Rohingyas in creating false IDs.

Besides praying for Rs 1 lakh as damages from Zee Media, its CEO, and two anchors, the suit also sought an injunction restraining them from posting any such news on their news channel and sought direction from the court to direct the National Broadcasters Standards Association (NBSA) to take action against Zee Media, its CEO, and two anchors for violating its code. It also requested for a direction to Youtube and Facebook to remove the defamatory, derogatory, obnoxious post from their social media platform.

Missing words

The Wire reader Raj Kumar has this observation to make about Prime Minister Narendra Modis recent speech from Varanasi:

Modi ji utters all the achievements in this speech, but economic matters were overlooked. It had nothing on unemployment, inflation rate, and other issues that impact the common person.

Endnote

It touched the heart, Satish Acharyas cartoon showing India weeping for Danish Siddique, the Pulitzer Prize-winning photojournalist, with the words: Ive lost my eyes, Son. You showed the truth.

Siddiques career was like an Usain Bolt streak across our collective consciousness as he provided us with some of the most defining images of the times we have had to live through.

Write to ombudsperson@thewire.in

Link:
Backstory: 'Population Control' and 'Information Control' Are Part of the Same Package - The Wire

Comcast and ViacomCBS face prisoner’s dilemma as they consider ways to work together – CNBC

CEO of Comcast Brian Roberts arrives for the Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference on July 06, 2021 in Sun Valley, Idaho.

Kevin Dietsch | Getty Images

The prisoner's dilemma is a standard game theory situation often taught in business school. Comcast Chief Executive Brian Roberts and ViacomCBS chairman Shari Redstone are living it in real-time as they consider working together.

Comcast's NBCUniversal and ViacomCBS are struggling to keep up with the biggest players in streaming video.

While Netflix, Amazon and Disney all have more than 100 million subscribers to their flagship video services, NBCUniversal's Peacock has 42 million U.S. signups most of which don't pay for the service and ViacomCBS's Paramount+ has fewer than 36 million subscribers. ViacomCBS doesn't reveal the specific amount of paying Paramount+ customers, but it said earlier this year it had 36 million total streaming subscribers, including Showtime and other niche products.

AT&T's WarnerMedia and Discovery also have subscale streaming products. They announced plans to merge earlier this year. That left NBCUniversal and ViacomCBS as the largest leftover streaming players.

Roberts and Redstone have held conversations to explore ways the companies can work together, according to people familiar with the matter. Investment bankers are pumping both companies with ideas in hopes of getting what might be the last large traditional media merger fee for quite some time, said the people, who asked not to be named because the discussions are private. Spokespeople for Comcast, Redstone's private National Amusements and ViacomCBS declined to comment.

One of the options under consideration is to bundle Peacock and Paramount+ together in international markets, as The Information reported earlier this year. Both companies are planning global expansions, and partnering is relatively frictionless.

Another option is a merger or acquisition, but there are numerous complications on that path. Neither ViacomCBS nor NBCUniversal are actively seeking a merger at this time, according to people familiar with the matter.

While there may be no rush to merge, both companies will ultimately need more scale to compete against larger players. They could partner or merge, or they could attempt to merge with Warner Bros. Discovery when/if that deal closes in the middle of 2022. A merger with Warner Bros. Discovery may be a cleaner fit for either ViacomCBS or NBCUniversal.

But only one of the two could join Warner Bros. Discovery. That would leave the other company out in the cold possibly for years.

That's the essence of the prisoner's dilemma.

Working together may ensure both companies are better off than they started, but holding out against each other may be the best-case scenario for one company and the worst-case scenario for the other. (This isn't a perfect prisoner's dilemma example because the companies can't really betray each other, ending up in a situation where both are worse off).

Regulators probably wouldn't allow a combined NBCUniversal-ViacomCBS to own both broadcast stations NBC and CBS. It's likely any merger will have to include a divestiture of one of the broadcast networks along with all local NBC or CBS television affiliates that overlap in the same markets.

That immediately diminishes the value of both companies. If CBS is divested, NBCUniversal would get Paramount+ without CBS programming, including live National Football League games and NCAA's March Madness. If the companies decide to divest NBC, ViacomCBS wouldn't get "Sunday Night Football" and other popular NBC broadcast shows.

While it's possible the companies could attempt to argue broadcast networks are like cable networks and don't need separate ownership, regulators may not view that as a reasonable argument. About 40% of Americans own a digital antenna to get free over-the-air programming along with streaming video, according to Horowitz Research. Broadcast networks have historically battled each other for valuable programming. Putting two under one roof would stifle those competitive bidding situations.

The second obstacle is structure. Comcast could simply acquire ViacomCBS, buying out Redstone's voting shares in a deal. But ViacomCBS has an enterprise value of about $40 billion and would ask for a decent-size premium to sell, two of the people said. Even with major divestitures, a deal would be pricey.

Shari Redstone, president of National Amusements and Vice Chairman, CBS and Viacom, speaks at the WSJTECH live conference in Laguna Beach, California, October 21, 2019.

Mike Blake | Reuters

Comcast shareholders, who MoffettNathanson analyst Craig Moffett said are more likely to cheer a separation between NBCUniversal and Comcast, may not like a decision to buy ViacomCBS and divest one of the networks.

Roberts could spin out NBCUniversal and merge with it ViacomCBS similar to the WarnerMedia-Discovery deal. That might require him to give up control of NBCUniversal. If Redstone ends up owning more economic control of a merged NBCUniversal-ViacomCBS, she may want to run the company or choose who's in charge, for at least a number of years. Roberts and Redstone would have to reach an agreement on economic and voting control if this option is pursued.

A bundled offering through a commercial partnership skirts the merger and acquisition issues and is ultimately the most likely "step one" scenario but it gives less flexibility to the companies on offerings than a merger would. It also might not move the needle enough for either firm.

Either NBCUniversal or ViacomCBS could theoretically fit with Warner Bros. Discovery because David Zaslav's future company won't own a broadcast network. That would eliminate the need for divestiture. Combining with HBO Max and Discovery+ would also arguably be a more robust streaming offering, in terms of content, than simply pushing together the assets of NBCUniversal and ViacomCBS.

But the size of Warner Bros. Discovery combined with either ViacomCBS or NBCUniversal could pose regulatory issues, depending on how Biden administration regulators view the entertainment market. Even WarnerMedia's deal with Discovery isn't assured approval.

A choice to hold for a deal with Warner Bros. Discovery forces both NBCUniversal and ViacomCBS to wait two or three more years, given the length of time it would take to merge to gain regulatory approval first for WarnerMedia and Discovery and then for the second merger. There would also be integration costs and issues from two large deals happening so quickly.

For the company that didn't merge with Warner Bros. Discovery, the likely path forward would be rolling up some of the smaller streaming players. like Lionsgate and AMC Networks, or pushing for an acquisition of Sony Pictures.

Merging or waiting both present headaches. This is why investment bankers get paid the big bucks.

Disclosure: NBCUniversal is the parent company of CNBC.

WATCH: Tom Rogers on the future of media, gaming and more

Read this article:
Comcast and ViacomCBS face prisoner's dilemma as they consider ways to work together - CNBC

‘Airpocalypse’ hits Siberian city as heatwave sparks forest fires – The Guardian

A heatwave in one of the worlds coldest regions has sparked forest fires and threatened the Siberian city of Yakutsk with an airpocalypse of thick toxic smoke, atmospheric monitoring services have reported.

High levels of particulate matter and possibly also chemicals including ozone, benzene and hydrogen cyanide are thought likely to make this one of the worlds worst ever air pollution events.

Local authorities have warned the 320,000 residents to stay indoors to avoid choking fumes from the blazes, which are on course to break last years record.

Satellite analysts say regional levels of PM2.5 small particles that can enter the bloodstream and damage human organs have surged beyond 1,000 micrograms a cubic metre in recent days, which is more than 40 times the recommended safe guideline of the World Health Organization.

On Tuesday, live air quality monitors for Yakutsk measured PM 2.5 levels of 395 micrograms. This fell into the extreme category of airpocalypse, which is defined as immediate and heavy effects on everybody. Russian social media accounts have shown images of readings that are more than 17 times worse than the average in even the most polluted cities of India and China.

Scientists see human-caused climate disruption as an important factor. Yakutsk, the capital of Russias north-east Sakha Republic also known as Yakutia is the coldest winter city on the planet, but due to global heating, summer temperatures here have been rising at least 2.5 times faster than the world average.

Last year, during an unusually prolonged heatwave in the wider Siberian region temperatures remained more than 5C above average from January to June, causing permafrost to melt, buildings to collapse, and sparking an unusually early and intense start to the forest fires season. Scientists said this was made 600 times more likely by exhaust fumes, industrial emissions, deforestation and other human activities.

The record-breaking trend resumed this spring, earlier than usual and slightly further south than last year, near more populated areas such as Yakutsk. Much of the surrounding area is dense taiga forest, which ignites more easily when hot and dry.

The Siberian Times reported the first fire in the beginning of May outside Oymyakon in north-east Yakutia, which is known as the pole of cold for its record low temperatures. As the blazes widened, more than 2,000 firefighters were deployed across the region and drafted in from outside.

Military planes have been used to douse forests with water and seed clouds with silver iodide and liquid nitrogen to induce rainfall. Some desperate communities have reportedly even drafted children into the fight to hold back the flames. Overall, this has been described as the biggest fire-fighting operation in the region since the end of the Soviet Union.

Despite these efforts, dozens of fires rage out of control. Horrifying video from the region shows dense black smoke and red flames alongside the Kolyma highway, which was known as the Road of Bones during the Soviet era. This trunk road has since been closed. Tourists on a boat on the Lena River have posted phone clips of their cruise past burning hiillsides.

Last week Sakhas emergencies ministry said more than 250 fires were burning across 5,720 sq km an area about twice the size of Luxembourg. Satellite images from the US space agency Nasa have shown vast plumes rising into the atmosphere.

Based on satellite observations, the European Unions Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reported that forest fires in the Sakha Republic have released 65 megatonnes of carbon since 1 June, which is well above the average for 2003-2020. This is already the second highest total ever and it could beat last years record if the current trend continues until the usual end of the fire season in late August.

The forest smoke contains more toxins than even the most polluted urban centres. Mark Parrington, a senior scientist at Copernicus, said analysis of atmospheric aerosols from Sakhas fires suggested surface levels of PM2.5 levels above 1,000 micrograms a cubic metre of air, in addition to other potential constituents such as ozone, ammonia, benzene, hydrogen cyanide and organic aerosols. By comparison, the annual average in famously smoggy cities like Beijing, Hotan, New Delhi and Ghaziabad is between 100 and 110.

Parrington said climate change was helping to create the conditions for more fires in northern boreal forests in Siberia, Canada, and northern Europe all of which are heating faster than the global average. This is in keeping with a broader global trend of fires moving from grasslands to fuel-rich forests, which emit more carbon.

Alexey Yaroshenko, head of the forest department in Greenpeace Russia, said poor forest management, weak regulation and budget cuts had compounded the fire risks. For many years, propaganda has made people think that the climate crisis is a fiction, and if not fiction, that it will only benefit Russia, since it will become warmer and more comfortable. Now the situation is starting to change, he wrote in an email.

Little by little, people are beginning to understand that the climate is really changing, and the consequences are really catastrophic. But the majority of society and the majority of politicians are still very far from understanding the real scale of the problem.

Read the original here:
'Airpocalypse' hits Siberian city as heatwave sparks forest fires - The Guardian

50-year war on drugs imprisoned millions of Black Americans – Associated Press

Landscaping was hardly his lifelong dream.

As a teenager, Alton Lucas believed basketball or music would pluck him out of North Carolina and take him around the world. In the late 1980s, he was the right-hand man to his musical best friend, Youtha Anthony Fowler, who many hip hop and R&B heads know as DJ Nabs.

But rather than jet-setting with Fowler, Lucas discovered drugs and the drug trade at arguably the worst time in U.S. history at the height of the so-called war on drugs. Addicted to crack cocaine and convicted of trafficking the drug, he faced 58 years imprisonment at a time when drug abuse and violence plaguing major cities and working class Black communities were not seen as the public health issue that opioids are today.

By chance, Lucas received a rare bit of mercy. He got the kind of help that many Black and Latino Americans struggling through the crack epidemic did not: treatment, early release and what many would consider a fresh start.

I started the landscaping company, to be honest with you, because nobody would hire me because I have a felony, said Lucas. His Sunflower Landscaping got a boost in 2019 with the help of Inmates to Entrepreneurs, a national nonprofit assisting people with criminal backgrounds by providing practical entrepreneurship education.

Lucas was caught up in a system that limits him and a virtually unknowable number of people with criminal drug records, with little thought given to their ability to rehabilitate. In addition to employment, those with criminal records can be limited in their access to business and educational loans, housing, child custody rights, voting rights and gun rights.

Its a system that was born when Lucas was barely out of diapers.

Fifty years ago this summer, President Richard Nixon declared a war on drugs. Today, with the U.S. mired in a deadly opioid epidemic that did not abate during the coronavirus pandemics worst days, it is questionable whether anyone won the war.

Yet the loser is clear: Black and Latino Americans, their families and their communities. A key weapon of the war was the imposition of mandatory minimums in prison sentencing. Decades later those harsh penalties at the federal level and the accompanying changes at the state level led to an increase in the prison industrial complex that saw millions of people, primarily of color, locked up and shut out of the American dream.

An Associated Press review of federal and state incarceration data showed that, between 1975 and 2019, the U.S. prison population jumped from 240,593 to 1.43 million Americans. Among them, about 1 in 5 people were incarcerated with a drug offense listed as their most serious crime.

The racial disparities reveal the uneven toll of the war on drugs. Following the passage of stiffer penalties for crack cocaine and other drugs, the Black incarceration rate in America exploded from about 600 per 100,000 people in 1970 to 1,808 in 2000. In the same timespan, the rate for the Latino population grew from 208 per 100,000 people to 615, while the white incarceration rate grew from 103 per 100,000 people to 242.

Gilberto Gonzalez, a retired special agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration who worked for more than 20 years taking down drug dealers and traffickers in the U.S., Mexico and in South America, said hell never forget being cheered on by residents in a predominantly Hispanic neighborhood near Los Angeles as he led away drug traffickers in handcuffs.

That gave me a sense of the reality of the people that live in these neighborhoods, that are powerless because theyre afraid that the drug dealers that control the street, that control the neighborhood are going to do them and their children harm, said Gonzalez, 64, who detailed his field experiences in the recently released memoir Narco Legenda.

We realized then that, along with dismantling (drug trafficking) organizations, there was also a real need to clean up communities, to go to where the crime was and help people that are helpless, he said.

Still, the law enforcement approach has led to many long-lasting consequences for people who have since reformed. Lucas still wonders what would happen for him and his family if he no longer carried the weight of a drug-related conviction on his record.

Even with his sunny disposition and close to 30 years of sober living, Lucas, at age 54, cannot pass most criminal background checks. His wife, whom hed met two decades ago at a fatherhood counseling conference, said his past had barred him from doing something as innocuous as chaperoning their children on school field trips.

Its almost like a life sentence, he said.

___

Although Nixon declared the war on drugs on June 17, 1971, the U.S. already had lots of practice imposing drug prohibitions that had racially skewed impacts. The arrival of Chinese migrants in the 1800s saw the rise of criminalizing opium that migrants brought with them. Cannabis went from being called reefer to marijuana, as a way to associate the plant with Mexican migrants arriving in the U.S. in the 1930s.

By the time Nixon sought reelection amid the anti-Vietnam war and Black power movements, criminalizing heroin was a way to target activists and hippies. One of Nixons domestic policy aides, John Ehrlichman, admitted as much about the war on drugs in a 22-year-old interview published by Harpers Magazine in 2016.

Experts say Nixons successors, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, leveraged drug war policies in the following decades to their own political advantage, cementing the drug wars legacy. The explosion of the U.S. incarceration rate, the expansion of public and private prison systems and the militarization of local police forces are all outgrowths of the drug war.

Federal policies, such as mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenses, were mirrored in state legislatures. Lawmakers also adopted felony disenfranchisement, while also imposing employment and other social barriers for people caught in drug sweeps.

The domestic anti-drug policies were widely accepted, mostly because the use of illicit drugs, including crack cocaine in the late 1980s, was accompanied by an alarming spike in homicides and other violent crimes nationwide. Those policies had the backing of Black clergy and the Congressional Black Caucus, the group of African-American lawmakers whose constituents demanded solutions and resources to stem the violent crack scourge.

I think people often flatten this conversation, said Kassandra Frederique, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, a New York-based nonprofit organization pushing decriminalization and safe drug use policies.

If youre a Black leader 30 years ago, youre grabbing for the first (solution) in front of you, said Fredrique, who is Black. A lot of folks in our community said, OK, get these drug dealers out of our communities, get this crack out of our neighborhood. But also give us treatment so we can help folks.

The heavy hand of law enforcement came without addiction prevention resources, she said.

Use of crack rose sharply in 1985, and peaked in 1989, before quickly declining in the early 1990s, according to a Harvard study.

Drug sales and use were concentrated in cities, particularly those with large Black and Latino populations, although there were spikes in use among white populations, too. Between 1984 and 1989, crack was associated with a doubling of homicide victimizations of Black males aged 14 to 17. The increases tapered off among Black men in older age groups. By the year 2000, the correlation between crack cocaine and violence faded amid waning profits from street sales.

Roland Fryer, an author of the Harvard study and a professor of economics, said the effects of the crack epidemic on a generation of Black families and Black children still havent been thoroughly documented. A lack of accountability for the war on drugs bred mistrust of government and law enforcement in the community, he said.

People ask why Black people dont trust (public) institutions, said Fryer, who is Black. Its because we have watched how weve treated opioids its a public health concern. But crack (cocaine) was, lock them up and throw away the key, what we need is tougher sentencing.

Another major player in creating hysteria around drug use during the crack: the media. On June 17, 1986, 15 years to the day after Nixon declared the drug war, NBA draftee Len Bias died of a cocaine-induced heart attack on the University of Maryland campus.

Coverage was frenzied and coupled with racist depictions of crack addiction in mostly Black and Latino communities. Within weeks of Biass death, the U.S. House of Representatives drafted the Anti-Abuse Act of 1986.

The law, passed and signed by Reagan that October, imposed a mandatory minimum federal prison sentence of 20 years, and a maximum life imprisonment, for violation of drug laws. The law also made possession and sale of crack rocks harsher than that of powder cocaine.

The death of Len Bias could have been one of the off-ramps in Lucass spiral into crack addiction and dealing. By then, he could make $10,000 in four to five hours dealing the drug.

One of the things that I thought would help me, that I thought would be my rehab, was when Len Bias died, Lucas said. I thought, if they showed me evidence (he) died from an overdose of smoking crack cocaine, as much as I loved Len Bias, that I would give it up.

I did not quit, he said.

He was first introduced to crack cocaine in 1986, but kept his drug use largely hidden from his friends and family.

What I didnt know at the time was that this was a different type of chemical entering my brain and it was going to change me forever, Lucas said. Here I am on the verge of being the right-hand man to DJ Nabs, to literally travel the world. Thats how bad the drug did me.

By 1988, Fowlers music career had outgrown Durham. He and Lucas moved to Atlanta and, a few years later, Fowler signed a deal to become the official touring DJ for the hip hop group Kris Kross under famed music producer Jermaine Dupris So So Def record label. Fowler and the group went on to open for pop music icon Michael Jackson on the European leg of the Dangerous tour.

Lucas, who began trafficking crack cocaine between Georgia and North Carolina, never joined his best friend on the road. Instead, he slipped further into his addiction and returned to Durham, where he took a short-lived job as a preschool instructor.

When he lacked the money to procure drugs to sell or to use, Lucas resorted to robbing businesses for quick cash. He claims that he was never armed when he robbed soft targets, like fast food restaurants and convenience stores.

Lucas spent four and a half years in state prison for larceny after robbing nine businesses to feed his addiction. Because his crimes were considered nonviolent, Lucas learned in prison that he was eligible for an addiction treatment program that would let him out early. But if he violated the terms of his release or failed to complete the treatment, Lucas would serve 12 years in prison on separate drug trafficking charges under a deal with the court.

He accepted the deal.

After his release from prison and his graduation from the treatment program, Fowler paid out of his pocket to have his friends fines and fees cleared. Thats how Lucas regained his voting rights.

On a recent Saturday, the two best friends met up to talk in depth about what had largely been a secret that Lucas intentionally kept from Fowler. The DJ learned of his friends addiction after seeing a Durham newspaper clipping that detailed the string of robberies.

Sitting in Fowlers home, Lucas told his friend that he doesnt regret not being on the road or missing out on the fringe benefits from touring.

All I needed was to be around you, Lucas said.

Right, Fowler replied, choking up and wiping tears from his eyes.

Lucas continued: You know, when I was around you, when there was a party or whatnot, my job, just out of instinct, was to watch your back.

In a separate interview, Fowler, who is two years younger than Lucas, said, I just wanted my brother on the road with me. To help protect me. To help me be strong. And I had to do it by my damn self. And I didnt like that. Thats what it was.

___

Not everyone was as lucky as Lucas. Often, a drug offense conviction in combination with a violent gun offense carried much steeper penalties. At the heights of the war on drugs, federal law allowed violent drug offenders to be prosecuted in gang conspiracy cases, which often pinned murders on groups of defendants, sometimes irrespective of who pulled the trigger.

These cases resulted in sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, a punishment disproportionately doled out to Black and Latino gang defendants.

Thats the case for Bill Underwood, who was a successful R&B and hip hop music promoter in New York City in the late 70s through the 80s, before his 33-year incarceration. A judge granted him compassionate release from federal custody in January, noting his lauded reputation as a mentor to young men in prison and his high-risk exposure to COVID-19 at age 67.

As the AP reported in 1990, Underwood was found guilty and sentenced to life without parole for racketeering, racketeering conspiracy and narcotics conspiracy, as part of a prosecution that accused his gang of committing six murders and of controlling street-level drug distribution.

I actually short-changed myself, and my family and my people, by doing what I did, said Underwood, who acknowledges playing a large part in the multimillion-dollar heroin trade, as a leader of a violent Harlem gang from the 1970s through the 1980s.

Underwood, who now is a senior fellow with The Sentencing Project, a nonprofit pushing for an end to life imprisonment, testified to Congress in June that his punishment was excessive.

As human beings, we are capable of painful yet transformative self reflection, maturity, and growth, and to deny a person this opportunity is to deny them their humanity, he said in the testimony.

Sympathy for people like Underwood can be hard to come by. Brett Roman Williams, a Philadelphia-based independent filmmaker and anti-gun violence advocate, grew up watching his older brother, Derrick, serve time in prison for a serious drug offense. But in 2016, his brother was only a month out on parole when he was killed by gunfire in Philadelphia.

The laws are in place for people to obey, whether you like it or not, Williams said. We do need reform, we do need opportunities and equity within our system of economics. But we all have choices.

Rep. Cori Bush of St. Louis, following similar action by several members of Congress before her, last month introduced legislation to decriminalize all drugs and invest in substance abuse treatment.

Growing up in St. Louis, the War on Drugs disappeared Black people, not drug use, Bush, who is Black, wrote in a statement sent to the AP. Over the course of 2 years, I lost 40 to 50 friends to incarceration or death because of the War on Drugs. We became so accustomed to loss and trauma that it was our normal.

___

The deleterious impacts of the drug war have, for years, drawn calls for reform and abolition from mostly left-leaning elected officials and social justice advocates. Many of them say that in order to begin to unwind or undo the war on drugs, all narcotics must be decriminalized or legalized, with science-based regulation.

Drug abuse prevention advocates, however, claim that broad drug legalization poses more risks to Americans than it would any benefits.

Provisional data released in December from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show overdose deaths from illicit drug use continued to rise amid the global COVID-19 pandemic. And according to the latest Drug Enforcement Administration narcotics threat assessment released in March, the availability of drugs such as fentanyl, heroin and cocaine remained high or plateaued last year. Domestic and transnational drug trade organizations generate tens of billions of dollars in illicit proceeds from sales annually in the U.S., the DEA said.

Many people think drug prevention is just say no, like Nancy Reagan did in the 80s and we know that did not work, said Becky Vance, CEO of the Texas-based agency Drug Prevention Resources, which has advocated for evidenced-based anti-drug and alcohol abuse education for more than 85 years.

As a person in long-term recovery, I know firsthand the harms of addiction, said Vance, who opposes blanket recreational legalization of illicit drugs. I believe there has to be another way, without legalizing drugs, to reform the criminal justice system and get rid of the inequities.

Frederique, of the Drug Policy Alliance, said reckoning with the war on drugs must start with reparations for the generations needlessly swept up and destabilized by racially biased policing.

This was an intentional policy choice, Frederique said. We dont want to end the war on drugs, and then in 50 years be working on something else that does the same thing. That is the cycle that were in.

It has always been about control, Frederique added.

As much as the legacy of the war on drugs is a tragedy, it is also a story about the resilience of people disproportionately targeted by drug policies, said Donovan Ramsey, a journalist and author of the forthcoming book, When Crack Was King.

Even with all of that, its still important to recognize and to celebrate that we (Black people) survived the crack epidemic and we survived it with very little help from the federal government and local governments, Ramsey told the AP.

Fowler thinks the war on drugs didnt ruin Lucas life. I think he went through it at the right time, truth be told, because he was young enough. Lukes got more good behind him than bad, the DJ said.

Lucas sees beauty in making things better, including in his business. But he still dreams of the day when his past isnt held against him.

It was the beautification of doing the landscaping that kind of attracted me, because it was like the affirmation that my soul needed, he said.

I liked to do something and look back at it and say, Wow, that looks good. Its not just going to wash away in a couple of days. It takes nourishment and upkeep.

___

Morrison reported from New York. AP writers Allen G. Breed in Durham, North Carolina, and Angeliki Kastanis in Los Angeles contributed.

___

Morrison writes about race and justice for the APs Race and Ethnicity team. Follow him on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/aaronlmorrison.

Follow this link:
50-year war on drugs imprisoned millions of Black Americans - Associated Press