Archive for the ‘Media Control’ Category

‘It’s out of our control’: MultiChoice sets the record straight on Russia Today – TDPel Media

MultiChoice has made it clear that the airing of Russia Today (DSTV channel 407) is completely out of its control.

On Wednesday, viewers were not able to view Russia Today. MultiChoice confirmed that the channel is indeed suspended. The broadcaster said sanctions imposed on Russia by the EU led to the global distributor of the channel ceasing to provide the broadcast feed to all suppliers, including MultiChoice.

MultiChoice received a lot of backlash following the suspension of Russia Today. TheIndependent Communications Authority of South Africa(ICASA) also questioned why the Russian news channel was removed from DSTV.

ICASA Chairperson Dr Keabetswe Modimoeng said their Licensing and Compliance Division did not receive any notification by Multichoice confirming the discontinuation of the Russian news channel on its DSTV platform.

We want to reaffirm that we cannot continue to broadcast Russia TV on DSTV for reasons outside of our control. Theglobal distributor of the channel(who are based in Europe) stopped providing the broadcast feed to all its suppliers, including MultiChoice, because of the sanctions imposed on Russia by the European Union.

Our role as a broadcaster is to provide a platform for diverse news channels. Our aim is to enable our subscribers to select channels they wish to view. We do not have editorial control over the content of third party channels, nor do we endorse any points of view.

MultiChoice

The Economic Freedom Fighters said the suspension undermined both press freedom and the rights of consumers who pay for the DSTV service.

MultiChoice has chosen which news outlets consumers must watched and dictated what content must be watched, based on their allegiance in a complex conflict in Europe. MultiChoice has basically declared that the only reliable international news outlets are those aligned with NATO, such as CNN and the BBC.

We demand the immediate reinstatement of Russia Today and not this condescending move which seeks to force a one-sided narrative on the conflict between Ukraine and Russia.

Read the rest here:
'It's out of our control': MultiChoice sets the record straight on Russia Today - TDPel Media

Alex Ovechkin breaks silence on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: ‘Something I can’t control, it’s not in my hands – CBS Sports

After declining to speak with the media on Thursday, hours after Russia invaded Ukraine, Washington Capitals star Alex Ovechkin broke his silence a day later. The 12-time NHL All-Star from Russia said he's hoping for "no more war."

Ovechkin called the situation "hard" because he has friends in both Russia and Ukraine. The 36-year-old added he wants "peace in the whole world" sooner rather than later.

"Please, no more war," Ovechkin said. "It doesn't matter who is in the war Russia, Ukraine, different countries I think we live in a world, like, we have to live in peace and a great world."

While Ovechkin criticized the war, he directed no negative words toward Russian president Vladimir Putin. A longtime supporter of Putin, Ovechkin called him "my president" on Friday and said it is a "hard situation right now for both sides." Ovechkin established a social movement called PutinTeam in 2017 to strengthen his re-election bid.

Ovechkin's anti-war sentiment mirrors that of another Russian athlete. World No. 7 tennis player Andrey Rublev wrote "no war please" on a nearby camera lens immediately after he advanced to the Dubai Open final on Friday.

Russia's invasion reportedly reached Ukraine's capital of Kyiv on Friday.

Excerpt from:
Alex Ovechkin breaks silence on Russia's invasion of Ukraine: 'Something I can't control, it's not in my hands - CBS Sports

Senators Markey and Cassidy Praise President Biden’s Call in the State of Union for Strengthening Children’s Online Privacy Protections – Ed Markey

Senators have introduced bipartisan legislation to ban targeted advertising and include teenagers in online privacy regulations

Washington (March 3, 2022) Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.) today expressed their support for President Joe Bidens commitment to holding Big Tech accountable for childrens online privacy, and mental health, and well-being after he used his State of the Union address to call for action to strengthen childrens online privacy laws. President Biden specifically called for a ban on targeted advertising to children and an end to personal data collection on children by online and social media companies. Senators Markey and Cassidy introduced the bipartisanChildren and Teens Online Privacy Protection Actin May 2021 and pledge in their letter today to working with the Biden administration to advance this legislation.

There is a direct link between the lack of online privacy protections for young people and the youth mental health crisis in this country,write the senators in their letter to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.In the absence of data privacy protections for children and teens, online platforms are able to amass troves of personal information about users and leverage that data with algorithms that amplify and recommend toxic content to young and vulnerable users to keep them glued to their screens.It is imperative that the United States addresses this issue by providing children and teens with control over their data and by prohibiting companies from engaging in harmful data collection and use.

A copy of the senators letter can be foundHERE.

More than90percentof parentsagree that existing childrens privacy rules should be extended to teenagers, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, young peoples use of the internetdoubledby some estimates. Over one in four teens report using social media almost constantly. And35 percentof parents report that their children began using social media at a younger age than they had originally planned. In 2021, Surgeon General Murthy released a report on the disturbing decline in childrens mental health, noting that social media platforms must do more to stop this devastating trend.

The Senators introduced theChildren and Teens Online Privacy Protection Actto help protect American children from harm. It prohibits internet companies from collecting personal information from anyone 13- to 15-years old without the users consent; creates an online Eraser Button to permit users to eliminate personal information from a child or teen; amends theChildrens Online Privacy Protection Actto stop online platforms from turning a blind eye to the children on their websites; limits the collection of personal information from young users; and creates a Youth Privacy and Marketing Division at the Federal Trade Commission.

###

See the original post here:
Senators Markey and Cassidy Praise President Biden's Call in the State of Union for Strengthening Children's Online Privacy Protections - Ed Markey

Below average runoff continues for the upper Missouri River Basin – nwd.usace.army.mil

OMAHA, Neb. --

The updated 2022 calendar year runoff forecast for the Missouri River Basin above Sioux City, Iowa, continues to be below average.

The runoff in February was less than predicted, and we expect the lower-than-average runoff to continue in the coming months, said John Remus, chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Missouri River Basin Water Management Division.

The snow accumulation in both the plains and the mountains continues to be below average, and the soil moisture remains very low compared to normal. This resulted in us lowering our anticipated runoff for the 2022 water year, he added.

The 2022 calendar year runoff forecast above Sioux City, Iowa, has dropped from 21.7 million acre feet last month to 20.4 MAF on March 1, a reduction of 1.3 MAF. If realized, this forecast would be 79% of normal.

Runoff forecasts incorporate several factors including end-of-February soil moisture conditions, plains snowpack, mountain snowpack, and long-term precipitation and temperature outlooks. Based on these factors, runoff is expected to be well below normal for all reaches except from Gavins Point Dam to Sioux City.

February runoff in the Missouri River Basin above Sioux City was 0.9 million acre-feet, 78% of average. Runoff was below-average due to lack of snow accumulation coupled with the drier-than-normal soil conditions in the upper Basin. Drought conditions are about the same as they were at the beginning of February, with 89% of the Basin experiencing abnormally dry or drought conditions.

System storage is currently 48.1 MAF, 8.0 MAF below the base of the annual flood control zone. The System will continue to serve all Congressionally authorized purposes during 2022, including flood control, navigation, and water supply.

Basin and river conditions continue to be monitored, including plains and mountain snow accumulation, and System regulation will be adjusted based on the most up-to-date information.

Navigation:

Beginning in mid-March, releases from Gavins Point Dam will be adjusted to provide flow support for Missouri River navigation. Navigation flow support for the Missouri River is expected to be at minimum levels for the first half of the 2022 season, which begins April 1 at the mouth of the river near St. Louis, Missouri. The actual service level will be based on the total volume of water stored within the System on March 15, in accordance with the guidelines in the Master Manual. Flow support for the second half of the navigation season, as well as navigation season length, will be based on the storage in the system on July 1.

Mountain and Plains Snowpack:

Mountain snowpack in the upper Missouri River Basin is accumulating at below-average rates. The Feb. 27, mountain snowpack in the Fort Peck reach was 80% of average, while the mountain snowpack in the Fort Peck to Garrison reach was 82% of average. By March 1, about 80% of the total mountain snowpack has typically accumulated. Mountain snowpack normally peaks near April 15. The mountain snowpack graphics can be viewed at: https://go.usa.gov/xt7UH. Currently, plains snowpack in the upper Missouri River Basin is very light to non-existent.

Monthly Water Management Conference Calls for 2022:

The March 2022 monthly conference call will be held Thursday, March 3, to inform basin stakeholders of current weather and runoff forecasts and the planned operation of the reservoir system in the coming months. Presentation materials will be available via webinar. The call is intended for Congressional delegations; Tribes; state, county, and local government officials; and the media. It will be recorded in its entirety and made available to the public on the Defense Video and Imagery Distribution System at https://go.usa.gov/xt7Uz.

Spring Public Meetings:

The spring public meetings will be held the week of April 11. The purpose of these meetings is to update the region on current hydrologic conditions and the planned operation of the mainstem reservoir system during the coming months. More information will be provided when it is available.

Reservoir Forecasts:

The forecast reservoir releases and elevations discussed above are not definitive. Additional precipitation, lack of precipitation or other circumstances could cause adjustments to the reservoir release rates.

Hydropower:

The six mainstem power plants generated 448 million kWh of electricity in February. Typical energy generation for February is 624 million kWh. The power plants are expected to generate 7.4 billion kWh this year, compared to the long-term average of 9.4 billion kWh.

To view the detailed three-week release forecast for the mainstem dams, go to https://go.usa.gov/xt7PC.

The Missouri Basin Web App provides links to these reports and others that are updated more frequently. https://go.usa.gov/xt7Pb.

MISSOURI RIVER MAINSTEM RESERVOIR DATA

Pool Elevation (feet above mean sea level)

Water in Storage (1,000 acre-feet)

On February 28

Change in February

On February 28

% of 1967-2021 Average

Change in February

Fort Peck

2222.5

-1.2

12,522

86

-220

Garrison

1827.8

-0.2

14,923

84

-25

Oahe

1597.1

-0.2

15,671

88

+64

Big Bend

1420.9

-0.1

1,684

99

-6

Fort Randall

1349.7

+4.1

2,976

89

+293

Gavins Point

1204.8

-2.7

302

77

-60

Total

48,078

87

+46

WATER RELEASES AND ENERGY GENERATION FOR FEBRUARY

Average Release in 1,000 cfs

Releases in 1,000 acre-feet

Generation in Million kWh

Fort Peck

9.1

503

80

Garrison

15.6

864

123

Oahe

14.1

780

109

Big Bend

14.2

787

45

Fort Randall

9.7

536

See the rest here:
Below average runoff continues for the upper Missouri River Basin - nwd.usace.army.mil

DO’s and DON’Ts for Discussing Face Masks and COVID-19 Vaccinations with Patients – Michigan State Medical Society

Should I be wearing a face mask?

Should I get a COVID-19 vaccine booster?

These are just two of the many questions and concerns physicians and other health care providers frequently encounter when discussing face masks and COVID-19 vaccines with patients. The following guidance is intended to provide some suggested practices for physicians when engaging patients in these discussions.

DO encourage patients in areas with high COVID-19 Community Levels to mask up.

According to current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, all individuals 2 years and older, regardless of vaccination status, living in areas with high COVID-19 Community Levels should be masking in public. The CDC also recommends in areas with medium COVID-19 Community Levels, individuals at high risk for severe illness and immunocompromised should speak with their physician about taking additional precautions in public, such as mask wearing.

The CDCs COVID-19 Community Level recommendations do not apply in health care settings. Health care setting should continue to monitor community transmission rates and follow CDCs infection prevention and control recommendations for health care settings. Currently, most areas across the country and nearly all of Michigan are presently considered to have substantial or high transmission of COVID-19.

DO encourage patients to get vaccinated.

Based on CDC and FDA guidelines, patients should be encouraged to receive the COVID-19 vaccine to help build protection from the virus. Physicians should counsel patients, who are not candidates for the vaccination due to medical conditions, on risk mitigation strategies, such as wearing face masks indoors, social distancing and hand washing.

DO encourage eligible patients to receive COVID-19 boosters.

When recommending booster doses for patients, reassure patients that the vaccines are effective, but research has shown a slight decrease in protection over time. Remind patients that booster shots are normal for vaccines, such as the annual flu shot or Tdap booster every 10 years. COVID-19 boosters offer elevated protections and have worked well against most variants. Pursuant to the latest CDC guidance from February 2, 2022, the following individuals are currently eligible for a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine:

For further recommendations regarding to COVID-19 vaccine eligibility, special clinical considerations, and alerts, visit the

Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of COVID-19 Vaccines Currently Approved or Authorized in the United States webpage.

DO use effective communication that is tailored to the patient.

Physicians are a trusted source of information for patients and you should share accurate, clear, and easy-to-find information that addresses common questions. In encouraging patients to getvaccinated against COVID-19 it is important to listen to patients concerns. Professional answers to patient questions and concerns matter and can help them make an informed decision about receiving the vaccine.

Physicians should consider using words which will better resonate with each patient. For example, when discussing the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination, explain the safety of the vaccine and the benefits to the patient and his or her family. Physicians should also be transparent with patients, such as discussing potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine or the effectiveness of cloth vs other types of face masks in preventing the transmission of COVID-19 indoors or in crowded places.

Physicians should avoid using judgmental language against individuals with face mask or vaccine concerns, which could negatively impact the patients trust and the overall physician-patient relationship. In addition, sharing facts about face masks and the COVID-19 vaccine, as opposed to personal opinions, may be more effective.

DO continue to implement COVID-19 policies and other infection prevention measures recommended by the CDC and MDHHS.

The CDC continues to recommend that medical practices and facilities use additional infection prevention and control practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, including, but not limited to, telehealth visits where medically appropriate, screening patients and visitors entering the facility for signs and symptoms of COVID-19, and implementing source control measures, such as face masks.

If a patient or visitor objects to or refuses to comply with the practices COVID-19 policies, such as refusing to wear a face mask, physicians should ensure its policies include a protocol for explaining the CDCs guidelines for health professionals, which may be different from mandates or guidelines for individuals, and that a patient must comply with the policies while inside the facility. If necessary and appropriate, the patients appointment may be rescheduled to a telehealth visit, or the patient may be referred to another physician for treatment.

DONT routinely terminate patients who refuse to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

It has been reported in the media that some physicians are refusing to treat unvaccinated patients. In other instances, some physicians have declined to treat children based on the parents vaccination status, although the American Pediatric Association advises against refusing to treat pediatric patients based on parental vaccination status or position. Generally, a physician is legally free to determine whom to treat and to end the physician/patient relationship with appropriate advance notice. Until consensus develops on any potential ethical, licensing or liability risk exposures that physicians could face by routinely declining to treat individuals who are unvaccinated or due to the vaccination status of others, physicians should consider making treatment decisions based on the facts and circumstances of each situation.

DO implement a process for handling patient claims of medical exemptions from the practices COVID-19 policies applicable to patients.

Medical practices are generally considered places of public accommodation and must comply with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act as well as Michigans Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act, when enforcing the practices own COVID-19 policies. Physicians need to have a process to address requests by patients and visitors for exemptions from the practices face mask mandate or similar policies based on medical grounds and to assess whether or not reasonable accommodations are possible. Physicians should not assume that an unmasked patient or visitor cannot medically tolerate a face mask or comply with other COVID-19 policies, but physicians are permitted to accept the patient or visitors verbal representation to that effect. Best practices advise to not request medical documentation from the patient or visitor to determine whether the patient or visitor has a disability warranting a reasonable accommodation.

DONT provide face mask or vaccine exemption letters or documentation to patients which are not medically necessary.

Several media sources have reported on several physicians who have been disciplined by various state medical boards for issuing medical exemptions to patients without an objective medical basis for the exemption. Some physicians individually oppose policies which mandate face masks or COVID-19 vaccinations. Other physicians may empathize with patients who may be negatively impacted by their refusal to comply with mandatory COVID-19 policies, such as a patient who may face termination from employment unless the patient receives the COVID-19 vaccine. Regardless, physicians should not attempt to help patients circumvent COVID-19 policies applicable to patients by drafting letters or other documentation regarding the patients medical condition that is false or misleading.

Read the original:
DO's and DON'Ts for Discussing Face Masks and COVID-19 Vaccinations with Patients - Michigan State Medical Society