good freedoms liberals
My common new name is rrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiii or you can just call me rrrrrRrrRrrrRrriiiii . This new community I am starting is mainly about new liberties freedoms . So , for anyone...
By: a Ri s gO nZaL eS
Go here to see the original:
good freedoms & liberals - Video
Dutch right wing Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders: The popularity of the government is dwindling again and the threat of attack posed by returning jihadists with connections to Islamic State gives Wilders a stronger profile. Photograph: Sander Koning/EPA
A new opinion poll in the Netherlands shows Geert Wilderss anti-Islam, anti-EU Freedom Party neck-and-neck with the Liberals, led by prime minister Mark Rutte, as the threat posed by returning Islamic State jihadists replaces the MH17 air disaster at the top of the national agenda.
A weighted average of the countrys four main political polls shows the Liberals losing three seats compared with a month ago, and the Freedom Party gaining three. The poll has the Liberals and the Freedom Party each taking between 25 and 29 seats, an outcome a long way from Mr Ruttes high of 41 seats in the 2012 general election and from the lacklustre 15 won by Mr Wilders.
The public reacted very well to the way the Rutte government handled the aftermath of the MH17 crash and managed to get the vast majority of the bodies repatriated, says political scientist Tom Louwerse of pollster Peilingwijzer.
The Rutte approval factor predictably benefited the Liberals more than the junior coalition partners, Labour, and so there was a spike in the Liberal support that lasted into September but that has now, apparently, worked itself through.
The beneficiary of that working through has been Mr Wilders and the Freedom Party, which, despite approaching the European elections in May on a high, fared not as well as expected after an uncharacteristic gaffe that saw Mr Wilders leading anti-Moroccan chants at an election rally.
The commotion surrounding that chanting, and the Freedom Party resignations that followed, has now died down, Mr Louwerse says. The popularity of the government is dwindling again and the threat of attack posed by returning jihadists with connections to Islamic State gives Wilders a stronger profile.
What is most interesting about this poll, he adds, is the degree to which conservative voters routinely switch allegiance between the Liberals (centre-right on economic matters) and the Freedom Party, depending on topical issues.
For the junior coalition party, Labour, there is little change in the unimpressive 13-17 seats, compared with the 38 seats they took in 2012. By contrast, centre-left D66 again did well, with 20-24 seats, .
As the poll was published, there was more unpopular news as finance minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem confirmed that a 642 million EU surcharge based on gross domestic product growth is probably correct, according to an initial analysis.
Read more from the original source:
Poll puts Wilders far-right party on par with Liberals
Victorian Premier Denis Napthine says the Liberal Party will preference the Greens last.
Both major parties have shunned the Greens in the Victorian election, although the minor party thinks it can win the Labor-held seat of Melbourne in its own right.
Premier Denis Napthine said on Thursday the Liberal Party would preference the Greens last in all seats, saying they were bad for the economy and Victoria.
And Labor has rejected a formal preference deal with the Greens, but says it could still swap votes on a seat-by-seat basis to maximise the chances of booting the coalition from government on November 29.
Melbourne Greens candidate Ellen Sandell, who will fight to win the seat that Labor holds by 4.7 per cent, said the Liberals' comments were unsurprising.
"We've always planned to win without preferences within our own right, just like (federal Greens MP) Adam Bandt did with a seven per cent swing," she told AAP.
Ms Sandell said it was no surprise the major parties were trying to keep the Greens out but they could win without them.
"It's also no surprise that Napthine and Abbott would prefer to have a Labor MP here in Melbourne rather than the Greens because they know that Labor will roll over on the East West toll road, they'll roll over on privatisation of TAFE, they won't shut down our dirtiest coal power stations and replace them with renewables," she said.
Dr Napthine said the Liberal Party would put the Greens last in all lower house seats, but was unclear whether it would put them below controversial conservative parties, such as Rise Up Australia, on how-to-vote cards for the upper house.
"If there's extremist candidates, we will consider putting them below the Greens," he said.
Go here to see the original:
Vic Liberals to preference Greens last
The South Australian Opposition has formally moved to set up a parliamentary inquiry into unconventional gas exploration in the state's south-east.
But the Liberals moved to debate the subject on December 10, an optional sitting day for Parliament that the Government says is unlikely to proceed if there is little on the agenda.
The motion's passage through the Lower House is also reliant on the support of two independent MPs, Geoff Brock and Martin Hamilton-Smith, who both sit on Labor's Cabinet.
State Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis said the mining industry was furious with Opposition Leader Steven Marshall over the inquiry.
"The man whose two seats from becoming Premier of South Australia is flagging to the entire world that he is anti-gas, he's anti-oil and he's anti-business," he said.
"That scares them and that worries them.
"The oil and and gas sector, the mining sector, employ 15,000 people in this state and he's putting all that at risk."
The Greens have a similar motion to be debated in the Legislative Council next week.
Greens MLC Mark Parnell said they would offer to negotiate the terms of the inquiry with the Liberals but the Opposition's "heart was not in it".
"If their heart was in it, they would have put it to a vote in the chamber where it has a chance of winning," he said.
Read more from the original source:
Liberals move for late debate on fracking inquiry, chooses optional sitting day of Parliament
The liberal intelligentsia is mad at Americans again. But where the railing is usually about, say, their penchant for guns or religion, this time its about their refusal to turn out to vote.
Blasted Americans.
The lowest turnout in more than seven decades so irked the University of Wisconsins paper, the Cardinal, that it rushed out a column calling for mandatory voting. The doltish voters dont seem to grasp that this is, as The New York Times put it in an editorial, bad for Democrats.
And even worse for democracy, it added.
Never mind that we sloths managed to end Democratic control of the Senate while bestirring, in most states, fewer than half of our eligible voters.
Id have thought we deserved a medal for efficiency.
After all, just 36.3 percent of eligible voters turned out in this election. According to MSNBC, we havent seen that since FDRs last stand in 1944. Yet the decision made by these few, these happy few, was streamed in headlines across every front page in the land.
The left seems to prefer the old Soviet system. This, according to a quick check, produced a turnout in the 1950 legislative election of 100 percent. The Democrats ... pardon me, the Communists, won in a landslide.
Old Joe Stalin knew how to fire up democracy and nobody had to run any negative ads (of course, theyd have been cast into the Gulag Archipelago if they did).
Then again, by the logic of the left, the voters must have been happy as clams under the Soviet system. The Times has it that our voters stayed home because of anger and frustration at the relentlessly negative tone of the campaigns.
Continue reading here:
Blaming the non-voters liberals turnout excuse