Archive for the ‘Jordan Peterson’ Category

Jordan B Peterson – YouTube

My wife, Tammy, and I toured Australia and New Zealand in February 2019. I was lecturing about the topics covered in my book, 12 Rules for Life (and also Maps of Meaning, my first book). I had a number of the lectures professionally filmed. This highlight from my lecture in Auckland focuses on what might be done about crippling feelings of guilt.

--- SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL ---

Donations: https://www.jordanbpeterson...Merchandise: https://teespring.com/store......

--- BOOKS ---

12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: https://jordanbpeterson.com......Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: https://jordanbpeterson.com......

--- LINKS ---

Website: https://jordanbpeterson.com/12 Rules for Life Tour: https://jordanbpeterson.com...Blog: https://jordanbpeterson.com...Podcast: https://jordanbpeterson.com...Reading List: https://jordanbpeterson.com...Twitter: https://twitter.com/jordanb...Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/j......Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dr......

--- PRODUCTS ---

Self Authoring Suite: https://selfauthoring.com/Understand Myself personality test: https://understandmyself.com/Merchandise: https://teespring.com/store...... Show less

View post:

Jordan B Peterson - YouTube

Jordan Peterson Destroys Q&A | 25 February 2019

Monday, 25 February 2019

Jordan Peterson join the live Q&A Panel with Alex Hawke, Terri Butler, Cathryn McGregor and Van Badham.

For more from Q&A, click here: http://www.abc.net.au/qanda

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/QandALike us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/abcqanda/Subscribe to us on YouTube: https://ab.co/2E3pCZ9

Q&A is a television discussion program that focuses mostly on politics but ranges across all of the big issues that set Australians thinking, talking and debating.

It is driven by interaction: Q&A provides a rare opportunity for Australian citizens to directly question and hold to account politicians and key opinion leaders in a national public forum and Q&A is broadcast live so that not only the studio audience but also the wider audience can get involved.

We aim to create a discussion that is constructive, that reflects a diverse range of views and that provides a safe environment where people can respectfully discuss their differences.

Its impossible to represent every view on a single panel or in one audience but were committed to giving participants a fair go.

In order to be as inclusive and diverse as possible, the program is presented from a range of locations around the country and all Australians are encouraged to get involved through social media as well as by joining the audience.

This is an official Australian Broadcasting Corporation YouTube channel.

Read the original:

Jordan Peterson Destroys Q&A | 25 February 2019

Dwayne The Rock Johnson has ties to Tom Peterson, Portland wrestling and, of course, Salt & Straw – OregonLive

Not only does Dwayne The Rock Johnson have a new ownership stake in the Portland-based Salt & Straw ice cream chain, it turns out the pro wrestler-turned-TV-and-movie star has even more Northwest connections. On Johnsons Twitter page, hes been busy posting about his new hit movie, Jumanji: The Next Level, Salt & Straws Dwanta Claus Holiday Pack ice cream flavors, and the fact that Johnson has ties to such local icons as Tom Peterson and Portland wrestling.

Responding to another Twitter post, Johnson wrote, I lived in Vancouver, WA when my old man wrestled for Portland based wrestling promoter, Don Owens. I practically lived in the old Portland sports arena when I was a kid. Lots of ties to Oregon & Portland in particular.

As if that wasnt enough, Johnson added, in another Twitter post, Haha and another crazy connection to Portland..my uncle, Siva married Tom Petersons (famous local Portland appliance and electronics store owner) daughter, Kathy. Back in the 80s I believe.

Johnsons posts have drawn plenty of responses, including invitations for Johnson to attend a Portland Timbers match, along with a Twitter poster who wrote, Thats some serious old Portland credibility. The only other way you could top it is having been on the Ramblin Rod show as a kid.

As The Oregonian/OregonLive recently reported, Johnson became an investor in Salt & Straw via the Garcia Companies, an investment firm operated by Johnsons ex-wife, Dany Garcia.

Along with his many other talents, Johnson seems to be a gifted salesman, because according to the Salt & Straw website, the $65 Dwanta Claus Holiday Pack, is, at the moment, sold out.

More of our coverage:

-- Kristi Turnquist

kturnquist@oregonian.com 503-221-8227 @Kristiturnquist

Subscribe to Oregonian/OregonLive newsletters and podcasts for the latest news and top stories.

See the article here:

Dwayne The Rock Johnson has ties to Tom Peterson, Portland wrestling and, of course, Salt & Straw - OregonLive

They is Merriam-Websters Word of the Year. Heres why. – Vox.com

They isnt new.

Many nonbinary people, who dont identify as male or female, have been using the pronouns they and them for years. Being able to use a pronoun thats not he or she is really affirming and really welcoming and freeing for many people, Addison Rose Vincent, acting executive director of the nonprofit Intersex & Genderqueer Recognition Project, told Vox.

And when people use they and them pronouns, theyre tapping into a long history they has been used as a singular pronoun in English since the late 1300s, if not before.

Despite this background, the pronoun has received pushback, with grammar sticklers arguing that its incorrect English and right-wing commentators dismissing its use as mere political correctness. University of Toronto professor Jordan Peterson, for example, proclaimed in 2016, I dont recognize another persons right to determine what pronouns I use to address them.

But recently, they has been getting a new level of mainstream recognition. In September, Merriam-Webster added the singular pronoun they, used to refer to a single person whose gender identity is nonbinary, or to a person whose gender is unknown or is intentionally not revealed. And earlier this month, the publication went a step further and chose the pronoun as its Word of the Year. Meanwhile, this October, the American Psychological Association (APA) endorsed the use of the singular they in scholarly writing.

For groups like the APA, the change is about recognizing that the pronouns he and she dont describe all Americans. We wanted to be sure that our entire community knows that we see you, we hear you, we value you, Emily Ayubi, director of APA Style, told Vox. And for some nonbinary people, the changes are a sign that mainstream publications and groups are finally catching up to where they already are.

Its really important for these organizations to take a stance, Vincent said, but at the same time, we dont necessarily need the approval or validation of anyone else to be who we are.

The first known use of the singular they occurs in the 1375 poem William and the Werewolf, according to the Oxford English Dictionary. Each man hurried ... till they drew near ... where William and his darling were lying together, reads the relevant part of the poem, using a modern English translation. But its likely that the pronoun was in use long before then, writes Dennis Baron at the OED blog. In fact, the singular they didnt fall out of favor until the 18th century, when grammarians started discouraging its use, according to Baron.

Over time, he or she (often just he) became more common. For example, someone might say a person should enjoy his or her vacation.

But, as Baltimore Sun copy editor John E. McIntyre noted, 19th- and 20th-century writers from Jane Austen to W.H. Auden still used the singular they. And while some people used they to describe a person whose gender was unknown or to conceal that persons gender nonbinary people began using the pronoun as well.

For people who dont identify as male or female, it was difficult to navigate having to choose between he and she, Vincent said, since neither applied. Instead, many nonbinary people use the pronouns they and them meaning its correct to say, They went to the store rather than She (or he) went to the store.

They and them arent the only pronouns nonbinary people use others have included ze and hir. But for people who do use those pronouns, its a way of reclaiming a history of the English language in which they has long been used in a gender-neutral way, Vincent said.

As the use of they became more visible, right-wing critics began to push back against its use. Among the most famous was Peterson, a psychology professor whos hailed by conservatives and libertarians as a member of the intellectual dark web. In response to a 2016 Canadian bill banning discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression, Peterson announced, Im not using the words that other people require me to use. Especially if theyre made up by radical left-wing ideologues.

Others have argued against the singular they on grammatical rather than political grounds. New Yorker copy editor Mary Norris, for example, called it just wrong in her 2015 book Between You & Me. (However, she also said in a 2016 interview that when it comes to pronouns, You should call people what they want to be called.)

Ultimately, critics of singular they are increasingly in the minority as more publications and groups like the APA endorse the use of the pronoun. Writers are using it in two main scenarios, which Chelsea Lee outlined in an APA Style blog post in October: when referring to a generic person whose gender is unknown or irrelevant to the context and when referring to a specific, known person who uses they as their pronoun.

While the APA endorses the use of correct pronouns to refer to specific people, it also supports using they in a general context, as in the sentence, Each student submitted their art portfolio to the committee. Using their in this case, rather than his or her, acknowledges that some students might not use he or she pronouns.

The APA change is important because scholars in psychology and other fields, as well as librarians, authors, and editors, look to the organizations guidelines for advice, Ayubi said. The groups goal in making the change was to help ensure that everyone across the academy is using affirming and inclusive language, Ayubi added. We feel that its important for all readers to see themselves in academic works.

The APA was also joining a growing list of publications that use the singular they. The Washington Post officially sanctioned the use of the pronoun in 2015; the Associated Press began allowing its use in limited cases in 2017. Vox has long had a policy of using the correct pronouns for all people, but has now updated its style guide to recommend the use of they in generic contexts rather than he or she.

The shift by the APA is part of a broader one in American society, as more companies, nonprofits, and individuals who do identify as male or female recognize something that nonbinary people have been saying for some time: The pronouns he and she dont include everybody. That shift includes a move by people of all genders to list pronouns in their social media bios and email signatures, to point out that pronouns arent always obvious and shouldnt be taken for granted. Several Democratic presidential candidates, for example, including Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg, and Julin Castro, include their pronouns in their Twitter bios.

In general, thats good practice for everybody, Vincent said. Whenever and wherever you introduce yourself with your name, introduce yourself with your own gender pronouns if possible, they advised. You never know the impact that youll make on a nonbinary or trans person, who might feel a little bit safer talking to you, they explained. (Its not always safe for nonbinary or trans people to be open about their gender identity, and some have made the point that pronoun-sharing in academic settings, for example, shouldnt be required.)

And even though nonbinary people dont need a stamp of approval from the outside, changes by the APA and others are a positive step forward, Vincent said. It really helps to have these bigger organizations, especially those that are around mental health and grammar and writing, to be able to be behind us now.

Overall, they said, its about time.

Original post:

They is Merriam-Websters Word of the Year. Heres why. - Vox.com

As the Year Closes: Appreciating One’s Political Opponents – Merion West

(Alex Edelman/CNP/Zuma Press/TNS)

In this spirit I would like to thank all the many individuals who have written or commented on my writing the last year, especially those who have offered sincere and interesting criticisms that have helped me develop my understanding of the world.

But if you have an enemy, do not requite him evil with good, for that would put him to shame. Rather prove that he did you some good. And rather be angry than put to shame. And if you are cursed, I do not like that you want to bless. Rather join a little in the cursing.

Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

The past year has been a gratifying one for me, seeing the publication of my first two books and taking the leap into married life. As I will be taking several weeks off through the holidays, I wanted to present a small article expressing gratitude towards my various interlocutors and intellectual opponents atMerion West and elsewhere. Through the year I engaged in edifying dialogues with writers such as Henry George andSamuel Kronen, while also responding to various critics who have put forward arguments against my positions. Many of these dialogues were highly engaging. Some were just eye-roll inducing. But each encouraged me to think more carefully about the relationship between an author and his or her critics and opponents. This has obvious bearing in our strained political climate, where increasing polarization and the banalization of post-modern culture can make it hard to appreciate those who feel differently than we do.

This is not to say that everyone who holds an opinion worth criticizing is saying something of value. Nazis, racists, and so on may all hold views which should be criticized, but they are not saying much that contributes to the public discourse or adds anything to the world. Their reactionary impulse is to simply negate anything that betters the lives of those they resent. Such individuals can be understood and criticized, but the only thing we can truly learn from them is the root causes of such a distorted mindset. Fortunately, many (lets hope most!) of the people in our society are not creatures of resentment and anger but, rather, morally-committed citizens with strong opinions and aspirations as sincere as our own. Perhaps they are mistaken. Perhaps we are. But there is much to be learnt from hearing their perspectives and trying to incorporate their insights into our own worldview.

As a progressive, I think there is much that can be learnt from examining the classics of religious and conservative thinking. It can make one less driven by purely materialist analysis. It can also make one more willing to take seriously the questions of meaning and community addressed by figures like Jordan Peterson, and it can facilitate an appreciation for continuity with the past. The first set of questions on the nature of meaning are especially pertinent, and this is an area where I think too many contemporary progressives ignore questions of existential meaning in favor of more down-to-earth material concerns. Adorno, Sartre, and De Beauvoir were certainly not guilty of such myopia, and it is important to return to their ambitions. I think much the same is true on the other end of the spectrum. Too many conservative thinkers are guilty of transforming the past into an idol, while neglecting the lived experiences and injustices of the present because dealing with them would involve asking tough questions about the legacy of our communities and their myriad sins. Conservatives could also gain much by looking at the works of radical thinkers, from Marxs analysis of how capitalism undermines traditional ways of life to Wendy Browns pioneering analyses of the psychology of identity politics in the wounded attachments of marginalized individuals, as well as sincere experiences of victimization. Such engagements with the other side are unlikely to produce sudden conversions, but they may help make politics less of a bitter and one-sided conflict, driven by the myopic hooligans Jason Brennan criticizes in Against Democracy.

In this spirit I would like to thank all the many individuals who have written or commented on my writing the last year, especially those who have offered sincere and interesting criticisms that have helped me develop my understanding of the world. It may be that we will never reach a consensus on the correct approach to some of the most pressing problems, though the challenge itself has its rewards. But the opportunity to learn and grow is one I appreciate and hope I offered in return.

Matt McManus is Professor of Politics and International Relations at Tec de Monterrey, and the author of Making Human Dignity Central to International Human Rights Law and The Rise of Post-Modern Conservatism. His new projects include co-authoring a critical monograph on Jordan Peterson and a book on liberal rights for Palgrave MacMillan. Matt can be reached atmattmcmanus300@gmail.comor added on twitter vie@mattpolprof

The rest is here:

As the Year Closes: Appreciating One's Political Opponents - Merion West