Khalifa Haftar controls two-thirds of Libya, leaving the  UN-backed government increasingly isolated in the capital.  Photograph: Esam Al-Fetori/Reuters
    Talks between leaders of the two largest rival factions in    Libya appear to have    reached an outline agreement in probably the most optimistic    moment for the war-torn country in many years.
    In a diplomatic breakthrough the leader of the UN-backed    government, Fayez al-Sarraj, and his rival Khalifa Haftar met    on Tuesday in the United Arab Emirates for two hours.  
    They are scheduled to hold further talks with the Egyptian    president, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, next week. Sisi has been    critical to the stop-start reconciliation process, along with    Italy and the UAE.  
    Libya has been wracked by internal divisions ever since the    ousting of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 led to the collapse of the    economy and oil production, and to a political vacuum in which    human trafficking has proliferated, resulting in mass deaths of    refugees trying to cross the Mediterranean to Europe.  
    Control of the country is split between the UN-backed    government in Tripoli and forces loyal to the parliament in the    eastern city of Tobruk, which are commanded by Haftar.  
    No official statement was issued after the Abu Dhabi talks but    the unconfirmed reports  initially mainly coming from media    sources allied to Haftar  suggest fresh elections will be held    within six months and the UN-backed governments presidency    council reduced to three from nine members.  
    One of the three would be the head of Libyas Tobruk-based    parliament and another the head of the armed forces.  
    The UN has been opposed to the head of the armed forces being    in full political control of the country and the proposal puts    the position within a clear political framework. At the same    time an agreement to hand all military appointments to    politicians would be revoked.  
    There is also said to be an agreement on identifying terrorist    groups outside the political process and a fresh call to    disband militias.  
    Haftar controls two-thirds of the country, leaving the    UN-backed government increasingly isolated in the capital and    unable to deliver basic services. His supporters insists he has    never sought to establish a military dictatorship.  
    The agreement reportedly also calls for an end to foreign    interference in army and security affairs. Arms have been    supplied by foreign powers across Libyas porous borders ever    since the fall of the Gaddafi regime in a Nato-backed    operation.  
    The EU has also been training the Libyan coastguard in an    effort to stem the flow of migrants across the Mediterranean,    and the UN has been trying to develop a presidential guard.  
    In a statement welcoming the fact that Hafter and Sarraj had    finally met on Tuesday, the UAE lauded the positive atmosphere    of the talks and praised the determination shown by the two    sides to reach a solution to the current political stalemate in    Libya.  
    The UAE also urged the international community to find a    replacement for the UN special envoy to Libya, Martin Kobler,    who is due to step down. Political infighting in the    international community has blocked a replacement being    announced.  
    Many British Conservative politicians believe the UK  in    supporting Sarraj  has backed the wrong, or ineffective side,    but recognise any political agreement will be hard to secure on    the ground owing to multiple sources of power in Libya.  
    UK and US officials are due to discuss its stance at meetings    in London next week. There are signs that the US are supporting    the process, even by suggesting the Libyans could come to    Washington for meetings in June.
    The French foreign affairs department broadly welcomed the    developments in Libya saying it supports all initiatives aimed    at strengthening the dialogue between all the parties in    Libya.  
    Any decision in the agreement on fighting terrorism could    however be hard to implement if, as reported, militia forces    the Shura Council of Benghazi Revolutionaries and the Benghazi    Defence Brigades are to be classified as terrorists because of    their ties to al-Qaida. Such a move would almost certainly be    rejected by a number of groups in Misrata as well as those    allied to the countrys grand mufti, Sheikh Sadik al-Ghariani.  
    Mattia Toaldo, Libyan expert at the European Council on Foreign    Relations questioned whether the outline agreement would ever    be implemented. It is significant if Haftar has agreed to a    shift in his strategy and said he will stand in elections by    March 2018. It is very much Egypts strategy.  
    If he does win those elections, he would be able to say he has    a new legitimate right to get back into Triploi the capital.    But it is very doubtful it would be possible to run free and    fair elections, and it is not clear why Sarraj, or the Islamist    militias in Benghazi that have been supporting him, would agree    to this process since he is quite likely to lose, or find    themseleevs designated as terrorist groups.  
See the original post here:
Breakthrough Libya talks appear to yield deal between rival factions - The Guardian