UK Liberals Call for Knife Ban
It had to happen. We #39;ve been told for decades that gun control has curtailed violence in Great Britain. With no guns around, people who are intent on doing harm are using knives. So, of course,...
By: TheAlexJonesChannel
Read more from the original source:
UK Liberals Call for Knife Ban - Video
by Rabbi Michael Lerner November 11, 2014
Why does the Right keep winning in American politics, sometimes through electoral victories, sometimes by having the Democrats and others on the Left adopt what were traditionally right-wing policies and perspectives? Sure, I know that progressives won some important local battles in 2014: A few towns in California, Texas, and Ohio banned fracking. A few towns in Ohio, Massachusetts, Florida, and Illinois supported ballot measures to overturn Citizens United. Richmond, California, stood up to Chevron, and Berkeley stood up to "Big Soda."
But the overall direction of the country for the past forty years has given increasing strength to right-wing politicians in the Republican Party and opportunists in the Democratic Party who effectively do much of the same work that these right-wingers would do when they win political power. So why has this been happening? And why do so many people end up voting to elect politicians who are committed to enacting policies that hurt the economic well-being of a significant section (not the majority, but many) of the people who voted for them?
I asked this question first to thousands of people whom my research team and I encountered when I was Principal Investigator for an NIMH-sponsored study about how to deal with stress at work and stress in family life. At the time Ronald Reagan was president and he had won in part by winning many votes of middle-income working people.
The answer given by the media then, and often proffered today as well by the Democrats is, Its the economy, stupid. They didnt give that explanation up when Reaganomics produced heavy economic losses for working people who continued to vote Republican, and they didnt give that explanation up when the Clinton/Gore years produced a booming economy and yet Gore lost (OK, he won but for the Supreme Court, but that was only made possible because of how close the vote wasand why would it have been so close if the economy is the determining issue?)
Nor am I convinced when recent statisticians show that those with the least income give ten votes to Democrats to every eight they give to Republicans, thus supposedly showing that people always vote their economic interests. The issue remains: those whose economic interests are not served by a politics that caters to the wealthy (those eight who vote Republican when the Republicans over and over again try to dismantle economic programs that might help them) continue to support those politicians, and that gives the Right the electoral edge it would never have on the grounds of its policies (most people who vote for them, according to recent polls, dont agree with their specific policy positions).
What my research team discovered was the following:
1. Most Americans work in an economy that teaches them the common sense of global capitalism: Everyone is out for themselves and will seek to advance their own interests without regard to your well-being, so the only rational path is for you to seek to advance your own interests in the same way. Those who have more money and power than you have are just better at seeking their own self-interest, because this is a meritocratic society in which you end up where you deserve to end up, so stop whining about the differences in wealth and power, because if you deserved more you would have more.
2. Now here is the central contradiction: most people hate this kind of reality. They believe that it is in stark contrast to the values they would like to live by but simultaneously they also believe that the logic of capitalist society is the only possible reality, and that they would be fools not to try to live by it in every part of their lives. This message is reinforced in our workplaces and also by almost every sitcom and television news story available. But most people hate that this is the case. They often will tell you, Everyone is selfish and materialistic, so Id be a fool to be the one person who is caring for others in a world where everyone is just out for themselves. Unconsciously, many people adopt the values of the marketplace, and these values have a corrosive impact on their own friendships, relationships, and family life.
3. So when many Americans encounter a different reality in right-wing churches that have specialized in creating supportive communities, they feel much more addressed there than theyve ever felt in progressive movements that focus on economic entitlements or political rights and sometimes disintegrate due to internal tensions over dynamics of relative privilege and unproductive feelings of guilt. Only rarely do these liberal or progressive movements actually manifest a loving community that seems to care specifically about the people who come to their public talks or gatheringsthe experience is more about hearing a good speech than about encountering people who want to know who you are and what you needprecisely what happens in most right-wing churches.
Excerpt from:
Why the Right Keeps Winning and the Liberals Keep Losing
Published on November 25, 2014
Published on November 25, 2014
Steve Crocker thanks supporters Tuesday night in Whiteway. Crocker claimed a victory for the Liberals in the Trinity-Bay de Verde byelection.
Photo by Melissa Jenkins/The Compass
Published on November 25, 2014
Steve Crocker, right, shares a hug as supporters cheer him on Tuesday evening in Whiteway. Crocker defeated Progressive Conservative candidate Ron Johnson to secure Trinity-Bay de Verde for the Liberals in the byelection.
Photo by Melissa Jenkins/The Compass
For the first time in over a decade, a Liberal will represent Trinity-Bay de Verde in the House of Assembly.
Steve Crocker secured a convincing victory for the resurgent Liberals, who have now won several byelections in recent months. According to unofficial results reported by Elections Newfoundland and Labrador, Crocker attracted almost 66 per cent of all ballots cast, defeating Progressive Conservative candidate Ron Johnson by over 1,700 votes.
Johnson, the father of former cabinet minister and district MHA Charlene Johnson, failed to hold onto the seat for the PCs.
Follow this link:
Liberals take Trinity-Bay de Verde
Liberals Euroa TVC - Testimonials 2
Liberals TV Commercial Production by Shon Productions http://www.shonproductions.com.au.
By: Shon Productions - Film Video Production
The rest is here:
Liberals Euroa TVC - Testimonials 2 - Video
Polling suggests the Tasmanian Liberals' popularity among voters has now fallen to its lowest level since November 2010.
Enterprise Marketing and Research Services (EMRS) figures based on a telephone survey of 1,000 people conducted last week showed 42 per cent would opt for the Liberals, 9 per cent less than at the March election.
Labor's primary vote had risen from 27 per cent in March to 31 per cent, while the Greens' share of the vote was 19 per cent, up from 14.
The Liberal vote has been in consistent decline throughout the year and EMRS said it was the biggest quarterly fall since August 2010.
Premier Will Hodgman had a comfortable lead as preferred leader with 50 per cent preferring Mr Hodgman and 22 per cent nominating Labor's Bryan Green.
Other pollsters suggested EMRS surveys consistently overestimate the size of the Tasmanian Greens vote.
Mr Hodgman said polls come and go and the Government was focussed on governing.
Former prime minister John Howard, who is visiting Tasmania, urged the Government not to pay too much attention to polling data.
"I think the Hodgman Government is a breath of fresh air and energy for Tasmania," Mr Howard said.
"Again it's difficult given the deleterious impact of the Labour-Green alliance.
Read the rest here:
Poll indicates Tas Liberals' popularity at lowest level since late 2010